Re: Gerry to speak at CEOP Conference in Jan

by vaguely 02.01.10 18:30

Avery wrote:I agree, we should not attack Jim Gamble and his group. It is quite possible he has his own reasons for inviting Gerry, if only to watch him squirm. The more public questioning of the couple the more exposure and pressure. They have hid behind Clarence and have avoided public scrutiny so exposure is a good thing.

You think it's a trap? Rather than just asking possibly the most prominent missing child in recent times parents to talk?

by Old Nick 02.01.10 18:40

Of course it's a trap. Slowly, slowly catchee monkey....

by littlepixie 02.01.10 18:40

Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

by vaguely 02.01.10 18:45

littlepixie wrote:Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

the disappearance might not, but the internet was used both by them and against them in a pretty ground breaking way post disappearance. I guess it's a case of publicity on both sides.

by aiyoyo 03.01.10 18:02

littlepixie wrote:Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

So that attendees can pose GM questions like :

Refering to the earlier 2 speakers speech on 'faked abduction' what is your view on that?

Why do you think you are especially included in this meeting when there are plenty other missing children?

by Autumn 04.01.10 3:14

aiyoyo wrote:
littlepixie wrote:Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

So that attendees can pose GM questions like :

Refering to the earlier 2 speakers speech on 'faked abduction' what is your view on that?

Why do you think you are especially included in this meeting when there are plenty other missing children?

I think that Gerry probably agreed to speak at this meeting without realizing that, amongst the topics to be discussed, would be 'Faked Abduction'. Dont be too surprised if Gerry finds a way of worming out of attending.

by aliberte2 04.01.10 3:37

Autumn wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
littlepixie wrote:Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

So that attendees can pose GM questions like :

Refering to the earlier 2 speakers speech on 'faked abduction' what is your view on that?

Why do you think you are especially included in this meeting when there are plenty other missing children?

I think that Gerry probably agreed to speak at this meeting without realizing that, amongst the topics to be discussed, would be 'Faked Abduction'. Dont be too surprised if Gerry finds a way of worming out of attending.

I Don't Think He Has Anything to Worry About as the Portuguese Investigation was Seriously Botched and Every Legitimate Profiler and Expert Agrees Madeleine was Abducted.

by Guest 04.01.10 3:42

aliberte2 wrote:
Autumn wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
littlepixie wrote:Maddies disappearance had nothing to do with the internet so why is Gerry at the meeting anyway.

So that attendees can pose GM questions like :

Refering to the earlier 2 speakers speech on 'faked abduction' what is your view on that?

Why do you think you are especially included in this meeting when there are plenty other missing children?

I think that Gerry probably agreed to speak at this meeting without realizing that, amongst the topics to be discussed, would be 'Faked Abduction'. Dont be too surprised if Gerry finds a way of worming out of attending.

I Don't Think He Has Anything to Worry About as the Portuguese Investigation was Seriously Botched and Every Legitimate Profiler and Expert Agrees Madeleine was Abducted.

Not to mention every PROFESSIONAL who has seen ALL the case notes.

If the armchair sleuths are so good at what they do, why don't they turn professional? thinking

by diatribe 15.02.14 14:23

Guest wrote:

On the contrary, I believe what the evidence suggests and the evidence is not swayed by hate or by what people want to believe or what makes them sleep better at night, it is what it is and it suggests abduction to be the most likely event that took place that night.

Can you point to one fact that suggests an abduction was the most likely event that took place that night. I'd have thought that all the evidence points in a diametrically opposed direction beginning with a lack of motive and ending with an even greater lack of opportunity. The lies of the McCanns and their friends, not to mention their extremely suspicious behaviour merely adds to the ingredients of being anything but an abduction. Incidentally, I don't include in the aforementioned, Kate MacCanns reluctance to answer police questions under caution as I consider that to be her right as an accused person.

In my considered opinion, an abduction hypothesis is all but a physical impossibility, although I am an open minded person and as previously stated, await for you to point me in the direction of one scintilla of evidence that remotely suggests an abduction is the most likely reason for the disappearance of the McCann's daughter, Madeleine.

by Guest 15.02.14 14:32

Diatribe, that comment is from December 2009 when the forum was awash with trolls.

Whoever posted that has long gone.

by diatribe 15.02.14 14:34

No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:Diatribe, that comment is from December 2009 when the forum was awash with trolls.

Whoever posted that has long gone.

Well, I won't wait with bated breath for a reply then and allow him to continue unimpeded in his quest to become the next honourable member to represent Brighton Pavilion. big grin

by jeanmonroe 15.02.14 15:51

Gerry did a 'runner' before the American guys 'talked' about FAKED 'abductions'

by diatribe 15.02.14 16:05

jeanmonroe wrote:Gerry did a 'runner' before the American guys 'talked' about FAKED 'abductions'

I guessed as much and you'll have to excuse my unfamiliarity with all the facts concerning this case as I only began taking an interest after inadvertently stumbling across a couple of videos on Youtube relating to the McCanns during the course of last yr.

I'm one of those rare breed of people who neither reads newspapers or watches news bulletins and as a consequence, don't normally involve myself with matters that I have no control over. big grin

Latest topics