Re: 'VIDEO OF THE DAY'

by crusader 23.06.24 20:23

She said the McCann's were at the recent memorial she saw them in their car at the church.

by Cake Lover 23.06.24 20:27

We were told that they weren't. We were also told that she had been dna tested, iirc.

by Cake Lover 23.06.24 21:38

We know she's not Madeleine. I don't know why the dna wasn't tested, and we have only her word that she saw the McCann pair in a car. I thought the phone call from Mark, if that's his name, strangely unprofessional, but perhaps that's just me.

by crusader 23.06.24 21:44

It proves Madeleine is dead, they have confirmed it by saying they KNOW she's not Madeleine.

by Cake Lover 23.06.24 22:15

Yes, that needs challenging by somebody, but probably won't be. They can't KNOW a person is dead unless they have the details. Or some of them,

by crusader 02.07.24 13:54

Latest from Peter Hyatt

by **Jill Havern** 21.07.24 21:05

How Did Madeleine McCann Vanish Into Thin Air? Criminal Experts Analyse Infamous Missing Child Case

by crusader 17.08.24 7:19

Book review Sudden Impulse coming very soon.

by Silentscope 16.09.24 19:16

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Judicial Secrecy ended with the PJ Files being made Public.

by Cammerigal 16.09.24 21:35

So [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], my key take here is that tiktok, being CCP state run cannot be blocked or banned whereas the American Youtube is subject to state censorship, with respect to the McCann case. Eg Bogart, Richard D Hall and any other posters
So very ironic.
George Orwell should be spinning in his grave, as 1984 is enacted in the west as well as the east.

And then, we question 'Why' the USA censorship, UK D notices (state secrets), blatant BBC lies, covert 77 brigade activity and UK home office "fat controller" ordered Metropolitan Police coverup, over the alleges 'abduction' sorry, no evidence of that; but CSI dog determined death of a poor 4 year old English child, of non-descript NHS doctors?

by Silentscope 16.09.24 21:43

I wonder if that interview is available in full elsewhere?

The Poster is apparently based in Scotland.

by deepeepee 17.09.24 10:07

Silentscope wrote:I wonder if that interview is available in full elsewhere?

The Poster is apparently based in Scotland.

first part here [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

second part here [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That clip is from about 3m30s in the first video

by pinkgladioli 17.09.24 11:24

In the first video clip at 3.14
KM says the following=

Is it right for somebody to go into your apartment and take a child out YOUR bed

So from that I deduce that Madeleine was not in her own bed so how could she ever be abducted from it!

P.S. the TikTok clip previously shown of the clip if the source is from OnlyCans the Scottish guy is called Craig, he was the guy that attended Bernts press conference book launch

by AnneCGuedes 17.09.24 11:46

deepeepee wrote:
Silentscope wrote:I wonder if that interview is available in full elsewhere?

The Poster is apparently based in Scotland.
first part here [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

second part here [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That clip is from about 3m30s in the first video

This is an interesting interview. Compare K's arrogance and what she looks like now. It's easier to fight external opponents than internal ones.
"Is it right for somebody to go into your apartment and take your child out of your bed ?" Hadn't M been left in (her) bed when it happened?
"It wouldn't have crossed our minds again about M making that comment (the crying episode) but because of what happened suddenly that was significant and that's the reason why we told the police". M's comment didn't cross their minds again and they were so "relaxed" that on May 3 at the Tapas table K told the group the crying episode and was worried about leaving the door open in case M would wake up again and want to look for them !

by pinkgladioli 17.09.24 12:18

I really think she is a possibly a victim of Domestic Violence, when we see her lashing out externally like in this video clip, it maybe because she is protecting herself in the sense that if the interview portrays them in a favourable light she’s spared suffering any after affects that may ensue

by Cake Lover 17.09.24 13:21

If the tale about Madeleine and Sean crying is true, it should have horrified the McCann's to think that they had done this to their children. But no, they did the same again. If it's not true, they said it to make the police think that the children hadn't been sedated. It's the usual tactic - better to be accused of lousy parenting than of the sinister implications of Madeleine's 'disappearance'.

by Justice for Maddie 17.09.24 15:10

pinkgladioli wrote:I really think she is a possibly a victim of Domestic Violence, when we see her lashing out externally like in this video clip, it maybe because she is protecting herself in the sense that if the interview portrays them in a favourable light she’s spared suffering any after affects that may ensue

Yes, there is a rumor that Kate was abused in her childhood and we know that victims can turn into sex offenders as an adult. I fear that was the case with Kate (Kate described Maddie's genitals in her book). Another thing is the oversexed factor. There is a rumor that they were swingers. Gerry is a very dominant person and he likes to control everything, which includes Kate (also Domestic Violence). In every interview you can clearly see her fear to say something wrong. The only interview in which she was relaxed, was her interview with J. Corner from 2007.

by Silentscope 17.09.24 15:23

Kate's micro mouth movement when Gerry speaks about 'leaving no Stone unturned' and her look as he explains that they do not know what is in the Police Files (even though the Presenter does) is very tellling.

