The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 3 of 10 • Share
Page 3 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
IMO TB is right, think about it !
The Smith sighting was primarily to state that it wasn't RM they saw.
1)NO there may well have been children being carried in their pyjamas from the Cresh but it wasn't maddie was it ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
2)NO the window wasn't open that night, until the alarm was raised and we all know who opened it ?
Why ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
3)NO there was NOT a man carrying Maddie about in her pyjamas that night, who would want you to think that there may have been ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Why ?
Think about It ! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
The Smith sighting was primarily to state that it wasn't RM they saw.
1)NO there may well have been children being carried in their pyjamas from the Cresh but it wasn't maddie was it ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
2)NO the window wasn't open that night, until the alarm was raised and we all know who opened it ?
Why ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
3)NO there was NOT a man carrying Maddie about in her pyjamas that night, who would want you to think that there may have been ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Why ?
Think about It ! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Grande Finale- Posts : 140
Activity : 224
Likes received : 64
Join date : 2013-02-02
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
I'm not sure if you are referring to this covering letter that was added to the Statement taken from Mr Smith after he reported how much Gerry McCann reminded him of the man he had seen on the night Madeleine was reported missing.Mirage wrote:@ Plebgate
Snipped
When something strikes you and lingers in the mind, it should not be ignored IMO. If, for example, I went to the police and reported a sighting of something suspicious in relation to a known crime, I would expect my statement to be taken in a formal way and sent off to the relevant force. What I would not expect, would be an appraisal of my respected character and standing in the community to accompany that statement. This colours the statement and lends unaccountable weight to someone else's testimony. IMO, that is overstepping the mark.
Well, that's me tuppence worth for now. Thanks again Plebgate.
To me the Sergeant was reporting to his Portuguese colleagues that Mr Smith was being seriously harassed by both the Press and Mr Brian Kennedy and felt obliged to include a character reference and his opinion that Mr Smith was being truthful.
"Detective Branch
Drogheda
County Lough
Re – Investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann
I took an additional statement from Mr Smith as requested. His wife does not want to make another statement. I showed him the video clip and he stated that it was not the clip that alerted him but the BBC news at 10 PM on 9th September 2007.
He has been contacted by numerous tabloid press looking for stories. He has been contacted by Mr Brian Kennedy who is supporting the McCann family to take part in a photo fit exercise. He has given no stories or helped in any photo fits. He sent a solicitor's letter to six papers in relation material that was printed that was misquoted. The Evening Herald paid his solicitor's fees and all papers printed an apology. His photograph appeared in another tabloid paper and this matter is being pursued at the moment.
I do not believe that Martin Smith is courting the press and my view his is a genuine person. He is known locally and is a very decent person.
Forwarded please
Sergeant
Liam Hogan"
Rob Royston- Posts : 112
Activity : 152
Likes received : 40
Join date : 2012-07-06
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
***Rob Royston wrote:[ [...]
To me the Sergeant was reporting to his Portuguese colleagues that Mr Smith was being seriously harassed by both the Press and Mr Brian Kennedy and felt obliged to include a character reference and his opinion that Mr Smith was being truthful.
I agree. There's nothing suspicious about that.
Guest- Guest
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
@ChateleineChâtelaine wrote:Before going into timing, I'd like to know [because I've never been in Portugal], if maybe the general practice in bars is like in Italy: You go to the cashier, tell them what you want, pay, get a receipt, then proceed to the bar, show your ticket and get your drinks. Anyone know?
The till receipts used to be handed to you on small dish each time you order, then you add them up and leave the cash (Plus big tip [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]) as you are leaving...
Anyhow the Smith sighting was primarily to state that it wasn't RM they saw.
There may well have been children being carried in their pyjamas from the Cresh but it wasn't Maddie was it ?
WHO gains by making people think it might have been ?
In six years there has been NO evidence whatsoever of an abduction, and as a top policeman stated NO clear evidence to say that the parents were not involved in her disappearance.
Grande Finale- Posts : 140
Activity : 224
Likes received : 64
Join date : 2013-02-02
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Amaral says around 21.55pm in his book.
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Grand finale, you cannot state with certainty the sighting was to support Murat - when was that established ? We cannot see the questions asked of witnesses, so IMO its impossible to be certain how Murat came into the picture.Grande Finale wrote:@ChateleineChâtelaine wrote:Before going into timing, I'd like to know [because I've never been in Portugal], if maybe the general practice in bars is like in Italy: You go to the cashier, tell them what you want, pay, get a receipt, then proceed to the bar, show your ticket and get your drinks. Anyone know?
The till receipts used to be handed to you on small dish each time you order, then you add them up and leave the cash (Plus big tip [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]) as you are leaving...
Anyhow the Smith sighting was primarily to state that it wasn't RM they saw.
There may well have been children being carried in their pyjamas from the Cresh but it wasn't Maddie was it ?
WHO gains by making people think it might have been ?
In six years there has been NO evidence whatsoever of an abduction, and as a top policeman stated NO clear evidence to say that the parents were not involved in her disappearance.
sami- Posts : 965
Activity : 1019
Likes received : 54
Join date : 2012-04-08
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Smiths saw someone. Newspapers and Brian Kennedy on his case. Each has a reason to be interested in this sighting. Newspapers because it's money. Kennedy because the McCanns need to know. It they're in 'innocent' because they want to follow up any sighting. If they're guilty because they need to know what was seen and how they can use it (even if it they knew it wasn't Gerry).
Imagine this:
Imagine the McCanns are guilty but its not pre-planned but done in a panic night of May 3rd. The first thing they would do is invent the abduction story plus a sighting to get people looking outwards. Over the next few days they harden up that story.
Then a report comes out that the Smiths think they saw someone that night. Lets say you KNOW it wasn't Gerry (because he went some other way carrying a bag). What do you do with this sighting? You send your man in to find out more.
The you discover that what the Smiths think they saw - far from being the truth - in fact reads like it bears OUT Tanner's invented man more than it contradicts it. What do you do? You try to add the. Together. I kind of agree with Tony - I'm not sure they DID in any serious way cover up this 'sighting'. What they covered up was the idea that all the evidence pointed more at THEM than at anyone else which Oakley's report is alleged to have concluded.
As Tony says, there is clear evidence that the McCanns in fact DID try to combine these two sightings together. The motive? To bolster up the concept of 'abduction' at the expense of credulity.
Imagine this:
Imagine the McCanns are guilty but its not pre-planned but done in a panic night of May 3rd. The first thing they would do is invent the abduction story plus a sighting to get people looking outwards. Over the next few days they harden up that story.
Then a report comes out that the Smiths think they saw someone that night. Lets say you KNOW it wasn't Gerry (because he went some other way carrying a bag). What do you do with this sighting? You send your man in to find out more.
The you discover that what the Smiths think they saw - far from being the truth - in fact reads like it bears OUT Tanner's invented man more than it contradicts it. What do you do? You try to add the. Together. I kind of agree with Tony - I'm not sure they DID in any serious way cover up this 'sighting'. What they covered up was the idea that all the evidence pointed more at THEM than at anyone else which Oakley's report is alleged to have concluded.
As Tony says, there is clear evidence that the McCanns in fact DID try to combine these two sightings together. The motive? To bolster up the concept of 'abduction' at the expense of credulity.
____________________
The prime suspects in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann cannot be permitted to dictate what can and can't be discussed about the case
ProfessorPPlum- Posts : 414
Activity : 425
Likes received : 5
Join date : 2012-05-04
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
On a tangent, in a crime a bag could be used to dispose of all sorts of contaminated items such as cloths, cleaning stuff etc. And once used would be contaminated and have to be disposed of.ProfessorPPlum wrote:snip
Then a report comes out that the Smiths think they saw someone that night. Lets say you KNOW it wasn't Gerry (because he went some other way carrying a bag). What do you do with this sighting? You send your man in to find out more.
snip
____________________
Coincidences turn into Conspiracies when all inconvenient information is ignored.
