l-azzeri lies in the sun: Doesn't add up

by **Jill Havern** 13.10.15 22:39

Doesn't Add Up

Much of what we know of this case, doesn't add up, not least the police witness statements given by Gerry McCann, Kate McCann, David Payne, Fiona Payne, Matthew Oldfield, Rachael Oldfield, Russell O'Brien, Jane Tanner and Dianne Webster.

Any police authority, hoping to solve this case, reading the statements must have thought all their Christmases had come at once. A bunch of witness statements that would have any detective worth their salt eager to unravel the many inconsistencies, discover the reasons why the untruths. The answers handed to them on a plate, just in a mixed up order!

Over past eight years since we first heard the name Madeleine McCann her parents have without fail, and just prior to any Court action they initiated, or any anniversary of the disappearance of this little girl, any road run, or event planned by them, or indeed any visit to Portugal by the Metropolitan Police, they arranged with Clarence Mitchell to flood the headlines with stories of sightings of Madeleine, he also arranged for them to appear on gossip style shows like that hosted by Lorraine Kelly and other TV presenters. That is what the guy is paid to do. (Admittedly since Met arrived on scene the sightings have been thin on the ground, but Mitchell still filled the column inches and air time with other nonsense)

The McCanns refer to Madeleine as an alive and findable little girl, and to find her they need YOUR cash, so they tell us.

It is very important to the Madeleine Fund that Madeleine be thought of as alive and findable!

Last week it was thought there would be an appeal hearing in the case brought against Dr Amaral by the McCanns. The McCanns stand to lose a considerable amount of money if this appeal is not decided in their favour. They already have a huge legal bill to meet in this regard, a bill they must pay, win or lose.

The McCanns/Mitchell flooded the press with stories of how they NEED THAT CASH - for Madeleine of course - a search for her. That is, a FUTURE SEARCH. A search they will begin when the Metropolitan Police, or perhaps both police authorities, UK and Portugal wind up the case, close it, shelve it whatever you wish to call it.

Their message was, to not donate to Dr Amaral's Fund (a fund set up to assist him with legal fees as the McCanns had his assets frozen, leaving him without the financial means to defend himself against their action, The Fund for Dr Amaral has been hugely successful, much to the annoyance of the McCanns) If you donate they said, then you are lessening their chances of winning, lessening their chances of getting their hands on Dr Amaral's money. Money which they NEED FOR MADELEINE, A SEARCH FOR HER. Indeed! It's not to pay any legal fees they, the McCann have incurred. No siree, don't even think that way, it is ALL for Madeleine, EVERY PENNY. In fact on their Website they have posted a statement declaring that their action against Dr Amaral WAS NEVER ABOUT THE MONEY. THEY WANTED TO EMPHASISE THAT.

So why now are they the McCanns, Mitchell, and their family sources speaking out in the press saying they need that money for Madeleine and their search, a search which thus far has been more mysterious than the disappearance of the child!

Shortly after the Metropolitan Police got involved in this case, the McCanns stopped their private search (and a very private search it was, no one quite knows how or where they searched - as Mitchell always said when it suited him - 'we won't be discussing our private investigation. Yip all the public needed to know is that their money was being put to a search, just to trust this snake in the grass ) they posted on the Find Madeleine Site a message informing the public that for them to continue it may cause problems for the Met if information was to cross over, be lost. Best they just stop searching for Madeleine (sit on whatever cash was in their Fund at that time, keep it warm) That was over 4 years ago.

One would have to assume that that same money is STILL where it was at the time they announced that they would not be spending in the way which they had been on their previous private search. And IF the ever generous public had made any further donations in this 4 year period, or any monies added to the pot from any other source during this period of NON SEARCHING, then the Fund for Madeleine must be looking pretty darn healthy. Well at least as healthy as when they ceased searching!

One of the things that to me doesn't add up, is that the McCanns, throughout the Metropolitan Police involvement in this case, have continually stated that they have EVERY CONFIDENCE in the Mets investigation.

But the stories in the press tell us, or me at least, differently.

Saying they need Dr Amaral's money to search for Madeleine when the Met Investigation is over, tells me that they do not expect it to be solved, that their alive and findable little girl is NOT going to be found.

It tells me that they DO NOT HAVE EVERY CONFIDENCE in the METROPOLITAN POLICE. Unless of course they are confident the Met will not solve it, but simply wrap it up, and they can continue on their way asking the public for more cash!

Surely not!

There was a mix up, confusion over the date at which the appeal hearing would be decided, one can see how such a mistake could have been made, the gist of which is that the date it was thought to take place, 7th October was wrong, or that is my understanding. But what DOESN'T ADD UP then, is the timing of the stories in the press by Mitchell/McCanns their family sources, their 'poor us, we are frustrated, exasperated, furious' at Dr Amaral receiving donations. Don't donate to help him with his appeal. We need to win, get our hands on his cash for Madeleine' type stories.

How could they the McCanns get the timing/date SO WRONG?

Never known that to happen before!

How could the McCanns/Mitchell, their flurry of stories about needing that cash, their timing be so wrong?

Could they be so out of touch? Their legal team so out of touch?

I wouldn't think so!

Put simply - Doesn't add up.

The stories about their twitter account closing, well that I can see. It was the anniversary of Brenda Leyland's death, and for them to produce another tale in the same vein about persons online affecting their search for Madeleine kinda par for the course. Look here we are still victims.

But those stories about needing Dr Amaral's money, and of how his Fund, providing him, his right to a legal defence were troublesome to them, were getting in the way of them getting their hands on his cash -for those stories to have the affect they the McCanns desired, the impact they desired, to be of benefit to them, those tales really required releasing, as is their usual way - just prior to, in this instance, - the appeal hearing.

How could they be so out in their timing?

Doesn't add up.

Or could it be they thought they'd get in EARLY with their 'poor me' stories, stem the flow of monies to assist Dr Amaral?

Can we expect a re-run, another flurry of same type stories prior to whatever is the date of this appeal, or is something else bubbling...

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
13th October 2015

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Liz Eagles 14.10.15 11:32

Lazz once again never fails to get to the crux of things.

by Doug D 03.01.16 16:24

Good to see Lazz is back with a vengeance!

Eight (?) new posts to keep you reading all evening.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Doug D 05.01.16 9:00

Another four posts up:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **Jill Havern** 05.01.16 9:15

Doug D wrote:Another four posts up:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thank you Doug thumbsup

by Doug D 06.01.16 14:15

Lazz still going strong:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Guest 06.01.16 14:45

Doug D wrote:Lazz still going strong:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Yes, it's rubbish.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Agonisingly, he is now sure that standing behind this door was his four-year-old daughter's abductor, waiting to steal her from her bed in the Praia da Luz.
The haunting memory was revealed by a close family friend, who said Mr McCann and his wife Kate, both 39, checked on their children as they ate at a tapas bar 40 yards away.
"Gerry believes there was certainly something odd," the friend said. "The bedroom door was ajar when he got in and he thought: 'That's strange'.
"He went into the room, checked that Madeleine was still asleep in bed; she was and he came out, closed the door.
"Initially he thought she might have got up and gone to the toilet or gone to get a drink or something but now he thinks that the abductor must have been in there hiding."
The friend said Gerry had pondered over the sequence of events that night for four and half painful months. "He believes the abductor came in, opened the door and didn't have time to close it (before Mr McCann arrived)," said the friend.

by Guest 06.01.16 14:48

Just where was this abductor hiding?

The implication is he was behind the childrens bedroom door.

It wasn't the bathroom because Gerry said he used it.

The idea that Gerry WENT IN, checked the children and somehow missed the abductor hiding is ludicrous.

by joyce1938 06.01.16 15:04

I think someone said the door was too close to wall and no-one could have been been behind that door, no space hardly, with all the other efforts to make it look as if someone had taken her. It's just not viable. joyce1938

by kaz 06.01.16 15:27

@ Blue Bag

"Gerry believes there was certainly something odd," the friend said. "The bedroom door was ajar when he got in and he thought: 'That's strange'.
"He went into the room, checked that Madeleine was still asleep in bed; she was and he came out, closed the door.
"Initially he thought she might have got up and gone to the toilet or gone to get a drink or something but now he thinks that the abductor must have been in there hiding."

How blasé can a person be? He was talking about his three years old daughter for heaven's sake! A little girl in a strange country, in a strange room and without a responsible adult present. Bathrooms and kitchens are FULL of dangerous implements for little hands to reach for and yet he has the gall to acknowledge the possibility of her going to the toilet or getting herself a drink...................all the time presumably wondering where mummy and daddy were. He makes me sick to the stomach with his nonsense. At the very LEAST they should be charged with negligence.

by plebgate 06.01.16 18:20

We have heard in the past that the abductor might have done a trial run the night before and then we read that Mr. thinks the abductor might have been hiding behind the door of the bedroom?

