Blacksmith - Stating The McCann's Will Settle On Amaral's Terms ........PLUS NEW ***McCanns ask for extrajudicial settlement by Joana Morais**TRIAL NOW SUSPENDED**

candyfloss wrote:Here is more confirmation from Joana blog.......

McCanns ask for extrajudicial settlement


24 January 2013 | Posted by Joana Morais

They were the ones who took him to court for defamation and asked to suspend the judgement in order to negotiate. On the eve of the trial of Gonçalo Amaral, against whom they filed a complaint, the McCanns asked to negotiate.

by Hernâni Carvalho

It's not often the one that accuses that asks to negotiate but in this case it was so. TVmais found that, on the eve of Gonçalo Amaral's trial, the McCann couple lawyers proposed a meeting in order to reach an extrajudicial settlement[out of court).

In court, Madeleine McCann's parents demanded from Gonçalo Amaral (see box*) a compensation of 1,2 million euro for alleged defamation. Now it's them who propose an extrajudicial settlement. TVmais also learned the lawyers for the defendants (sic) have accepted a meeting to take place within the following 20 days.

As all parties have agreed, the start of the trial, scheduled for 24th of this month at the 1st Civil Court of Lisbon, “has been suspended because the parties are trying to reach an agreement”, said a judiciary to Lusa News agency. All witnesses have already been notified of the suspension of the hearing.

Now follows a period of six months, after which, if there is no agreement, the hearing will be scheduled and the trial will start.

Read the full story in this week's edition of tvmais, on news-stands now!

in: TVmais, 24.01.2013

Note:* belongs to the paper version/not online (trying to get paper version)

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/01/mccanns-ask-for-extrajudicial-settlement.html

Brilliant News but I hope Mr Amaral does not make a
deal......taking it to court is the only way to get these two leeches
off his back and show the world what this pair are like.....I would not
trust them at all !!!

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

candyfloss wrote:

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

Oh for goodness sake give it up, you are talking rubbish. Amaral will not have to pay anything if the McCanns are seeking a settlement, use your loaf. Just how much clarification do you need...........oh I know clarification.

If you haven't got anything sensible to say then don't!!!!

ed1976 wrote:

candyfloss wrote:

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

Oh for goodness sake give it up, you are talking rubbish. Amaral will not have to pay anything if the McCanns are seeking a settlement, use your loaf. Just how much clarification do you need...........oh I know clarification.

If you haven't got anything sensible to say then don't!!!!

We will just have to wait to see who is talking rubbish.

tiny wrote:

ed1976 wrote:

candyfloss wrote:

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

Oh for goodness sake give it up, you are talking rubbish. Amaral will not have to pay anything if the McCanns are seeking a settlement, use your loaf. Just how much clarification do you need...........oh I know clarification.

If you haven't got anything sensible to say then don't!!!!

We will just have to wait to see who is talking rubbish.

ed1976,the village is looking for you.

monkey mind wrote:The future is pretty predictable imho.

The McCanns have clearly been advised on the futility of a trial and that salvage is better done behind closed doors.

Money isn’t the issue for the McCanns, because it isn’t theirs.

What is going on is a face saving exercise.

Amaral won’t give them any.

It is unlikely a settlement will be reached.

A further trial date will be set.

On the eve of that trial they will cave completely because it is still better than going to trial otherwise they wouldn’t have been currently advised that now would they?

It’s just the inevitable delayed.

candyfloss wrote:

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

Oh for goodness sake give it up, you are talking rubbish. Amaral will not have to pay anything if the McCanns are seeking a settlement, use your loaf. Just how much clarification do you need...........oh I know clarification.

If you haven't got anything sensible to say then don't!!!!

monkey mind wrote:

candyfloss wrote:Err I don't think so ed, I have just looked at her timeline, I can't see it. There is one tweet but she was being wound up by pros and she is describing them. If you have the tweet in question post it otherwise don't spread misinformation!

I would suggest that is the sole purpose of Mr Ed’s presence here. His/her constant barrage of unsubstantiated one liners coupled with patent misdirection, misinformation or a complete failure to answer valid questions has done little but that, and served to bury any real discussion of the Blacksmith info at the begining of this 44 page thread. Of course it should be apparent that Ed isnt interested in expressing his opinion to us, he isn't interested in converting us, the guests are his target audience. Job done eh? It is for that purpose alone I will not enter into debate with him/her because quite simply, there isn’t any. And doesn’t Ed just know it.

jozi wrote:
Brilliant News but I hope Mr Amaral does not make a deal......taking it to court is the only way to get these two leeches off his back and show the world what this pair are like.....I would not trust them at all !!!

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Which bit don't you understand that the Portuguese Civil Code obliges them not to comment on an ongoing case (which the libel case is).
That had't stopped the mccanns and their spin machinery before, why now?
Any chance of an answer from you?

Their shameful action follows by crashing defeat is tough to swallow, let's face it. Deal with it!


Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

jozi wrote:
Let's face it, one of the Amaral's terms must be to require them to issue public statements withdrawing their accusations, admitting their accusations were made out of malice. On top of that to issue a public apology in two countries media for all the slandering and libelous remarks they made against him in the media and in Kate's bewk. All the rest is secondary.

I cant see Amaral accepting anything less as he is in it to clear his name, vindication, and justice for him and his family. Refusing by mccanns to the fundamental terms will result in collapse of negotiation, I believe.

Amaral has nothing to lose, while the mccanns have everything to lose, every which way.

Me wrote:

candyfloss wrote:

ed1976 wrote:first I am very happy to se more coming into the public domain re the court case.

However.... Still no word from Amaral himself or the McCanns.

Still no confirmation that the McCanns have caved in and will give up all their claims and not make any demands on Amaral. I expect Amaral will still have to make some concessions to the Mcanns otherwise the court case will go ahead. we will see.

Oh for goodness sake give it up, you are talking rubbish. Amaral will not have to pay anything if the McCanns are seeking a settlement, use your loaf. Just how much clarification do you need...........oh I know clarification.

If you haven't got anything sensible to say then don't!!!!

He just doesn't get it does he?

He's been given information, evidence based opinions and facts as to why he is wrong but he still refuses to believe it and worse he refuses to tell us WHY he thinks Amaral has backed down.

It's the archetypal McCann supporter mindset. They have their own pre coneived ideas and no matter how much evidence one presents they refuse to change their mind becuase they "ya know, know, in their heart of hearts that the McCann's couldn't possibly have done it".

jay2001 wrote:Still waiting for proof of Joana's tweet calling people c**** or have I missed it?

ShuBob wrote:Back on topic

It would appear word is getting out little by little. I'm pleasantly surprised Guido has provided a platform on his blog for the latest news to be debated. I wonder what [else] he's heard