BRODFB- Posts : 33
Activity : 35
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-12
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Apologies Woofer - not had time to look over the last day or so. Afraid I can't find the reference to the dozens in the actual PJ report - I must have picked that up from somewhere else, perhaps a pro-McCann newspaper article. What it actually says in the final report with regard to Smith's identification of GM as Smithman is thisWoofer wrote:Galena - can you give a reference for the dozens (that`s over 24) of people that vouched for his whereabouts and whether they were independent of the T7?galena wrote:That's very true. The PJ at the time concluded that Gerry had an alibi for the time when the Smith's spotted the man, that dozens of people could vouch for his whereabouts at that time. You certainly can't really ascertain his whereabouts from the information we have available so presumably they have witness statements we haven't seen?
It was established that at the time that was being mentioned, GERALD McCANN was sitting at the table, in the Tapas Restaurant.'
GA seemed to doubt this though but was presumably taken off the case before he could look into it properly.
galena- Posts : 288
Activity : 291
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-09-23
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
The Smith statements and can be seen herelogical wrote:sixmillionquid
What have the Smiths said in the papers?
The Smiths statements havnt changed from day one apart from the additional statement Martin Smith made in January 2008 that is according to the Maddie Case files as far as I know.
No one here has answered a question I raised earlier i.e if you take time to read the official pj files in Maddies case files regarding all the Smiths statements and take into account the FACT that Goncalo Amaral and Pat Brown have never doubted the Smiths statements then why Cant genuine supportors for Justice for Madeleine here accept the statements for what they are i.e Real Honest and Genuine statements from independent Honest witnesses.
If posters posts are carefully read on this forum its not too hard to seperate the Genuines from the ungenuines iMo.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Policia Judiciaria
NUIPC 201-070 GALGS
NOTE
On this date I state for the files that at about 12.12 I had telephone contact with the witness Martin Smith, by means of phone number ********* who referred to the communication he made on 20-09-2007 to the British authorities, that confirms his sighting and showing his full availability to travel to Portugal with the aim of making statements and collaborating with this police in all the diligences that could be considered necessary concerning these events.
Portimao, 27th September 2007
Signed
Inspector Paiva
From paper edition of Daily Mail Jan 2008 quoting the Mr Smith
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[color:7c43=000000]"We have not been contacted by the private detective hired by the McCanns, and have had no contact with the investigating police since May 26 last year...."
Well [color:7c43=000000]Inspector Paiva thinks he was speaking to Mr Smith on 27th September 2007. Why did Mr Smith make this claim?
[color:7c43=000000][color:7c43=000000]And by the 30 January 2008 the [color:7c43=000000]Po[color:7c43=000000]rtugeuse police were aware he [color:7c43=000000]had been [color:7c43=000000]contacted by the media and B[color:7c43=000000]rian K[color:7c43=000000]ennedy. Around this time he still believed it was GM he saw he made additional statement to that effect on 30 January 2008. Now he says it wasn't GM he saw. It looks like he was mistaken, just like Jane Tanner. But I dont know why he thought it was definately GM just on the basis of the way he carried a child. Was there something else that Mr Smith has not disclosed that caused him to think it was GM? I think so, but he hasn't said what it was.
EDIT dont know whats up with the formatting.
SixMillionQuid- Posts : 436
Activity : 445
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Keeping things as simple as possible, a scenario (feel free to shoot it down in flames! ):
A male "Tapas" member decides they require a sighting and takes a child at around 10PM and bumps into the Smith family. Later after he gets back he either arranges the Tanner sighting or Tanner announces it to some members (whether invented or not) and he decides to use the Tanner sighting to debunk the Smith sighting.
