Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
€1.2 Million
For Moral damages?
MORAL
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear
For Moral damages?
MORAL
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear
____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
MayMuse- Posts : 2033
Activity : 3472
Likes received : 1413
Join date : 2016-04-15
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
Translated up to page 42 now.
Thank you Anne.
Thank you Anne.
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
Fantastic work, thank you to all those involved!
____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
MayMuse- Posts : 2033
Activity : 3472
Likes received : 1413
Join date : 2016-04-15
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
MayMuse wrote:€1.2 Million
For Moral damages?
MORAL
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear
I think GA should issue a writ, against the McCan'ts, stating that the 'actions' of the McCan'ts, caused him to be 'deeply and seriously depressed'. The writ, imo, should also describe how he suffered from:
■ permanent anxiety
■ insomnia
■ lack of appetite
■ irritability
■ indefinable fear
and that he felt,
■ "totally destroyed"
■ "irreparably damaged", and
■ "totally destroyed from a moral, social, ethical, emotional and family point of view"
£1.2million, from 'them', for 'damage to his reputation and HONOUR', should just about 'cover it'!
Oh, the 'irony'!
jta: I have always 'praised' Anne, not least because she was, a times, the ONLY person, that reported the 'trials', TRUTHFULLY, everyday.
ALONE, against all the 'odds', the UK Madia 'spin' machine employed in 'support' of their 'untouchable, cash cows'!
GO ANNE!
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
None of my business really but does anyone know if Snr Amaral is still with his wife? Can they now get re-married?
I am, at heart, an old romatic and yearn for at least one happy ending in this case....
mods - please delete if thought inapproriate/personal
I am, at heart, an old romatic and yearn for at least one happy ending in this case....
mods - please delete if thought inapproriate/personal
mootle- Posts : 75
Activity : 145
Likes received : 64
Join date : 2017-01-05
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
Does anyone know if they have settled the costs yet?
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
Just a thought: If Kate's book 'madeleine' was written at a time when Kate and Gerry McCann knew that the investigation had been archived by the PJ and after their arguido status had been lifted; a time when they thought mistakenly, as it transpired in the Supreme Court ruling (McCann/Amaral 2017), can the PJ and SY use the contents of her book as evidence since there are many anomalies?
Kate may not have brazenly written it if she had understood her legal position, in my opinion, of course.
Kate may not have brazenly written it if she had understood her legal position, in my opinion, of course.
tara- Posts : 53
Activity : 98
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2017-03-29
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
It could and would become part of the evidence since she wrote it freely detailing her version of events.
It pins her to a specific timeline, specific actions and specific language, all of which can be compared to her written police statements and also all the other statements both written and verbal that have come from them.
Her lawyers from the get go would have told her to say nothing since anything she says could be used as evidence.
If you say nothing they can't use your words against you, especially when you confess the victim is dead.
She ignored them and wrote her book.
Her lawyers would have been raging at her stupidty, kate though, clearly seemed to think she knew better and has freely presented us with exhibit 1
It pins her to a specific timeline, specific actions and specific language, all of which can be compared to her written police statements and also all the other statements both written and verbal that have come from them.
Her lawyers from the get go would have told her to say nothing since anything she says could be used as evidence.
If you say nothing they can't use your words against you, especially when you confess the victim is dead.
She ignored them and wrote her book.
Her lawyers would have been raging at her stupidty, kate though, clearly seemed to think she knew better and has freely presented us with exhibit 1
____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
Thank you, that is most interesting Hobs. Misplaced confidence on Kate, and Gerry's part then. IMO
tara- Posts : 53
Activity : 98
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2017-03-29
Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
According to this article they are going to the European courts.
Anyone know how long that would likely take and whether Rocky's assetts remain frozen?
According to this article they are going to the European courts.
Anyone know how long that would likely take and whether Rocky's assetts remain frozen?
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Similar topics
» Hero of the Day: Grateful thanks to Anne Guedes for translating the Supreme Court Verdict transcript of Snr Amaral's victory
» Pamalam: Page 47 is brilliant page #McCann V #Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017
» McCann family vs Amaral et al Judgment Verdict - April 27, 2015: Translated by Anne Guedes
» McCann v Amaral Libel Trial transciptions by Anne Guedes and 'Astro'
» McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)
» Pamalam: Page 47 is brilliant page #McCann V #Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017
» McCann family vs Amaral et al Judgment Verdict - April 27, 2015: Translated by Anne Guedes
» McCann v Amaral Libel Trial transciptions by Anne Guedes and 'Astro'
» McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum