Greg Jones: Silvia Batista Testimony
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Professional and Featured blogs :: Featured professional blogs
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Greg Jones: Silvia Batista Testimony
by Jill Havern 23.02.20 17:47
February 23, 2020
Silvia Batista Testimony
Now that over 12 years have passed few people remember the exact details of the case as it emerged in the first day or two. It is worth reminding ourselves of the testimony of Silvia Batista, Head of Maintenance who was called to the Ocean Club about 10.30pm to arrive around 11pm.
Witness statement of Sílvia Maria Correia Ramos Batista
Date: 2007/07/26
Time: 16h00
Location: CID Portimão
Statement taken by Paulo Ferreira, Inspector
Concerning the matter of the process, the witness said:
That she has given statements for several times within the process, and remembers the contents of what she stated before, therefore reproducing the contents of the previous statements into this statement.
The deponent offers another statement because with the passage of time, since Madeleine’s disappearance, she has remembered some details of the facts that she witnessed, which she considers of some interest to the investigation.
Like she said before, she was alerted to Madeleine’s disappearance between 10.30 and 11 p.m. She was at home and was informed about the event through a telephone call. She immediately went to the Ocean Club, where she arrived only minutes before the GNR officers. When she arrived at the resort, she went immediately to apartment 5A, where she met several persons both on the inside and on the outside of the apartment. She went into the apartment but left it right away without speaking to anyone, because she was informed that the GNR officers were at the main reception, so she went to meet them.
When she arrived near the GNR officers, she verified that Gerry, Madeleine’s father, was behind her, in the company of another individual whose identity she doesn’t remember. At that moment, Gerry placed both knees on the floor, hit the floor with both hands, too, placing himself like a praying Arab, and shouted out twice in rage, and it was not possible to understand what he said. Then Gerry got back on his feet and accompanied the deponent and the other individual who was in the GNR car, to apartment 5A.
Already on location, the deponent entered the apartment and asked those who were present both for the passports of all family members and photographs of the missing person. The deponent walked Gerry to the GNR car, so he could deliver the requested documents. She states that she carried out these diligences, and other diligences, at the request of the GNR Commander as they used the deponent’s knowledge of the English language to translate the questions that were asked from the missing person’s family members, and the answers that were given. She remembers that Gerry gave the GNR Commander several photographs of the missing person. These were postcard-type photographs, taking their size and shape into account. They were actually photographs of the size and shape of a postcard, and they seemed to be all similar to her.
She also realised that from the very first moment on, both Gerry and the rest of the group members insisted in stating that Madeleine had been abducted, all of them using the word “abducted” [original in English] instead of missing, and they all showed great interest in informing the press about the situation.
The deponent further recalls that she entered the room where Madeleine had been sleeping. She now remembers that the door was closed. The inside of the room was dark. The shutters were down, and light entered only through its holes. The windows were closed and the curtains slightly open. Gerry, who accompanied the deponent during this visit, with the GNR officers also present, said that it had been him who had closed the window because the babies were still sleeping inside, which the deponent could verify as true. Gerry mentioned that when he noticed that Madeleine was missing, he had found the window and shutters open, and the curtains fluttering.
The deponent recalls that the cots that were used by the babies were placed in the middle of the room and aligned, and therefore she found it strange that someone could have taken Madeleine from the bed where she was sleeping up to the window, because there was no space to get through. The deponent opened the bedroom’s wardrobe to check if eventually Madeleine was hiding inside. Then they all left the room, and someone closed its door again. The deponent remained in the living room for a while, with the GNR officers, Gerry and the other group members that were there in a frenzy, going in and out and speaking on their mobile phones. She noticed that none of the group members, including the child’s mother and father, were busy looking for her. The mother was sitting on the master bedroom’s bed, the father accompanied the deponent and the GNR officers and the other group members walked in and out and spoke on the phone, apparently concerned about informing the press about the event.
