Criminal Profiler Pat Brown's Maddie Search Fund - Lisbon & PdL Feb 6th - Feb 21st 2012

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown's Maddie Search Fund Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Criminal-Profiler-Pat-Browns-Maddie-Search-Fund/298440643512565?sk=wall#!/pages/Criminal-Profiler-Pat-Browns-Maddie-Search-Fund/298440643512565?sk=wall

- Welcome Everyone! This is the place to get updates on my Fund and my Search.

- Financial Update: The Fund has a bank account set up through USAA bank. Total royalties from Amazon in July/August (prior to its ban) were - $1671 – 50% to fund $835.50; B&N Sept/Oct -$118 – 50% to fund $59; Smashwords – Sept/Oct - $211 – 50% to fund $105.50

- Total in Fund as of November 11, 2011 - $1000

- A purchase of a round trip ticket from Baltimore, MD to Lisbon, Portugal was purchased from Travelocity on November 22, 2011 in the amount of USD $857.10 (economy class). Remaining Fund monies - USD $142.90

- Search plans to date: I will be arriving in Lisbon, Portugal on February 6, attending the libel trial of Goncalo Amaral, then driving down to Praia da Luz from where the search will begin, and returning to Lisbon for my flight back to the US on February 21. I have wonderful offers for places to stay and help getting around and with the search. I will update you later on more specific details.

Well done Pat!

It seems like you have shown more clarity about expenditure from your fund than the McCanns have done in over 4 years in their "fund".

Thanks too HiDeHo for sharing it with us

This does not do much to alter my opinion that she has latched onto this case for dubious motives. Or she has totaly lost touch with reality.

What happened to the original plan that she was coming with a camera crew etc?

And how long will $142.90 last her?

hmmmmm.

Have you not read that Pat is subsidising the search with her OWN money?

That is more that K & G McCann did. They'd rather take money out than actually spend their own money.

Or can you prove me wrong Xavier?

I have no time for the mccanns antics over their fund either gilly.

But that is beside the point. I am suggestion caution over brown's pronouncements. She seems to have latched onto this case. Her 'profile' is poorly researched (the bits that are any good appear to have been cut and paste from this forum and the Madeleine foundation). Her theory about transporting a mummified body through the airport does not do her credibility any good.


Does She imagine she will have some sort of official status for her 'search'? If not it is hard to see what she will be doing? Does she speak the language?

It looks to me as though she is taking a fortnights vacation in Portugal to pursue her hobby of criminal profiling. While enjoying free accommodation and entertainment at the expense of well meaning folk.

Anyway time will tell. In the meantime I suspect this is more about brown than about Madeleine and nothing I have seen so far, from the 'profile' to the imaginary court case convinces me that I
Am wrong.

Gillyspot wrote:Have you not read that Pat is subsidising the search with her OWN money?

That is more that K & G McCann did. They'd rather take money out than actually spend their own money.

Or can you prove me wrong Xavier?

What searching have the McCann's paid for apart from the spurious "sightings" such as the recent Indian one which, as befitting the other heavily reported ones, seemed to have existed only in Clarence Mitchell's imagination given that the Indian authorities new naught of the sighting.



Regardless of Pat's full motivations - it doesn't really matter if she's doing it for fame, attention, profile, whatever. Maddie's parents certainly don't sem to have much to show for the several hundred thousands of public money they've spent. I'm quite sure that Pat sees what a great opportunity this is and perhaps her motives are not purely about the search - but I am fairly sure she WILL search properly and honestly which is more than anyone related to the girl ever did.

Sorry but have any of you actually read Pats book? 'Cut and pasted from this forum', what utter total & complete rubbish. For those that haven't read it, Pats profile is taken from facts, the tapas 9 actual contradictory and ever changing inconsistent police statements. To those that haven't read Pats book, Pat tries at every opportunity to make their ever changing inconsistent police statements fit to their story, but none of it does how ever hard one tries. And how much have the Mccanns spent of their own money searching for their imaginary daughter? How much of the publics money have they spent on the search? Its gone on lawyers, carter rucks, to squash anyone with an opinion and trying to take peoples houses, peoples pension, and freedom of speech away.....FACT

Yes, I have read it a couple of times. She really needs to read the files.

And I am suspious of her motives - although I accept I may be in a minority here.

You can't have read it that properly if you coming on here saying she copied and pasted bits from this forum...For starters this forum was hardly in existence when she wrote the profile. If you read it properly you will conclude that she has taken her analysis from the factual police statements, and any theories she has, is taken from the actual facts that the tapas 9 gave the world

Also, if you read properly what she is taking the mccanns to court for is 'interfering with her business' (which they are) and whilst she in in Portugal will be conducting her own search. She has been more transparent with the funding she has received than the mccanns ever have been in 4 years, and they have millions compared to Pats meagre £1000. What are you suspicious about? what could she possibly do that is suspicious in searching for an imaginary Madeleine on a few pennies? find the truth maybe?

Pat is not a 'newbie' to nasty and negative comments towards her.

She is a whistleblower.

She has the courage of her convictions and knows that negative attention confirms the importance of her efforts.

Portugal is the first 'leg' of her journey...it won't stop at that...

Maybe UK next?

Pat is a credible 'force' not to be messed with and I believe she will stop at nothing....

NOTHING!

Let's all pray for that..

I suggest everyone should be very cautious of attaching both too much hope or credence to Pat Browns activities until we actually know the plans of action and what results are expected?. As we know she is a profiler, she is not an legal person or police investigator, Im really not at all sure what she is hoping to achieve by going to PDL. Iam weary of her motives and I would worry this could do the Non-supporter community serious damage.

To say it yet again....Pat is taking the mccanns to court over 'INTERFERING WITH HER BUSINESS'....if you cannot understand this then good luck with your life

She is not taking them to court to seek the truth of this scam

HiDeHo wrote:Pat is not a 'newbie' to nasty and negative comments towards her.

She is a whistleblower.

She has the courage of her convictions and knows that negative attention confirms the importance of her efforts.

Portugal is the first 'leg' of her journey...it won't stop at that...

Maybe UK next?

Pat is a credible 'force' not to be messed with and I believe she will stop at nothing....

NOTHING!

I am a Pat supporter and I believe she is a woman with a mission.

She is driven by a sense of fairness and justice and takes on those who stand in the way of fairness and justice.

Cheshire Cat wrote:

HiDeHo wrote:Pat is not a 'newbie' to nasty and negative comments towards her.

She is a whistleblower.

She has the courage of her convictions and knows that negative attention confirms the importance of her efforts.

Portugal is the first 'leg' of her journey...it won't stop at that...

Maybe UK next?

Pat is a credible 'force' not to be messed with and I believe she will stop at nothing....

NOTHING!

I am a Pat supporter and I believe she is a woman with a mission.

She is driven by a sense of fairness and justice and takes on those who stand in the way of fairness and justice.

May I add that my comment regarding 'stopping at nothing' means within the bounds of a legal and moral pursuance.

jd wrote:To say it yet again....Pat is taking the mccanns to court over 'INTERFERING WITH HER BUSINESS'....if you cannot understand this then good luck with your life

She is not taking them to court to seek the truth of this scam

we are referring to her `search` ? . And no real need to be so rude either

dannybohy wrote:

jd wrote:To say it yet again....Pat is taking the mccanns to court over 'INTERFERING WITH HER BUSINESS'....if you cannot understand this then good luck with your life

She is not taking them to court to seek the truth of this scam

we are referring to her `search` ? . And no real need to be so rude either

You're just purposely trying to stir things up

HiDeHo wrote:Pat is not a 'newbie' to nasty and negative comments towards her.

She is a whistleblower.

She has the courage of her convictions and knows that negative attention confirms the importance of her efforts.

Portugal is the first 'leg' of her journey...it won't stop at that...

Maybe UK next?

Pat is a credible 'force' not to be messed with and I believe she will stop at nothing....

NOTHING!

_______________

Credible force? You jest.

"PAT BROWN
@ProfilerPatB
Why would the PJ leak a Portuguese translation of Kate's diary when they had photocopies of the diary in English? #McCann"

Ye gods.

No matter what one thinks of Pat Brown's motive, at least she has justice for Maddie in mind - more than can be said about her lying parents who are all about them them them...woe are them....poor them ....being accused of killing their daughter and hiding her! lol

Pat's transparency about her search fund is admirable, and one can't be more transparent than that.
I know one poster mocked the little bit of balance in that account and questioned how much can be done with that, but Xavier is missing the whole point altogether. It's not about how much money you have, rather it's about determination and will to do something for a child without a voice -- or is it deprived of a voice by her own very parents? - we will never know do we unless the truth is out.