Like I say.....probably full of holes, but I try.
A male "Tapas" member decides they require a sighting and takes a child at around 10PM and bumps into the Smith family. Later after he gets back he either arranges the Tanner sighting or Tanner announces it to some members (whether invented or not) and he decides to use the Tanner sighting to debunk the Smith sighting.
Like I say.....probably full of holes, but I try.
TheTruthWillOut- Posts : 733
Activity : 754
Likes received : 19
Join date : 2011-09-26
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
I find the story of the Smith sighting credible up to this point. (Martin Smith recalls how despite the resort being buzzing with the abduction story he never makes the connection between the small blonde girl who has gone missing and the unfriendly single male carrying a small girl around at 10pm at night).Grande Finale wrote:IMO TB is right, think about it !
The Smith sighting was primarily to state that it wasn't RM they saw.
1)NO there may well have been children being carried in their pyjamas from the Cresh but it wasn't maddie was it ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
2)NO the window wasn't open that night, until the alarm was raised and we all know who opened it ?
Why ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
3)NO there was NOT a man carrying Maddie about in her pyjamas that night, who would want you to think that there may have been ?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Why ?
Think about It ! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
"We were home two weeks when my son rang up and asked was he dreaming or did we meet a man carrying a child the night Madeleine was taken. We all remembered that we had the same recollection. I felt we should report it to the police"
That sentence sticks out like a sore thumb. Two things had happened by this time - the Tannerman sighting had been released and Murat was under suspicion. It is absolutely certain in my mind - that this is what prompted the Smiths to finally contact the PJ. Maybe they did see something (though I suspect in nothing like the detail they described), maybe Smith got a call from Murat complaining that the Tapas people were trying to set him up and desperately asking for an alibi.
Remember they already had the Tannerman sighting as a template to go on, all that was needed was to change the hair colour from dark to brown.
Many accept readily that Gerry could persuade Jane to give him an alibi by constructing 'Tannerman'. Murat by all accounts was a bit of fixer, a guy who knew everybody - the 'Dauphin' of PDL - wouldn't it be likely that he would also be able to find someone to give him an alibi at a time when he was regarded as a potential paedophile and murderer?
galena- Posts : 288
Activity : 291
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-09-23
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
He only came forward after murat was made arguido..Its quite possible that as he hadnt seen the person full on, and didnt think he could identify the person, that he may of thought his sighting of not much worth, hence not coming forward straight away..however he would know it wasnt Murat, he was a person he knew already, he came forward to make sure the police knew that if the person he saw (although unfamilar, and unable to identify) It wasnt Murat, he most definately would of recognised, but the person he saw was a stranger to him. That was his purpose. However he did say a little later that he saw GM and it triggered some kind of recollection..but as he said in his statement that he could not identify the person, its unlikely that could be used as anything useful without backing of other witnesses that collaborate that?galena wrote:I find the story of the Smith sighting credible up to this point. (Martin Smith recalls how despite the resort being buzzing with the abduction story he never makes the connection between the small blonde girl who has gone missing and the unfriendly single male carrying a small girl around at 10pm at night).
"We were home two weeks when my son rang up and asked was he dreaming or did we meet a man carrying a child the night Madeleine was taken. We all remembered that we had the same recollection. I felt we should report it to the police"
That sentence sticks out like a sore thumb. Two things had happened by this time - the Tannerman sighting had been released and Murat was under suspicion. It is absolutely certain in my mind - that this is what prompted the Smiths to finally contact the PJ. Maybe they did see something (though I suspect in nothing like the detail they described), maybe Smith got a call from Murat complaining that the Tapas people were trying to set him up and desperately asking for an alibi.
Remember they already had the Tannerman sighting as a template to go on, all that was needed was to change the hair colour from dark to brown.
Many accept readily that Gerry could persuade Jane to give him an alibi by constructing 'Tannerman'. Murat by all accounts was a bit of fixer, a guy who knew everybody - the 'Dauphin' of PDL - wouldn't it be likely that he would also be able to find someone to give him an alibi at a time when he was regarded as a potential paedophile and murderer?
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
I would appreciate if you could read this thread. I don't think its getting enough attention. It will take about 10 mins to read. Im sorry for jumping in, but where the thread is, I don't think its getting to many views. Thanks all.....I believe its significant.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
chillyheat- Posts : 814
Activity : 884
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
interesting..I had read that post. im quite convinved that Mr Smith would not of done an efit, id be very disappointed if he did. In his statement to PJ he clearly says that he would not recognise the person from a photo, hence why no efit was done..he was then asked by Brian Kennedy to do an efit..again he refused (I presume for the same reason) If he did one for SY I would be very surprised...After all an efit of facial features from Mr Smith could only be 'guess work' or 'persuasive suggestion'...after all he openly admitted he could not idntify whom he saw :/ChillyHeat wrote:I would appreciate if you could read this thread. I don't think its getting enough attention. It will take about 10 mins to read. Im sorry for jumping in, but where the thread is, I don't think its getting to many views. Thanks all.....I believe its significant.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
On the subject of important info..Neil Berry and Raj Balu are of recent interest to me..Im thinking their statements which seem to of been held back, may have some interesting stuff in them. I started a post on 'stairwell man' on proporting theories section. As they were dining in an apartment nearby that night, and may have been vital witnesses..I think maybe a part here that has been overlooked??
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Am just supposing here......Maybe Martin Smith did say words to the effect of being 60-80% sure, only on the basis that he knew at that time Tannerman was the main suspect. So maybe he was saying things to deflect from Murat. Its possible therefore Mary was having none of it and gave an efit to SY based on who she witnessed. If its true she said words to the effect "Ah the baby is cold" or similar, then its possible she looked at the face when saying it.thetruthbeknown wrote:interesting..I had read that post. im quite convinved that Mr Smith would not of done an efit, id be very disappointed if he did. In his statement to PJ he clearly says that he would not recognise the person from a photo, hence why no efit was done..he was then asked by Brian Kennedy to do an efit..again he refused (I presume for the same reason) If he did one for SY I would be very surprised...After all an efit of facial features from Mr Smith could only be 'guess work' or 'persuasive suggestion'...after all he openly admitted he could not idntify whom he saw :/ChillyHeat wrote:I would appreciate if you could read this thread. I don't think its getting enough attention. It will take about 10 mins to read. Im sorry for jumping in, but where the thread is, I don't think its getting to many views. Thanks all.....I believe its significant.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
On the subject of important info..Neil Berry and Raj Balu are of recent interest to me..Im thinking their statements which seem to of been held back, may have some interesting stuff in them. I started a post on 'stairwell man' on proporting theories section. As they were dining in an apartment nearby that night, and may have been vital witnesses..I think maybe a part here that has been overlooked??
chillyheat- Posts : 814
Activity : 884
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilitiesthetruthbeknown wrote:interesting..I had read that post. im quite convinved that Mr Smith would not of done an efit, id be very disappointed if he did. In his statement to PJ he clearly says that he would not recognise the person from a photo, hence why no efit was done..he was then asked by Brian Kennedy to do an efit..again he refused (I presume for the same reason) If he did one for SY I would be very surprised...After all an efit of facial features from Mr Smith could only be 'guess work' or 'persuasive suggestion'...after all he openly admitted he could not idntify whom he saw :/ChillyHeat wrote:I would appreciate if you could read this thread. I don't think its getting enough attention. It will take about 10 mins to read. Im sorry for jumping in, but where the thread is, I don't think its getting to many views. Thanks all.....I believe its significant.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
On the subject of important info..Neil Berry and Raj Balu are of recent interest to me..Im thinking their statements which seem to of been held back, may have some interesting stuff in them. I started a post on 'stairwell man' on proporting theories section. As they were dining in an apartment nearby that night, and may have been vital witnesses..I think maybe a part here that has been overlooked??