She thought that the child’s mother was downbeat with the situation, the father showed his concern and also asked both for the press to be alerted and for dogs to be brought in for the search. Concerning the others, she can only recall that Fiona and her husband, Payne, were hysterical about the situation. At a given moment, right after the PJ’s elements arrived, the child’s parents removed the twins from the cots where they still slept, and took them into the apartment on the first floor. At Kate’s request, the deponent removed the soft toys and a blanket from the cots, and also took them to the first floor. The babies’ cots were left only with the mattresses.
The deponent also wishes to mention that at around 3 a.m. Madeleine’s parents asked for the presence of a priest on location. They didn’t explain the reason why they wanted a priest, but the deponent found the fact strange as there were no indications that the little girl was dead, and that’s the circumstance under which usually the presence of a priest is requested.
At a given moment, the deponent translated the deposition from one of the ladies that belonged to the group of English people, namely one that she indicates as being a brunette. This lady told the GNR officers, and the deponent translated, that she had seen a man crossing the road, possibly carrying a child. The deponent found that situation strange because she was convinced that when she saw this man, the lady was positioned in a spot that has no viewing angle to the location where she had seen the man. She doesn’t know exactly where the lady was positioned when she saw the man passing by, but she knows that she indicated that she saw him passing on the street that lies in front of the window to the bedroom where Madeleine was, walking into the direction of the street that leads to the Baptista supermarket.
When questioned about the clothes that the English group members wore that night, she mentions that she only remembers that Fiona wore a green blouse, Gerry wore a dark coloured shirt, and Fiona’s husband wore light-coloured trousers, she thinks cream-coloured.
And she stated nothing further.
As you will gather there are several very important clues that emerge in this testimony. One that I hadn't fully appreciated was how quickly the infamous First Search Photos were produced and the fact that they were printed on Photographic Paper. It seems that 4 copies were handed to the GNR officer at around 11-11.30pm on 3rd May.
The Portuguese police, not surprisingly found this very odd and suspicious.
The first question is where did they get the data file for this photo? It was not taken with the Canon but with an earlier camera probably 18 months to a year before. How did it come to be in their possession whilst on holiday?
The next question is where was it printed. The PJ soon established it could not have been on any of the printers in the Ocean Club. One of the nannies claimed that it was printed on a printer of her boy friend's which disappeared to France apparently before anyone could take a look at it. The next question is where did the supply of photographic paper come from. Apparently none of this type was available for sale in Luz (and of course it was night then anyhow). If it was the paper of the Nanny's BF why would he have brought a supply of photographic paper with him from wherever he came from?
The next question of course is why use this old photo as the first search photo rather than the more logical solution of downloading a crop of one of the pictures on their camera and printing that off on the Ocean Club printers. I have previously discussed this and concluded that the only logical reason for using an old photo would be if you had wanted to sow confusion as to what exactly Maddie currently looked like.
To me I just don't buy that this photo was found sometime between 10-11pm and that during this time, they found one of the Nannies who in turn found her boyfriend to print out the photos on his own printer and paper not available locally and hand the said photos to the GNR by 11.30pm and then for the mystery boyfriend to disappear along with his printer and supply of Kodac paper.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POSTERS.htm
https://patternsinthesand.blogspot.com/2020/02/silvia-batista-testimony.html?fbclid=IwAR27rhSgoOFHHTZZCHM1w7TnCH0qC6TuB3xwzQFsIdMW2Q8zDy8Tr5CXvXg
Silvia Batista Testimony
Now that over 12 years have passed few people remember the exact details of the case as it emerged in the first day or two. It is worth reminding ourselves of the testimony of Silvia Batista, Head of Maintenance who was called to the Ocean Club about 10.30pm to arrive around 11pm.
Witness statement of Sílvia Maria Correia Ramos Batista
Date: 2007/07/26
Time: 16h00
Location: CID Portimão
Statement taken by Paulo Ferreira, Inspector
Concerning the matter of the process, the witness said:
That she has given statements for several times within the process, and remembers the contents of what she stated before, therefore reproducing the contents of the previous statements into this statement.
