"Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Leveson Inquiry / Murdoch Empire
Page 2 of 2 • Share
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
tcat wrote:There must a queue of journalists and writers in the UK just waiting to see what happens with Mr Amaral's book.
The McCanns slagged off so many people in their book - press, police (including UK police), UK government, their Portuguese lawyer, everyone except their 7 friends in fact - without once thanking all the ordinary people who donated pots of money to them.
It can only be a matter of time before their arrogance trips them up, I'm sure of it [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
And o good days, I totally agree with you tcat. On a bad day, however it's a different story...
____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.
NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
rainbow-fairy- Posts : 1971
Activity : 2140
Likes received : 16
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 50
Location : going round in circles
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
rainbow-fairy wrote:tcat wrote:There must a queue of journalists and writers in the UK just waiting to see what happens with Mr Amaral's book.
The McCanns slagged off so many people in their book - press, police (including UK police), UK government, their Portuguese lawyer, everyone except their 7 friends in fact - without once thanking all the ordinary people who donated pots of money to them.
It can only be a matter of time before their arrogance trips them up, I'm sure of it [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
And o good days, I totally agree with you tcat. On a bad day, however it's a different story...
From tcats post - "It can only be a matter of time before their arrogance trips them up, I'm sure of it [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]"
I now (very sadly) no longer believe that. I now think their arrogance derives from their absolute belief/assumption of total protection.
listener- Posts : 643
Activity : 681
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2010-01-10
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
Hi listener,
Swimming with sharks doesn't make one shark-proof. Even a little pod of dolphins can tickle a shark to death on occasion. Life changes, things change, people change, circumstances change. There's nothing guaranteed to keep things under wrap forever. If I were to sum up in one word what TM lacks it is 'humility'. The world is full of arrogance and I would not choose an arrogant stance if my child went missing. I'd choose humility for the simple fact it's the honest way. The McCann's have received every conceivable help and continue to whinge and sue. They have chosen/been advised by people who are arrogant for a living.
eta. It only takes one 'arrogant' person to be crossed and the whole thing will no longer be hidden.
Swimming with sharks doesn't make one shark-proof. Even a little pod of dolphins can tickle a shark to death on occasion. Life changes, things change, people change, circumstances change. There's nothing guaranteed to keep things under wrap forever. If I were to sum up in one word what TM lacks it is 'humility'. The world is full of arrogance and I would not choose an arrogant stance if my child went missing. I'd choose humility for the simple fact it's the honest way. The McCann's have received every conceivable help and continue to whinge and sue. They have chosen/been advised by people who are arrogant for a living.
eta. It only takes one 'arrogant' person to be crossed and the whole thing will no longer be hidden.
Liz Eagles- Posts : 11153
Activity : 13562
Likes received : 2218
Join date : 2011-09-03
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
aquila wrote:Hi listener,
Swimming with sharks doesn't make one shark-proof. Even a little pod of dolphins can tickle a shark to death on occasion. Life changes, things change, people change, circumstances change. There's nothing guaranteed to keep things under wrap forever. If I were to sum up in one word what TM lacks it is 'humility'. The world is full of arrogance and I would not choose an arrogant stance if my child went missing. I'd choose humility for the simple fact it's the honest way. The McCann's have received every conceivable help and continue to whinge and sue. They have chosen/been advised by people who are arrogant for a living.
eta. It only takes one 'arrogant' person to be crossed and the whole thing will no longer be hidden.
Hi aquila,
I half understand your eta! but may I address your sentence - "The world is full of arrogance and I would not choose an arrogant stance if my child went missing. I'd choose humility for the simple fact it's the honest way."
One (you) would probably not 'choose' at all - surely your reaction would be automatic!
listener- Posts : 643
Activity : 681
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2010-01-10
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
listener wrote:rainbow-fairy wrote:tcat wrote:There must a queue of journalists and writers in the UK just waiting to see what happens with Mr Amaral's book.
The McCanns slagged off so many people in their book - press, police (including UK police), UK government, their Portuguese lawyer, everyone except their 7 friends in fact - without once thanking all the ordinary people who donated pots of money to them.
It can only be a matter of time before their arrogance trips them up, I'm sure of it [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
And o good days, I totally agree with you tcat. On a bad day, however it's a different story...
From tcats post - "It can only be a matter of time before their arrogance trips them up, I'm sure of it [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]"
I now (very sadly) no longer believe that. I now think their arrogance derives from their absolute belief/assumption of total protection.
That's probably what Lord Jeffery Archer thought until he was brought down by a former close pal.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
And interestingly, given the other thread, his wife stood by him, and even perjured herself on his behalf. So she can be added to the list of Hindley, West, et al.ShuBob wrote:
That's probably what Lord Jeffery Archer thought until he was brought down by a former close pal.
