Re: 'VIDEO OF THE DAY'

by Guest 07.04.18 0:29

Another repeat..

Searching for Madeleine ~ Dispatches C4

Channel 4

48:00 minutes

Dispatches sent a team of UK ex-police detectives over to Praia da Luz in November 2007 (that month again) to investigate (unofficially) the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

"Portuguese secrecy laws prevent the police from revealing any details about the investigation ...."

duh

You had Leicester police there, along with Robert Murat - they knew what was going on !!!

"We started off with the theory - had she wandered off or had she been taken ...."

duh

Almost as profound as DCI Redwood and his statement "either Madeleine is alive or sadly she's dead". roll

by Guest 10.04.18 2:02

McCann's Irish RTE Late Late Show Interview May 13 2011

HiDeHo

34:06 minutes

by worriedmum 10.04.18 9:45

This Expresso interview was apparently the first interview the parents gave after their arguido status was lifted in 2008.

I'm always shocked by Kate's demeanour here,and I would love to know what Gerry stops himself from saying, ''the day after, the day after... '' when Kate intervenes...

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Video added. Mod.

by polyenne 10.04.18 10:03

@worriedmum

We've seen this many times before and it's usually Gerry that stumbles over his words before Kate steps in with the guiding hand. She is so much more wily that perhaps her persona displays and it is this that will hopefully demonstrate in a court of law that she is just as culpable as Gerry in this whole charade.

In addition, how many times have we seen Gerry, "caught in the headlights", effectively bare his teeth and chuckle or grin......the traits of a guilty person catching themselves before blurting the truth.

by Guest 10.04.18 12:45

Post arguido - 'tis no wonder they are so laid-back and jolly.

Evening Standard wrote:As their relief at having their 'arguido' status revoked turned to anger, the McCanns have said that have not ruled out initiating legal proceedings.

The couple's spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, said: 'By the end of this week, lawyers will have complete access to everything.

'They will have 20 days to assess the work of the police and what has been done and what hasn't been done. If they feel legal action is necessary, we could press charges.'

20th July 2008

by Guest 19.04.18 21:59

Any newcomer, comparative newcomer or old die hard in need of a nudge in the right direction - this interview with Gerry and Kate McCann for the tenth anniversary of Madeleine's mysterious disappearance, is unmissable viewing..

It's only 24 minutes of your time, don't just skim through it half listening and half watching (although I can appreciate the temptation). Pay careful attention to their every word and their every facial expression, in particular Gerry McCann who's general demeanour reveals the inner self on every occasion, without fail, he can't help himself. The other one, the missus, is incapable of emotion of any description and/or incapable of even putting up a pretense of anything that might vaguely resemble emotion. So well rehearsed is she, it's like watching the inevitable BBC repeats every high day and holiday.

Remember, ten is significant - it's a big number, it supersedes all the other heartbreaking years only to be expected at the loss of a child - ones own precious child. Indeed it goes beyond single figures into the realms of three hands to continue the count, that's when time and memory fades into insignificance - isn't it?

Madeleine who?

Where's me abacus..

by Guest 23.04.18 0:03

Another McCann Interview

xklamation

2:04 minutes

by Guest 23.04.18 0:41

McCanns and Jim Gamble interview 2

xklamation

7:02 minutes

by Guest 23.04.18 0:51

Watch, listen and learn..

Crimewatch BBC in PDL & Jim Gamble Interview 08:10, Oct 14th

Maria Anna

7:03 minutes

by Guest 01.05.18 14:46

The REAL Madeleine McCann Story by SPUDGUN MUST SEE!

HiDeHo4

09:33 minutes

Acknowledgement Spudgun..