Why was there no DNA evidence of this abductor in the aparment?

To me it is absolutely non-sensical and I would dearly love to know what the Met police and their 81 helpers think of it all.

Are there any MPs brave enough to start asking questions in the Commons about all of it?

by **Hobs** 06.01.16 23:16

plebgate wrote:We have heard in the past that the abductor might have done a trial run the night before and then we read that Mr. thinks the abductor might have been hiding behind the door of the bedroom?

Why was there no DNA evidence of this abductor in the aparment?

To me it is absolutely non-sensical and I would dearly love to know what the Met police and their 81 helpers think of it all.

Are there any MPs brave enough to start asking questions in the Commons about all of it?

Why would an abductor do a trial run the night before, get as far as into their bedroom and within touching distance of Maddie and then leave, vowing to return tomorrow to do the actual abduction.
All assuming of course that the mccanns don't decide to use a MW babysitter, drop them off at the evening creche, have one of the adults babysitting all the children in one apartment not 5a, taking the children to dinner with them or, staying home and having a t6ake out or cooking for themselves?

Why would an abductor, with nefarious deeds in mind, go through all the risk of dry running an abduction and then NOT ABDUCT HIS CHOSEN VICTIM when the opportunity arose?

It makes no sense, it didn't happen.
The same as there was no mystery abductor and no abduction.

by JohnyT 06.01.16 23:29

Spot on...........so....we plan to rob a bank..............get in the vault........and come back tomorrow to 'do' the real thing...............
This gets stranger by the minute.......I cannot believe that all these things are being ignored.
JohnyT

by Guest 07.01.16 8:14

JohnyT wrote:I cannot believe that all these things are being ignored.

They evidently are.

No bog-standard police procedures here.

by Doug D 20.01.16 8:29

Another three from Lazz:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Liz Eagles 20.01.16 8:52

Snipped from Lazz's 'Stop Believing'

The public gave money to help find whatever became of this child, the money was never intended by those who kindly donated to pay the likes of the lowlife that is Mitchell whose goal on behalf of the McCanns, is to silence those who seek the truth, to make them stop believing!

by Doug D 28.02.16 0:08

Lazz having another field day!

Nothing for a few weeks then three (plus one to come) in one go.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by willowthewisp 28.02.16 11:24

Doug D wrote:Lazz having another field day!

Nothing for a few weeks then three (plus one to come) in one go.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Somehow, I don't think l-azerri believes what Kate and Gerry have told the PJ Police and UK Police. "What do they know, I was there", Kate on the steps of Portugal Court hearing, caught on camera?

by Liz Eagles 28.02.16 12:36

Lazz is without doubt the best blogger.

by Doug D 28.02.16 15:47

And another:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Its a 'shorty' this time after yesterdays marathon effort.

by Doug D 29.02.16 7:40

Still going:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Doug D 29.02.16 14:31

And still they come:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **Jill Havern** 29.02.16 14:40

Thank you Doug D...I agree with aquila that lazz is the best blogger!

by Doug D 29.02.16 17:12

Still more! Lazz on a marathon.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **sandancer** 29.02.16 17:42

Thank you Doug D . I totally agree about l-azzeri being the best blog . I have been steadily working my way through his/her work !

Does anyone have any idea who l-azzeri is ?

Whoever , certainly pulls no punches . This forum the P.J Files and his/her blogs should be compulsary reading for all !

by Doug D 01.03.16 8:38

No sleep for Lazz then:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Doug D 06.03.16 11:22

Maddie’s Mum Mothers Day

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by willowthewisp 06.03.16 12:04

Doug D wrote:Maddie’s Mum Mothers Day

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Another quality post but I do not think the people it is directed towards will read it, as of their "Code of Ethics/Silence" or as they say in the USA,"5th Amendment?

by Doug D 06.03.16 12:50

And a bit more light reading for a Sunday:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Liz Eagles 06.03.16 14:27

Lazz never fails to put things into perspective for me with hard-hitting, factual blogs. No fluffy stuff from Lazz, just occasional and somewhat subdued anger at what is an outrageous farce, Lazz says it as it is.

Some people want to know who Lazz is (some people think it's me - it isn't). I don't want to know who Lazz is. I'm only interested in the blog content. I don't want to know the identity of the author. I don't want to be distracted from the content.

Lazz is without doubt the best blogger.