justathought- Posts : 141
Activity : 164
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2012-07-06
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
He also dined with Raj that night, they got a takeaway from tapas and dined on the veranda. They apparently heard a commotion at 10pm, and 'overheard' a conversation...its hard to say of specific details as their initial statements are not ones made public. It seems to me they could be prime witnesses to the '10pm discovery'justathought wrote:
Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilities
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Have a read of Pat Brown's new blog out today.
Guest- Guest
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]thetruthbeknown wrote:He also dined with Raj that night, they got a takeaway from tapas and dined on the veranda. They apparently heard a commotion at 10pm, and 'overheard' a conversation...its hard to say of specific details as their initial statements are not ones made public. It seems to me they could be prime witnesses to the '10pm discovery'justathought wrote:
Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilities
justathought- Posts : 141
Activity : 164
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2012-07-06
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Do you have a link CF...Im lost with so many favouritescandyfloss wrote:Have a read of Pat Brown's new blog out today.
TY
chillyheat- Posts : 814
Activity : 884
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
This occurrence was targeted due to an information given by an employee of the resort, pages 504 and 505 of the Appendix VI, where a somewhat peculiar situation was reported, supposedly to do with NEIL BERRY. However, in spite of the diligences done, inclusive in the letter rogatory, nothing was established that connected him to the disappearance of the British child.justathought wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]thetruthbeknown wrote:He also dined with Raj that night, they got a takeaway from tapas and dined on the veranda. They apparently heard a commotion at 10pm, and 'overheard' a conversation...its hard to say of specific details as their initial statements are not ones made public. It seems to me they could be prime witnesses to the '10pm discovery'justathought wrote:
Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilities
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
justathought- Posts : 141
Activity : 164
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2012-07-06
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
I met Raj at the welcome ceremony when we arrived at the resort on 28th April 2007. I did not travel with him and we had not met before. I got on well with him and later on we discovered that our wives had both worked for the same company.justathought wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]thetruthbeknown wrote:He also dined with Raj that night, they got a takeaway from tapas and dined on the veranda. They apparently heard a commotion at 10pm, and 'overheard' a conversation...its hard to say of specific details as their initial statements are not ones made public. It seems to me they could be prime witnesses to the '10pm discovery'justathought wrote:
Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilities
Its so uncanny.....People on planes who never met ending up at the same resort (JW). Its endless isn't it.
chillyheat- Posts : 814
Activity : 884
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
that was in relation to Berry being identified by the employee of ocean club as the man in the stairwell...however while I was looking into that, his name and Raj came up in the other area of being witnesses to the 10pm occurence on the balcony.justathought wrote:
This occurrence was targeted due to an information given by an employee of the resort, pages 504 and 505 of the Appendix VI, where a somewhat peculiar situation was reported, supposedly to do with NEIL BERRY. However, in spite of the diligences done, inclusive in the letter rogatory, nothing was established that connected him to the disappearance of the British child.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Ps: the link you gave was to his follow up questioning, not his original statement.
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Me too, I don't even put things in there anymore I just google Pat Brown BlogChillyHeat wrote:Do you have a link CF...Im lost with so many favouritescandyfloss wrote:Have a read of Pat Brown's new blog out today.