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15102-a-story-by-spudgun#top

Unmissable read.

by Guest 05.05.18 1:16

GMTV Kate and Gerry McCann in exclusive interview with Lorrraine Kelly [on the telly]

07:29 minutes

fishie 1855

Bums on seats!

by Guest 05.05.18 1:25

Madeleine McCann - DAYBREAK Interview DCI Andy Redwood April 27 2012

040;44 minutes

anotheroneforjustice

'...... either Madeleine is alive or sadly she is dead......'

by Guest 08.05.18 16:07

Once Upon a Crime ..

Feat. Sheriff Randy Firtree and undercover agent Janey Sixpennyworth

by Guest 10.05.18 21:52

Sandra Felgueiras interviews McCanns

xklamation

06:24 minutes

by Guest 10.05.18 21:59

Away from the staged interviews with UK media, Sandra Felgueiras deserves a medal for being the only one to tie Gerry and Kate McCann in knots - watch them squirm..

McCann - Sandra Felgueiras 05.11.09 (Pt 3)

anotheroneforjustice

08:30 minutes

by willowthewisp 11.05.18 13:19

Verdi wrote:Away from the staged interviews with UK media, Sandra Felgueiras deserves a medal for being the only one to tie Gerry and Kate McCann in knots - watch them squirm..

McCann - Sandra Felgueiras 05.11.09 (Pt 3)

anotheroneforjustice

08:30 minutes

Hi Verdi,take a very close look at Gerry's reaction(04.10) to Sandra's question to Kate about how they are coping living with the situation,without Madeleine!
Observe his eye movements of who is watching his reactions!

by Guest 11.05.18 16:06

willow wrote:Hi Verdi,take a very close look at Gerry's reaction(04.10) to Sandra's question to Kate about how they are coping living with the situation,without Madeleine!
Observe his eye movements of who is watching his reactions!

What better than a video to illustrate the machinations of the McCanns and their associates.

No lost in translation or misquoting, it's all there straight from the horse's mouth - body language an' all !

by Liz Eagles 11.05.18 16:30

Did someone pin a poppy on Mr McCann's jacket?

by Guest 13.05.18 21:55

Unmissable viewing no matter how many times. Lest they forget..

The sound is poor quality, interview transcript can be found here..

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t14374-mccann-interview-transcripts?highlight=interview+transcripts

by Guest 17.05.18 15:44

10th September 2007

by Guest 17.05.18 15:47

by Guest 17.05.18 15:50

by willowthewisp 18.05.18 14:40

Verdi wrote:

10th September 2007

Hi Verdi,a couple of points?

So Martin Brunt states,the McCann family"Two weeks" in Portugal?

Jeremy Wilkens spoken words to Gerry McCann out side of the apartment 3 May 2007,(Jez wishing he was there for Two Weeks) as opposed to Gerry stating it was the families Second week!

The McCann Family spotted on a Nudist Beach a week earlier April 21-28 2007?

Which then contradicts the flying out from Birmingham on the 28th April 2007,Madeleine bus video,which was produced after Madeleine had disappeared,Evidence?

Are the flight tickets fabricated!

Mr Julian Totman was booked into an apartment in G4 Block for Two Weeks,but only took up residence for the second week,aka 28th April,according to Mark Warner records, So someone could have taken up this kind offer to stay for"Free" for one week,a financial struggling Doctor Family?

Deep Throat,"follow the Money"?

by Guest 18.05.18 15:53

by Guest 18.05.18 16:02

by willowthewisp 18.05.18 17:05

Hi Verdi,thanks for showing the Bookings for the Totmans April 28th to 11 May 2007.

what is confusing is that Mr Julian Totman claims his family only took up residence in Apartment G4 block for the Second week?

So therefore if Mr Totman claims to have been playing tennis with Gerry McCann on the 3 May 2007,how could he be taking his daughter home from the night Creche,as according to what he has stated he wasn't there on the 3 May 2007!

Perhaps I am Wrong,but why state he wasn't to be in the apartment until the Second week from the 5th May-11th May 2007?

by Guest 18.05.18 23:10

willowthewisp wrote:Hi Verdi,thanks for showing the Bookings for the Totmans April 28th to 11 May 2007.

what is confusing is that Mr Julian Totman claims his family only took up residence in Apartment G4 block for the Second week?

