Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Jill Havern 17.02.17 20:37
M Huzza
But wait.....they said there was no evidence that their daughter had come to any harm. Even when Andy Redwood of Scotland yard said she might not have left the apartment alive and Bernard Hogan Howe said it was a murder investigation. Those pesky death smelling dogs weren't having an off day after all. Please interview Gonzalo Amaral if these two don't have any grounds to sue anymore.
mark dudley
because they would hang themselves
DeFrost 5ptsFeatured
Maybe The Sun should be questioning the McCanns as to how they were so quick and ready to give up their parental and legal guardianship of Madeleine and make her a ward of court so early on. She might have been found the next day or week. By doing this, it meant they were given access to files of the case held by the PJ, but surely, as the concerned parents they propose to be, they have dumped Madeleine and any responsibility they held over their own child. The reality is Gerry and Kate never expected to find her.
Nicola Newman 5pts
Please read the enlightening Gaspar statements taken by the police. Why the info contained has never been pounced on by the media I do not know.
Summer Rules 5ptsStandardFeatured
39 minutes ago
Why haven't the remaining children been taken away? They are not fit for purpose as parents.
josh kellaway 5pts
For 10 years there has been ever thickening smoke above Madeleine's parents - indication being they know more than they've offered. British police have not been dealing with them as suspects, despite the suspicious events and circumstances so oft written and spoken about; why are our cops dragging heels?
Joshua Giles 5pts
It's called a lie detector that way they both have to reply to questions
Tokar911 5pts
Neither should they be cleared of any involvement, at the very least they should have been charged with child neglect through leaving their children unattended. The interviews they have done have contradicted emselves several times which is probably why they don't do anymore. I personally think they drugged Madeleine so they could go out with their friends for the night , she possible awoke doozy looking for her parents and could have had a fatal fall. Her parents are dodgy and no matter how much money they have they stink of guilt. Personally I think she was dumped at sea miles from the apartment and the parents know she will never be found.
hayley neill 5pts
They really are running terrified now. It isn't long until they are found guilty of murder and they know it. I hope they suffer abuse and violence by the inmates, so much they want to die but are kept alive to keep the suffering going. They deserve this and worse
Walter Oldfartknocker 5pts
The investigations into the McCanns is closed in all but name. However if they carry on trying to grab headlines and doing interviews they run the risk of a real investigation being launched into them. They may want to consider this as they keep on hogging the headlines. Any sane person whether guilty or not guilty would have walked away from the public eye years ago and lived their lives in private. If only just for the well being of their two remaining children.
HailTrump 5pts
Guilty
tommy graham 5ptsget this couple in for questioning and don’t let them out till the truth comes out there mouths. they should be in jail now swanning around the world conning money out of people we need this couple to face justice
Georgina Town 5pts
Public donations also paid for top extradition lawyers! Why would they need these if Madeleine was 'abducted' but when it came to paying for private investigators to 'search' for Madeleine, they picked ones that were as dodgy as they come! Within weeks they had Madeleine trademarked!! They were advised by the police not to mention Madeleine's eye defect but instead thought it was 'a good marketing ploy' to advertise it all over the place! They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction! As Doctors, who would have seen day in and day out of kids having accidents within the home, does anyone really believe they would of left 3 toddlers alone! There is a few good Facebook pages with the police files and links to Gonçalo Amaral’s book.
John Smith @Georgina Town
5pts
Spot on nail on the head
"They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!"
John Smith
5ptsFeatured
@Georgina Town The "neglect" started with the help of their friends after the child was dead, they are all involved up to their ears
Maria leprevost 5pts
Why are these people above the Law????
Robert Mansfield 5pts@Maria leprevost They think they are it would appear.
Claire Mybusiness 5pts
The statement of Dr Katherine Zacharias Gaspar made to Leicestershire Police on 16 May 2007:
One night, when all the adults, that is, from those couples I have mentioned above, were all sitting around on a patio outside the house where we were all staying. We had been eating and drinking ‘Berbers’.
I was sitting between Gerry and Dave and I think both were talking about Madeleine. I can’t remember the conversation in its entirety, but they seemed to be discussing a particular scenario. I remember Dave saying to Gerry something about ‘she’, meaning Madeleine, ‘would do this’.
“While he mentioned the word ‘this’, Dave was doing the action of sucking one of his fingers, pushing it in and out of his mouth, while with his other hand he was doing a circle around his nipple, with a circular movement around his clothes. This was done in a provocative way. There seemed to be an explicit insinuation about what he was saying and doing. I remember being shocked by that. I always felt it was something very weird and that it was not something anyone should say or do. I looked at Gerry, and also at Dave, to gauge their reactions.
“I looked around as if saying: “Did someone else hear that, or was it just me?”. The conversations stopped for a moment, then we all began conversing again. Moreover, I remember Dave doing the same thing on another occasion. In saying this, I want to mention once again that it was during a conversation in which he was talking about an imaginary scenario, although I’m not sure. He again stuck one of his fingers in and out of his mouth and with the other hand he once again drew a circle around his nipple in a provocative and sexual way. I think he was referring to the way she, that is, his daughter Lily, would behave or what she would do. I think he did this later during this same holiday.
John @Claire Mybusiness
Poor little girl, what she must have suffered in theirs and their friends hands
Rabid Allah @Claire Mybusiness
5pts
It;s no secret in Scotland that the McCann's had regular contact with known paedophiles and both Kate and Gerry were participants on the swinger circuit. What is very surprising to the legal fraternity in Scotland is the massive amount of public funds that has been spent on this case, when it is crystal clear they were directly involved in the death, either accidentally or deliberately. There was no abduction, and the discredited story of the McCann's fails under scrutiny. The subsequent disposal of Madeleine's body by the McCann's shows their actions were precise and calculated. There are various theories on how this was done, but one thing is very clear, Madeleine is dead and the McCann's have not provided a credible story on the events.
Claire Mybusiness 5pts
The celebrity snowflakes like Branson have been helping these two from the start. That's why the new information about Gerry's paedophile friend (overheard by a good friend at the table on that same holiday talking to Gerry inappropriately (sexually)) about little girls was removed by Google search engines.
Tim Sandham 5ptsFeatured
Try grilling them as hard as you've searched for the poor deceased maddie, grill them hard enough they WILL slip up with all the BS stories they have spouted over the years and you'll get the answer of they DID have something to do with her death ohh really meant "disappearance"
I can promise you that, and then give them life no parole only a cell four walls a dirty smelly mattress and a couple of diseased ridden rats to keep them company for the remainder of their lives
Don't let this be another oj outcome but involving an innocent child as the victim.
Donny Dee 5pts
Innocent people don't need to stay quiet....enough said.
bosch bosch 5ptsFeatured
This is so wrong on many levels, they have never been private and rarely speak, they have been on multi tv channels around the world speaking and peddling their lies to those who listen, and never actually say anything, Planning their next move to swell the coffers, but this is what erks me ! if they trully believe she was taken and searching, believing she will return , Then how do they know she wont return before 10th anniversary, or the next fund raiser, unless you have knowledge that the child will not return. As for previous comments on the use of the funds on other personal items for the McCann couple. please take a few minutes to read the fund site, it clearly states to help the family of madelaine financially. So on this they have done nothing illegal but morally very wrong, because people donated to search not to give them a lifestyle beyond their means. i do believe the walls are closing in and if the super injunctions were lifted, justice for the little girl would be served. Whilst everyone calls those against the McCanns trolls, all they ask for is justice for a little girl who has no voice, and it does not matter how many times they sue, they call people names , the truth that is in their minds, will eat away and will never go away. It is true the saying "the truth will set you free"
chloe reed @bosch bosch 5pts
But it was obviously meant as a long term thing to bolster their finances. After all Gerry was planning '1 year anniversaries' and such weeks after the disappearance. I am sure this is totally normal for parents of missing kids, to be thinking long term rather than hoping beyond hope that the child turns up within the next few minutes...
Iain McGregor 5pts
The only people who truly think that the McCann's are innocent are their close friends and their friends in high places who are protecting them. There are too many unanswered questions in Madeline's disappearance, i.e the scent the special dogs picked up in the apartment and the car that they hired after her disappearance, why? Kate washed Madeline's favourite toy, as a parent I know both my wife and I would never had done that if one of our kids had gone missing. Why? both of them and their friends from that night have blatantly REFUSED to take a lie detector test. So after this ruling let's hope the net is closing in on whatever involvement they had on their daughter's disappearance.
chloe reed 5pts
The 'fund' should not be spent on endless attempts to sue anyone who disagrees with their fairytale. As it should not be spent on mortgage payments and 5 star travel for themselves. Those who donated expect it to go on actually following up leads and searching for the child. It was never meant to be an income for the parents to squander. When I donated, I was under the impression my money would go on finding Madeleine not providing the parents with a luxury lifestyle. Of course, I donated before I read the files...I would never do so again.
NO proof of abduction. Any 'proof' points towards the abduction being a hoax. Anyone reading this, please read the files. If you think this was an abduction by a strange I guarantee your mind will change.
colin mair 5pts
I am surprised their other children weren't taken from them. May that poor little girl either be happy or rest in peace.
Moonk 5pts
It's just a shame so many people are working night and day to protect them whilst the governments just keep ignoring their own criminal activity. They are 100% responsible for that little girl going missing and should be answering questions on it - if they use "no comment" then they should be locked up. Then there is the issue with all the funding they've received to go on their holidays etc. Raised under false pretences of looking for a little girl that they know fine well what happened with.
James English 5pts
Why do they continue to spend fund money on legal actions?
If they truly want us to believe she is alive why aren't they simply ignoring Amaral and calling him out on his claims?
Perhaps they could come up with answers why the dogs were inaccurate!
Perhaps they could explain about blood spatter and why it had nothing to do with them!
Perhaps G could explain just what it was he found so funny in that video of him laughing a few days after M disappeared!
Perhaps they could explain the inconsistencies in the statements they all made!
Perhaps they could answer some of the original questions!
Perhaps they could both take lie detector tests after all that would put paid to all of the "untruths" from Amaral wouldn't it!
Perhaps they could actually tell some real truths!
No, you don't think they want to do any of that! I wonder why not?
Tony Wilcock 5ptsStandardFeatured
3 hours ago
If your child went missing everything should be laued out on the table to proof your also innocent .Why would you hide and then dodge questions if your innocent. I hope these two have a very bad accident.
Daz Fentz 5ptsFeatured
No lock the two of them up for the highest form of child neglect..
EvilCensor 5pts
So sick of people profiting from this awful situation. At the heart of this a little girl went missing and we have nothing but incompetence, book writing and what seems to be legal trickery. I hope the truth is uncovered and those responsible crushed.
Robert Mansfield 5ptsStandardFeatured
3 hours ago
The McCanns are the ones who should be answering questions, and a long list of them. The truth will out eventually.
Gary Barlow 5pts
Guilty child murdering filth who can ironically use all the money they earned from her murder to then continue to cover it up.
Yellow and Black 5pts
Further proof that the McCanns don't want the truth on what happen that night to come out
jbird65 5ptsFeatured
They'll never be in the clear because we all know they're as guilty as hell.
Ron Wiseman 5pts
Happy they lost the case.
Robert Mansfield 5pts @Ron Wiseman
And let’s hope they lose any other case they choose to bring.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2890547/kate-gerry-mccann-ban-lawyer-not-cleared-maddie-disappearance/#comments
But wait.....they said there was no evidence that their daughter had come to any harm. Even when Andy Redwood of Scotland yard said she might not have left the apartment alive and Bernard Hogan Howe said it was a murder investigation. Those pesky death smelling dogs weren't having an off day after all. Please interview Gonzalo Amaral if these two don't have any grounds to sue anymore.
mark dudley
because they would hang themselves
DeFrost 5ptsFeatured
Maybe The Sun should be questioning the McCanns as to how they were so quick and ready to give up their parental and legal guardianship of Madeleine and make her a ward of court so early on. She might have been found the next day or week. By doing this, it meant they were given access to files of the case held by the PJ, but surely, as the concerned parents they propose to be, they have dumped Madeleine and any responsibility they held over their own child. The reality is Gerry and Kate never expected to find her.
Nicola Newman 5pts
Please read the enlightening Gaspar statements taken by the police. Why the info contained has never been pounced on by the media I do not know.
Summer Rules 5ptsStandardFeatured
39 minutes ago
Why haven't the remaining children been taken away? They are not fit for purpose as parents.
josh kellaway 5pts
For 10 years there has been ever thickening smoke above Madeleine's parents - indication being they know more than they've offered. British police have not been dealing with them as suspects, despite the suspicious events and circumstances so oft written and spoken about; why are our cops dragging heels?
Joshua Giles 5pts
It's called a lie detector that way they both have to reply to questions
Tokar911 5pts
Neither should they be cleared of any involvement, at the very least they should have been charged with child neglect through leaving their children unattended. The interviews they have done have contradicted emselves several times which is probably why they don't do anymore. I personally think they drugged Madeleine so they could go out with their friends for the night , she possible awoke doozy looking for her parents and could have had a fatal fall. Her parents are dodgy and no matter how much money they have they stink of guilt. Personally I think she was dumped at sea miles from the apartment and the parents know she will never be found.
hayley neill 5pts
They really are running terrified now. It isn't long until they are found guilty of murder and they know it. I hope they suffer abuse and violence by the inmates, so much they want to die but are kept alive to keep the suffering going. They deserve this and worse
Walter Oldfartknocker 5pts
The investigations into the McCanns is closed in all but name. However if they carry on trying to grab headlines and doing interviews they run the risk of a real investigation being launched into them. They may want to consider this as they keep on hogging the headlines. Any sane person whether guilty or not guilty would have walked away from the public eye years ago and lived their lives in private. If only just for the well being of their two remaining children.
HailTrump 5pts
Guilty
tommy graham 5ptsget this couple in for questioning and don’t let them out till the truth comes out there mouths. they should be in jail now swanning around the world conning money out of people we need this couple to face justice
Georgina Town 5pts
Public donations also paid for top extradition lawyers! Why would they need these if Madeleine was 'abducted' but when it came to paying for private investigators to 'search' for Madeleine, they picked ones that were as dodgy as they come! Within weeks they had Madeleine trademarked!! They were advised by the police not to mention Madeleine's eye defect but instead thought it was 'a good marketing ploy' to advertise it all over the place! They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction! As Doctors, who would have seen day in and day out of kids having accidents within the home, does anyone really believe they would of left 3 toddlers alone! There is a few good Facebook pages with the police files and links to Gonçalo Amaral’s book.
John Smith @Georgina Town
5pts
Spot on nail on the head
"They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!"
John Smith
5ptsFeatured
@Georgina Town The "neglect" started with the help of their friends after the child was dead, they are all involved up to their ears
Maria leprevost 5pts
Why are these people above the Law????
Robert Mansfield 5pts@Maria leprevost They think they are it would appear.
Claire Mybusiness 5pts
The statement of Dr Katherine Zacharias Gaspar made to Leicestershire Police on 16 May 2007:
One night, when all the adults, that is, from those couples I have mentioned above, were all sitting around on a patio outside the house where we were all staying. We had been eating and drinking ‘Berbers’.
I was sitting between Gerry and Dave and I think both were talking about Madeleine. I can’t remember the conversation in its entirety, but they seemed to be discussing a particular scenario. I remember Dave saying to Gerry something about ‘she’, meaning Madeleine, ‘would do this’.
“While he mentioned the word ‘this’, Dave was doing the action of sucking one of his fingers, pushing it in and out of his mouth, while with his other hand he was doing a circle around his nipple, with a circular movement around his clothes. This was done in a provocative way. There seemed to be an explicit insinuation about what he was saying and doing. I remember being shocked by that. I always felt it was something very weird and that it was not something anyone should say or do. I looked at Gerry, and also at Dave, to gauge their reactions.
“I looked around as if saying: “Did someone else hear that, or was it just me?”. The conversations stopped for a moment, then we all began conversing again. Moreover, I remember Dave doing the same thing on another occasion. In saying this, I want to mention once again that it was during a conversation in which he was talking about an imaginary scenario, although I’m not sure. He again stuck one of his fingers in and out of his mouth and with the other hand he once again drew a circle around his nipple in a provocative and sexual way. I think he was referring to the way she, that is, his daughter Lily, would behave or what she would do. I think he did this later during this same holiday.
John @Claire Mybusiness
Poor little girl, what she must have suffered in theirs and their friends hands
Rabid Allah @Claire Mybusiness
5pts
It;s no secret in Scotland that the McCann's had regular contact with known paedophiles and both Kate and Gerry were participants on the swinger circuit. What is very surprising to the legal fraternity in Scotland is the massive amount of public funds that has been spent on this case, when it is crystal clear they were directly involved in the death, either accidentally or deliberately. There was no abduction, and the discredited story of the McCann's fails under scrutiny. The subsequent disposal of Madeleine's body by the McCann's shows their actions were precise and calculated. There are various theories on how this was done, but one thing is very clear, Madeleine is dead and the McCann's have not provided a credible story on the events.
