The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as many of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!

Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by MayMuse on 08.02.17 22:01

€1.2 Million
For Moral damages?

MORAL 
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear

laughat lol!

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.” bingo

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1826
Reputation : 1277
Join date : 2016-04-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by Doug D on 09.02.17 12:16

Translated up to page 42 now.

Thank you Anne.

Doug D

Posts : 2482
Reputation : 865
Join date : 2013-12-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by MayMuse on 09.02.17 12:33

Fantastic work, thank you to all those involved!

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.” bingo

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1826
Reputation : 1277
Join date : 2016-04-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by jeanmonroe on 09.02.17 12:40

@MayMuse wrote:€1.2 Million
For Moral damages?

MORAL 
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear

laughat lol!

I think GA should issue a writ, against the McCan'ts, stating that the 'actions' of the McCan'ts, caused him to be 'deeply and seriously depressed'. The writ, imo, should also describe how he suffered from:

■ permanent anxiety
■ insomnia
■ lack of appetite
■ irritability
■ indefinable fear

and that he felt,

■ "totally destroyed"
■ "irreparably damaged", and
■ "totally destroyed from a moral, social, ethical, emotional and family point of view"

£1.2million, from 'them', for 'damage to his reputation and HONOUR', should just about 'cover it'!

Oh, the 'irony'!

jta: I have always 'praised' Anne, not least because she was, a times, the ONLY person, that reported the 'trials', TRUTHFULLY, everyday.

ALONE, against all the 'odds', the UK Madia 'spin' machine employed in 'support' of their 'untouchable, cash cows'!

GO ANNE! high5

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5818
Reputation : 1663
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by mootle on 02.03.17 22:31

None of my business really but does anyone know if Snr Amaral is still with his wife? Can they now get re-married? 

I am, at heart, an old romatic and yearn for at least one happy ending in this case....

mods - please delete if thought inapproriate/personal
avatar
mootle

Posts : 64
Reputation : 53
Join date : 2017-01-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by plebgate on 28.04.17 9:21

Does anyone know if they have settled the costs yet?

____________________
Judge Judy to shifty  witnesses   -    LOOK AT ME  -   Um is not an answer.

If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
roll

plebgate

Posts : 6131
Reputation : 1804
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by tara on 28.04.17 16:51

Just a thought: If Kate's book 'madeleine' was written at a time when Kate and Gerry McCann knew that the investigation had been archived by the PJ and after their arguido status had been lifted; a time when they thought mistakenly, as it transpired in the Supreme Court ruling (McCann/Amaral 2017), can the PJ and SY use the contents of her book as evidence since there are many anomalies?
Kate may not have brazenly written it if she had understood her legal position, in my opinion, of course.
avatar
tara

Posts : 33
Reputation : 39
Join date : 2017-03-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by Hobs on 28.04.17 17:06

It could and would become part of the evidence since she wrote it freely detailing her version of events.
It pins her to a specific timeline, specific actions and specific language, all of which can be compared to her written police statements and also all the other statements both written and verbal that have come from them.

Her lawyers from the get go would have told her to say nothing since anything she says could be used as evidence.
If you say nothing they can't use your words against you, especially when you confess the victim is dead.

She ignored them and wrote her book.

Her lawyers would have been raging at her stupidty, kate though, clearly seemed to think she knew better and has freely presented us with exhibit 1

____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
avatar
Hobs
Researcher/Analyst

Posts : 856
Reputation : 517
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 53
Location : uk

View user profile http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by tara on 28.04.17 18:51

Thank you, that is most interesting Hobs. Misplaced confidence on Kate, and Gerry's part then. IMO
avatar
tara

Posts : 33
Reputation : 39
Join date : 2017-03-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anne Guedes: McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 - Snr Amaral's victory

Post by plebgate on 30.04.17 7:39

http://linkis.com/brisbanetimes.com.au/gH5v8

According to this article they are going to the European courts.

Anyone know how long that would likely take and whether Rocky's assetts remain frozen?

____________________
Judge Judy to shifty  witnesses   -    LOOK AT ME  -   Um is not an answer.

If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
roll

plebgate

Posts : 6131
Reputation : 1804
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum