Clarence Mitchell's Role

by Me 19.12.11 22:33

Just seen this as a comment on an anorak article:

The Guardian says the money was paid “on condition that the terms of the deal remained secret”. A confidentiality agreement was signed in September 2008.”

Yes, this deal was so hush-hush and confidential that Clarence Mitchell, in his role as family spokesman and roving ambassador for Freud Communications, felt able to put the figure in a powerpoint presentation to IIR Middle East’s annual PR Congress in Dubai in November 2009.

This presentation has been publicly available here for two years:

http://www.iirpresentations.com/A1035/pdf/D2-0845-ClarenceMitchell.pdf

See page 10.

However, there is another payment from the News of the World to the McCanns that remains very hush-hush and as yet unreported. Perhaps this press release is supposed to disguise that?

Click on this link:

http://www.iirpresentations.com/A1035/pdf/D2-0845-ClarenceMitchell.pdf

Tells you all you need to know.

by Me 19.12.11 22:35

The next comment from the same poster is also very interesting:

December 18th, 2011 at 10:47 pm

Regarding the publishing of the diary, I wonder how Mrs McCann explains the following, from the press release issue by her libel lawyers at the time of the ‘apology’:

“The News of the World assures Mrs McCann, AND SHE ACCEPTS, that it acted in good faith and had no wish to invade her privacy or cause distress.”

http://www.carter-ruck.com/Miscellaneous/Kate%20McCann%20Diary%20

by jd 19.12.11 23:49

“The News of the World assures Mrs McCann, AND SHE ACCEPTS, that it acted in good faith and had no wish to invade her privacy or cause distress.”

This was back in September 2008!!!! so how on earth is she going to LI in 2011 complaining when she has accepted 3 years previous?

The “T7” receive apologies and £375,000.... I never knew of the T7 getting any money, they seem to have slipped under the radar. I'd like to know why they got apologies and hundreds of thousands, what has rachael & matthew oldfield and dianne webster done to deserve being given so much money? apart from being there and friends of

by Gillyspot 20.12.11 7:23

Didn't T7 have damages paid to them that they agreed was paid into the "fund"?

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/358005-tapas-7s-375k-damages-for-maddie-reports

Thanks for the share ME - most interesting that Kate McCann felt the need to bring this up at the Leveson Inquiry AGAIN simply because NOTW is defunct so her Confidentiality Agreement is too. A woman of very little morals IMO

by Guest 20.12.11 9:33

Gillyspot wrote:most interesting that Kate McCann felt the need to bring this up at the Leveson Inquiry AGAIN simply because NOTW is defunct so her Confidentiality Agreement is too. A woman of very little morals IMO

What makes you think her Confidentiality Agreement no longer exists Gillyspot?

Surely any legal documents would have been in the name of News International, not NOTW.

by jd 20.12.11 9:46

Gillyspot wrote:Didn't T7 have damages paid to them that they agreed was paid into the "fund"?

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/358005-tapas-7s-375k-damages-for-maddie-reports

Thanks for the share ME - most interesting that Kate McCann felt the need to bring this up at the Leveson Inquiry AGAIN simply because NOTW is defunct so her Confidentiality Agreement is too. A woman of very little morals IMO

Thanks for the find Gillyspot. Why any of the T7 are getting payouts is beyond me, this is about a little girl missing not friends getting money!!!! But this does further prove what this scam is about.The article does say 'likely' to go to the fund which does not mean that it did, is there any proof of this? I doubt it as there is no transparency with the accounting of the fund. All this 'go to the fund' is just empty words and headlines, to con people imo. The money will have ended up in their own bank accounts no doubt

by Guest 20.12.11 10:29

Can anyone remember any articles about the Tapas 7 that were defamatory. I can't remember any confused

by jd 20.12.11 10:41

candyfloss wrote:Can anyone remember any articles about the Tapas 7 that were defamatory. I can't remember any

Neither can I which is more puzzling why they are getting any sort of money! what has ever been said about diane webster for example

by Guest 20.12.11 10:44

This on Pamalams site.............Statement in open court re Tapas 7 from Carter Ruck

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/18-Oct8/CR_16_10-08.htm

by Invinoveritas 20.12.11 10:45

jd wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Can anyone remember any articles about the Tapas 7 that were defamatory. I can't remember any

Neither can I which is more puzzling why they are getting any sort of money! what has ever been said about diane webster for example

Here we are:

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id171.html

Tapas 7 libel payout

by Guest 20.12.11 10:48

There has been a complete blackout where they have been concerned. They certainly have not made front page headlines. But I think I know what they are referring to, which did include the friends.

From Panorama on May 13th 2007

JOSE BARRA da COSTA Former Policia Judiciaria

There are people who guarantee that this is a couple who practice 'swinging' - i.e. sexual relationships between couples and then changing partners, and that this practice would allow in this type of...

BILTON: When you say: "there are people who say..." I'm assuming you are quoting....

DA COSTA: People who know obviously. I cannot reveal the source here because I would lose it.

Perhaps they should have been suing the BBC for including this in their documentary

by jd 20.12.11 10:59

Martin Brunt summary:

"Back to the High Court in the morning and another Madeleine McCann payout... this time to the 'Tapas 7'.

Where will it end? Here, probably. Unless other hacks want to push their luck.

Kate and Gerry's friends who were with them in Portugal had complained about 20 or so newspaper articles which accused them, variously, of covering up details of Madeleine's disappearance and misleading the authorities there.

In one case there was an allegation, based on Portuguese reports, that one of the friends had been involved in the disappearance.

The latest payment of £375,000 is from Express Newspapers, which have already paid the McCanns £550,000.

Although the award is to the McCann friends, I gather it will go to the Madeleine Fund to help in the continued search for the young girl.

Any connection between the combined £925,000 Express payout and the 86 redundancies recently announced at the, er, Express is entirely coincidental.

Those losing their jobs are mostly sub-editors, who provide a check on the exuberance and accuracy of the papers' reporters."

by Guest 20.12.11 11:33

Me wrote:Just seen this as a comment on an anorak article:

The Guardian says the money was paid “on condition that the terms of the deal remained secret”. A confidentiality agreement was signed in September 2008.”

Yes, this deal was so hush-hush and confidential that Clarence Mitchell, in his role as family spokesman and roving ambassador for Freud Communications, felt able to put the figure in a powerpoint presentation to IIR Middle East’s annual PR Congress in Dubai in November 2009.

This presentation has been publicly available here for two years:

http://www.iirpresentations.com/A1035/pdf/D2-0845-ClarenceMitchell.pdf

See page 10.

However, there is another payment from the News of the World to the McCanns that remains very hush-hush and as yet unreported. Perhaps this press release is supposed to disguise that?

Click on this link:

http://www.iirpresentations.com/A1035/pdf/D2-0845-ClarenceMitchell.pdf

Tells you all you need to know.

And we all know who our self appointed representative for the Middle East is, now don't we?

Mr Tony Blair, who offered to support them in any way he could.