The latest McCann suspect: Scotland Yard has revealed vital new information about a suspect wanted in connection with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

Batman wrote:A serious and relevant question for you: is there a definitive statement that tells us the crime being investigated under the Grange remit?

I'm delighted you had a good day - hope you didn't let your mask slip and you kept your distance .

If I'm understanding your question rightly then no, there isn't a definitive statement from the Metropolitan Police that tells what crime is being investigated. As you will be aware, the initial recorded remit for Operation Grange was to review the case as if the abduction occurred on UK soil.  There has never since been any officially documented statement to indicate a change of direction from the original remit.

Quite possibly because they are not investigating any crime, only posing as a figure head for delusion.

There are however, numerous interviews on record and documented for posterity, showing the general direction of proceeds.  Interviews with London police chiefs, Leicestershire constabulary - the initial point of contact for case coordination between Portugal and the UK, and various other nationwide police locations.

I believe the most significant and important question to be addressed is .... 'why after nine years, two years reviewing and seven years re-investigation, are the Metropolitan Police in the guise of Operation Grange, no further forward?  More importantly - why have they failed to acknowledge the most compelling evidence and the blatant deception of the McCanns and their group of friends.

Do you really need any more?

Liz Eagles wrote:@Batman.

Why do you think the German police are onto something?

Hi Liz. I'm sure you know the Grange case review changed to a criminal investigation, I think in 2014. But the new remit was never published. In fact, the Met coyly avoided answering Tony Bennett's FOI request asking this very question. Isn't that strange?

Given the presence of cadaverine in 5a, it would make sense for the investigation to focus on the unlawful concealment and disposal of a cadaver. And if that's the real remit of Grange, the Met and any other collaborating police force has to keep it quiet to avoid alerting the prime suspects.

With that as background, I'm suggesting that Christian B may have some knowledge or direct involvement in the crime. For me, that's more believable than the idea that the German police are in cahoots with the McCs, or that they're complicit in a UK establishment cover-up.

Thanks for asking and I hope that helps. I'd welcome any further thoughts.

Verdi wrote:

Batman wrote:A serious and relevant question for you: is there a definitive statement that tells us the crime being investigated under the Grange remit?

I'm delighted you had a good day - hope you didn't let your mask slip and you kept your distance .

If I'm understanding your question rightly then no, there isn't a definitive statement from the Metropolitan Police that tells what crime is being investigated. As you will be aware, the initial recorded remit for Operation Grange was to review the case as if the abduction occurred on UK soil.  There has never since been any officially documented statement to indicate a change of direction from the original remit.

Quite possibly because they are not investigating any crime, only posing as a figure head for delusion.

There are however, numerous interviews on record and documented for posterity, showing the general direction of proceeds.  Interviews with London police chiefs, Leicestershire constabulary - the initial point of contact for case coordination between Portugal and the UK, and various other nationwide police locations.

I believe the most significant and important question to be addressed is .... 'why after nine years, two years reviewing and seven years re-investigation, are the Metropolitan Police in the guise of Operation Grange, no further forward?  More importantly - why have they failed to acknowledge the most compelling evidence and the blatant deception of the McCanns and their group of friends.

Do you really need any more?

Thanks Verdi. I'm pleased to see we agree on the lack of a defined remit for the criminal investigation. 

You suggest this is so they can use it to cover-up the deed and of course that's a possibility. However, that's inconsistent with the involvement of MI5 (assuming you agree they were involved of course). Why is it inconsistent? Remember the Barnes Guest House (PIE HQ) and Cyril Smith investigations of the 80s? Both were closed down by MI5 without any explanation. They could have done the same with MM's disappearance and avoided Grange altogether.

So I prefer to believe the facts as presented: the Grange review was upgraded to a criminal investigation and the exact nature of the crime was hidden to avoid alerting the prime suspects.

I can't explain the length of time the investigation is taking, other than that it's complex and involves a number of people. But I'm going to pick up on your points about the police ignoring evidence of death in 5a and that they're no further forward with the investigation.

Like you, I found it shocking that the Met ignored the cadaverine. It's so shocking as to be unbelievable. So I decided to look at it differently. What if they haven't ignored it? What if that's what they're working on?

Taking that perspective, all the police statements to date can be explained as them continuing to conceal the true nature of their investigations, just as they did when they responded to Tony's FOI request. 