TY
Guest- Guest
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
i apologise. i should have explained that the link related to the "available" berry statements. wanted to make other posters aware as to what he said. you are right the 7th may statement has never been released. most probably due to it refereed to a "occurence"thetruthbeknown wrote:that was in relation to Berry being identified by the employee of ocean club as the man in the stairwell...however while I was looking into that, his name and Raj came up in the other area of being witnesses to the 10pm occurence on the balcony.justathought wrote:
This occurrence was targeted due to an information given by an employee of the resort, pages 504 and 505 of the Appendix VI, where a somewhat peculiar situation was reported, supposedly to do with NEIL BERRY. However, in spite of the diligences done, inclusive in the letter rogatory, nothing was established that connected him to the disappearance of the British child.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Ps: the link you gave was to his follow up questioning, not his original statement.
justathought- Posts : 141
Activity : 164
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2012-07-06
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
Yes, my apologies, I should have put the links to Raj and Berrys follow up questioning (Raj original statement is also not available) It seems to me wherever you go in this case, it leads to something else doesnt it What a tangled mess....justathought wrote:i apologise. i should have explained that the link related to the "available" berry statements. wanted to make other posters aware as to what he said. you are right the 7th may statement has never been released. most probably due to it refereed to a "occurence"
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
The shy one the Nannies called Madeleine instead of Maddie?justathought wrote:Berry had a daughter of a similar age to Madeleine and used the creche facilitiesthetruthbeknown wrote:interesting..I had read that post. im quite convinved that Mr Smith would not of done an efit, id be very disappointed if he did. In his statement to PJ he clearly says that he would not recognise the person from a photo, hence why no efit was done..he was then asked by Brian Kennedy to do an efit..again he refused (I presume for the same reason) If he did one for SY I would be very surprised...After all an efit of facial features from Mr Smith could only be 'guess work' or 'persuasive suggestion'...after all he openly admitted he could not idntify whom he saw :/ChillyHeat wrote:I would appreciate if you could read this thread. I don't think its getting enough attention. It will take about 10 mins to read. Im sorry for jumping in, but where the thread is, I don't think its getting to many views. Thanks all.....I believe its significant.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
On the subject of important info..Neil Berry and Raj Balu are of recent interest to me..Im thinking their statements which seem to of been held back, may have some interesting stuff in them. I started a post on 'stairwell man' on proporting theories section. As they were dining in an apartment nearby that night, and may have been vital witnesses..I think maybe a part here that has been overlooked??
If so, 'our' Maddie could have been long gone without anyone outside the Mcs Group noticing,
There was a Madeleine at the creche, as long as it took
Do we have any info on Neil Berry and Raj Balu?
As in: where did they come from, where did they work; no wives a/o other children of them are mentioned, isn't this a bit strange
Who are they, in short and do they have any ties to the Mcs and the Tapasniks?
Guest- Guest
Re: The TIME of the alleged Smith Sighting & the Till Receipts that don't Tally?
im still early reading on Berry and Balu. I think they were there with partners, Berry had 2 children with him. They also socialised with Jayne jensen and anne wiltshire on occasion (sisters who I think implicated Murat early on)...its all a tangled mess. Its a shame their original statements are not available, I think it may be valuable.Portia wrote:The shy one the Nannies called Madeleine instead of Maddie?
If so, 'our' Maddie could have been long gone without anyone outside the Mcs Group noticing,
There was a Madeleine at the creche, as long as it took
Do we have any info on Neil Berry and Raj Balu?
As in: where did they come from, where did they work; no wives a/o other children of them are mentioned, isn't this a bit strange
Who are they, in short and do they have any ties to the Mcs and the Tapasniks?
thetruthbeknown- Posts : 273
Activity : 282
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-10-21
Page 3 of 10 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Similar topics
» FOR NEW MEMBERS Smiths` Descriptions of Man Carrying Child + Mr Amaral's description in book
» the smith sighting
» WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
» A bit more information on those controversial Smithman efits - From Met Police answers to some more Freedom of Information Act Questions (11 Jun 2018)
» CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 1 DISCUSSION****
» the smith sighting
» WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
» A bit more information on those controversial Smithman efits - From Met Police answers to some more Freedom of Information Act Questions (11 Jun 2018)
» CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 1 DISCUSSION****
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 3 of 10
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum