Re: Is SKY NEWS making a film about Madeleine McCann? - Report from Richard D Hall's meeting in Nottingham last night (1 April)

by Richard IV 03.04.15 14:34

When you think about it, JK is hardly going to tarnish her reputation. She is now quite well established in the `media establishment` doing `what the papers say` and acceptable documentaries. She`s not going to upset the McCanns now is she and have her name blackened.

by jeanmonroe 03.04.15 14:47

DaSteelMan wrote:

From the questions I asked her, my instincts tell me that I may well be correct that the agenda is to portray 'abduction' doubters as trolls.

She also referred to me as a group, as a collective.

To be fair to Jenny, she says the reason she contacted me was because she says I've pestered her lots of times to look at the McCann case. This is TRUE, I like Jenny's work and for a few years I've said she should look at the case (like other journos). However she is not interested in aspects of inconsistencies - she is interested in 'doubters' and with her Sky News/Guardian/Hacked Off connections then this to me is no good.

Again, to be fair to Jenny, she said she wouldn't interview anyone that didn't want to be interviewed.
====================================
"From the questions I asked her, my instincts tell me that I may well be correct that the agenda is to portray 'abduction' doubters as trolls"

"THE AGENDA"? As 'PORTRAYED' by whom, for whom?
=============================
"She also referred to me as a group, as a collective."

Well, THAT'S just plain...... 'weird'!
===========================================
"....and for a few years I've said she should look at the case (like other journos). However she is not interested in aspects of inconsistencies......"

"Investigative journalism" at it's very, VERY, BEST then?
================================================
She said she "wouldn't interview anyone that didn't want to be interviewed."

Stating the bleed**g obvious!

You can't 'interview' someone that dosen't want to be 'interviewed'!
--------------------------------

Is Mrs Kleeman prepared to put her outstanding documentaries, reputation, on the 'line' for a few of Murdoch's 'shillings'?

"Another one bites the dust"?

by DaSteelMan 03.04.15 15:18

@ DaSteelMan

A few acid tests of her article/documentary might be:

1. Whether she mentions Richard's documentary in a positive light and perhaps shows a clip from it

2. Whether she mentions the alerts of Martin Grime's dogs - and highlights the fact that Grime is so highly regarded internationally that he was head-hunted by the F.B.I., and

3. Whether she acknowledges things like: the large number of people who have watched Hall's documentary, the professional authors & criminal profilers etc. who doubt the official version, PeterMac's e-book, written by an ex-police inspector, etc. etc.

A journalist's prime duty is to inform. In most cases, it is also a journalist's task to provide balance between opposing views.

We will probably know soon if Kleeman passes these tests.

P.S. I bought a ticket for Richard Hall's show in Hatfield (Herts) tomorrow morning; if anyone from CMOMM is also going, I look forward to meeting you there

I agree with these suggested acid-tests.

I know @veniviedivici is now hassling her on Twitter in his usual unhelpful way ... but what if she was just to put out a tweet on the lines of:

"Yes, I am doing a film on 'X' for reasons 'Y' and I want you to contact me" .... I'm not explaining well, but you get my drift.

For some reason my Twitter DM conversation with her has vanished. Perhaps she deleted the DM conversation? Perhaps it deletes when you block/unblock someone? Fortunatly Ive screenshot the entire conversation.

by jeanmonroe 03.04.15 16:28

For some reason my Twitter DM conversation with her has vanished. Perhaps she deleted the DM conversation? Perhaps it deletes when you block/unblock someone? Fortunately I've screenshotted the entire conversation..

DaSteelMan
====================================
And there's the 'rub'

'people' can be 'played' at their 'own' game!

I have loads of 'screen shots' where 'people' have sworn blind 'i didn't say that' 'that wasn't me'

when 'confronted' by the 'evidence'(ss) we sheepishly hear "Agh, oh, er..... OH, THAT one?"

And it's on the internet faster than you can say, "sh*t, did i just say/do that?"

Put you 'convo' shots on a disk, for 'research' only purposes, obviously. winkwink

eta: It's not 'illegal' to 'screen shot'

the McCann's media 'monitor' Michael Wrong and the McCann's 'dossier' compilers have 'taught' us THAT! laughat

by **Tony Bennett** 03.04.15 21:26

DaSteelMan wrote:Tony, I want to ask you a question in private. PM to you doesn't work. Is the email link active?

My e-mail is all over the net and you are welcome to contact me at:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by whatsupdoc 03.04.15 22:57

I don't seem to be able to edit my post so can I just correct the link to Richard D. Hall's website. It's [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by MRNOODLES 03.04.15 23:06

If you ask me, it smells a bit of pre-empting Ed forming some sort of government come May. And maybe Labour will shut down Op Grange and finish it off with a docu about the poor McCanns and their innocence and all the fruit loop trolls who doubt them. Plus that election vote where half of us (including me) saying we'd vote Ukip will be used against us.

Just my opinion which I hope I'm way off the mark.

by Mark Willis 04.04.15 7:52

Let's make this simple and cut to the quick.

Look what happened to Ms Hutton and The Sun.

That should a warning to all, NEVER volunteer anything or yourself to the Press (MSM)

They are a dying breed owing to the Internet (which they see as anathema to their "trade"), the medium by which all news will one day usurp TV as more devices become Internet enabled.

However "nice" Ms Kleeman is she is working for the Guardian which is MSM ergo YOU or anyone else will have the MSM's agenda spin put on anything you say.

My advice to everyone is to never (if you can avoid them) speak to the Press or MSM in any shape or form as veracity is an alien concept to them.

To conclude, look what happened to poor Brenda RIP. Perhaps a non sequitur but the MSM?; therein lies danger to anyone.

by jeanmonroe 04.04.15 10:56

So,.'ANTI' McCann 'trolls'

We've had MB (proxy 4 Sky News) 'contacting' a 'friend' of BL, and sent 'packing' because Sky wouldn't 'pay' for an, er, 'interview', days before he started 'following' BL and then 'contacting' her (literally) for his 'exclusiff' on 'trolls'. (non believers, ANTI, of McCann 'story')

Then we have SP, 'asking' for only ANTI McCann 'people' to contact her, for a 'piece' in a Murdoch (Sky news 'owner') paper about ANTI McCann 'trolls'

We all know how well that went, don't we?

RH 'made out' to be a complete, 'vindictive' nutter!

Now we have Channel 4 'doing a piece' on 'trolls', supposedly, and outside R Hall's 'tour' venue(?) and 'asking' only ANTI McCann 'people' to contact them.

Re; "SteelMan"

thinking

"If it looks like a 'plan', smells like a 'plan', etc., ..................IT'S A 'PLAN''!

By MSM 'against' INSOLENT, non-believing, 'ANTI McCann',......... 'nutters'

Of course, we'll hear ALL 'msm', screaming from the 'rooftops', should it all go 'pear shaped' for their 'perceived' er, 'heroes'...................."THEY (McCanns) DIDN'T FOOL US, NOT FOR A MILLI-SECOND. WE ALWAYS 'KNEW' THEY WERE 'INVOLVED'. WE'RE NOT 'DUMMIES' Y'KNOW.

by Mark Willis 04.04.15 11:06

This is the current agenda by the McMSM.
After the massive backfire by SKY they are trying to lure the unsuspecting into thinking the media will give them a voice on matters McCann.
That is never going to happen. Certainly so far.
It will never happen unless or until the Mcs are charged and convicted of anything.
Until such a time then the Press will stitch you up, of that there is no doubt whatsoever.

P.S.
After Savile died of course the BBC wouldn't air anything given how that would be exposing their own doorstep to being soiled.
Naturally, MWT dived in, like he will when/should the tide turns re Mcs.

by Liz Eagles 04.04.15 11:22

Mark Willis wrote:This is the current agenda by the McMSM.
After the massive backfire by SKY they are trying to lure the unsuspecting into thinking the media will give them a voice on matters McCann.
That is never going to happen. Certainly so far.
It will never happen unless or until the Mcs are charged and convicted of anything.
Until such a time then the Press will stitch you up, of that there is no doubt whatsoever.

P.S.
After Savile died of course the BBC wouldn't air anything given how that would be exposing their own doorstep to being soiled.
Naturally, MWT dived in, like he will when/should the tide turns re Mcs.

MWT is a bit of a mystery. How can this man be given a pass to watch child porn?

His credentials as a police officer are less than clear. One could almost say they are murky/opaque.

...but hey ho, MWT is flogging his stuff to the mainstream media and he's doing very well backed up occasionally by a top bloke who was his mentor.

It's as much of a mystery as why Jim Gamble went to Vietnam and is now flogging his stuff to the media, the establishment and peddling his wares as some sort of child protection internet guru when in actual fact his track record and achievement in CEOP is well....not clear.

MWT has now done an expose in The Mirror regarding the murder of Jill Dando which offers nothing other than to say it was a mob hit but it came with all the promise of some sort of breakthrough that's a similar breakthrough that DCI Redwood portrayed to the media in the Crime Watch extravaganza. A load of old hogwash.

by Mark Willis 04.04.15 11:32

"A load of old hogwash."

Indeed it is given the same gun used turned up in Liverpool some years later.
Mob/gang hit my aunt Fanny. About as credible as Dr Kelly's "suicide"
Much more credible is the possibility of Dando exposing paedophile rings very much too close to home...

MWT goes where the rewards (££) are, whichever way the wind blows.
He is pro Mc as of now but will hastily do a 180 should they be prosecuted.

by Liz Eagles 04.04.15 13:23

Mark Willis wrote:"A load of old hogwash."

Indeed it is given the same gun used turned up in Liverpool some years later.
Mob/gang hit my aunt Fanny. About as credible as Dr Kelly's "suicide"
Much more credible is the possibility of Dando exposing paedophile rings very much too close to home...

MWT goes where the rewards (££) are, whichever way the wind blows.
He is pro Mc as of now but will hastily do a 180 should they be prosecuted.

Didn't Jill Dando's fiance Alan Farthing become Surgeon-Gynaecologist to the Royal household?

That's quite an honour.

by Mark Willis 04.04.15 14:13

aquila wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:"A load of old hogwash."

Indeed it is given the same gun used turned up in Liverpool some years later.
Mob/gang hit my aunt Fanny. About as credible as Dr Kelly's "suicide"
Much more credible is the possibility of Dando exposing paedophile rings very much too close to home...

MWT goes where the rewards (££) are, whichever way the wind blows.
He is pro Mc as of now but will hastily do a 180 should they be prosecuted.
Didn't Jill Dando's fiance Alan Farthing become Surgeon-Gynaecologist to the Royal household?

That's quite an honour.

Yes, like a promotion amongst "friends" - so to speak.
And also "Kitty" Richard was interviewed.

by Guest 04.04.15 20:26

Tony Bennett wrote:
DaSteelMan wrote:I have tweeted Jenny for a few years because I like her documentary work, especially for Channel 4 Despatches. I have asked her why the likes of herself and other freelancers stay away from the McCann case.

Now she wanted to do an interview on video with myself on the topic of: "Growing number of people that believe the media isn't telling the real story of M McCann".

Not an indepth interview on the aspects of the case, but the general feeling of why people like myself feel the way we do about the Main Stream Media's biased coverage.

All sounds great, yeah? Sounds plausible?

I immediately asked the following questions:

1) Who was funding the documentary? ... Ans: The Guardian

2) Where will this 'docu' be broadcast? ... Ans: The Guardian website

3) Are you planning on tricking /portraying people like myself in bad light, like Brenda Leyland? ... Ans: No, the film is about people who think the media haven't asked the right questions.

4) Why are you doing this now, at this time? ... Ans: I've been getting lots of tweets from people wanting me to do this.

Now, I was considering this because I've got nothing to hide. I use my real name and use my real identity etc and I have never crossed any line of legality towards anyone when outing my feelings on the case. However ... an alarm bell rang:

A) The Guardian were the only UK newspaper to to accept Leveson recommendations

B) Hacked Off also want Leveson recommendations pushed through and are friendly with The Guardian

C) Gerry McCann was allowed to write an article in The Guardian around the time of the Brenda Leyland tragedy

So the Jenny Kleeman / Guardian / Hacked Off / Leveson / Gerald McCann connection is evident.

However, Jenny may be 100% genuine in her reasoning for wanting to interview ordinary folk on opinion of why MSM are not asking the right questions. I deep down hope she is genuine, because I like her and the work she does. But why is The Guardian willing to fund her and her crew to travel 100s of miles to interview myself and probably others?

It also crossed my mind that this was a planned Team McCann counteraction to Sonia Poulton's documentary or Richard D. Halls.

It also crossed my mind that Jenny also is a regular for the newspaper review on Sky News and of course there is the Gamble, Brunt connection.

As I said, I hope Jenny is doing this for the right reasons, but reading the fact that Jenny was stalking outside of Richard D. Hall's gig and not allowing him to see the final version of any agreed interview suggests something is not quite right.

Needless to say, I will refuse to get involved.
@ DaSteelMan

Thank you very much for posting this infomation about Jenny Kleeman for us all to digest.

And your points (A), (B) and (C) are absolutely relevant.

From what you have written, we can deduce that Jenny Kleeman and the Guardian have no interest whatsoever in reporting any of the many 'hidden' facts about the case that have been so skilfully buried by the McCann Team and the mainstream media for the past 8 years.

I wonder, then, what Jenny Kleeman's motive was for pursuing Richard Hall, and then filming outside his meeting the other night?

Was it:

(A) Because she wants to share with Guardian readers the facts and truths that Richard Hall covered in his documentary?,

OR

(B) To portray him just as someone into flying saucers and various off-beat alternative views, enabling the Guardian to try to pass off all McCann-doubters as deluded conspiracy theorists?

A few acid tests of her article/documentary might be:

1. Whether she mentions Richard's documentary in a positive light and perhaps shows a clip from it

2. Whether she mentions the alerts of Martin Grime's dogs - and highlights the fact that Grime is so highly regarded internationally that he was head-hunted by the F.B.I., and

3. Whether she acknowledges things like: the large number of people who have watched Hall's documentary, the professional authors & criminal profilers etc. who doubt the official version, PeterMac's e-book, written by an ex-police inspector, etc. etc.

A journalist's prime duty is to inform. In most cases, it is also a journalist's task to provide balance between opposing views.

We will probably know soon if Kleeman passes these tests.

P.S. I bought a ticket for Richard Hall's show in Hatfield (Herts) tomorrow morning; if anyone from CMOMM is also going, I look forward to meeting you there

TB, did you go to Richard's show today? Look forward to reading your comments if you did.

by **Tony Bennett** 04.04.15 22:25

Ladyinred wrote:
TB, did you go to Richard's show today? Look forward to reading your comments if you did.

@ Ladyinred Yes I did go, and in the process met one of CMOMM's legion of 'lurkers'.

A brief report on Richard Hall’s talk at Hatfield, 4 April 2015

So here goes.

I made 5 pages of notes before I left early.

Here’s a quick summary of what was covered.

There were about 110 present, hardly a spare seat in the room.

He referred to his two new feature-length films:

1) ‘Patsy Driver’, about the ‘Cumbria shootings’ on 2 June 2010 which left 12 dead and 11 injured. There were 24 shooting incidents and 90 first-hand witnesses. Hall had spoken to 26 of them and had taken statements from 26. There was evidence of a much younger accomplice. There were 3 shootings in Whitehaven but though there were plenty of CCTV images, none had been published of Bird doing the shootings in that town. A full BBC News team had arrived mysteriously early. There were no witnesses to the first two shootings, one of which was of a solicitor, Kevin Commons, senior partner in legal firm KJ Commons, which was pursuing legal action against United Utilities whose alleged negligence was said to have caused the Cumbrian floods a few months previous. There’s a reference to this here:

Cumbria flood victims lining up suit against United Utilities

By Rowena Mason
Published: 11:54PM GMT 13 Feb 2010

United Utilities is facing a potential mass action suit from up to 100 victims of the Cumbria floods who are unhappy with the water company's defences.

Law firm KJ Commons is acting for those who believe they have a claim against the company, including people whose property has been damaged and those who have large insurance excesses.

Homeowners living near United Utilities' Thirlmere reservoir are angry that the lake was overflowing for three weeks before the flood.

Markus Nickson, a senior lawyer at the firm, has written to United Utilities asking for a "detailed breakdown of its actions in the period up to and during the flood on November 19" as a pre-action disclosure.

No claim has been filed, but the company has been notified that its actions are under "close examination with a view to proceedings being commenced for compensation".

The water company replied that it would "like to place on record that we do not consider we are liable to pay any compensation to your clients".

A large suit against United Utilities could be costly for the water company already facing the prospect of having to spend high levels of funding to maintain defences.

Campaigners have urged the company to keep the water levels of its Thirlmere reservoir 3m below maximum, leaving room for heavy downpours. After the flood, the company confirmed that Thirlmere had been overflowing since late October.

The possibility of a mass action comes after Lord Campbell-Savours, a former MP for Workington, told the House of Lords that United Utilities ought to be doing more to prevent flooding in the area.

He asked for "an end to United Utilities resisting reductions in water levels on the dam in high rainfall periods; and an end to the delay in the funding of flood protection measures on west Cumbria rivers, in particular the Greta in Keswick."

A spokesman for the water company said: "So far as we are aware, no proceedings have been issued. This claim remains at an investigative stage and we will vigorously defend any claim should one arise."

2) ‘Phantoms’, a 3-hour film about alleged abductors supposedly seen carrying a child. He introduced his clips on Madeleine McCann with a full-screen pic of Redwood’s 'Crecheman’ - and then said something like ‘I believe this man [Redwood] should be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice with what I have suggested in my film is an obvious fabrication’.

At this stage of typing up my report, I have just noticed this write-up:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It summarises what Hall’s talk was all about better than I could. So I will leave it there, except to say that at the end of his segment on Madeleine, he referred to a certain theory - which I dare not repeat here - which he said had four circumstantial lines of evidence supporting it, which he proceeded to explain at some length.

He also reproduced on-screen copies of his correspondence with Jenny Kleeman, which began with an e-mail from her on 16 March.

by Mark Willis 05.04.15 7:22

Read that, read the link, yet...

The moral of the McTale is, until such mavericks as RH's (rather, their work) gets MSM broadcasting space the impact will remain about zero. The public are way too lazy to have to go search for the "news". They are much happier to be spoon fed by the TV and the newspapers - no effort required.
That is, the general public are oblivious to all the strange activity that has taken place around the Mcs.
Until such time, when the MSM allow something like RH's work to be given air time, then the song remains the same.

The MSM have a firm hold on what we're told and because it's on TV and in the newspapers, both dinosaurs, then the public will swallow it.

So you can make as many films as you want, do as many tours as you like, but only those who already are savvy to the whole (almost) 8 years of deception will be taking any notice.

So no TV, no newspaper verbatim exposés, then situation status quo.

by Guest 05.04.15 8:02

MW, I agree with you regarding media and journalists. However, let's not forget that there are probably super-inaudibles in place which restrict any meaningful reporting of this case.

by Mark Willis 05.04.15 8:12

Ladyinred wrote:MW, I agree with you regarding media and journalists. However, let's not forget that there are probably super-inaudibles in place which restrict any meaningful reporting of this case.

There is a pan-media blackout regards negativity re the Mcs; that much must be obvious to Stevie Wonder.
Akin to a D-notice, or whatever it's called, the media are instructed (by "concerned parties", aka our Government/Westminster) to promote the Mcs, not offer any truth. ( e.g. we know the Westminster Inquiry will never get anywhere regards historic and extant perversion apropos minors and ministers...)

The Mcs are a gift to a dying media whose agenda is to prop up their ineluctable doom before they are superceded by the Internet.

That day will come, but expect a very protracted, dirty and ruthless fight to the death.

by Guest 05.04.15 8:31

IMO, it's the MCs and their legals who are behind any injunctions.

by Mark Willis 05.04.15 8:40

I consider that TEAM Mc comprise UK Goverment (esp ex-PMs and current one), themselves, various gov agencies such as MI5, 6, Special Branch, assorted "spokespersons" (you know who I mean, plural), the mainstream media, especially SKY and Murdoch owned rags, and a sundry few mega rich persons who also have been embroiled in this sordid affair.
The Mcs, per se, are the vanguard of the defence of those unknown up to God knows what.

by Guest 05.04.15 9:17

Mark Willis wrote:I consider that TEAM Mc comprise UK Goverment (esp ex-PMs and current one), themselves, various gov agencies such as MI5, 6, Special Branch, assorted "spokespersons" (you know who I mean, plural), the mainstream media, especially SKY and Murdoch owned rags, and a sundry few mega rich persons who also have been embroiled in this sordid affair.
The Mcs, per se, are the vanguard of the defence of those unknown up to God knows what.

by **Richard D. Hall** 05.04.15 10:18

Mark Willis wrote:Read that, read the link, yet...

The moral of the McTale is, until such mavericks as RH's (rather, their work) gets MSM broadcasting space the impact will remain about zero. The public are way too lazy to have to go search for the "news". They are much happier to be spoon fed by the TV and the newspapers - no effort required.
That is, the general public are oblivious to all the strange activity that has taken place around the Mcs.
Until such time, when the MSM allow something like RH's work to be given air time, then the song remains the same.

The MSM have a firm hold on what we're told and because it's on TV and in the newspapers, both dinosaurs, then the public will swallow it.

So you can make as many films as you want, do as many tours as you like, but only those who already are savvy to the whole (almost) 8 years of deception will be taking any notice.

So no TV, no newspaper verbatim exposés, then situation status quo.

In reply to this I would say the following. In general I agree. However, if you consider the numbers that have watched my film, there has to be a breakthrough number. For example if 10 million watched it wouldn't you agree the damn would probably crack? - Current youtube stats show it is approaching half a million. Not enough to crack the damn, but enough to concern them, hence the current actions of trying to deal with the public "belief". The reason why I chose to make a film about this issue, is because I knew it was the issue that would get the most number of views online, hence the best issue to expose MSM on. If you accept defeat before the battle you will lose. If you believe in yourself at all times you might win.

by Mark Willis 05.04.15 12:21

Richard D. Hall wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:Read that, read the link, yet...

The moral of the McTale is, until such mavericks as RH's (rather, their work) gets MSM broadcasting space the impact will remain about zero. The public are way too lazy to have to go search for the "news". They are much happier to be spoon fed by the TV and the newspapers - no effort required.
That is, the general public are oblivious to all the strange activity that has taken place around the Mcs.
Until such time, when the MSM allow something like RH's work to be given air time, then the song remains the same.

The MSM have a firm hold on what we're told and because it's on TV and in the newspapers, both dinosaurs, then the public will swallow it.

So you can make as many films as you want, do as many tours as you like, but only those who already are savvy to the whole (almost) 8 years of deception will be taking any notice.

So no TV, no newspaper verbatim exposés, then situation status quo.

In reply to this I would say the following. In general I agree. However, if you consider the numbers that have watched my film, there has to be a breakthrough number. For example if 10 million watched it wouldn't you agree the damn would probably crack? - Current youtube stats show it is approaching half a million. Not enough to crack the damn, but enough to concern them, hence the current actions of trying to deal with the public "belief". The reason why I chose to make a film about this issue, is because I knew it was the issue that would get the most number of views online, hence the best issue to expose MSM on. If you accept defeat before the battle you will lose. If you believe in yourself at all times you might win.

I've not thrown the towel in, yet. I have been on this case since Day 2 (not day 1, I am not that prescient!).
I have just about seen every clip of the Mcs, every forum, group, blog, MSM crap and so on for coming up to 8 years next month.
I watched all your first 4 videos and I learned quite a few new things, (thanks for those) and it was great to see the 8 years of this scam all rolled into one, so to speak (ok, 4).
The viewing numbers ordinarily would have almost guaranteed some MSM air time. But this is the McMedia since mid 2008.
I would absolutely love your vids and the Phantoms to be sufficiently cumulative to pass that tipping point and turn heads, those numbed noggins that vegetate in front of the telly and struggle with The Sun crossword.
We saw how the BBC wouldn't touch Savile (and we know why) until he kindly ran up the curtain allowing in the hovering vulture(s).
I had great hopes for Ms Poulton on The People's Voice (Icke TV) until they caved in to OFCOM at the first hurdle - that is, TPV was going to be just another on line channel - I had hoped it would get on Freeview via one of their channels.
The MSM are desperate to dilute the impact of the Internet to save their own medium, although they will be first to jump ship and become high rollers on the Net when TV is finally shoved down the pecking order, not exactly something that's going to happen quick enough for me.
Anyway, you know what I am saying and how the public are so credulous and lazy.
Who knows, your work may be the catalyst for some action(s) in the necessary areas, places, people. You've certainly added to the plethora of McStuff on line, big time.
If this country ever allowed Amaral's book on sale then I figure your vids or yourself would be on TV in a flash.
Let's hope Amaral wins that Lisbon damages debacle - I can see the fawning MSM headlines spin on that right now.
And SKY's silence.

Is SKY NEWS making a film about Madeleine McCann? - Report from Richard D Hall's meeting in Nottingham last night (1 April)