Claire Mybusiness 5pts
The celebrity snowflakes like Branson have been helping these two from the start. That's why the new information about Gerry's paedophile friend (overheard by a good friend at the table on that same holiday talking to Gerry inappropriately (sexually)) about little girls was removed by Google search engines.
Tim Sandham 5ptsFeatured
Try grilling them as hard as you've searched for the poor deceased maddie, grill them hard enough they WILL slip up with all the BS stories they have spouted over the years and you'll get the answer of they DID have something to do with her death ohh really meant "disappearance"
I can promise you that, and then give them life no parole only a cell four walls a dirty smelly mattress and a couple of diseased ridden rats to keep them company for the remainder of their lives
Don't let this be another oj outcome but involving an innocent child as the victim.
Donny Dee 5pts
Innocent people don't need to stay quiet....enough said.
bosch bosch 5ptsFeatured
This is so wrong on many levels, they have never been private and rarely speak, they have been on multi tv channels around the world speaking and peddling their lies to those who listen, and never actually say anything, Planning their next move to swell the coffers, but this is what erks me ! if they trully believe she was taken and searching, believing she will return , Then how do they know she wont return before 10th anniversary, or the next fund raiser, unless you have knowledge that the child will not return. As for previous comments on the use of the funds on other personal items for the McCann couple. please take a few minutes to read the fund site, it clearly states to help the family of madelaine financially. So on this they have done nothing illegal but morally very wrong, because people donated to search not to give them a lifestyle beyond their means. i do believe the walls are closing in and if the super injunctions were lifted, justice for the little girl would be served. Whilst everyone calls those against the McCanns trolls, all they ask for is justice for a little girl who has no voice, and it does not matter how many times they sue, they call people names , the truth that is in their minds, will eat away and will never go away. It is true the saying "the truth will set you free"
chloe reed @bosch bosch 5pts
But it was obviously meant as a long term thing to bolster their finances. After all Gerry was planning '1 year anniversaries' and such weeks after the disappearance. I am sure this is totally normal for parents of missing kids, to be thinking long term rather than hoping beyond hope that the child turns up within the next few minutes...
Iain McGregor 5pts
The only people who truly think that the McCann's are innocent are their close friends and their friends in high places who are protecting them. There are too many unanswered questions in Madeline's disappearance, i.e the scent the special dogs picked up in the apartment and the car that they hired after her disappearance, why? Kate washed Madeline's favourite toy, as a parent I know both my wife and I would never had done that if one of our kids had gone missing. Why? both of them and their friends from that night have blatantly REFUSED to take a lie detector test. So after this ruling let's hope the net is closing in on whatever involvement they had on their daughter's disappearance.
chloe reed 5pts
The 'fund' should not be spent on endless attempts to sue anyone who disagrees with their fairytale. As it should not be spent on mortgage payments and 5 star travel for themselves. Those who donated expect it to go on actually following up leads and searching for the child. It was never meant to be an income for the parents to squander. When I donated, I was under the impression my money would go on finding Madeleine not providing the parents with a luxury lifestyle. Of course, I donated before I read the files...I would never do so again.
NO proof of abduction. Any 'proof' points towards the abduction being a hoax. Anyone reading this, please read the files. If you think this was an abduction by a strange I guarantee your mind will change.
colin mair 5pts
I am surprised their other children weren't taken from them. May that poor little girl either be happy or rest in peace.
Moonk 5pts
It's just a shame so many people are working night and day to protect them whilst the governments just keep ignoring their own criminal activity. They are 100% responsible for that little girl going missing and should be answering questions on it - if they use "no comment" then they should be locked up. Then there is the issue with all the funding they've received to go on their holidays etc. Raised under false pretences of looking for a little girl that they know fine well what happened with.
James English 5pts
Why do they continue to spend fund money on legal actions?
If they truly want us to believe she is alive why aren't they simply ignoring Amaral and calling him out on his claims?
Perhaps they could come up with answers why the dogs were inaccurate!
Perhaps they could explain about blood spatter and why it had nothing to do with them!
Perhaps G could explain just what it was he found so funny in that video of him laughing a few days after M disappeared!
Perhaps they could explain the inconsistencies in the statements they all made!
Perhaps they could answer some of the original questions!
Perhaps they could both take lie detector tests after all that would put paid to all of the "untruths" from Amaral wouldn't it!
Perhaps they could actually tell some real truths!
No, you don't think they want to do any of that! I wonder why not?
Tony Wilcock 5ptsStandardFeatured
3 hours ago
If your child went missing everything should be laued out on the table to proof your also innocent .Why would you hide and then dodge questions if your innocent. I hope these two have a very bad accident.
Daz Fentz 5ptsFeatured
No lock the two of them up for the highest form of child neglect..
EvilCensor 5pts
So sick of people profiting from this awful situation. At the heart of this a little girl went missing and we have nothing but incompetence, book writing and what seems to be legal trickery. I hope the truth is uncovered and those responsible crushed.
Robert Mansfield 5ptsStandardFeatured
3 hours ago
The McCanns are the ones who should be answering questions, and a long list of them. The truth will out eventually.
Gary Barlow 5pts
Guilty child murdering filth who can ironically use all the money they earned from her murder to then continue to cover it up.
Yellow and Black 5pts
Further proof that the McCanns don't want the truth on what happen that night to come out
jbird65 5ptsFeatured
They'll never be in the clear because we all know they're as guilty as hell.
Ron Wiseman 5pts
Happy they lost the case.
Robert Mansfield 5pts @Ron Wiseman
And let’s hope they lose any other case they choose to bring.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2890547/kate-gerry-mccann-ban-lawyer-not-cleared-maddie-disappearance/#comments
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA 
MBGAA wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Jill Havern- Captain, Chief Faffer, Forum Owner
- Posts : 31115
Activity : 43929
Likes received : 7758
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : Parallel universe -
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 17.02.17 20:59
There are a few dodgy comments in there.
"murderers" and "well known swingers".
"murderers" and "well known swingers".
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Tony Bennett 17.02.17 21:05
Agreed.BlueBag wrote:There are a few dodgy comments in there.
"murderers" and "well-known swingers".
But prime responsibility for publishing these comments on a website read by millions, and for their subsequent re-publication on various sites all across the internt, rests firmly with the Editor of the Sun.
It's entirely his choice to leave them up there for hours and hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by sharonl 17.02.17 21:43
[img]
[/img]
[/img]
sharonl- Forum Owner
- Posts : 8643
Activity : 11282
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by sharonl 17.02.17 21:47
Oh Dear
" />
" />
sharonl- Forum Owner
- Posts : 8643
Activity : 11282
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Google.Gaspar.Statements 17.02.17 22:36
Newest | Oldest | Top Comments
Pam Gurney 1 minute ago
I am sorry but I am so sick of these trolls everyday spewing out their bilge on facebook & twitter and reporting them does no good.
Something needs to be done to stop this plague of venomous comments.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 5 minutes ago
Police dogs alerted to Cadaver Odor in McCann apartment, Madeleine's cat, and Kate McCann's clothing
FlagShare
1
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 3 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Then Kate answer this:
Why were Kate's trousers returned to her to continue wearing?
Why was CuddleCat returned and Kate able to carry it around?
Nobody knows just what the dogs alerted to in 5a but as there was blood in the apartment before the Mccanns arrived perhaps Paul Gordon's. No need for a cadaver when dogs alert to both.
FlagShare
LikeReply
sherlock holmes 15 minutes ago
It looks from the comments allowed as if they've been thrown to the wolves.
Something has changed dramatically.
I cannot help but think of the twins.
Why did the parents let it come to this.?
It looks like payback time for all those lawsuits against the press. The Portuguese Supreme court ruling looks to have been the fatal blow - a self inflicted fatal blow.
It looks just like with Lance Armstrong, that the lie has just got too big.
FlagShare
3
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 13 minutes ago
@sherlock holmes ...TOSH!
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 18 minutes ago
One thing I and many parents know if a stranger tried to carry off a 3 year old child that child would be making a racket and wriggling.
Unless the alledged abductor went prepared with means to keep Maddie quiet then it's extremely difficult to carry off a distressed, vocal and wriggling child it would take some balls to do that in a holiday centre and that reason alone has always made me believe from day 1 that they are guilty of something.
FlagShare
1LikeReply
Pam Gurney 12 minutes ago
@Gail Marie Oh really Gail? Why would that make you think the parents are guilty? And yes, it is possible Madeleine was given some kind of chloroform to keep her asleep judging by the way she was laying in Tannerman's arms.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 9 minutes ago
Tanner man has been dismissed by Scotland Yard
It was a father taking his child home
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 8 minutes ago
@Kate Adams No you are quite wrong about that. Crechedad was brought in but Tannerman remains a suspect and rightly so.
