Re: Met police fly to Spain re Madeleine disappearance

by Pershing36 29.12.11 13:09

Fair enough, even I think that is the most likely from the evidence shown. However there are loads of people who think differently.

by aiyoyo 29.12.11 17:44

Cheshire Cat wrote:
Pershing36 wrote:
tigger wrote:

I think the crime is solved, there's just not going to be retribution by law.
I don't think they'll ever go to prison, not that that would solve anything anyway. I want them to shut up, if possible a good home found for the twins and the two of them to work! NZ would perhaps be good.
I just want Amaral to win and win big. I want Pat to get publicity and her book to be a best seller, since she is donating to real charities.
.

I really can't say it is solved. All we really have is a situation were many people do not believe their version of events. Other than that there are loads of theories, ranging from a fatal accident in either the UK or Portugal to some botched kidnap. Many people don't even believe Maddie was ever there, I couldn't put solved on it myself.

Personally I think it is to big now with too many high profile people involved for the authorities to risk bringing it into the open. I think it is the kind of case they will want to bury for decades letting the files gather dust.

Read Dr Amarals book and Pat Browns profile. She died in the appartment. I don't entertain any other possibility.

Me too, I dont entertain any other possibility.
Not even a demise days earlier.
Not even conspiracy - they are not Princess Diana or David Kelly after all. In fact they were no bodies until after the Maddie's fact.
Or any of the wilder theory.

I believe they were lucky to have friends through chain of connections in the right places, even in PDL, and they managed to reach out to them at the right time. That combined with effective media control manned by a highly adept professional specialized in that art, combusted into a chain reaction sets this momentum where effectively they'd mounted a tiger they cant get off. They have to hold tight or risk falling off at great perils to them.

I don't believe 3 governments conspired to protect a pair of non entities. I believed the first two offered help partly out of good faith and partly for selfish reason to improve their popularity poll. On the other hand I do believe the UK Government did impede the main investigators out of misguided and misinformed conception put in place by team mccanns. Mccanns speedy hire of all sorts of lawyers - extradition and libel specialising lawyers - means they'd covered all grounds to protect themselves from day 1.
From the onset, it was never about Madeleine - that much is OBVIOUS.

P.s. BTW, a poster at Maddie case file site posted up an excellent long post (around page 120 something on the daily news thread) concerning mccanns friends' and friends of friends ie a chain of connections traceable back to PDL. So it would suggest mccanns did have friends in PDL contrary to the PP's belief they were in new terrain with no friends. Has anyone seen it?

by Pershing36 30.12.11 22:51

P.s. BTW, a poster at Maddie case file site posted up an excellent long post (around page 120 something on the daily news thread) concerning mccanns friends' and friends of friends ie a chain of connections traceable back to PDL. So it would suggest mccanns did have friends in PDL contrary to the PP's belief they were in new terrain with no friends. Has anyone seen it?

Yes I am one who also believes they knew a lot about PDL and people living there than they told. I am a firm believer that the location may be the key in this investigation. Even with the PJ early conclusion there are many unanswered questions.