And she is a doctor !!
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
PeterMac wrote:And interestingly, given the other thread, his wife stood by him, and even perjured herself on his behalf. So she can be added to the list of Hindley, West, et al.ShuBob wrote:
That's probably what Lord Jeffery Archer thought until he was brought down by a former close pal.
And she is a doctor !!
Perhaps not surprisingly, she was recently honoured (made a Dame) in the Queen's birthday list for her "services to healthcare".
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
Although I can't stand Jeffrey Archer, nor his awful books, I think his would have been a valid case for the Leveson.
It's entirely his business if he hires a prostitute, but as I recall, it was a set-up with one of the tabloids and the woman herself - who was depicted as a victim trying to make enough money to keep herself and her son. As we all know, that really doesn't wash - I expect she was on various benefits at the time and hey - cleaning jobs aren't hard to come by and pay pretty well.
Archer was just stupid denying it with the help of fake evidence from his friends. In effect committing perjury. Like the mr. Toad he is, he hasn't suffered much from the publicity.
It's high time the prurient, hypocritical press shut up about the sexual shenanigans of celebrities and politicians, uninteresting and irrelevant. I do find it revelant if they commit fraud - that is our business.
It's entirely his business if he hires a prostitute, but as I recall, it was a set-up with one of the tabloids and the woman herself - who was depicted as a victim trying to make enough money to keep herself and her son. As we all know, that really doesn't wash - I expect she was on various benefits at the time and hey - cleaning jobs aren't hard to come by and pay pretty well.
Archer was just stupid denying it with the help of fake evidence from his friends. In effect committing perjury. Like the mr. Toad he is, he hasn't suffered much from the publicity.
It's high time the prurient, hypocritical press shut up about the sexual shenanigans of celebrities and politicians, uninteresting and irrelevant. I do find it revelant if they commit fraud - that is our business.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
Perjury is a serious offense. There's hardly any mitigation for it.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
ShuBob wrote:Perjury is a serious offense. There's hardly any mitigation for it.
That's exactly what I mean, he should have told them to publish and be damned - committing perjury was plain stupid and of course totally illegal.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
ShuBob wrote:
That's probably what Lord Jeffery Archer thought until he was brought down by a former close pal.[/quote]
Brought down? Well he did some easy, protected months and now has returned to his multi-million pound lifestyle! - Easy!
The McCanns wont even need to do the time to join the same club - So protected - They must know too much[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
(It's obvious! - the protection started too early!)
listener- Posts : 643
Activity : 681
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2010-01-10
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
But he was in the habit of doing so.His CV is full of lies.tigger wrote:[...] - committing perjury was plain stupid and of course totally illegal.
It said he was at "Oxford".
In fact he went to a small Teacher training college in Oxford, having gained 3 'O' levels.
And so on. Private Eye has the full list. As does the web.
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
I gather that Jeffrey's father was a con artist so he went into the family business too. I always think of people like him, Jonathan Aitken and assorted expenses fiddlers as very small fry brought to book for comparatively minor offences while the much bigger fish get away scot free.
Guest- Guest
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
PeterMac wrote:But he was in the habit of doing so.His CV is full of lies.tigger wrote:[...] - committing perjury was plain stupid and of course totally illegal.
It said he was at "Oxford".
In fact he went to a small Teacher training college in Oxford, having gained 3 'O' levels.
And so on. Private Eye has the full list. As does the web.
Yes, it's quite hilarious. He also said that he won several races and was champion over some or other distance. He's the original mr. Toad. I once read an article by Alan Coren when JA took him to see the West Indies at Lords. Coren didn't get to see any cricket at all because Jeffrey was dragging him around to be introduced to various 'important' people he absolutely had to meet.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: "Any new press regulation MUST SATISFY THE MCCANNS" - Financial Times
listener wrote:ShuBob wrote:
That's probably what Lord Jeffery Archer thought until he was brought down by a former close pal.
Brought down? Well he did some easy, protected months and now has returned to his multi-million pound lifestyle! - Easy!
The McCanns wont even need to do the time to join the same club - So protected - They must know too much[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
(It's obvious! - the protection started too early!)
It may have been easy but he still did prison time.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
» Gerry McCann calls for press control laws - 75% of the public agree
» Oh dear - Leveson: Government's press regulation plans put on ice
» Leveson Inquiry - report due TODAY 29.11.12 @ 1.30 pm
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» Gerry McCann calls for press control laws - 75% of the public agree
» Oh dear - Leveson: Government's press regulation plans put on ice
» Leveson Inquiry - report due TODAY 29.11.12 @ 1.30 pm
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Leveson Inquiry / Murdoch Empire
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum