The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Mm11

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Mm11

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Regist10

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Page 33 of 34 Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by SixMillionQuid 25.06.15 19:14

SixMillionQuid wrote:So Wayback did not archive the result of webcrawl of the CEOP website on 30 April 2007 with mccann.html as the filename?

If all mccann related web pages were created after this date then I'm struggling to understand how the Wayback machine 'invented' the 30 April 2007 archive date.

No takers then?

Why would the Wayback machine backdate a webcrawl back to the 30 April 2007?

____________________
"It is my belief that Scotland Yard was set out on a mission, not one to find out what happened to Madeleine McCann but to rewrite the history of the case in such a way that the majority of the public simply forgets the past." - The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency
SixMillionQuid
SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Activity : 445
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 19:18

@SMQ. No takers because nobody has an answer other than 'it can't be right', and repeat a hundred times.
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by cloak'ndagger 25.06.15 20:00

HKP wrote:@SMQ. No takers because nobody has an answer other than 'it can't be right', and repeat a hundred times.
The time has to be constant .It is a robot.  It cannot crawl [grab] material relating to the future.
avatar
cloak'ndagger

Posts : 118
Activity : 133
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2014-08-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whodunnit 25.06.15 20:14

The arguments more or less boils down to: the WBM captured a file that lacks any evidence whatsoever of ever having been captured [Oct. 23-24] and erroneously filed it away in a file that never existed in the first place. [April 30] dontgetit
Anonymous
whodunnit
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 20:16

@ PeterMac

Is there a reason why another archiving site would NOT record this.

It's hit and miss, not everything was crawled by some of the archives, particularly the further back you go.


@ Cloak'nDagger

The time has to be constant .It is a robot.  It cannot crawl [grab] material relating to the future.

No, but it can grab material, store it, then add the wrong date when it's retrieved.
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 20:28

@cloak'ndagger. The McCann. htm had no future material.
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by SixMillionQuid 25.06.15 21:04

Nuala wrote:@ PeterMac

Is there a reason why another archiving site would NOT record this.

It's hit and miss, not everything was crawled by some of the archives, particularly the further back you go.


@ Cloak'nDagger

The time has to be constant .It is a robot.  It cannot crawl [grab] material relating to the future.

No, but it can grab material, store it, then add the wrong date when it's retrieved.

So the first page Steve Marsden identified (mccann.html) had the wrong date when the record was retrieved i.e. the correct date is some other date after 30 April 2007?

____________________
"It is my belief that Scotland Yard was set out on a mission, not one to find out what happened to Madeleine McCann but to rewrite the history of the case in such a way that the majority of the public simply forgets the past." - The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency
SixMillionQuid
SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Activity : 445
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 21:29

@ SixMillionQuid

So the first page Steve Marsden identified (mccann.html) had the wrong date when the record was retrieved i.e. the correct date is some other date after 30 April 2007?

That's what Wayback says, and it's what I believe happened as well.

It just so happens that the crawl date span for that page is April 30th 2007 to Sep 4th 2009, so it appears to me that it erroneously defaulted to the first date in the span on retrieval.
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by SixMillionQuid 25.06.15 21:42

Nuala wrote:@ SixMillionQuid

So the first page Steve Marsden identified (mccann.html) had the wrong date when the record was retrieved i.e. the correct date is some other date after 30 April 2007?

That's what Wayback says, and it's what I believe happened as well.

It just so happens that the crawl date span for that page is April 30th 2007 to Sep 4th 2009, so it appears to me that it erroneously defaulted to the first date in the span on retrieval.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So 20070430115803  in the URL is a retrieval datestamp? I thought it was the date the page was first archived.

____________________
"It is my belief that Scotland Yard was set out on a mission, not one to find out what happened to Madeleine McCann but to rewrite the history of the case in such a way that the majority of the public simply forgets the past." - The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency
SixMillionQuid
SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Activity : 445
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Richard D. Hall 25.06.15 22:02

Is there some sort of fanfare if the thread reaches 100 pages?
Richard D. Hall
Richard D. Hall
Investigator

Posts : 129
Activity : 274
Likes received : 141
Join date : 2015-01-21

http://www.madeleinefilms.net/

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 22:03

@ SixMillionQuid

So 20070430115803  in the URL is a retrieval datestamp? I thought it was the date the page was first archived.

The URL isn't created until and unless the page is retrieved. At that point the URL is created with a date corresponding to the date Wayback also adds to the HTML coding of the page itself.

That date is retrieved from Wayback's archive database (for want of a better word) and is supposed to represent the date Wayback's crawler crawled the page, but nothing is 100% perfect.

Indeed Wayback makes it clear that if the date of a page is important for legal reasons it is up to the person wanting that proof to prove it.

In other words, Wayback makes no claims for a date to be absolutely correct, none at all.

Which is hardly surprising. Software is only as good as those that program it, so there will always be times when it doesn't work properly. It's not some infallible thing that is never wrong.

As we all know smilie
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:05

@SMS. It‘s the archive date, not retrieval
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:08

Looks like we're moving into 485 billion questionable dates territory; laughable
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by PeterMac 25.06.15 22:14

HKP wrote:Looks like we're moving into 485 billion questionable dates territory; laughable

It makes the "Date stamp" of 3/5/7 on the Last Photo 'LUDICROUS"
Everyone knows that was a forgery ! (Probably !)
PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 13945
Activity : 16948
Likes received : 2075
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by worriedmum 25.06.15 22:17

At the risk of appearing gormless here, can some-one please spell out to  me , in non-technical language,what  WBM say has happened and what the alternative possibilities are?
worriedmum
worriedmum

Posts : 2062
Activity : 2819
Likes received : 583
Join date : 2012-01-17

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:24

@nuala. Archive.org will also:-



[size=31]The Internet Archive will provide printed pages and a standard affidavit of authenticity. [/size][size=31]We require five business days from receipt of payment to turn around most requests. Requests for especially large numbers of URLs may take longer or we may contact you and ask that you limit your request. Errors contained in your request will also delay the process. Please be patient so we can fix these errors for you. [/size]
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:30

@PeterMac. It certainly appears that the McCanns and verifiable dates don't mix.
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Empty Chamber 25.06.15 22:32

Its kinda strange how all these monitored sites are starting to gel. Even Ghetto Monk on GLP has unbanned Alex Jones.
As you were.
Anonymous
Empty Chamber
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty

Post by Skyrocket1 25.06.15 22:37

Whodunnit - thanks.

I have found the 27 April 2007 ceop.gov.uk page archived on the website 'archive.is'. If you open it up for some reason it states 'redirected' from the 30 April 2007 date stamp - no idea why it would link back to this (I didn't input it at any stage).

One other thing which is bothering me - the jpeg images of MBM being used are filed as madeleine_01.jpg and madeleine_02.jpg. 01 is the 'young' photo and 02 is the 'tennis photo'. BUT as the 'young' photo was the only one showing on the original 30 April/13 May/22 May appeal pages I assumed this would be the one I would find with the 30 April date stamp, but I haven't found it with this date (yet). I have found this date stamp for the 'tennis' photo  - work that one out. It would be interesting if anyone out there has the data for the appeal page with only the one photo i.e. from 17 June 2015.

Nothing makes sense including the 31 July and 7 October dates given by WBM. Apart from anything else (including news items being post 7 October) what are the chances that 2 separate misfiles would end up on the same date?

This extraordinary admission of misfiling by WBM must extrapolate out to thousands more mistakes - it can't be that the ceop site would be the only one singled out twice in 3 months.
Anonymous
Skyrocket1
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 22:39

@ HKP

The Internet Archive will provide printed pages and a standard affidavit of authenticity. We require five business days from receipt of payment to turn around most requests. Requests for especially large numbers of URLs may take longer or we may contact you and ask that you limit your request. Errors contained in your request will also delay the process. Please be patient so we can fix these errors for you.

Yes, but that says nothing about dates of pages, which is what we're interested in here, unless I've misunderstood why you posted that paragraph?
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:43

@nuala. Authenticating the page means it was the exact content at the stated date otherwise what is there to authenticate?
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Skyrocket1 25.06.15 22:49

Nuala Today at 9:29 pm
@ SixMillionQuid

So the first page Steve Marsden identified (mccann.html) had the wrong date when the record was retrieved i.e. the correct date is some other date after 30 April 2007?

That's what Wayback says, and it's what I believe happened as well.