The lack of money shouldn't be a deterrent to a voluntary will to find a missing child - look at Ben Needham's mum - did she let her financial situation stop her persistence or her repeated returns to Greece to search until the Police agreed to reopen her case?

Well, now then, let's talk about the mccanns, they're sitting on million of pounds of other people's money. By xavier's twisted logic they should be able to do plenty for Maddie right? - but have they? And we're not even talking what they can achieve with the search with that kind of money! We are only talking physical attempt to search?
Did they get off their lying arse to go to PDL repeatedly (like Ben's mum) to search for her? Excuse me, what fraction of that goes to bogus detectives? In a nutshell they searched only with their mouth and no action!
FFS, kate in her bewk even labelled it ;'fighting fund' - to fight who? A phantom abductor? Or is it going to be to fight the lawless villagers a la style Indiana Jones to reach a cave to rescue Maddie from her captor?

It's so anal to mock other's efforts when her parents did absolutely NOTHING to search for her. They didn't even join the search party on the night they reported her missing (not that she went missing) because it was too dark they told Oprah!

I don't care if Pat has a motive or not (as her detractors seem to think).
I only know she was attacked by the mccanns for having a professional opinion and she's standing up to this pair of intimidating fucking tossers ( to borrow kate's cliche). So what if their dastardly lawyers are watching! They should know, since reportedly they have proof read her bewk, that their infamous client, kate, yes fragrant kate - swears as well.

Better still, Pat's going the extra miles by throwing in search for Maddie. Well, at least she's trying - who are we who did nothing for Maddie to complain about that? What Pat Brown can achieve or not achieve with that little bit of her own hard earned money is incidental to her efforts. It is the effort which is admirable.

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

A New Search for Maddie


'No law enforcement agency is looking for Madeleine'...


Over four years ago, the arguidos in the missing Madeleine case allowed the Portuguese police to controversially shelf and put on hold the investigation due to insufficient evidence. The fact that certain suspects and witnesses failed to co-operate didn't help. The PJ and the British Police continue to work in the background but will only reopen the case if any new credible information arises.


Now, criminal profiler Pat Brown has created her own independent Maddie Search Fund. The fund, which promises to be transparent, has been created thanks to sales of the ebook, Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann.


The book is available to buy online from Barnes & Noble and Smashwords at a snippet of $2.99 - 50% of sales will go direct to her own Maddie search fund. Please click to buy, your book will be electronically delivered within minutes.


Pat has confirmed that there is no conflicting ongoing search for Madeleine in Portugal and has purchased her ticket for travel to Lisbon on 6th February 2012. The search will begin shortly after, concentrating in and around Praia de Luz for starters.


Please follow Pat on Twitter, or visit the Official Criminal Profiler Pat Brown's Maddie Search Fund page on Facebook for updates on the fund and search. I would urge you to support and like this page, as she has bizarrely (but not surprisingly), taken a horrendous amount of abuse from supporters of the McCanns for her well intended actions.


Whichever side of the fence you sit on, this can only be beneficial for the most important person - Madeleline. Pat Brown is doing something that the majority of us would dearly love to do... travel to Praia de Luz to search. Credit where it's due, I wish her the very best of luck and success and hope she has rewarding findings which will either lead to Madeleine being found or help with the investigation. I would urge Pat to take the utmost care if she stumbles across any lawless villages on her travels.


And here's hoping that she has more success than the McCanns' own hapless private investigators. This has gone on years too long, we need a shining light. Most importantly, Madeleine needs it.


Help find Madeleine.

http://thepottingshedder.blogspot.com/

aiyoyo wrote:
It's so anal to mock other's efforts when her parents did absolutely NOTHING to search for her. They didn't even join the search party on the night they reported her missing (not that she went missing) because it was too dark they told Oprah!

Yep. and then in the 'book'' lied by saying how they jumped through hedges, ran through fields through the night searching for her! beggars belief these outright lies they tell

jd wrote:

dannybohy wrote:

jd wrote:To say it yet again....Pat is taking the mccanns to court over 'INTERFERING WITH HER BUSINESS'....if you cannot understand this then good luck with your life

She is not taking them to court to seek the truth of this scam

we are referring to her `search` ? . And no real need to be so rude either

You're just purposely trying to stir things up

So , because I disagree with you on the issue of Pat Brown, you have both implied I am stupid and that I`m trying to stir things up?. Im as non-supporter as it gets but its people like you on these sites that just gives newcomers the impression your all nuts!.



Lets be honest, not alot of people are that confident of Pats efforts, £1000 raised?! I could put a lost ad on facebook for search fund for a kids lost Teddy bear and get more response. Did you donate?

jd wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:
It's so anal to mock other's efforts when her parents did absolutely NOTHING to search for her. They didn't even join the search party on the night they reported her missing (not that she went missing) because it was too dark they told Oprah!

Yep. and then in the 'book'' lied by saying how they jumped through hedges, ran through fields through the night searching for her! beggars belief these outright lies they tell

That was after the search party had gone home!
They were asleep while the search party was searching and only woke up later 'jumping through hedges looking into ditches' to search their souls while howling in the wind at the realization YES they'd done it .
They'd disposed of her to a safe place and managed to raise the alarm - the worst is over (or so they thought)!

aiyoyo wrote:
That was after the search party had gone home!
They were asleep while the search party was searching and only woke up later 'jumping through hedges looking into ditches' to search their souls while howling in the wind at the realization YES they'd done it .
They'd disposed of her to a safe place and managed to raise the alarm - the worst is over (or so they thought)!

Then kate says in TV interviews how she didn't and couldn't leave the apartment that night!!!!

Probably too busy scribbling down more lies to tell the world on the back of Maddies sticker book that they ripped the back page off

jd wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:
That was after the search party had gone home!
They were asleep while the search party was searching and only woke up later 'jumping through hedges looking into ditches' to search their souls while howling in the wind at the realization YES they'd done it .
They'd disposed of her to a safe place and managed to raise the alarm - the worst is over (or so they thought)!

Then kate says in TV interviews how she didn't and couldn't leave the apartment that night!!!!

Probably too busy scribbling down more lies to tell the world on the back of Maddies sticker book that they ripped the back page off

Bet she couldnt...too knackered after hours of exhausting illegal activities of planning, lab-style cleaning, and disposal maybe?
Well all those are besides the point really as it does not matter what she was doing to be so tired that she couldn't leave the apartment, which was a lie anyway, since she was only hours earlier dinning and wining out, so no reason for her to be suddenly feeling handicapped when it comes to the search for her daughter.

The fact that she didn't indicates she knew it would be a furtile attempt because she knew Maddie is beyond searchable (alive anyway)! Else, is there any other possible and valid reason why she didn't search? NO?

aiyoyo wrote: The fact that she didn't indicates she knew it would be a furtile attempt because she knew Maddie is beyond searchable (alive anyway)!

And why she got really irritated when the police asked her to come to the police station to look at the CCTV images of the couple with a young girl they believed could be Maddie at the petrol station

jd wrote:

aiyoyo wrote: The fact that she didn't indicates she knew it would be a furtile attempt because she knew Maddie is beyond searchable (alive anyway)!

And why she got really irritated when the police asked her to come to the police station to look at the CCTV images of the couple with a young girl they believed could be Maddie at the petrol station

Exactly, because she knew it couldn't POSSIBLY be Maddie..

Bet she was cursing under her breath while muttering 'sweat nothing' that the police were wasting her time!

aiyoyo wrote:
Exactly, because she knew it couldn't POSSIBLY be Maddie..

Bet she was cursing under her breath while muttering 'sweat nothing' that the police were wasting her time!

Couldn't have said this any better

Xavier wrote:

HiDeHo wrote:Pat is not a 'newbie' to nasty and negative comments towards her.

She is a whistleblower.

She has the courage of her convictions and knows that negative attention confirms the importance of her efforts.

Portugal is the first 'leg' of her journey...it won't stop at that...

Maybe UK next?

Pat is a credible 'force' not to be messed with and I believe she will stop at nothing....

NOTHING!

_______________

Credible force? You jest.

"PAT BROWN
@ProfilerPatB
Why would the PJ leak a Portuguese translation of Kate's diary when they had photocopies of the diary in English? #McCann"

Ye gods.

Sorry I am lost. Who said anything about leaking a portuguese translation?

Because the McCann's intimated yesterday that when it was reproduced, a few of the words were incorrect as per the original and that it must have happened when it was translated from English into Portuguese and back again into English.