New Madeleine McCann book will claim missing tot is already dead

I want it NOW  

3 hours ago

The Sudden Impulse

I've only just started watching this - it looks like a repeat - I thought it was going to add something new.

Yes, it appears to be the same as the previous video but with just the musical interlude from 2min to 6m30s cut out.

I've just watched the whole thing again, it is the same but there is some good info in it.

Have you ordered it?

Peter hasn't got his yet.

No, I did go onto the website and the price was 36 euros, I'm not paying that price for it.

I have the feeling that Petermac and Pat Brown will be reading their own words, but rephrased.

  <------ Peter 

The rest of us....

Pat Brown has received a copy and will report on it in due course. I'll post the link here.

Peter is already 1/4 of the way through the book and will be reporting to us soon.

Peter seems suitably impressed with the book so far.

 PeterMac

Good that it is not on Amazon.

Imagine how many One Star reviews and bad Comments it would have got from all the Pro McCann supporters.

Bless 'em, their dogged support of The McCann's is comically stupid.

https://www.gbnews.com/news/madeleine-mccann-investigation-metropolitan-police-peter-bleksley

By James Saunders

Published: 14/05/2024
 - 10:13
Updated: 14/05/2024
 - 12:03

Peter Bleksley said the four-person force's extra funding "just about keeps the lights on" and claimed the team itself "just exists to keep Kate and Gerry McCann happy"

A four-person Metropolitan Police team working on the Madeleine McCann case has been slammed as "languishing" and "struggling to justify its existence" by a former Met detective as the hunt for Maddie enters its 17th year.
Just four British police officers are still investigating Madeleine McCann's 2007 disappearance in Portugal as part of an ongoing Home Office-funded investigation, known has Operation Grange.

Overseas, investigations are still underway - not least in Germany, where rapist Christian Brueckner remains on trial for unrelated offences, but has been identified as a suspect in the McCann case by German authorities
But Peter Bleksley, a former Metropolitan Police detective, has slated the force amid reports that a mere three officers alongside a civilian member of staff are involved in Operation Grange in the UK - and, at that, part-time.
Bleksley told GB News: "The Metropolitan Police are pretty low down the food chain. They've played second fiddle to the Portuguese, and they've since been pushed even further down because the Germans have taken the primary lead... The Met are languishing, while the others are trying to find work to do.


Bleksley said the Met were "covering their backs, so that if convictions were made in the UK, they can say: "We did our bit'"
PA/GB News

He acknowledged that while Christian Brueckner's committed and alleged crimes did not relate to the UK, the Met were "covering their backs, so that if convictions were made in the UK, they can say: "We did our bit'."
Bleksley said the money being diverted to the four-man force "just about keeps the lights on" and claimed the team itself "just exists to keep Kate and Gerry McCann happy", adding that he understood the public's "frustration" over why said funds weren't going towards solving other crimes.
The Met has previously talked up how it "continues to work with and support" colleagues from police in Portugal - where Maddie vanished - and Germany.
In 2013, the status of the force's inquiries changed to an investigation which, alongside Portuguese authorities, entails pursuing "specific lines of enquiry" - but just two years later, the amount of police working on the case had been scaled back to 29.
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson told GB News that the number of staff on Operation Grange always remains under review and is "flexed accordingly to new information coming in, or new lines of enquiry".
END

NOW IT IS IN PRINT

So now it is the job of the police to keep suspects happy?

You only have to look at the two-tier policing going on every weekend to see how they keep the pro-Hamas protesters happy.

Or as someone else said,
"Operation Grange is just four blokes working on their Golf Handicap"

Q: So when you talk of success and progress, it’s really a case of eliminating things? 
You’re not getting any nearer to finding out what happened?

MR: So our mission here is to do everything reasonable to provide an answer to Kate and Gerry McCann. 

I’d love to guarantee them that we would get an answer, sadly investigations can never be 100 per cent successful. But, it’s our job, and I’ve discussed it with them, we’ll do everything we can do, reasonably, to find an answer to what’s happened to Madeleine.

Source: http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Finding a way to get Kate and Gerry off the Hook more like it?

But the real question is why, I could understand him saying what he did if he was talking about a real abduction but the McCann's have never been cleared by the Portuguese, there just isn't enough evidence to charge them.
They have interfered with all aspects of the Portuguese investigation but have never once been suspicious of the McCann's involvement.

Operation Grange is working on the basis that Dr Amaral has the opinion that it was a tragic Accident while the Parents were not there.

As Gerry said 'If Madeleine had fallen and died in the Apartment, how can that be our fault.'


Even if they were in the living room at the time they could have not reacted in time to catch or save her?

But there are other indications that something else happened which were never fully investigated.

The biggest worry I have  is something that Mark T Hoffman said.
'Madeleine had to die because she was old enough to talk, she could explain to someone what had happened to her.'

What really happened and when is the Question.

Silentscope wrote:The biggest worry I have  is something that Mark T Hoffman said.
'Madeleine had to die because she was old enough to talk, she could explain to someone what had happened to her.'

Blimey, I haven't seen that quote before.

I've always thought that - she was due to start school that year.

Have you got a link please?

Yes but she was already at nursery, that is a lot more hands on than primary school.

Child abuse is complicated. The younger you are the more you think of it as 'normal'...especially if you know the person.