I Suspect they did know which explains why Kate went Quiet.

Thank you deepeepee.

by Silentscope 19.09.24 4:44

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.

by Nina 19.09.24 10:45

Silentscope wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.

Well waded through some of the usual stuff and then from about 33.30 information I have never heard before. Worthy of some investigation me thinks.

by Keelafreeze 19.09.24 11:29

Nina, away to watch the video, but it’s interesting that he concludes Maddie disappeared on the 3rd yet from what I’ve heard so far believes in the ‘buried on a hill’ theory. Kinda sums up the whole perception of the case with people agreeing/interpreting things as the same yet disagreeing on vital parts!

by deepeepee 19.09.24 12:28

Nina wrote:
Silentscope wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.
Well waded through some of the usual stuff and then from about 33.30 information I have never heard before. Worthy of some investigation me thinks.

For me, there's just mad speculation and putting two and two together to get about seven!
He embellishes everything to make it sound dramatic ("Ladies and gentlemen, wait for it...") when there is basically nothing.
Terrible awful salesy type youtuber.

by Nina 19.09.24 12:47

deepeepee wrote:
Nina wrote:
Silentscope wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.
Well waded through some of the usual stuff and then from about 33.30 information I have never heard before. Worthy of some investigation me thinks.
For me, there's just mad speculation and putting two and two together to get about seven!
He embellishes everything to make it sound dramatic ("Ladies and gentlemen, wait for it...") when there is basically nothing.
Terrible awful salesy type youtuber.

Did you already know about Kate's uncle and his connection to these schools then deepeepee? It was news to me.

by Jojo1 19.09.24 13:47

Nina wrote:
Silentscope wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.
Well waded through some of the usual stuff and then from about 33.30 information I have never heard before. Worthy of some investigation me thinks.

I had not heard that before either. I don't recall it being in the files or in Amarals book.
It might just be speculative information. To be honest it's an avenue that has never crossed my mind to look into as I tend to stick to files, Amarals book, Peter's ebook and latterly Bernts book.

by Cake Lover 19.09.24 14:22

I also watched the video from 3.30 minutes, and I hadn't read the information before. It's certainly revolting, but not surprising. We have long known that there are some filthy people involved in this case.

by Justice for Maddie 19.09.24 14:35

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Part V from this channel is also interesting
Is David Payne Smith Man (without glasses), who brought Maddie to the Freud villa in the hill area? Social worker Yvonne M, recognized him, because she met him during her professional work for children security.

by deepeepee 19.09.24 15:09

Nina wrote:
deepeepee wrote:
Nina wrote:
Silentscope wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Playback on other Sites is unsupported.
Well waded through some of the usual stuff and then from about 33.30 information I have never heard before. Worthy of some investigation me thinks.
For me, there's just mad speculation and putting two and two together to get about seven!
He embellishes everything to make it sound dramatic ("Ladies and gentlemen, wait for it...") when there is basically nothing.
Terrible awful salesy type youtuber.
Did you already know about Kate's uncle and his connection to these schools then deepeepee? It was news to me.

Yes, Nina. I already knew about his business activities from looking up the Companies House records. Going from the McCann's "the fund" company it is easy to find out the business activity of everyone involved.
However, there is zero evidence to link (as the youtuber does) him to any historical abuse at the schools. Also to then infer or imply that there is somehow any link to Madeleine, as again the youtuber does is just crass publicity seeking.
His modus operandi appears to be that so-and-so knows the McCanns and may be dodgy so there must be a link. But one could equally say that there may be Madeleine links to the Pope cos Catholics have abused children in the past. Maybe he's got her in the Vatican

Sadly, it is just total speculation with zero evidence in order to get youtube clicks.

by Nina 19.09.24 18:43

Whilst watching a video regarding the recent non custodial sentence of the BBC employee RAINS was mentioned, so googled it. Names on here you will have heard of

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Jojo1 20.09.24 0:03

Nina wrote:Whilst watching a video regarding the recent non custodial sentence of the BBC employee RAINS was mentioned, so googled it. Names on here you will have heard of
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That's one hek of a list

by Silentscope 20.09.24 15:04

Chinese Spy at a McCann Event.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Latest topics