The deponent offers another statement because with the passage of time, since Madeleine’s disappearance, she has remembered some details of the facts that she witnessed, which she considers of some interest to the investigation.
Like she said before, she was alerted to Madeleine’s disappearance between 10.30 and 11 p.m. She was at home and was informed about the event through a telephone call. She immediately went to the Ocean Club, where she arrived only minutes before the GNR officers. When she arrived at the resort, she went immediately to apartment 5A, where she met several persons both on the inside and on the outside of the apartment. She went into the apartment but left it right away without speaking to anyone, because she was informed that the GNR officers were at the main reception, so she went to meet them.
When she arrived near the GNR officers, she verified that Gerry, Madeleine’s father, was behind her, in the company of another individual whose identity she doesn’t remember. At that moment, Gerry placed both knees on the floor, hit the floor with both hands, too, placing himself like a praying Arab, and shouted out twice in rage, and it was not possible to understand what he said. Then Gerry got back on his feet and accompanied the deponent and the other individual who was in the GNR car, to apartment 5A.
Already on location, the deponent entered the apartment and asked those who were present both for the passports of all family members and photographs of the missing person. The deponent walked Gerry to the GNR car, so he could deliver the requested documents. She states that she carried out these diligences, and other diligences, at the request of the GNR Commander as they used the deponent’s knowledge of the English language to translate the questions that were asked from the missing person’s family members, and the answers that were given. She remembers that Gerry gave the GNR Commander several photographs of the missing person. These were postcard-type photographs, taking their size and shape into account. They were actually photographs of the size and shape of a postcard, and they seemed to be all similar to her.
She also realised that from the very first moment on, both Gerry and the rest of the group members insisted in stating that Madeleine had been abducted, all of them using the word “abducted” [original in English] instead of missing, and they all showed great interest in informing the press about the situation.
The deponent further recalls that she entered the room where Madeleine had been sleeping. She now remembers that the door was closed. The inside of the room was dark. The shutters were down, and light entered only through its holes. The windows were closed and the curtains slightly open. Gerry, who accompanied the deponent during this visit, with the GNR officers also present, said that it had been him who had closed the window because the babies were still sleeping inside, which the deponent could verify as true. Gerry mentioned that when he noticed that Madeleine was missing, he had found the window and shutters open, and the curtains fluttering.
The deponent recalls that the cots that were used by the babies were placed in the middle of the room and aligned, and therefore she found it strange that someone could have taken Madeleine from the bed where she was sleeping up to the window, because there was no space to get through. The deponent opened the bedroom’s wardrobe to check if eventually Madeleine was hiding inside. Then they all left the room, and someone closed its door again. The deponent remained in the living room for a while, with the GNR officers, Gerry and the other group members that were there in a frenzy, going in and out and speaking on their mobile phones. She noticed that none of the group members, including the child’s mother and father, were busy looking for her. The mother was sitting on the master bedroom’s bed, the father accompanied the deponent and the GNR officers and the other group members walked in and out and spoke on the phone, apparently concerned about informing the press about the event.
She thought that the child’s mother was downbeat with the situation, the father showed his concern and also asked both for the press to be alerted and for dogs to be brought in for the search. Concerning the others, she can only recall that Fiona and her husband, Payne, were hysterical about the situation. At a given moment, right after the PJ’s elements arrived, the child’s parents removed the twins from the cots where they still slept, and took them into the apartment on the first floor. At Kate’s request, the deponent removed the soft toys and a blanket from the cots, and also took them to the first floor. The babies’ cots were left only with the mattresses.
The deponent also wishes to mention that at around 3 a.m. Madeleine’s parents asked for the presence of a priest on location. They didn’t explain the reason why they wanted a priest, but the deponent found the fact strange as there were no indications that the little girl was dead, and that’s the circumstance under which usually the presence of a priest is requested.
At a given moment, the deponent translated the deposition from one of the ladies that belonged to the group of English people, namely one that she indicates as being a brunette. This lady told the GNR officers, and the deponent translated, that she had seen a man crossing the road, possibly carrying a child. The deponent found that situation strange because she was convinced that when she saw this man, the lady was positioned in a spot that has no viewing angle to the location where she had seen the man. She doesn’t know exactly where the lady was positioned when she saw the man passing by, but she knows that she indicated that she saw him passing on the street that lies in front of the window to the bedroom where Madeleine was, walking into the direction of the street that leads to the Baptista supermarket.
When questioned about the clothes that the English group members wore that night, she mentions that she only remembers that Fiona wore a green blouse, Gerry wore a dark coloured shirt, and Fiona’s husband wore light-coloured trousers, she thinks cream-coloured.
And she stated nothing further.
As you will gather there are several very important clues that emerge in this testimony. One that I hadn't fully appreciated was how quickly the infamous First Search Photos were produced and the fact that they were printed on Photographic Paper. It seems that 4 copies were handed to the GNR officer at around 11-11.30pm on 3rd May.
The Portuguese police, not surprisingly found this very odd and suspicious.
The first question is where did they get the data file for this photo? It was not taken with the Canon but with an earlier camera probably 18 months to a year before. How did it come to be in their possession whilst on holiday?
The next question is where was it printed. The PJ soon established it could not have been on any of the printers in the Ocean Club. One of the nannies claimed that it was printed on a printer of her boy friend's which disappeared to France apparently before anyone could take a look at it. The next question is where did the supply of photographic paper come from. Apparently none of this type was available for sale in Luz (and of course it was night then anyhow). If it was the paper of the Nanny's BF why would he have brought a supply of photographic paper with him from wherever he came from?
The next question of course is why use this old photo as the first search photo rather than the more logical solution of downloading a crop of one of the pictures on their camera and printing that off on the Ocean Club printers. I have previously discussed this and concluded that the only logical reason for using an old photo would be if you had wanted to sow confusion as to what exactly Maddie currently looked like.
To me I just don't buy that this photo was found sometime between 10-11pm and that during this time, they found one of the Nannies who in turn found her boyfriend to print out the photos on his own printer and paper not available locally and hand the said photos to the GNR by 11.30pm and then for the mystery boyfriend to disappear along with his printer and supply of Kodac paper.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POSTERS.htm
https://patternsinthesand.blogspot.com/2020/02/silvia-batista-testimony.html?fbclid=IwAR27rhSgoOFHHTZZCHM1w7TnCH0qC6TuB3xwzQFsIdMW2Q8zDy8Tr5CXvXg
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA 
MBGAA wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Jill Havern- Captain, Chief Faffer, Forum Owner
- Posts : 31115
Activity : 43929
Likes received : 7758
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : Parallel universe -
Re: Greg Jones: Silvia Batista Testimony
by crusader 23.02.20 19:41
This statement makes very interesting reading. Silvia Batista said when she entered the room in which Madeleine had been sleeping,she found it strange that someone could have taken Madeleine from the bed where she was sleeping up to the window because there was no space to get through.
So , we now have Gerry moveing the cots to get to the window to close the blinds, then push them back together again to go outside and see if they could be opened from the outside.
So , we now have Gerry moveing the cots to get to the window to close the blinds, then push them back together again to go outside and see if they could be opened from the outside.
crusader- Forum support
- Posts : 6797
Activity : 7148
Likes received : 345
Join date : 2019-03-12
Similar topics» Greg Jones: Who's an insider?
» Greg Jones: The Missing Link
» Greg Jones: Patterns on the wall in Apartment 5a
» Sunday Express 9 Feb 2014 - MADELEINE - There REALLY WAS a COVER-UP
» A statement remembered with the passage of time - Batista
» Greg Jones: The Missing Link
» Greg Jones: Patterns on the wall in Apartment 5a
» Sunday Express 9 Feb 2014 - MADELEINE - There REALLY WAS a COVER-UP
» A statement remembered with the passage of time - Batista
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Professional and Featured blogs :: Featured professional blogs
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