FlagShare
LikeReply
John Tunstall 20 minutes ago
Kate McCann always looks like a mixture of being both grief stricken and burdened with guilt, Gerry McCann has the look of a manipulative controller always watching his wife like a hawk ready to step in if he thinks she may be about to say the wrong thing. Only they know the truth about happened to that poor little girl, sadly tho they wont confess to the truth........
FlagShare
3LikeReply
mark stephenson 5 minutes ago
@John Tunstall 100% agree with you John.I said in a post yesterday that the way he looks at her when she is speaking,he is coaching her!! I think she she really is grief stricken,but she knows what happened that night!!!
FlagShare
2LikeReply
Pam Gurney 21 minutes ago
Ah the gang is all here I see. Called to take up the arms and spam the Sun boards regarding this article!
Try getting a hobby other than trolling. It is agony watching your campaign against this suffering family & you should be ashamed of yourselves.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 16 minutes ago
Pam Gurney You spend your days on Facebook disrespecting Amaral and his family.
Do you have a life? Do you sleep?
Never mind your comments on victims of abuse and multiple homophobic comments
FlagShare
1LikeReply
Pam Gurney 10 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Really? I don't think so. However when I am online I am utterly disgusted by you trolls and your online behaviour.
I have no respect for Sr Amaral and make no bones about that. Homophobic...NO! And what have I ever said against victims of abuse?
I am standing up for such victims here right now. the McCanns are the MOST abused people I have ever seen...abused by trolls on social media.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 12 minutes ago
@Pam Gurney asking questions, speculating is not trolling. If I was name calling or being insulting that makes me a troll.
Me asking questions or speculating in a adult manner is called freedom of speech.
Because I don't believe their version of events doesn't make me a troll.
It's an open forum for people to express there views.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 9 minutes ago
@Gail Marie But to do it each and every day Gail? this has gone beyond speculating into the realms of a mass campaign on facebook and twitter to get this family brought to their knees.
Disgraceful!
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 54 minutes ago
Kate McCann said in filmed interview she wanted to push a Button and kill her family so they could all be together with Madeleine
If Madeleine is alive as tthey claim and they ask for donations , how would killing her whole family reunite her with Madeleine
We can only conclude Kate knows her daughter has died
FlagShare
6
LikeReply
John Tunstall 31 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Very good point!
FlagShare
2LikeReply
Anneke Du Plessis 58 minutes ago
I honestly don't understand why they at the very least have not been imprisoned for child neglect.
Even if they were not involved in her dissapearnce they left a 3 year old and two babies alone. Incredible what lots of money can buy you
FlagShare
4LikeReply
JULIE MILES 1 hour ago
Some infor from the Portuguese police files
Results of the 5A dog searches
-- Small amounts of blood behind and on the living room sofa-- Cadaver odour in Kate & Gerry McCann's bedroom-- Cadaver odour outside, on the veranda, in a flowerbed, near the window Eddie marked the McCann's wardrobe Eddie marked the outside of the McCann's apartment Eddie marked behind the sofa Keela marked behind the sofa
As a result of the dogs' sofa indication, the police discovered more blood underneath the tiles below the window.
Eddie is trained to find both blood and cadaver odour.
FlagShare
6
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 17 minutes ago
@JULIE MILES That is nonsense Julie and maybe you need to go and read the files again and then Lowe's report and understand what you are reading.
The blood underneath the tile was from a police officer charged with lifting said tile.
At least you have got one thing right...Eddie does alert to both and as the occupant prior to the McCanns gave a statement about bleeding in the apartment, then if blood was the alert...what does it prove to you?
FlagShare
LikeReply
ben benson 1 hour ago
read the book i did and was shocked because this man is the lead detective he knows the truth they refused t o answer any questions why according to phone records did mr mcann phone the sun news paper before the police after maddie disapeared these records obtained after police got warrent for phone records because mr mcann put his phone back to factory setting as he did with his wifes too why and why did the mother go for a jog on the beach the next morning every question asked by the police were no commented if my child went missing i never shut up i would want to help they got david cameron involved fact he leant on the portugeuse to back off the mcanns
FlagShare
7
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 14 minutes ago
@ben benson Ben I am reading it again and it is full of holes. Whether it is twisted by the translation I don't know because Anna Esse had to make disclaimers where she didn't understand this or that.
Poorly written and more a chronological run down of events as he recalled them with a lot of hypothesising involved too.
I don't understand how he could write it while under the oath of judicial secrecy either?
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 1 hour ago
My musings & questions.
Curious that no one at the hospital where he works is allowed to talk about the case to the media, rumour has it and it's only alledged but talking to the media about him could result in a disciplinary wonder if that's true.
Couples who go through what they have invariably part sometimes permanently, others who manage to hold onto each other do so in a very difficult way.
Yet the McCann's are so into each other and I really don't think that is a front for the media but I do think that it's possibly an obsessive love or a union which has to stay tight due to the dark secrets they share.
It's time for the politics and protection around this couple disappeared and allow the Portuguese free rein to question who they wish.
FlagShare
5
LikeReply
colin culk 1 hour ago
@Gail Marie i don't see any problem with their work colleagues not being allowed to talk about the case. imagine if they weren't as guilty as they clearly are it would be massively inappropriate. obviously not as inappropriate as offing their own child so they could have some mediocre tapas but, y'know, employment laws and industrial tribunals and all that
FlagShare
2LikeReply
Gail Marie 25 minutes ago
@colin culk I know, especially as the McCann's would sue an opening of an envelope if they thought they could win. I have never known a case like it as regards how they appear to control what is and isn't said. Considering the intrusion and investigation into other high profile mysteries heck they have had more control then the royal family have over Princess Di's life and death. Just don't get it.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 5 minutes ago
@Gail Marie Now that is you musing because you don't know the truth about that or whether it has been ever asked of the staff...do you?
So are you implying the McCanns should have split up & then you might have believed them? does this fit in with the criteria you demand of people who have been to hell and back a thousand times?
Are you jealous they are a strong & loving couple? Seems like it to me.
FlagShare
LikeReply
colin culk 1 hour ago
the net is closing.
FlagShare
8LikeReply
picasso14 1 hour ago
Two doctors leave there 3 children alone in an apartment abroad.If that was a single mum on benefits, she would have been chastised, and hounded.
But......professionals mget off with being charged with neglect....??
FlagShare
3
LikeReply
june newland 1 hour ago
@picasso14 they were not the only people to leave kids on their own in those appartments either that are all guilty
FlagShare
1LikeReply
M Huzza 2 hours ago
But wait.....they said there was no evidence that their daughter had come to any harm. Even when Andy Redwood of Scotland yard said she might not have left the apartment alive and Bernard Hogan Howe said it was a murder investigation. Those pesky death smelling dogs weren't having an off day after all. Please interview Gonzalo Amaral if these two don't have any grounds to sue anymore.
FlagShare
7LikeReply
mark dudley 2 hours ago
because they would hang themselves
FlagShare
3LikeReply
Robert Mansfield 1 hour ago
@mark dudley Or dig the hole even deeper.
FlagShare
5LikeReply
Max DeFrost 2 hours ago
Maybe The Sun should be questioning the McCanns as to how they were so quick and ready to give up their parental and legal guardianship of Madeleine and make her a ward of court so early on. She might have been found the next day or week.
By doing this, it meant they were given access to files of the case held by the PJ, but surely, as the concerned parents they propose to be, they have dumped Madeleine and any responsibility they held over their own child.
The reality is Gerry and Kate never expected to find her.
FlagShare
6
LikeReply
june newland 1 hour ago
@Max DeFrost the sun like many other rags tell lies
FlagShare
1LikeReply
Nicola Newman 2 hours ago
Please read the enlightening Gaspar statements taken by the police. Why the info contained has never been pounced on by the media I do not know.
FlagShare
5LikeReply
Mazzerboo 1 hour ago
Just read it, thanks, it throws a whole new light on the story
FlagShare
1LikeReply
Summer Rules 3 hours ago
Why haven't the remaining children been taken away? They are not fit for purpose as parents.
FlagShare
7LikeReply
josh kellaway 3 hours ago
For 10 years there has been ever thickening smoke above Madeleine's parents - indication being they know more than they've offered. British police have not been dealing with them as suspects, despite the suspicious events and circumstances so oft written and spoken about; why are our cops dragging heels?
FlagShare
9
LikeReply
Joshua Giles 3 hours ago
It's called a lie detector that way thay both have to reply to questions
FlagShare
5
LikeReply
Robert Mansfield 3 hours ago
Don't say anything, you might incriminate us!!