It just so happens that the crawl date span for that page is April 30th 2007 to Sep 4th 2009, so it appears to me that it erroneously defaulted to the first date in the span on retrieval.
 
-----------------------------------------------------

HANG ON - Sorry, I'm losing the plot a bit. If it defaulted to the first page in the span on retrieval and the first page in the span was the 30 April 2007, your saying that the mccann.html 30 April page was in existence for it to default to. That answers everything doesn't it or is it past my bedtime?
Anonymous
Skyrocket1
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by siobhan3443 25.06.15 22:51

 Skyrocket1 




it gives the 13/may date because it was searched and archived by archive.is after waybackmachine changed it. i know because i submitted it to be archived the other day - you can submit links to be archived. there was nothing archived on that site until i ran the page, waybackmachine had change the link before i ran it


a
Anonymous
siobhan3443
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Skyrocket1 25.06.15 22:57

siobhan3443 Today at 10:51 pm
 Skyrocket1

it gives the 13/may date because it was searched and archived by archive.is after waybackmachine changed it. i know because i submitted it to be archived the other day - you can submit links to be archived. there was nothing archived on that site until i ran the page, waybackmachine had change the link before i ran it

--------------------------------------------


Thanks Siobhan - but yours isn't the record I was talking about. There was one on there prior to yours which is dated the 27 April 2007. This is the one with the 803 link and I think it was already on there before all this blew up.
Anonymous
Skyrocket1
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 22:59

@nuala. To counter my own affidavit argument if found this which means you were correct

Does the Internet Archive's affidavit mean that the printout was actually the page posted on the Web at the recorded time?
The Internet Archive's affidavit only affirms that the printed document is a true and correct copy of our records. It remains your burden to convince the finder of fact what pages were up when.
Seems a bit useless if you ask me!
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 23:00

@ HKP

Authenticating the page means it was the exact content at the stated date otherwise what is there to authenticate?

Okay, but note that if Wayback was authenticating mccann.html they would authenticate it with a date in July 2007, because they've said the 30th April 2007 date is incorrect.
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Nuala 25.06.15 23:11

@ HKP

Seems a bit useless if you ask me!

What seems to be missing from the debate, and not aiming this at you just generally, is that Wayback is a non-profit organisation trying to maintain an archive of web pages that have appeared on the Internet, since well . . . . way back.

It's like a museum, storing exhibits. It's not meant for legal cases, it's not what it was intended for, or designed for.

Because it is there, of course people have used it in legal cases, but it's not the job of Wayback to provide irrefutable proof that a certain web page contained certain information on a certain date.

So it's not useless, it's doing the job it intends to do and is designed to do. Any legal stuff is secondary and TBH almost certainly unwelcome by Wayback, though they do, of course, co-operate with legal cases if asked to do so.
avatar
Nuala

Posts : 130
Activity : 130
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-19

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by jack dexter 25.06.15 23:15

Cant believe that kate and gerry are not here with us looking for their daughter. Possible the biggest lead they may ever have and they are nowhere to be seen. Maybe they are working with wbm already, 
  I know i would be if it was my child.
avatar
jack dexter

Posts : 48
Activity : 57
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2014-05-24

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whodunnit 25.06.15 23:19

"Okay, but note that if Wayback was authenticating mccann.html they would authenticate it with a date in July 2007, because they've said the 30th April 2007 date is incorrect."


Which literally makes no sense. It amounts to panicked gibberish spouted by Mr. Butler after he was told in so many words "This is a high profile case, very sensitive, be careful how you reply". You just can't do that.

The April 30th, 2007 date can be independently authenticated in the code of both pages--homepage and mccann.html by the sequential previous/next date codes embedded in the redirected pages now extant on the WBM site. This authentication extends to the original screenshots of the mccann.html captures of the page and it's date code. In my opinion a judge or jury would have no trouble believing that mccann.html existed on April 30.
Anonymous
whodunnit
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 33 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by HKP 25.06.15 23:22

@nuala. I meant the authentication is useless if they are not willing to stand by what they are giving you with a caveat of you need to further prove it yourself. I and many others know archive.org are non profit making, they provide a service, their data has of course been used in court of law and I'm sure they are actually proud of the integrity of their machine. As for they will now authenticate the McCann file as July, that is seriously flawed as well.
Anonymous
HKP
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 33 of 34 Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum