Have a look

by LG78 02.09.11 7:38

Hi,
Found this, maybe someone with English as first language and some photo experience can have a look at this

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **tigger** 02.09.11 14:06

LG78 wrote:Hi,
Found this, maybe someone with English as first language and some photo experience can have a look at this

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

What is you first language? Because I might explain it better? Yes, this is a useful quick way of determining alterations. In easy language it is just that Jpegs are compressed photographs, every time you save them there is a slight change, what he is saying is that every time you do something new to a photograph the pixels are 'new' so to speak and will be saved for the first time, unlike the rest of the pixels, which will have already been saved dozens of times. This difference can be seen with this programme.
I'm sure Scotland Yard have far more sophisticated equipment!

I'll see if I can use it with my own photos as an experiment and then try with screen jpegs.

by LG78 02.09.11 14:13

tigger wrote:
LG78 wrote:Hi,
Found this, maybe someone with English as first language and some photo experience can have a look at this

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

What is you first language? Because I might explain it better? Yes, this is a useful quick way of determining alterations. In easy language it is just that Jpegs are compressed photographs, every time you save them there is a slight change, what he is saying is that every time you do something new to a photograph the pixels are 'new' so to speak and will be saved for the first time, unlike the rest of the pixels, which will have already been saved dozens of times. This difference can be seen with this programme.
I'm sure Scotland Yard have far more sophisticated equipment!

I'll see if I can use it with my own photos as an experiment and then try with screen jpegs.

Thanks I did understand a little bit better when u explain it :) My first language is Norwegian.
I want you to look at the famouse poster picture ( red dress and showing hte fleck in the eye) because when taking it in to this program I did see (I think) that where the fleck are in her eye, that part was a little bit lighter/brighter/whiter then the other eye?
I want you to look at it an give an oppinion, because I might see something that is really not there? Or understanding the program explainings correct.

by LG78 02.09.11 14:16

Im sure SY have a much better program, question is if they use it, or if we can trust them to do so?

by LG78 02.09.11 14:31

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **tigger** 02.09.11 14:45

LG78 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

At least we're lucky, because most of the photoshopping is done by an amateur on Maddie's photos. I read many years ago, that it has been a favourite tool for paedo's and other pornography for a long time as they can adjust images as they like.OMG I can't think about that, I really, really hate those people.
It has to be someone in the UK, because Gerry needed to get home in order to fake the poolside photo. I reckon he isn't smart enough and it must have been too risky to do it himself as he was being watched by that time. One hopes.
I think the same person who did the poster photo, did all the others. I've got two people in mind. But if it was one of those two, the poster photo was done in the UK, before the holiday.... that is something I can't get away from, neither could the Portugese police I take it.

I'll send you a link to Dr. Luke, who thinks the same.

by **tigger** 02.09.11 14:47

LG78 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Very much worth a read, published 7/9/07!

by LG78 02.09.11 15:01

It so easy to make
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Now compere this one to the original one in this program [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by LG78 06.09.11 19:24

LG78 wrote:Hi,
Found this, maybe someone with English as first language and some photo experience can have a look at this

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Look at this one and compear to the Example photo of that homepage

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And this one that is Photoshopped, using Tennis pic face on the pool pic
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Can anyone with English as first language and a good understanding of photo work explain this to me please?
Because to me the original pool picture looks a lot more fake compeared to the example picture of the site than the one we know for sure is photoshopped.

by SkruffyKat 23.10.12 14:06

I know this has nothing to do with MM, but shows just how easy it can be to even manipulate videos to show exactly what you want. Please move/remove if this isn't acceptable. Its called Two Dogs Dining, and can be found on youtube under that same title.