FlagShare
4LikeReply
Tokar911 tokar911 3 hours ago
Neither should they be cleared of any involvement, at the very least they should have been charged with child neglect through leaving their children unattended. The interviews they have done have contradicted emselves several times which is probably why they don't do anymore. I personally think they drugged Madeleine so they could go out with their friends for the night , she possible awoke doozy looking for her parents and could have had a fatal fall. Her parents are dodgy and no matter how much money they have they stink of guilt. Personally I think she was dumped at sea miles from the apartment and the parents know she will never be found.
FlagShare
5LikeReply
hayley neill 3 hours ago
They really are running terrified now. It isn't long until they are foubd guilty of murder and they know it. I hope they suffer abuse and violence by the inmates, so much they want to die but are kept alive to keep the suffering going. They deserve this and worse
FlagShare
8LikeReply
Walter Oldfartknocker 4 hours ago
The investigations into the McCanns is closed in all but name. However if they carry on trying to grab headlines and doing interviews they run the risk of a real investigation being launched into them.
They may want to consider this as they keep on hogging the headlines. Any sane person whether guilty or not guilty would have walked away from the public eye years ago and lived thier lives in private. If only just for the well being of their two remaining children.
FlagShare
3LikeReply
colin culk 1 hour ago
@Walter Oldfartknocker i'd not given them a second thought for years but by aggressively trying to control how they are seen in the media they have once again highlighted the fact that they are guilty. it's as if they feed off media attention and have decided that a bit of press is more important than keeping a low profile and avoiding prison
FlagShare
2LikeReply
vencedor 4 hours ago
This has turned into the Maddie franchise...
FlagShare
7
LikeReply
chloe reed 1 hour ago
@vencedor That was the plan it seems. Early on after the disappearance, Gerry was warned against publicizing Madeleines coloboma. The police told him that doing so would mean almost certain death/harm for the child IF she was still alive. Gerry ignored this, published it, his reasons? 'It is a good marketing ploy'. Just sick.
FlagShare
3LikeReply
HailTrump 4 hours ago
Guilty
FlagShare
10
LikeReply
tommy graham 4 hours ago
get this couple in for questioning and dont let them out till the truth comes out there mouths. they should be in jail now swanning around the world conning money out of people we need this couple to face justice
FlagShare
12LikeReply
Wendi Wilkins 47 minutes ago
The problem is when the mccanns were in the police station they refused to answer any questions and also refused to take a lie detector test they were still subjects when they left Portugal the police didn't know they were leaving and they have not gone back to Portugal since wonder why. They have always been no 1 suspects to the Portuguese police amaral should be compensated for ten years of stress distress libel and anything else he can charge the mccanns with the poor man lost his job cus of them lost everything cus of them he needs his life back now if there is anything u wanna know about the case there are groups on Facebook I learnt so much from s group called hideho they are on twitter aswell everyone should know the truth and that group have extensive research on the case
FlagShare
2LikeReply
Georgina Town 4 hours ago
Public donations also paid for top extradition lawyers! Why would they need these if Madeleine was 'abducted' but when it came to paying for private investigators to 'search' for Madeleine, they picked ones that were as dodgy as they come! Within weeks they had Madeleine trademarked!! They were advised by the police not to mention Madeleine's eye defect but instead thought it was 'a good marketing ploy' to advertise it all over the place! They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!
As Doctors, who would of seen day in and day out of kids having accidents within the home, does anyone really believe they would of left 3 toddlers alone! There is a few good Facebook pages with the police files and links to Gonçalo Amarals book.
FlagShare
14LikeReply
John Smith 4 hours ago
@Georgina Town Spot on nail on the head
"They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!"
FlagShare
6LikeReply
John Smith 4 hours ago
@Georgina Town The "neglect" started with the help of their friends after the child was dead, they are all involved up to their ears
FlagShare
7LikeReply
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2890547/kate-gerry-mccann-ban-lawyer-not-cleared-maddie-disappearance/#comments
Pam Gurney 1 minute ago
I am sorry but I am so sick of these trolls everyday spewing out their bilge on facebook & twitter and reporting them does no good.
Something needs to be done to stop this plague of venomous comments.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 5 minutes ago
Police dogs alerted to Cadaver Odor in McCann apartment, Madeleine's cat, and Kate McCann's clothing
FlagShare
1
LikeReplyPam Gurney 3 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Then Kate answer this:
Why were Kate's trousers returned to her to continue wearing?
Why was CuddleCat returned and Kate able to carry it around?
Nobody knows just what the dogs alerted to in 5a but as there was blood in the apartment before the Mccanns arrived perhaps Paul Gordon's. No need for a cadaver when dogs alert to both.
FlagShare
LikeReply
sherlock holmes 15 minutes ago
It looks from the comments allowed as if they've been thrown to the wolves.
Something has changed dramatically.
I cannot help but think of the twins.
Why did the parents let it come to this.?
It looks like payback time for all those lawsuits against the press. The Portuguese Supreme court ruling looks to have been the fatal blow - a self inflicted fatal blow.
It looks just like with Lance Armstrong, that the lie has just got too big.
FlagShare
3
LikeReplyPam Gurney 13 minutes ago
@sherlock holmes ...TOSH!
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 18 minutes ago
One thing I and many parents know if a stranger tried to carry off a 3 year old child that child would be making a racket and wriggling.
Unless the alledged abductor went prepared with means to keep Maddie quiet then it's extremely difficult to carry off a distressed, vocal and wriggling child it would take some balls to do that in a holiday centre and that reason alone has always made me believe from day 1 that they are guilty of something.
FlagShare
1
LikeReplyPam Gurney 12 minutes ago
@Gail Marie Oh really Gail? Why would that make you think the parents are guilty? And yes, it is possible Madeleine was given some kind of chloroform to keep her asleep judging by the way she was laying in Tannerman's arms.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 9 minutes ago
Tanner man has been dismissed by Scotland Yard
It was a father taking his child home
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 8 minutes ago
@Kate Adams No you are quite wrong about that. Crechedad was brought in but Tannerman remains a suspect and rightly so.
FlagShare
LikeReply
John Tunstall 20 minutes ago
Kate McCann always looks like a mixture of being both grief stricken and burdened with guilt, Gerry McCann has the look of a manipulative controller always watching his wife like a hawk ready to step in if he thinks she may be about to say the wrong thing. Only they know the truth about happened to that poor little girl, sadly tho they wont confess to the truth........
FlagShare
3
LikeReplymark stephenson 5 minutes ago
@John Tunstall 100% agree with you John.I said in a post yesterday that the way he looks at her when she is speaking,he is coaching her!! I think she she really is grief stricken,but she knows what happened that night!!!
FlagShare
2
LikeReplyPam Gurney 21 minutes ago
Ah the gang is all here I see. Called to take up the arms and spam the Sun boards regarding this article!
Try getting a hobby other than trolling. It is agony watching your campaign against this suffering family & you should be ashamed of yourselves.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 16 minutes ago
Pam Gurney You spend your days on Facebook disrespecting Amaral and his family.
Do you have a life? Do you sleep?
Never mind your comments on victims of abuse and multiple homophobic comments
FlagShare
1
LikeReplyPam Gurney 10 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Really? I don't think so. However when I am online I am utterly disgusted by you trolls and your online behaviour.
I have no respect for Sr Amaral and make no bones about that. Homophobic...NO! And what have I ever said against victims of abuse?
I am standing up for such victims here right now. the McCanns are the MOST abused people I have ever seen...abused by trolls on social media.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 12 minutes ago
@Pam Gurney asking questions, speculating is not trolling. If I was name calling or being insulting that makes me a troll.
Me asking questions or speculating in a adult manner is called freedom of speech.
Because I don't believe their version of events doesn't make me a troll.
It's an open forum for people to express there views.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 9 minutes ago
@Gail Marie But to do it each and every day Gail? this has gone beyond speculating into the realms of a mass campaign on facebook and twitter to get this family brought to their knees.
Disgraceful!
FlagShare
LikeReply
Kate Adams 54 minutes ago
Kate McCann said in filmed interview she wanted to push a Button and kill her family so they could all be together with Madeleine
If Madeleine is alive as tthey claim and they ask for donations , how would killing her whole family reunite her with Madeleine
We can only conclude Kate knows her daughter has died
FlagShare
6
LikeReplyJohn Tunstall 31 minutes ago
@Kate Adams Very good point!
FlagShare
2
LikeReplyAnneke Du Plessis 58 minutes ago
I honestly don't understand why they at the very least have not been imprisoned for child neglect.