The extensive digging in Portugal a few years ago is consistent with them believing MM is dead and searching for a body. And Redwood's quote at the time: 'she may not have left the apartment alive' (which I hope you recall). Isn't that also a  giveaway?

Not to clutch at straws, but I'm hopeful that CB is a suspected accessory to concealment or disposal of the body and that the final pieces of the jigsaw are coming together. It's a possibility at least.

And I prefer this explanation to one that says the police are too stupid to get their stories straight, that MI5 couldn't make this story disappear in 13 years, that the police are being paid by the McCs or indeed any of the other conspiracy theories I've read over the years. And now the Germans are involved, how many more people must be 'in on it' to keep this huge cover-up secret? I suppose all these things are also possible, but it seems very scrappy and amateurish to be a British or EU-wide cover-up.

I don't subscribe to any theory that advocates the intricate involvement by MI5 as regards this case.

I don't think for a moment the McCanns are 'paying' the police.

I do not believe in any way shape or form that the German police hold the key to solving this case.  I don't know, can't explain, why a German individual is taking centre stage.  Maybe he's another Mark Williams-Thomas or Colin Sutton, in short all wind and wee-wee.  Maybe he's trying to make an international name for himself or maybe this is all just a load of tabloid crap.  Or maybe a combination of one or more factors.

Whatever, I remain convinced that the German prisoner is in no way connected with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  So far there is nothing to make me think otherwise.

Following this case from the beginning, there have been too many similar 'exclusives' dominating the airwaves for this to stand the test of time.

One thing I'm certain of.  The McCanns escaped the intense scrutiny of the Portuguese police directly they were named arguidos at the beginning of September 2007. by fleeing Portugal for refuge back in the UK - that in itself speaks volumes to me.  Since that time they have luxuriated in the knowledge that they are safe from prosecution.  They have been protected by the British government, the police and the media.  That must say something to even the most ardent McCann supporter.

There have been major incidents over the years that have necessitated complete establishment discretion, or concealment to put it bluntly - the missing Madeleine McCann mystery I believe to be one such case.   Always such incidents encompass heinous crimes that must never be allowed to surface,  involving such a wide spectrum of society that would totally destroy the establishment and the fabric of society if ever the detail came to light.

You needn't think too hard to get the idea.

Net result .... Madeleine McCann disappeared after arriving at the Ocean Club, Praia da Luz on 28th April 2007.  On the surface it's not complicated - a routine police investigation would have solved the case in a matter of days/weeks/months if allowed to proceed without interference.  That didn't happen - you need to ask why.

A clever operation such as this would not require the service of a German criminal, petty or otherwise.  The German prisoner is yet another distraction.

Don't be distracted.  Always go back to the beginning.

Keep your eye on the ball.

Put it in simple terms.

A three year old child disappears whilst on holiday with her parents and two siblings.

Praia d Luz is a fishing village, a small community on the sleepy coast of the Algarve.

It's very unlikely the McCanns or their group of friends knew anybody in the locale.  Even if they did - so what?

Madeleine McCann disappeared off the face of the earth.  Never seen or heard of since.

A straightforward case for routine policing.

The case was thoroughly investigated by the Portuguese police during the summer of 2007.  Their investigation was seriously compromised by outside interference - the British authorities.

The case was said to be investigated by private detectives hired by the Find Madeleine Co Ltd.

The case was then referred to London's Metropolitan police, initially in 2011 to collate and review all documentation relating to the case (including private detectives) which was later upgraded to an investigation in May 2013.

Despite all this intensive investigating, thirteen years later the case has not been solved.

Why not?

The specialist dogs seconded to Portugal, alerted to the scent of cadavar and blood in locations and on items belonging to the McCanns alone, in addition to the Renault Scenic hired by the McCanns.

Is it really necessary to look for another accomplice to further complicate an otherwise straightforward case of a missing child that focuses entirely on the prime suspects - the parents.  The deception aided and abetted by their holiday companions?

Keep your eye on the ball.

Meanwhile, back in the land of make believe the show goes on..

ATTACK CLAIM

Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B ‘raped’ British woman in Praia da Luz

Exclusive

• Nick Pisa
  

• 20 Jun 2020, 22:40
  
• Updated: 21 Jun 2020, 0:00
  

The paedophile, 43, is currently in prison in Germany after being convicted of the 2005 rape of a 72-year-old American woman in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

Court documents from that case reveal an unnamed British woman living in the area told the US victim she was also raped was by him.

The files say: “An English woman, who had obviously heard what had happened to her, also whispered to her at some point behind closed doors ‘the same thing’ had happened to her.”

The UK woman died of cancer before her claim could be investigated.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11914500/madeleine-mccann-christian-b-rape-claim-british-woman/
...................

Yeh yeh yeh, of course, what else can you expect.  Another one comes out of the woodwork to feed the frenzy.

I can't even bother to paste the whole stupid article.

If you've got a case put up, otherwise .

Wake me up when it's over .

One crucial lead that needs to be followed up is the DNA and hair samples extracted from the McCanns' rental car, which were found to be inconclusive or in Dr. John Lowe's words, "too complex for meaningful interpretation".

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

Instead, these supposedly competent three police forces are wandering around, looking for imaginary abductors.

It's like looking for a murderer when you stumble upon a dead body, before you even examine it. For all you know, the victim could have died of natural causes, but it doesn't matter because person X over there made two phone calls an hour before the murder, so he/she is clearly guilty.

"Despite all this intensive investigating, thirteen years later the case has not been solved."

It has not only not been solved.  
It goes deeper that that.
Thirteen years later there still isn't a credible case.


As we keep repeating, until you have a case – in other words you know what happened – you can't even start trying to solve it.
You can't solve a problem you can't define.
Grange and the BKA don't know what they are supposed to be 'solving'.
The PJ worked it out in the first hours.

Hobs wrote:I was reading the news article on the Sky News website about


Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B's name wasn't on list because of 'court blunder'

https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bs-name-wasnt-on-list-because-of-court-blunder-12010968

They had an interesting photo of Maddie and something caught my eye about her eyes, in particular her left eye.



The reflection in her left eye is white where I would expect to see some red.
If you look at her right eye there is a hint of red eye.
Is it just me or could there have been something wrong with her left eye causing the white reflection in the pupil?
I know there are several causes of this, and the most common one is simply a light shining off the optic nerve.
This happens when light entering the eye at a certain angle is reflected, causing a white eye effect and is totally harmless, however given  Maddie's history with her coloboma in her right eye, initially described as obvious and a great way to identify her and used in advertising later minimized to just a small fleck in her eye and not something they had 'promoted' it could be something worth noting.


However, the white reflex could be a sign of something more serious including, occasionally, retinoblastoma, a rare form of eye cancer that affects babies and young children mainly under the age of six.

It’s very important to remember that retinoblastoma is rare and only affects around 50 children a year in the UK. There are other, much more likely causes of this white eye effect.

However, we urge parents who have seen the white reflex in their child’s eyes to get it checked out as soon as possible just to rule out anything serious.

Yes, it's very telling.  There have been a number of cases where children have had a photo taken and a defect in their eye has been seen and the parents advised to get medical help to check it out.

I remember a story going back some years that a doctor was queue-ing up in a supermarket to pay for his groceries and he got talking to the man in front of him.  He noticed that the man had a defect in his eye (I can't remember what it was now) but he told him he should get it checked out, which the man did and it was a form of cancer, I think.  He later praised the doctor and said if it wasn't for him seeing it he would be dead without having the appropriate treatment.

I think Madeleine had a lot of medical problems which have been covered up, hence her medical records not being made available to the PJ.

At least her genitals were perfect, according to Kate in her bewk.

Jill Havern wrote:At least her genitals were perfect, according to Kate in her bewk.

After I posted my previous comment I remembered from a long time ago, probably 8 or 9 years ago or more, that there was a photo of Madeleine on the internet, she must have been about 2 years old, standing on a beach in a red swimming costume holding a bucket and spade and it looked like she had a stoma (colostomy) bag under her swimming costume on her stomach next to her belly button. 

A number of people on different forums commented on it as to what the bulge was, but it all petered out when some of the forums got closed down, never to be mentioned again.

(Jill, if this isn't appropriate please delete it.)

I don't think we need to go into this though because other photos of  her look normal enough.

Verdi wrote:Meanwhile, back in the land of make believe the show goes on..

ATTACK CLAIM

Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B ‘raped’ British woman in Praia da Luz

Exclusive

• Nick Pisa
  

• 20 Jun 2020, 22:40
  
• Updated: 21 Jun 2020, 0:00
  

The paedophile, 43, is currently in prison in Germany after being convicted of the 2005 rape of a 72-year-old American woman in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

Court documents from that case reveal an unnamed British woman living in the area told the US victim she was also raped was by him.

The files say: “An English woman, who had obviously heard what had happened to her, also whispered to her at some point behind closed doors ‘the same thing’ had happened to her.”

The UK woman died of cancer before her claim could be investigated.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11914500/madeleine-mccann-christian-b-rape-claim-british-woman/
...................

Yeh yeh yeh, of course, what else can you expect.  Another one comes out of the woodwork to feed the frenzy.

I can't even bother to paste the whole stupid article.

If you've got a case put up, otherwise .

Wake me up when it's over .

That element is likely to be truthful - if he raped one older woman then him raping another older women is not unlikely. Being it is in court documents and she is dead it feels to me like that element is true.

Just picked this up on the Controversy FB site.
I assume it's to do with all this latest nonsense:



Hopefully our Portuguese speaking friends will report back.

Jill Havern wrote:

I don't think we need to go into this though because other photos of  her look normal enough.

This is perfectly normal posture for a toddler . Slightly protruding abdomen , lower back curve . Our centre of gravity sits just below the navel at this age just out of baby stage toddlers are still " finding their feet " balance and coordination . 
Please let's not go down the MSM route . 
No offence , cookiemuncher 

Textusa has just published Sandra Felgueiras interview with Christian Wolter from 19^th June.
 
Sandra addresses him in English, so it is a transcription, and his replies have been translated by Joana Morais.
 
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2020/06/christian-wolter-sexta-as-9-june-19-2007.html

Doug D wrote:Textusa has just published Sandra Felgueiras interview with Christian Wolter from 19^th June.
 
Sandra addresses him in English, so it is a transcription, and his replies have been translated by Joana Morais.
 
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2020/06/christian-wolter-sexta-as-9-june-19-2007.htm

I've skim read the article but I see no mention of Eddie and Keela.  It is mentioned that "Madeleine is dead" but as it takes about an hour for cadaver odour to form it means that this "suspect" must have hung around for about an hour before taking away Madeleine's body, or am I missing something?  I know I'm "thick" sometimes but why does everybody deliberately ignore the findings of Eddie and Keela, the same as they ignore the findings of the PJ as if they never investigated?

Is everyone afraid of Eddie and Keela's findings as they are frightened of the findings of the PJ and hope they will all disappear into oblivion if they're never mentioned again.

cookiemuncher wrote:

Hobs wrote:I was reading the news article on the Sky News website about


Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B's name wasn't on list because of 'court blunder'

https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bs-name-wasnt-on-list-because-of-court-blunder-12010968

They had an interesting photo of Maddie and something caught my eye about her eyes, in particular her left eye.



The reflection in her left eye is white where I would expect to see some red.
If you look at her right eye there is a hint of red eye.
Is it just me or could there have been something wrong with her left eye causing the white reflection in the pupil?
I know there are several causes of this, and the most common one is simply a light shining off the optic nerve.
This happens when light entering the eye at a certain angle is reflected, causing a white eye effect and is totally harmless, however given  Maddie's history with her coloboma in her right eye, initially described as obvious and a great way to identify her and used in advertising later minimized to just a small fleck in her eye and not something they had 'promoted' it could be something worth noting.


However, the white reflex could be a sign of something more serious including, occasionally, retinoblastoma, a rare form of eye cancer that affects babies and young children mainly under the age of six.

It’s very important to remember that retinoblastoma is rare and only affects around 50 children a year in the UK. There are other, much more likely causes of this white eye effect.

However, we urge parents who have seen the white reflex in their child’s eyes to get it checked out as soon as possible just to rule out anything serious.

Yes, it's very telling.  There have been a number of cases where children have had a photo taken and a defect in their eye has been seen and the parents advised to get medical help to check it out.

I remember a story going back some years that a doctor was queue-ing up in a supermarket to pay for his groceries and he got talking to the man in front of him.  He noticed that the man had a defect in his eye (I can't remember what it was now) but he told him he should get it checked out, which the man did and it was a form of cancer, I think.  He later praised the doctor and said if it wasn't for him seeing it he would be dead without having the appropriate treatment.