So therefore if Mr Totman claims to have been playing tennis with Gerry McCann on the 3 May 2007,how could he be taking his daughter home from the night Creche,as according to what he has stated he wasn't there on the 3 May 2007!

Perhaps I am Wrong,but why state he wasn't to be in the apartment until the Second week from the 5th May-11th May 2007?

A lot of water has passed under the bridge (hopefully taking a few trolls with it 'VIDEO OF THE DAY' - Page 14 110921

) since this new report broke, you need to remind me where it was stated that the Totman family only took up residence in apartment G4 for the second week. As far as I'm aware, no official declaration has been made by Julian Totman or any of his family, only a news report which frankly I take with a sack of salt every time, without exception.

Looking at the Tapas restaurant booking for the week 28th April - 5th May, the name Totman is booked in Tuesday 1st May as two + one. According to the shambolic Ocean Club computerized records, the Totman family was booked in with two children - a two year old girl and a three year old boy. I don't think it unreasonable to suggest the Totmans used the night creche for their two year old girl whilst taking their three year old boy to the Tapas restaurant for dinner.

I can't help but think this is a non story, a sort of dangling carrot for the donkey. Who knows, maybe it was suggested to Julian Totman that he could have been the stranger allegedly seen by Jane Tanner - under the circumstances why would he think to deny it? He was there, his young child could have been at the creche, he could have collected her and taken her back to their lodging. Would it occur to him to research the case to see what Jane Tanner had said eleven years ago?

Cut the bloke some slack, I think he's most likely the victim of circumstances.

by worriedmum 20.05.18 21:22

But if he's a doctor and, ergo, smart, why hasn't he realised he was travelling in the opposite direction?

Should we really 'cut him some slack' if he hasn't said that 'Tannerman ' was going the wrong way for it to be him?

by Phoebe 21.05.18 0:25

I fear poor Jane T is in a bit of a bind here. If Totman was the man she saw going from left to right at around 9.10 pm then it makes sense that he was going to collect his child, ie. the man she saw was not carrying a child across his arms. She cannot attempt to backtrack now and agree to this, as she gave so much detail about the child's bare feet and the pyjama legs she "saw".
If Totman was carrying a child he can only have been walking in the opposite direction to that which she claimed. One way or another, if Totman is accepted as Tannerman, it means Jane has given misleading (at best) evidence.
Op. grange would like everyone to forget this sighting and accept that the "abduction" must have happened after the Tannerman sighting. I don't accept that it should just be quietly dropped. If Totman is Tannerman Jane has clearly given misleading and false testimony. That, in my book, calls into question all her other statements and testimony. She has proven herself an unreliable witness with Tannerman - this brings into question the veracity of All her statements!

by Guest 21.05.18 1:09

worriedmum wrote:But if he's a doctor and, ergo, smart, why hasn't he realised he was travelling in the opposite direction?

Should we really 'cut him some slack' if he hasn't said that 'Tannerman ' was going the wrong way for it to be him?

As I said, would it occur to him eleven years down the line, to check out Jane Tanner's description in the PJ files? Like as not, he didn't even know the PJ files exist in the public domain, not everyone follows this case enough to know the detail, if at all. As far as he was concerned, he collected his daughter from the night creche and returned to his accommodation. If it were me and I hadn't been involved with the investigation at any stage, it wouldn't occur to me for one moment about direction - whatever Jane Tanner did or didn't say.

As I also say, I've not seen any official documentation that might confirm this story to be true or otherwise. It's a press report which can hardly be considered factual, generally their sense of reality hovers somewhere between Walter Mitty and Arthur Rackham.

All that aside, there was no evidence that Madeleine McCann was abducted on 3rd May 2007 or any other time during the weeks holiday.

No abduction = no sighting.