Even if they were not involved in her dissapearnce they left a 3 year old and two babies alone. Incredible what lots of money can buy you
FlagShare
4
LikeReplyJULIE MILES 1 hour ago
Some infor from the Portuguese police files
Results of the 5A dog searches
-- Small amounts of blood behind and on the living room sofa-- Cadaver odour in Kate & Gerry McCann's bedroom-- Cadaver odour outside, on the veranda, in a flowerbed, near the window Eddie marked the McCann's wardrobe Eddie marked the outside of the McCann's apartment Eddie marked behind the sofa Keela marked behind the sofa
As a result of the dogs' sofa indication, the police discovered more blood underneath the tiles below the window.
Eddie is trained to find both blood and cadaver odour.
FlagShare
6
LikeReplyPam Gurney 17 minutes ago
@JULIE MILES That is nonsense Julie and maybe you need to go and read the files again and then Lowe's report and understand what you are reading.
The blood underneath the tile was from a police officer charged with lifting said tile.
At least you have got one thing right...Eddie does alert to both and as the occupant prior to the McCanns gave a statement about bleeding in the apartment, then if blood was the alert...what does it prove to you?
FlagShare
LikeReply
ben benson 1 hour ago
read the book i did and was shocked because this man is the lead detective he knows the truth they refused t o answer any questions why according to phone records did mr mcann phone the sun news paper before the police after maddie disapeared these records obtained after police got warrent for phone records because mr mcann put his phone back to factory setting as he did with his wifes too why and why did the mother go for a jog on the beach the next morning every question asked by the police were no commented if my child went missing i never shut up i would want to help they got david cameron involved fact he leant on the portugeuse to back off the mcanns
FlagShare
7
LikeReplyPam Gurney 14 minutes ago
@ben benson Ben I am reading it again and it is full of holes. Whether it is twisted by the translation I don't know because Anna Esse had to make disclaimers where she didn't understand this or that.
Poorly written and more a chronological run down of events as he recalled them with a lot of hypothesising involved too.
I don't understand how he could write it while under the oath of judicial secrecy either?
FlagShare
LikeReply
Gail Marie 1 hour ago
My musings & questions.
Curious that no one at the hospital where he works is allowed to talk about the case to the media, rumour has it and it's only alledged but talking to the media about him could result in a disciplinary wonder if that's true.
Couples who go through what they have invariably part sometimes permanently, others who manage to hold onto each other do so in a very difficult way.
Yet the McCann's are so into each other and I really don't think that is a front for the media but I do think that it's possibly an obsessive love or a union which has to stay tight due to the dark secrets they share.
It's time for the politics and protection around this couple disappeared and allow the Portuguese free rein to question who they wish.
FlagShare
5
LikeReplycolin culk 1 hour ago
@Gail Marie i don't see any problem with their work colleagues not being allowed to talk about the case. imagine if they weren't as guilty as they clearly are it would be massively inappropriate. obviously not as inappropriate as offing their own child so they could have some mediocre tapas but, y'know, employment laws and industrial tribunals and all that
FlagShare
2
LikeReplyGail Marie 25 minutes ago
@colin culk I know, especially as the McCann's would sue an opening of an envelope if they thought they could win. I have never known a case like it as regards how they appear to control what is and isn't said. Considering the intrusion and investigation into other high profile mysteries heck they have had more control then the royal family have over Princess Di's life and death. Just don't get it.
FlagShare
LikeReply
Pam Gurney 5 minutes ago
@Gail Marie Now that is you musing because you don't know the truth about that or whether it has been ever asked of the staff...do you?
So are you implying the McCanns should have split up & then you might have believed them? does this fit in with the criteria you demand of people who have been to hell and back a thousand times?
Are you jealous they are a strong & loving couple? Seems like it to me.
FlagShare
LikeReply
colin culk 1 hour ago
the net is closing.
FlagShare
8
LikeReplypicasso14 1 hour ago
Two doctors leave there 3 children alone in an apartment abroad.If that was a single mum on benefits, she would have been chastised, and hounded.
But......professionals mget off with being charged with neglect....??
FlagShare
3
LikeReplyjune newland 1 hour ago
@picasso14 they were not the only people to leave kids on their own in those appartments either that are all guilty
FlagShare
1
LikeReplyM Huzza 2 hours ago
But wait.....they said there was no evidence that their daughter had come to any harm. Even when Andy Redwood of Scotland yard said she might not have left the apartment alive and Bernard Hogan Howe said it was a murder investigation. Those pesky death smelling dogs weren't having an off day after all. Please interview Gonzalo Amaral if these two don't have any grounds to sue anymore.
FlagShare
7
LikeReplymark dudley 2 hours ago
because they would hang themselves
FlagShare
3
LikeReplyRobert Mansfield 1 hour ago
@mark dudley Or dig the hole even deeper.
FlagShare
5
LikeReplyMax DeFrost 2 hours ago
Maybe The Sun should be questioning the McCanns as to how they were so quick and ready to give up their parental and legal guardianship of Madeleine and make her a ward of court so early on. She might have been found the next day or week.
By doing this, it meant they were given access to files of the case held by the PJ, but surely, as the concerned parents they propose to be, they have dumped Madeleine and any responsibility they held over their own child.
The reality is Gerry and Kate never expected to find her.
FlagShare
6
LikeReplyjune newland 1 hour ago
@Max DeFrost the sun like many other rags tell lies
FlagShare
1
LikeReplyNicola Newman 2 hours ago
Please read the enlightening Gaspar statements taken by the police. Why the info contained has never been pounced on by the media I do not know.
FlagShare
5
LikeReplyMazzerboo 1 hour ago
Just read it, thanks, it throws a whole new light on the story
FlagShare
1
LikeReplySummer Rules 3 hours ago
Why haven't the remaining children been taken away? They are not fit for purpose as parents.
FlagShare
7
LikeReplyjosh kellaway 3 hours ago
For 10 years there has been ever thickening smoke above Madeleine's parents - indication being they know more than they've offered. British police have not been dealing with them as suspects, despite the suspicious events and circumstances so oft written and spoken about; why are our cops dragging heels?
FlagShare
9
LikeReplyJoshua Giles 3 hours ago
It's called a lie detector that way thay both have to reply to questions
FlagShare
5
LikeReplyRobert Mansfield 3 hours ago
Don't say anything, you might incriminate us!!
FlagShare
4
LikeReplyTokar911 tokar911 3 hours ago
Neither should they be cleared of any involvement, at the very least they should have been charged with child neglect through leaving their children unattended. The interviews they have done have contradicted emselves several times which is probably why they don't do anymore. I personally think they drugged Madeleine so they could go out with their friends for the night , she possible awoke doozy looking for her parents and could have had a fatal fall. Her parents are dodgy and no matter how much money they have they stink of guilt. Personally I think she was dumped at sea miles from the apartment and the parents know she will never be found.
FlagShare
5
LikeReplyhayley neill 3 hours ago
They really are running terrified now. It isn't long until they are foubd guilty of murder and they know it. I hope they suffer abuse and violence by the inmates, so much they want to die but are kept alive to keep the suffering going. They deserve this and worse
FlagShare
8
LikeReplyWalter Oldfartknocker 4 hours ago
The investigations into the McCanns is closed in all but name. However if they carry on trying to grab headlines and doing interviews they run the risk of a real investigation being launched into them.
They may want to consider this as they keep on hogging the headlines. Any sane person whether guilty or not guilty would have walked away from the public eye years ago and lived thier lives in private. If only just for the well being of their two remaining children.
FlagShare
3
LikeReplycolin culk 1 hour ago
@Walter Oldfartknocker i'd not given them a second thought for years but by aggressively trying to control how they are seen in the media they have once again highlighted the fact that they are guilty. it's as if they feed off media attention and have decided that a bit of press is more important than keeping a low profile and avoiding prison
FlagShare
2
LikeReplyvencedor 4 hours ago
This has turned into the Maddie franchise...
FlagShare
7
LikeReplychloe reed 1 hour ago
@vencedor That was the plan it seems. Early on after the disappearance, Gerry was warned against publicizing Madeleines coloboma. The police told him that doing so would mean almost certain death/harm for the child IF she was still alive. Gerry ignored this, published it, his reasons? 'It is a good marketing ploy'. Just sick.
FlagShare
3
LikeReplyHailTrump 4 hours ago
Guilty
FlagShare
10
LikeReplytommy graham 4 hours ago
get this couple in for questioning and dont let them out till the truth comes out there mouths. they should be in jail now swanning around the world conning money out of people we need this couple to face justice
FlagShare
12
LikeReplyWendi Wilkins 47 minutes ago
The problem is when the mccanns were in the police station they refused to answer any questions and also refused to take a lie detector test they were still subjects when they left Portugal the police didn't know they were leaving and they have not gone back to Portugal since wonder why. They have always been no 1 suspects to the Portuguese police amaral should be compensated for ten years of stress distress libel and anything else he can charge the mccanns with the poor man lost his job cus of them lost everything cus of them he needs his life back now if there is anything u wanna know about the case there are groups on Facebook I learnt so much from s group called hideho they are on twitter aswell everyone should know the truth and that group have extensive research on the case
FlagShare
2
LikeReplyGeorgina Town 4 hours ago
Public donations also paid for top extradition lawyers! Why would they need these if Madeleine was 'abducted' but when it came to paying for private investigators to 'search' for Madeleine, they picked ones that were as dodgy as they come! Within weeks they had Madeleine trademarked!! They were advised by the police not to mention Madeleine's eye defect but instead thought it was 'a good marketing ploy' to advertise it all over the place! They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!