I think Madeleine had a lot of medical problems which have been covered up, hence her medical records not being made available to the PJ.

I believe there is a simple explanation given it's a photo 2006 or 2007. They've used a free/cheap photo editor to clumsily remove red eye.

Rogue-a-Tory wrote:

cookiemuncher wrote:

Hobs wrote:I was reading the news article on the Sky News website about


Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B's name wasn't on list because of 'court blunder'

https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bs-name-wasnt-on-list-because-of-court-blunder-12010968

They had an interesting photo of Maddie and something caught my eye about her eyes, in particular her left eye.



The reflection in her left eye is white where I would expect to see some red.
If you look at her right eye there is a hint of red eye.
Is it just me or could there have been something wrong with her left eye causing the white reflection in the pupil?
I know there are several causes of this, and the most common one is simply a light shining off the optic nerve.
This happens when light entering the eye at a certain angle is reflected, causing a white eye effect and is totally harmless, however given  Maddie's history with her coloboma in her right eye, initially described as obvious and a great way to identify her and used in advertising later minimized to just a small fleck in her eye and not something they had 'promoted' it could be something worth noting.


However, the white reflex could be a sign of something more serious including, occasionally, retinoblastoma, a rare form of eye cancer that affects babies and young children mainly under the age of six.

It’s very important to remember that retinoblastoma is rare and only affects around 50 children a year in the UK. There are other, much more likely causes of this white eye effect.

However, we urge parents who have seen the white reflex in their child’s eyes to get it checked out as soon as possible just to rule out anything serious.

Yes, it's very telling.  There have been a number of cases where children have had a photo taken and a defect in their eye has been seen and the parents advised to get medical help to check it out.

I remember a story going back some years that a doctor was queue-ing up in a supermarket to pay for his groceries and he got talking to the man in front of him.  He noticed that the man had a defect in his eye (I can't remember what it was now) but he told him he should get it checked out, which the man did and it was a form of cancer, I think.  He later praised the doctor and said if it wasn't for him seeing it he would be dead without having the appropriate treatment.

I think Madeleine had a lot of medical problems which have been covered up, hence her medical records not being made available to the PJ.

I believe there is a simple explanation given it's a photo 2006 or 2007. They've

used a free/cheap photo editor to clumsily remove red eye.

Why bother, her right eye looks "red".  Perhaps they didn't know that particular photo was going to be released into the public domain, the same as they don't know a lot about their own daughter when Kate McCann was asked the 48 questions, one of them being "were you thinking of giving Madeleine to a family member to bring up", which was one of the many questions she refused to answer...

Eastree27 wrote:That element is likely to be truthful - if he raped one older woman then him raping another older women is not unlikely. Being it is in court documents and she is dead it feels to me like that element is true.

It's a tabloid news report, a Sun tabloid news report.

The Sun has outwardly supported the McCanns since the word go.

Show me the court document, then I might start believing.

Aside, supposing this person did rape two or more older women, what bearing does that, can that have, on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann?

'I KNOW he did it': Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner's friend says the drifter talked of selling children in Morocco

• A friend of Christian Brueckner believes the German took Madeline McCann
  
• Michael Tatschl was a cellmate of Brueckner's before their release in 2006
  
• The Austrian carpenter said pervert Brueckner was capable of snatching a child
  
• Mr Tatschl believes Madeline could have been sold to an individual or a sex ring
  

By Arthur Martin In Praia Da Luz For The Daily Mail
Published:  22:00, 21 June 2020   |  Updated:  00:32, 22 June 2020

A close friend and former cellmate of Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner declared yesterday: 'I know he did it.'

Michael Tatschl, who lived with Brueckner in a ramshackle farmhouse near the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz, described him as a pervert who was 'more than capable of snatching a child'.

The Austrian carpenter said his friend bragged about making money by trafficking drugs and burgling apartments, and once talked about 'selling children to Morocco'. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8445183/I-know-did-Christian-Brueckners-friend-says-German-guilty-taking-Madeline-McCann.html
....................

Madeleine McCann suspect's best friend believes he abducted her and sold her
______________________________________________________


EXCLUSIVE: Michael Tatschl lived with Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner in Praia da Luz

By
Martin Fricker
Jon Clarke

• 22:00, 21 JUN 2020
  
• Updated22:48, 21 JUN 2020
  

The best friend of Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner has dramatically claimed “I know he did it.”

Michael Tatschl lived with the German paedophile in Praia da Luz, where Madeleine vanished. He said: “He was a pervert and more than capable of snatching a child for sexual kicks or money.”

We can reveal that Austrian drifter Mr Tatschl was grilled last year by German and Austrian police investigating Madeleine’s disappearance.

He reportedly told them how his pal bragged about burgling rich tourists’ holiday apartments.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-suspects-best-friend-22230250
....................

PUSHER PURSUED


Drug dealer called Julia being hunted to help solve Madeleine McCann case
____________________________________________________


Exclusive

• Nick Pisa
  

• 21 Jun 2020, 22:20
  
• Updated: 21 Jun 2020, 22:20
  

A DRUG DEALER is being hunted by German cops in connection with Madeleine McCann’s disappearance.

She was the dope supplier to prime Madeleine suspect Christian B, 43, from 2007-2008 when he set up a lucrative drugs
operation after he fled Portugal.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11919823/drug-dealer-julia-help-solve-madeleine-mccann/
....................

1.  Why would anyone be stupid enough to believe Morocco, or any other country, would wish to buy children?  They've presumably got thousands of their own.  Or is the suggestion that Madeleine McCann was so special, so outstanding, had a certain quality that would make her desirable to child traffickers - as claimed by McCann friend and confidante - Jon Corner?
2.  Oh please, not Herr Frick and the Jon Clarke of the Olive Press .

3.  Is Nick taking the Pisa?



Tell me why oh why oh why people believe this utter tripe.

Verdi, I don't think anyone is believing it. I haven't seen it posted on this forum, even though the article was from earlier today. It's just a lot of tosh. And when the Mirror said that CB "abducted Madeleine" and then sold her to a sex gang, I moved on quickly

But the interview, given by Dr Amaral on Sunday, looks interesting. However, I can't understand what he's saying in it, as I don't understand Portuguese, but I have Google translated any text that I can find in relation to the interview.

Here is the link to the interview that Dr Amaral gave on Sunday 21 June, for those who understand Portuguese: 

https://tvi24.iol.pt/videos/maddie-amostra-de-saliva-descoberta-e-de-bebe-com-leite-materno/5eefc9ec0cf2c4d7ff3f8837?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ed-tvi24

sallypelt wrote:Verdi, I don't think anyone is believing it. I haven't seen it posted on this forum, even though the article was from earlier today. It's just a lot of tosh. And when the Mirror said that CB "abducted Madeleine" and then sold her to a sex gang, I moved on quickly

But the interview, given by Dr Amaral on Sunday, looks interesting. However, I can't understand what he's saying in it, as I don't understand Portuguese, but I have Google translated any text that I can find in relation to the interview.

But they do believe sallypelt, you only need read through this thread to see they believe.

That aside, I've moved two of your most recent posts on the subject of Dr Amaral's commentary over here, they appear above my post.  Somehow they landed in the 'New Members Questions/Comments' thread.



I'm assuming it was due to a forum blip - can you please let me know?

Verdi wrote:

sallypelt wrote:Verdi, I don't think anyone is believing it. I haven't seen it posted on this forum, even though the article was from earlier today. It's just a lot of tosh. And when the Mirror said that CB "abducted Madeleine" and then sold her to a sex gang, I moved on quickly

But the interview, given by Dr Amaral on Sunday, looks interesting. However, I can't understand what he's saying in it, as I don't understand Portuguese, but I have Google translated any text that I can find in relation to the interview.

But they do believe sallypelt, you only need read through this thread to see.

That aside, I've moved two of your posts on the subject of Dr Amaral's commentary over here.  Somehow they landed in the 'New Members Questions/Comments' thread.

Thank you, Verdi. I realised that I had posted them in the wrong thread, after I had posted them. I thought I was on this thread. 

What WAS I doing in the New Members Question/Comments' thread??  It's well-past witching hour, and my brain is scrambled, so cut me some slack. 

Our paths have crossed sallypelt.

No, I don't think it's you going ga-ga.  It happened to another member very recently - exactly the same.



I've passed it on to admin.