VIDEO - Kate McCann interviewed by Jon Corner - HiDeHo

ProfessorPPlum wrote:It's not a glove folks.

If anything it's a yellow bracelet that flashes by.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Prof plum . he isint wearing a glove when putting boxes in the car. Instead it's when he is at the side door.

I find it very disturbing like everyone says, Kate acting like a film star. To me it shows their thought process even then, they believed the public would be interested in their musings. I think it'd be hard for a genuine victim to stomach it.

But in another way it shows Kates emotional immaturity. She's acting like a child does when the spotlight is on them. Towards the end it brings to mind a child explaining who took the chocolate when it's really smeared all around it's face.

Oh come on wrote:

ProfessorPPlum wrote:It's not a glove folks.

If anything it's a yellow bracelet that flashes by.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Prof plum . he isint wearing a glove when putting boxes in the car. Instead it's when he is at the side door.

Yes thank you Prof. Plum. The glove is definately visable AFTER this clip when he has put something into the rear seat of the car and puts his hand on the frame of the car.
It looks almost yellowy in colour and is def. a surgical glove.
As someone has just pointed out why wear one and not the other.

The box they are putting in the car has a yellow bag in the top and I think it looks like yellow rubber wrist bands and a pile of leaflets. Perhaps they were putting them there to make it look like GM was off out to hand them out to people in the area while wifey stays at home to look after the kids.
BUT as someone else pointed out why put just one tiny box in the boot. By the time you got where you were going all the contents would have come out! Surely you would have just put a box that size on the front seat next to you. THIS WHOLE PLACING STUFF IN CAR ETC AND DRIVING OFF (SUPPOSEDLY) IS SET UP.

So again (like Prof. plum has said) why the glove? he has to have put it on for a reason - because he was touching something he didn't want transference of OR he does not want his dna on things. Bringing us nicely back to the dna question again!

I don't know, but if Gerry is wearing the same clothes as on the trip to Huelva, perhaps this was the preparation for going there. Jon Corner came with them.
The gloves are weird because it's not as if he needs to protect his delicate surgeon's hands, he doesn't do surgery.

  "Clouseau Yesterday at 3:25 pm
what a spot hummingbird ....Gerry is indeed wearing a rubber glove stop the vid at 4.54"

Just to be precise, the above ^ comment is what I responded to - and it is NOT a glove at 4.54.

If you meant a DIFFERENT part of the video you should have errrm...said so Chief Inspector Clouseau :) I will have a look at that other bit later.

Certainly does look like a surgical glove in that second sequence I'll enhance colors later and see how it looks.

Men and cars... Surgical glove to check the oil and water? You'd really want gloves on both hands for that..

I'd be surprised at anyone checking oil and water on a hire car. But then you'd think the same about taking a broken fridge to the dump in a holiday villa.

Professor......... are you really saying you cant see the glove ? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Clouseau wrote:Professor......... are you really saying you cant see the glove ? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

It's at 4.54 when he puts his right hand on the pillar of rhe car. I think he is wearing yellow wrist bands, but I believe I can see a glove on the hand itself.

It looks indeed like it might be a glove, when his hand is going OUT of the car, BUT it doesn't when the hand is going INSIDE the car. It just a split second, but then the hand looks normal and I see no colour differences between hand and arm. I think it is a trick of light, sun and car windows playing a role, as well as a possible yellow wristband.

Châtelaine wrote:It looks indeed like it might be a glove, when his hand is going OUT of the car, BUT it doesn't when the hand is going INSIDE the car. It just a split second, but then the hand looks normal and I see no colour differences between hand and arm. I think it is a trick of light, sun and car windows playing a role, as well as a possible yellow wristband.

I agree, I have a better copy of the programme and just looked. I think you're right. There's definitely a wristband but I don't think there's a glove.

For goodness sake: let's be clear here.

We are currently talking about two different clips. The first (at 4.54 as specified by Clouseau) is NOT a gloved hand.

But then I'm told you mean the next clip (which is LATER than 4.54). Having now watched this I agree it does look like a gloved hand.

The confusion is around the times given but be clear: we are talking about two different SHOTS. The first isn't a gloves hand, the second probably IS.

Châtelaine wrote:It looks indeed like it might be a glove, when his hand is going OUT of the car, BUT it doesn't when the hand is going INSIDE the car. It just a split second, but then the hand looks normal and I see no colour differences between hand and arm. I think it is a trick of light, sun and car windows playing a role, as well as a possible yellow wristband.

Whilst your analysis may be right, it is important to note that both scenes are NOT consecutive. If he was wearing gloves, he could have put them on/removed them between clips.

on relflection could well be a trick of the light and the wristband.....things were going so well

Well we have seen a clip of gloves in a drawer that also contained a marker pen and paper and paperclips, so looks like a stationary type of drawer and he was putting posters and wristbands into the back of the car so was linked again to paper. And he wears on his right hand, not his left. They are surgical type gloves, not household so are more sensitive for delicate work and are to protect either the wearer from some harm or what he was touching from harm or contamination. Just thinking out loud here . But why only his right hand?

The film.

At 46 seconds into the film Kate passes a kitchen cupboard of sorts.

Isn't there a microscope on one of the upper drawers?

What for?

Surgical gloves + microscope equals what? Research on childrens' hairs? On drugs in childrens' hairs? Or residue of blood?
Or something to do with IVF?

What film Portia, no link. Or are you meaning on the other thread, in which case I will merge.

I'm quite convinced he's NOT wearing a glove. But IF he is, what would it matter? I always have boxes of very thin latex gloves in stock and they're being used by myself and others in the household for various reasons. E.g. to protect a wounded fingertip, which is difficult to bandage. Or for real dirty work, imagine washing a doggie with a dirty diarhea popo, after which they're been thrown away immediately after use. Just to mention

Portia wrote:The film.

At 46 seconds into the film Kate passes a kitchen cupboard of sorts.

Isn't there a microscope on one of the upper drawers?

What for?

Surgical gloves + microscope equals what? Research on childrens' hairs? On drugs in childrens' hairs? Or residue of blood?
Or something to do with IVF?

Well spotted Portia. yes indeed a microscope in a plastic bag on the shelf. Now the only reason you need a microscope is to look at things under high magnification. Look at what?

Clouseau wrote:on relflection could well be a trick of the light and the wristband.....things were going so well

Not to worry Clouseau, glove or no glove, it was unlikely to crack the case. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Spaniel wrote:

Clouseau wrote:on relflection could well be a trick of the light and the wristband.....things were going so well

Not to worry Clouseau, glove or no glove, it was unlikely to crack the case. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

We just know they had surgical gloves at hand, pun not intended And I am getting to the stage where I question everything about this pair, old cynic me.

Nina wrote:Well we have seen a clip of gloves in a drawer that also contained a marker pen and paper and paperclips, so looks like a stationary type of drawer and he was putting posters and wristbands into the back of the car so was linked again to paper. And he wears on his right hand, not his left. They are surgical type gloves, not household so are more sensitive for delicate work and are to protect either the wearer from some harm or what he was touching from harm or contamination. Just thinking out loud here [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] . But why only his right hand?

Dunno.

But in the single shot at 32 seconds into the film, there is a broken green wristband on the floor, possibly ripped open/apart with some force.

Someone in a hurry perhaps?

Nina wrote:

Spaniel wrote:

Clouseau wrote:on relflection could well be a trick of the light and the wristband.....things were going so well

Not to worry Clouseau, glove or no glove, it was unlikely to crack the case. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

We just know they had surgical gloves at hand, pun not intended [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] And I am getting to the stage where I question everything about this pair, old cynic me.

Perhaps they play Doctors and Nurses. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

First clip no glove but yes yellow wristbands.

Second clip yes, looks like glove and same yellow wristbands.

Has anyone thought about the smell in the car? This is about the time they went to Huelva, The PJ haven't told us from which date the car was seen to be aired overnight by the neighbours. But the dogs inspected the car when? I thought it was the first days of August.

No gloves, as explained in this thread on Remembering Madeleine forum

Panorama (no gloves)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

admin if this is a duplicate post, please remove.

I am behind the times, I was unaware he is a big cheese in media-city, Salford.


Jon Corner appointed as MEC Director
Media expert Jon Corner has been appointed as Director of the Media Enterprise Centre at Salford’s MediaCityUK.
Located
in the South Tower of the MediaCityUK studio block, the Media
Enterprise Centre spans six floors covering 53,500 sq ft. It will aim to
stimulate existing and emerging media talent and will offer small and
medium businesses a range of commercial and business centre services.
It will house a Games Hub including a purpose-built Usability Lab and
testing facility, a Digital Workflow centre where emerging processes in
file-based media can be developed and a Production Hub where new content
and new ideas can be created and nurtured.


In this new role Jon will begin by ensuring the Media Enterprise
Centre becomes a fully operational business within the next six months.


Jon will continue to raise the Centre’s profile, working with
partners such as the BBC, the University of Salford and Peel Media to
develop and enhance the commercial relationships that are crucial to the
Centre’s success.


As one of the UK’s leading media professionals, Jon has extensive
experience within the digital and creative industries, having
spearheaded the development of Salford University’s iconic presence at
MediaCityUK, and will harness this expertise to ensure research and
innovation continues to be at the heart of the Centre’s objectives.


Jon previously founded River Media, the highly successful Liverpool
production house and has significant experience of working in knowledge
transfer within the digital and creative industries.


Among a host of senior positions, Jon is Chair of the Liverpool
Digital and Creative Advisory board and is a non-executive director of
Liverpool Vision. Jon will also maintain his role as Non-Executive
Chairman at Rivermotion group.


Jon Corner said:


“I am delighted to be appointed Director of the Media Enterprise
Centre. MediaCityUK is one of the most exciting environments in Europe
right now in terms of digital platform, creative talent, production
facilities and ambition. The Media Enterprise Centre will stimulate and
support the growth of the region’s talent base, and importantly will be a
flagship for a different way of working in digital media.”


Councillor John Merry, Leader of Salford City Council said:


“The Media Enterprise Centre has always been one of our top
priorities, and will help to stimulate and support the ongoing growth of
digital and creative industries, making the sector accessible to all by
nurturing fresh talent and encouraging creative collaboration. Under
Jon’s leadership, the Media Enterprise Centre will support a bustling
centre of digital and creative thinking at every level from grassroots
community media, to international names, joining organisations such as
the University of Salford, ITV and the BBC.”


IIRC Kate had about 15 contacts with him May 4th. Possibly to do with the production of some " images" [ the bold above is mine ]

I watched the Jon Corner video again tonight and was struck with the thought 'what makes you think KM is guilty? 'or words to that effect thread but couldn't find it in search box. In the initial thread I said I first thought they might be guilty because KM selected earrings to wear everyday, a mother would never do that .

The Jon Corner video though, she says that for the first few days 'YOU' wouldn't be functioning normally etc. Doesn't that mean that a person would NOT be able to select earrings?

Also, don't you find that she comes over much differently in this video, relaxed and flirtatious , as opposed to stiff and trying to be middle class in her other video footage. At one point she says she is a good parent, that she is not the issue but 'some pervert who was watching them WHICH ITSELF IS CHILLING'.

Sorry, haven't repeated her words verbatim but come on, the focus on the words I put in bold - your child is missing so what are your feelings? Would you be devastated and horrified by the fact that your child is missing? or chilled after the fact that someone had been watching you? Come on!

Strictly In my own opinion.

Just watched it again,( and still feeling nauseous)

Someone recently pointed out the tiny hesitation as Gerry is loading the box into the boot.
it is at 4:48
He is going to place it on the right, but then plumps for the centre of the floor.
It is very quick, but noticeable if o play it a few times.

So why would his subconscious force him to do this ?
Now look at this.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

He was going to place the box exactly over the spot indicated by the dogs later that day, but did not.

whmon wrote:I watched the Jon Corner video again tonight and was struck with the thought 'what makes you think KM is guilty? 'or words to that effect thread but couldn't find it in search box. In the initial thread I said I first thought they might be guilty because KM selected earrings to wear everyday, a mother would never do that .

The Jon Corner video though, she says that for the first few days 'YOU' wouldn't be functioning normally etc. Doesn't that mean that a person would NOT be able to select earrings?

Also, don't you find that she comes over much differently in this video, relaxed and flirtatious , as opposed to stiff and trying to be middle class in her other video footage. At one point she says she is a good parent, that she is not the issue but 'some pervert who was watching them WHICH ITSELF IS CHILLING'.

Sorry, haven't repeated her words verbatim but come on, the focus on the words I put in bold - your child is missing so what are your feelings? Would you be devastated and horrified by the fact that your child is missing? or chilled after the fact that someone had been watching you? Come on!

Strictly In my own opinion.

Yeah, such a narcissist