As Doctors, who would of seen day in and day out of kids having accidents within the home, does anyone really believe they would of left 3 toddlers alone! There is a few good Facebook pages with the police files and links to Gonçalo Amarals book.
FlagShare
14
LikeReplyJohn Smith 4 hours ago
@Georgina Town Spot on nail on the head
"They want the public to think they are neglectful parents as without neglect then there would be no abduction!"
FlagShare
6
LikeReplyJohn Smith 4 hours ago
@Georgina Town The "neglect" started with the help of their friends after the child was dead, they are all involved up to their ears
FlagShare
7
LikeReplyhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2890547/kate-gerry-mccann-ban-lawyer-not-cleared-maddie-disappearance/#comments
Google.Gaspar.Statements- Posts : 365
Activity : 701
Likes received : 238
Join date : 2013-05-15
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 17.02.17 22:44
Pam Gurney....
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 17.02.17 22:49
I may have become cynical over the last ten years but this could turn out to be a nice little deliberate earner for the McCanns, by their friends at the sun. (when they sue for lots and lots of money). The timing certainly could not be any better, as they face financial ruin due to the success of the legal appeal overturning that £425000 payout.
Far fetched? . . Maybe. Unbelievable? . . . No more unbelievable than the whole sorry charade. just another chapter in marketing.
Far fetched? . . Maybe. Unbelievable? . . . No more unbelievable than the whole sorry charade. just another chapter in marketing.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 17.02.17 22:57
Rupert Murdoch = The Sun = Tracey Kandohla = Gerry and Kate McCann.
Press Association October 2014
The father of Madeleine McCann has called for an example to be made of “vile” internet trolls who have been targeting the family.
Just look at The Sun's comments chief spokesperson for team McCann - Pam Gurney !?!
Press Association October 2014
The father of Madeleine McCann has called for an example to be made of “vile” internet trolls who have been targeting the family.
Just look at The Sun's comments chief spokesperson for team McCann - Pam Gurney !?!
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Rogue-a-Tory 17.02.17 23:12
Chloroform? Has Pammy been watching re-runs of The Saint on TV Gold 
Rogue-a-Tory- Posts : 647
Activity : 1115
Likes received : 454
Join date : 2014-09-10
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by hogwash 17.02.17 23:15
Lest they forget what Team McCann did to Brenda Leyland.
I don't know what their agenda is, but they've certainly upped their game.
I don't know what their agenda is, but they've certainly upped their game.
hogwash- Posts : 209
Activity : 472
Likes received : 197
Join date : 2015-09-20
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Rogue-a-Tory 17.02.17 23:30
The agenda is one of two things IMO;hogwash wrote:Lest they forget what Team McCann did to Brenda Leyland.
I don't know what their agenda is, but they've certainly upped their game.
following the original modus operandi by allowing the McCs to sue, settle out of court and top up the fund. A way of money laundering income into their fund which is what I believe happened before.
or
It's a deliberate stalking horse to tempt them out, make them sue and then put them on the stand to face the questions we've all been waiting for them to face. This would be a very convenient way for the Establishment to quickly distance themselves from the McCs as they get slaughtered in court. It's possible that criminal action follows without the risk of the McCs taking others down with them as they're already utterly discredited.
Rogue-a-Tory- Posts : 647
Activity : 1115
Likes received : 454
Join date : 2014-09-10
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 8:10
Verdi wrote:Rupert Murdoch = The Sun = Tracey Kandohla = Gerry and Kate McCann.
Press Association October 2014
The father of Madeleine McCann has called for an example to be made of “vile” internet trolls who have been targeting the family.
Just look at The Sun's comments chief spokesperson for team McCann - Pam Gurney !?!
Absolutely.
Anyone foolish enough to put anything libelous ("murderers", "swingers") better watch out.
They should keep to the facts and unanswered questions - there is plenty of meat there.
Stick to them and they can't touch you.
The other part of the game is of course the people who deliberately put comments like that there to push someone to take action about "terrible trolls".
Problem - reaction - solution.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Tony Bennett 18.02.17 8:20
But these comments are not on Twirter or on a website.BlueBag wrote:Verdi wrote:Rupert Murdoch = The Sun = Tracey Kandohla = Gerry and Kate McCann.
Press Association October 2014
The father of Madeleine McCann has called for an example to be made of “vile” internet trolls who have been targeting the family.
Just look at The Sun's comments chief spokesperson for team McCann - Pam Gurney !?!
Absolutely.
Anyone foolish enough to put anything libelous ("murderers", "swingers") better watch out.
They should keep to the facts and unanswered questions - there is plenty of meat there.
Stick to them and they can't touch you.
The other part of the game is of course the people who deliberately put comments like that there to push someone to take action about "terrible trolls".
Problem - reaction - solution.
The Editor of the Sun has personally been responsible for all those comments being published in in the Sun - and if the McCann Team are going to go after anyone, they will have to go after him...
Tony Gallagher, Editor of the Sun - authorised his newspaper to publish unmoderated comments claiming that the McCanns were 'swingers' and murdered their daughter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 8:21
Ermmmmm.....
"Trolling" is making the news again.
Item on the BBC News front page today.
Trolling?
These are people with legitimate concerns about the conduct of the Pope, including a Cardinal.
Yeah "trolling".
Watch out for an attack on "trolls".
Someone should do something about those terrible "trolls" and all that "fake" news.
And they probably will.
"Trolling" is making the news again.
Item on the BBC News front page today.
Trolling?
These are people with legitimate concerns about the conduct of the Pope, including a Cardinal.
Yeah "trolling".
Watch out for an attack on "trolls".
Someone should do something about those terrible "trolls" and all that "fake" news.
And they probably will.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 8:22
Did they ever go after Mark Zuckerberg?Tony Bennett wrote:But these comments are not on Twirter or on a website.BlueBag wrote:Verdi wrote:Rupert Murdoch = The Sun = Tracey Kandohla = Gerry and Kate McCann.
Press Association October 2014
The father of Madeleine McCann has called for an example to be made of “vile” internet trolls who have been targeting the family.
Just look at The Sun's comments chief spokesperson for team McCann - Pam Gurney !?!
Absolutely.
Anyone foolish enough to put anything libelous ("murderers", "swingers") better watch out.
They should keep to the facts and unanswered questions - there is plenty of meat there.
Stick to them and they can't touch you.
The other part of the game is of course the people who deliberately put comments like that there to push someone to take action about "terrible trolls".
Problem - reaction - solution.
The Editor of the Sun has personally been responsible for all those comments being published in in the Sun - and if the McCann Team are going to go after anyone, they wil have to go after him...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial responsibility will not be the issue.
The "vile trolls" will be.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 8:30
Tony,
Don't forget the definition of trolls according to the Telegraph:
I think you are included :-)
Don't forget the definition of trolls according to the Telegraph:
Investigation-into-McCann-internet-trolls-launched-by-police
Other tactics include attempts complain about the McCanns through Freedom of Information requests, the bombardment of the BBC Crimewatch show message board and Facebook pages. Anthony Summers, the author of a recent book that argues the McCanns are innocent, has also been targeted.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/11134162/Investigation-into-McCann-internet-trolls-launched-by-police.html
I think you are included :-)
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by ChippyM 18.02.17 9:12
In one of the DM stories recently Clarie used the term 'antis', they have obviously decided using the word 'troll' is a big no-no after driving someone to kill themselves. They have to keep appearences squeaky clean.
.......which has been working really well recently.
.......which has been working really well recently.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 11:46
I disagree Tony, there will be a get out clause, otherwise the Sun's editorial team wouldn't have allowed the comments to be published. There is a devious reason behind this and it's not related to freedom of speech.Tony Bennett wrote:
The Editor of the Sun has personally been responsible for all those comments being published in in the Sun - and if the McCann Team are going to go after anyone, they will have to go after him
To think otherwise you would have to believe that all Murdoch's work has been in vain. When you think back over the years, the Murdoch empire, the Sun tabloid in particular, has been backing the McCanns 100%. They were even behind Gerry McCanns extraordinary invitation to the Police Bravery Awards where he, Gerry McCann, was said to have received an outstanding ovation!!! How could they possibly volte-face now?
Murdoch Inc. is a very powerful global force to reckon with - talk establishment and Murdoch is right up front. This case has never been about the McCanns in isolation - and there lies the true mystery.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Doug D 18.02.17 11:59
Verdi:
How could they possibly volte-face now?
They were happy to do it with the political parties, so why not the Mc's?
If it sells more papers they would probably do almost anything.
How could they possibly volte-face now?
They were happy to do it with the political parties, so why not the Mc's?
If it sells more papers they would probably do almost anything.
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 12:00
As much as I abhor the behaviour of the McCanns and their extensive entourage, it sickens me to see some of the things written about them on social media over the past years. Even I can't help but sympathize with those at the receiving end.BlueBag wrote:Anyone foolish enough to put anything libelous ("murderers", "swingers") better watch out.
They should keep to the facts and unanswered questions - there is plenty of meat there.
Whatever your personal feelings are on the case, there is absoluely no need to resort to vile abuse. It doesn't help anyone or anything.
Whatever their reason, to use the case of a missing child as a platform for their warped minds is simply wrong on all levels. These miscreants are the very reason why anyone who questions the circumstances surrounding Madeleine McCann's disappearance are collectively called evil/vile trolls.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Mirage 18.02.17 12:07
Verdi wrote:I disagree Tony, there will be a get out clause, otherwise the Sun's editorial team wouldn't have allowed the comments to be published. There is a devious reason behind this and it's not related to freedom of speech.Tony Bennett wrote:
The Editor of the Sun has personally been responsible for all those comments being published in in the Sun - and if the McCann Team are going to go after anyone, they will have to go after him
To think otherwise you would have to believe that all Murdoch's work has been in vain. When you think back over the years, the Murdoch empire, the Sun tabloid in particular, has been backing the McCanns 100%. They were even behind Gerry McCanns extraordinary invitation to the Police Bravery Awards where he, Gerry McCann, was said to have received an outstanding ovation!!! How could they possibly volte-face now?
Murdoch Inc. is a very powerful global force to reckon with - talk establishment and Murdoch is right up front. This case has never been about the McCanns in isolation - and there lies the true mystery.
Yes, food for thought. It also reminded me of reports that Murdoch has recently been in talks with May at No 10.
The only thing I would say is that May has ditched many policies Cameron pursued. May was for some reason used as leverage in Brooks getting Cameron to set up the SY review (the threat to have May on the front page for a week). The McCanns had also stated their displeasure with May when she stonewalled them at a HO meeting.
May has had to do the rounds, pictured with Kate McCann and April Jones' mother among others. Maybe not too willingly.
Mirage- Posts : 1905
Activity : 2711
Likes received : 764
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 12:09
Different ball game I think. As regards politics, they go with the flow - but there ain't no flow were the McCanns are concerned. It's a carefully orchestrated campaign, or as I prefer to call it, a protection racket!Doug D wrote:Verdi:
How could they possibly volte-face now?
They were happy to do it with the political parties, so why not the Mc's?
If it sells more papers they would probably do almost anything.
Besides, Murdoch Inc. is politics as politics is Murdoch Inc. - if you get my drift.
I have my doubts about stories selling copy in more recent times. I never buy a newspaper anymore, it's all online so why should I? If there's a paywall then I'm not interested, just move along to another news source. The days of alliance to a particular newspaper I think are long since gone, they all latch on to reports circulated by a central source, i.e. The Press Association.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Doug D 18.02.17 12:22
O/T as such, but The Sun have now recycled this one from last year for some reason:
'I'M LOOKING FOR MADDIE' Guide defends ‘ghoulish’ Maddie McCann tour around the apartment where tot went missing and says he is ‘trying to progress the case’
He says he is just 'trying to progress the case' as the 10th anniversary of her disappearance approaches
EXCLUSIVE
BY SAM CHRISTIE 18th February 2017, 10:08 am
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2894902/madeleine-mccann-tour-guide/
'I'M LOOKING FOR MADDIE' Guide defends ‘ghoulish’ Maddie McCann tour around the apartment where tot went missing and says he is ‘trying to progress the case’
He says he is just 'trying to progress the case' as the 10th anniversary of her disappearance approaches
EXCLUSIVE
BY SAM CHRISTIE 18th February 2017, 10:08 am
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2894902/madeleine-mccann-tour-guide/
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by Guest 18.02.17 12:23
@Mirage wrote: "May has had to do the rounds, pictured with Kate McCann and April Jones' mother among others. Maybe not too willingly."
Of course, I don't really put any credence to Theresa May posing with Kate McCann for a photo-shoot but it's excellent fodder for ridicule. I see these occasions as an indication of how Madeleine's disappearance has catapulted the McCanns into the dizzy heights of celebrity status.
Having said that - if Madeleine McCann's fate is embroilded in some way with a national/international scandal that, if exposed, will rock the very foundations of society (which I strongly suspect - I can see no other explanation), then I truly don't believe Theresa May will be the whistleblower.
History has shown in such cases, when one door is opened someone is right behind ready to plug the hole. Bit like Ocean Club apartment 5a, way back in April/May 2007.
Of course, I don't really put any credence to Theresa May posing with Kate McCann for a photo-shoot but it's excellent fodder for ridicule. I see these occasions as an indication of how Madeleine's disappearance has catapulted the McCanns into the dizzy heights of celebrity status.
Having said that - if Madeleine McCann's fate is embroilded in some way with a national/international scandal that, if exposed, will rock the very foundations of society (which I strongly suspect - I can see no other explanation), then I truly don't believe Theresa May will be the whistleblower.
History has shown in such cases, when one door is opened someone is right behind ready to plug the hole. Bit like Ocean Club apartment 5a, way back in April/May 2007.
Guest- Guest
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by ChippyM 18.02.17 14:19
Verdi wrote:I disagree Tony, there will be a get out clause, otherwise the Sun's editorial team wouldn't have allowed the comments to be published. There is a devious reason behind this and it's not related to freedom of speech.Tony Bennett wrote:
The Editor of the Sun has personally been responsible for all those comments being published in in the Sun - and if the McCann Team are going to go after anyone, they will have to go after him
.........snipped..........
As I understand it, moderating comments means the website are held responsible for what's posted. If they don't moderate then it's the individual commenters that are responsible. I don't think this is a 'fishing for trolls' type exercise, it could be that they want individuals to take the risk of saying certain things before they publish anything along the same lines.....to test the water.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Unmoderated comments from Tracey Kandohla's article in the Sun (17 Feb 2017)
by plebgate 18.02.17 21:12
I tend to think the same as Tony. If the comments have been allowed to stand for several hours then why on earth hasn't the moderating team whooshed them.
Its not as if the comments were posted on a weekend when staffing levels might not be as high as a weekday.
We know that other comments have been removed in the past quick as a flash so I do believe the comments on anything to do with Mr. & Mrs. are monitored regularly.
Its not as if the comments were posted on a weekend when staffing levels might not be as high as a weekday.
We know that other comments have been removed in the past quick as a flash so I do believe the comments on anything to do with Mr. & Mrs. are monitored regularly.
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Similar topics» Daily Mail says Madeleine McCann is DEAD ( in an article by Tracey Kandohla! ) - 18 Feb 2017
» "It's going to be very painful for us on 3rd May 2017" - Irish Times, 29 Apr 2017 >> Article is especially harsh on 'vile anti-McCann trolls'
» Liverpool Echo article, 12 March - Extraordinary comments saying the McCanns killed Madelene being allowed - comments saved in OP
» A BLUNDER BY TRACEY KANDOHLA – SHE DOESN’T KNOW WHICH IS THE ‘LAST PHOTO’ OF MADELEINE (Daily Mail, 2 January 2017)
» 'IT'S NOT ABOUT MAKING MONEY' Kate McCann threatens to sue social media users for stealing extracts from best seller book about missing Maddie by Tracey Kandohla 18th March 2017
» "It's going to be very painful for us on 3rd May 2017" - Irish Times, 29 Apr 2017 >> Article is especially harsh on 'vile anti-McCann trolls'
» Liverpool Echo article, 12 March - Extraordinary comments saying the McCanns killed Madelene being allowed - comments saved in OP
» A BLUNDER BY TRACEY KANDOHLA – SHE DOESN’T KNOW WHICH IS THE ‘LAST PHOTO’ OF MADELEINE (Daily Mail, 2 January 2017)
» 'IT'S NOT ABOUT MAKING MONEY' Kate McCann threatens to sue social media users for stealing extracts from best seller book about missing Maddie by Tracey Kandohla 18th March 2017
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
