Re: Extract from Jon Clarke's new book: 'My Search for Madeleine McCann'

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 9:11

Extract from Jon Clarke's new book: 'My Search for Madeleine McCann' - Page 2 Jc_my_10

I love how even Donal Macintyre is giving Jon Clarke a positive review...says it all really titter

He looks like he's trying hard not to laugh at the ridiculousness of what he's saying, especially when he said the abductors cleaned the apartment. All in ca. 1 minute and 20 seconds....it would take longer than that just to find a bucket and fill it with hot soapy water.

Poor Maddie with all these opportunists making money out of her singlerose

by **PeterMac** 04.09.21 9:18

Never judge a book by its cover ? ?
Certainly not by the back cover, where the very first sentence is a LIE

Jon Clarke was the first journalist at the scene when Madeleine McCann went missing in 2007 . . .

No Jon, you were not. You were at least the 6th, as everyone in the world can see from the YouTube
newsreel clips of you looking over the shoulders of the others.

by Guest 04.09.21 9:32

PeterMac wrote:
Jill Havern wrote:Gawd knows how many new chapters Jon Clarke's new bewk is going to produce for PeterMac's e-book

The problem with that is that someone will actually have to buy one.

I'd read Clarke's book, for the benefit of the forum, but he'd have to pay me. Guinea pigs don't suffer for no reward.

by **Silentscope** 04.09.21 10:47

It will probably have more holes in the storyline than the “bullet ridden” car in Brückners factory!

by Guest 04.09.21 13:04

'Sky News veteran crime correspondent Martin Brunt praised the book as 'tirelessly researched', adding: " it told me a lot of things I didn't know about the case." '

I strongly believe that to be a bit of a porky.

Jon Clarke's reputation thus far has proved to be less than reliable, economic with truth springs to mind.

I doubt Brunt ever said such a thing - why would he? Or maybe he's just been misquoted, the press has a nasty habit of rearranging words to produce an entirely new meaning.

Over the years I've been very lenient towards Martin Brunt, I truly think he's just doing his job. I don't think he's on board the good ship T-Mac, he's become a target by association - the Murdoch empire. Whatever, I don't think he'd be daft enough to put his name to this work of fiction.

Learn something from Jon Clarke? Don't make me laugh oh go on

.

by Guest 04.09.21 13:17

PeterMac wrote:GA has permitted us to announce that his new book is being printed, and will be released on 2nd October.
Details of the Cover, the Title and the Publisher will be released soon.

Now that is a book I will buy!

drinks

All in a good cause, more than you can say for the other bloke!

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 13:30

Verdi wrote:
'Sky News veteran crime correspondent Martin Brunt praised the book as 'tirelessly researched', adding: " it told me a lot of things I didn't know about the case." '

I strongly believe that to be a bit of a porky.

Jon Clarke's reputation thus far has proved to be less than reliable, economic with truth springs to mind.

I doubt Brunt ever said such a thing - why would he? Or maybe he's just been misquoted, the press has a nasty habit of rearranging words to produce an entirely new meaning.

Over the years I've been very lenient towards Martin Brunt, I truly think he's just doing his job. I don't think he's on board the good ship T-Mac, he's become a target by association - the Murdoch empire. Whatever, I don't think he'd be daft enough to put his name to this work of fiction.

Learn something from Jon Clarke? Don't make me laugh .

Extract from Jon Clarke's new book: 'My Search for Madeleine McCann' - Page 2 Jc_my_11

Brunt is quoted on the front cover...be a bit dodgy to do that without permission.

by Guest 04.09.21 13:34

Then he's a bigger idiot than he's portrayed.

I retract anything I've said in his support until further notice - and possibly longer ....

Further thought - maybe Brunt is taking the pith. he can't possibly be serious, not with a straight face.

by Guest 04.09.21 13:44

Isn't 2nd October Dr Amaral's birthday?

party

by **PeterMac** 04.09.21 16:20

I have done the unthinkable, and ordered one from Amazon.
Let is not be said that we do not have open minds, or that we are not willing
to consider new evidence or new ways of interpreting the existing evidence.

I shall gut it, and let the forum know what it contains.
Extracts for Research and Deeper understanding may be posted as well.

I have hand sanitiser, and may wear a mask !

by Guest 04.09.21 16:41

Extract from Jon Clarke's new book: 'My Search for Madeleine McCann' - Page 2 Scre1866

https://www.amazon.co.uk/MY-SEARCH-MADELEINE-Reporters-Harrowing/dp/B09F1CZH1X/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1630769685&sr=1-1

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 17:03

You can review this crime fiction novel on Amazon. I doubt that they'd print mine so i'll post it here

The first lie on this botched attempt to once again manipulate people into believing that Madeleine was abducted, appears on the front cover where this clown claims to have been the first journalist on the scene. We have seen him change many of his tall tales more times than the McCanns themselves. And lets be honest, he only wrote this novel for two reasons, firstly to stitch up patsy Christian Bruekner and secondly because SNR Amaral who wrote The truth of the lie, based on the actual facts of the case, is bringing his second one out in October.

by **PeterMac** 04.09.21 17:21

If I may quote from Chapter 31, Clarke , Olive Press, Lies and Videotape
https://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.com/2016/01/chapter-31-jon-clarke-olive-press-lies.html

I quote from three long articles in the Olive Press, and from his words in the Netflix Nonsense-umentary

"We find a series of direct statements
            He arrived about 11:45am
            He was the only reporter till late that evening
            He was the first journalist on the scene
            Kate [Kay] Burley was there
            He walked into the apartment
            He did not walk into the apartment
            He met the McCanns in the apartment
            He met the McCanns as they were leaving
            He introduced himself, and told them he would do everything to help
            He introduced himself, and they said ‘Hi’, and may have said ‘thanks for coming’
            There were no dogs until late afternoon
            The Portuguese police charged the McCanns

What is truly astonishing about this whole series of statements is not merely that some contradict others.   It is that there is documentary evidence available in the public domain in the form of professionally recorded contemporaneous Video, which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that every one of those statements is untrue.
And Clarke, a professional journalist who has access to the internet and to search engines as we all do, must be fully aware that his lies can be, and will be exposed."

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 17:31

Oh Dear,

Why is that book advertised underneath Jon's novel?

Why is this is true crime when it should be in crime fiction?

The idiot has put on his cover, a photograph of a man who has not even been questioned in connection with Madeleines' disappearance. If Brueckner is not a willing patsy, can he sue Clarke?

Extract from Jon Clarke's new book: 'My Search for Madeleine McCann' - Page 2 Untitl11

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 17:39

You forgot to mention money, Sharon.

Jon has replied on Fakebook so at least we now know what the book's about.

Jon Clarke
Jill Havern/peter macloud and Tony Bennett (all warned and tackled by UK police and courts over lies and claims about the McCanns) - anyone interested can buy the book and read all about this tragic trio… a Ukip supporter, a retired detective and a driving instructor. No one should believe a word from trolls like them

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 17:48

Ok Mrs Troll,

Should we have a Facebook group or blog set up to review this novel? We may get a good few thousand more trolls to join us.

by Guest 04.09.21 17:52

He has given the forum some publicity. He's a kind little moron.

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 17:57

sharonl wrote: Ok Mrs Troll,

Should we have a Facebook group or blog set up to review this novel? We may get a good few thousand more trolls to join us.

That would be a splendid idea if I may say so.

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 18:07

A Facebook group would be good I think...

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 18:09

Jill Havern wrote:A Facebook group would be good I think...

Yes, more traffic.

What will we call it?

Can we use Skouliki's pics? big grin

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 18:17

We'll do a Farcebook group and then post our findings on the forum and all four of our blogs too - even more traffic!

And I'm sure Peter will be busy writing more chapters big grin

And we'll all be consulting a lawyer Mrs

Hey! how come he never mentioned you?

by Guest 04.09.21 18:45

Will I be able to join in the fun? I'm not on Facebook.

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 18:52

CaKeLoveR wrote:Will I be able to join in the fun? I'm not on Facebook.

That would be a bit tricky then to be fair.

You'll just have to have fun on this forum.

by Guest 04.09.21 19:03

I hear some horror stories about Facebook, and I'm a bit wary of it. But I suppose I could join, just to be on the side of the forum.

by **sandancer** 04.09.21 19:30

Thanks to Mr Clarke people will now be looking up Jill Havern and retired detective Peter Macleod so finding this forum and Peters book ! Do tell us Jill when you were both "warned " by the police and UK courts ? Nothing to do with being a driving instructor I presume

!

A Facebook group sounds a great idea , don't worry @ CaKeLoveR , I was wary of Facebook too , took me a long time to join ( being technologically dyslexic doesn't help thinking

) I've managed fine .

Mr Clarke seems to be getting a tad annoyed in his comments

by **Jill Havern** 04.09.21 20:10

When Jon 'investigated' me some years back he got the wrong person and address, so if he's published details of the wrong person in his book and libelled her, he might find himself being chatted up by the police...especially as she's still running a business and I'm retired.

oh go on

by **sandancer** 04.09.21 21:53

Jill Havern wrote:When Jon 'investigated' me some years back he got the wrong person and address, so if he's published details of the wrong person in his book and libelled her, he might find himself being chatted up by the police...especially as she's still running a business and I'm retired.

Aww bless he must have been " tired " when he was doing that part of his " research " splat

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 22:04

CaKeLoveR wrote:I hear some horror stories about Facebook, and I'm a bit wary of it. But I suppose I could join, just to be on the side of the forum.

I suppose you could join as Verdi and give very little other information. You don't need to add your private friends, just join the group.

by **sharonl** 04.09.21 22:16

Jill Havern wrote:We'll do a Farcebook group and then post our findings on the forum and all four of our blogs too - even more traffic!

And I'm sure Peter will be busy writing more chapters

And we'll all be consulting a lawyer

Hey! how come he never mentioned you?

this tragic trio… a Ukip supporter, a retired detective and a driving instructor

Yeah, I felt a bit left out really. I'll shall have to work much harder nod

to get a mention in his next novel

But then I supported UKIP too, Hissyfit

It's not fair

by Guest 05.09.21 1:25

Reverse psychology, Clarke is not so daft.

Encouraging adverse commentary will ultimately lead back to his booky wook - more attention more sales.

If you don't believe me just watch.

As for the insolent comments about prominent members of CMOMM, I've seen the exact same words bandied about in the past on more than one occasion and not by the pen of Jon Clarke .... seriously!

This is like an epic blockbuster - 'The Resurrection of Dracula'.

The Hitchhikers Guide to the Fallacy.

liar

The man's a deluded fool, he must know the facts can be so easily researched. I guess that doesn't matter when there's a buck to be made with mischief a forethought.

Swann and Edgar didn't give a toss about truth when they published their novel any more than Kate McCann gave a toss when her autobiographical chiclit was published.

How bloody embarrassing.

The bloke's so full of conceit and bravado he's forgotten what it is to be a human being.

Enter CMOMM ....

But beware

.

Latest topics