Re: Twitter (News and important information only please)

by **sharonl** on 13.11.18 23:26

If the police were actually doing a job, what is the likelihood that they would allow Sonia to discuss it in this way? What would be her chances of obtaining enough information for the interview. Is this going to be all about Sonia opinion?

by **Tony Bennett** on 13.11.18 23:32

@Verdi wrote:Thanks to forum member ladyinred..

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15686-operation-grange-to-receive-extra-150k-sky-news#393390

Well, "to explain why the police have to be allowed to finish the job".

It will be interesting to see how Ms Poulton spins this one.

How will she describe what the police's 'job' actually is in this case?

For more than 7 whole years and 6 whole months it has been: 'to find the abductor' (and Madeleine).

Is she going to suggest that, after all this time, the remit is to be changed?

When she tells us (if she does) what the 'job' actually is, will she tell us how and when we will know that it is 'finished'?

Does she have any basis whatsoever for thinking that the case is anywhere near finished?

And why has Poulton been picked by Nick Ferrari for this interview?

Surely it is because she is a 'safe pair of hands'. She is NOT going to suggest, surely, that the McCanns should now be looked at?

Perhaps she will in a 'Colin Sutton' sort of a way...after all his input was to say words in her film to the effect that "The McCanns should be looked at so that they can be eliminated".

Poulton's Madeleine video, starring Coiin Sutton, made over 10 derogatory references to the work of Goncalo Amaral and the PJ - see my article on her film. She didn't have a positive word for them.

And what was Poulton's record at David Icke's 'People's TV'?

She gave a platform successively to Stephen D Birch, Rosalinda Hutton and Michael Shrimpton to spout their unintelligible nonsense.

And she followed up that by deliberately arranging for Rosalinda Hutton to appear in a 2-page spread in the Sun n which she harmed our cause immensely by portraying 'anti-McCanns' as being like her: 'An anti-McCann troll who got a buzz out of squishing people on Twitter'.

Just what the mainstream media ordered, Poulton. Thanks for nothing at all

by **Verdi** on 22.11.18 0:11

by **sharonl** on 22.11.18 18:58

@Verdi wrote:

Why is there only one entry on that report?

Why is the rest of the page concealed?

How can we be sure that the call was made be her and that it isn't a screenshot from someone else?

Can we be sure that pic has not been manipulated?

How do we know that she wasn't on hold for 31 minutes?

by Ladyinred on 22.11.18 19:01

... It's also dated February of this year, so not a recent "call".

I have made a note of the number. I might give them a ring tomorrow big grin

by **sharonl** on 22.11.18 21:08

@Ladyinred wrote:... It's also dated February of this year, so not a recent "call".

I have made a note of the number. I might give them a ring tomorrow

and if you get through?

by NickE on 23.11.18 8:35

@sharonl wrote:
@Verdi wrote:

Why is there only one entry on that report?

Why is the rest of the page concealed?

How can we be sure that the call was made be her and that it isn't a screenshot from someone else?

Can we be sure that pic has not been manipulated?
f
How do we know that she wasn't on hold for 31 minutes?

Didn't she claim that she had talked to a Detective "Mark" in Operation Grange?
This is a tweet a few days ago from the Brazil guy who has for many years claimed Madeleine is alive in Holland and has posted several photos of girls and even dropped the name and photo of the "kidnapper".
He also reported a hoax sighting and sent a photo to the British media some years ago and they published the fake story.
There is only 4? detectives in the O.G so I wonder if this is the same Mark as Isabelle said she talked to?
Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Screen76

Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Screen76

by **Verdi** on 23.11.18 12:08

Whatever, it seems mighty strange to me that particular people have direct contact with police officers investigating a serious crime, even more strange that they are able to discuss an investigation with someone who effectively wanders in off the street.

It amounts to a stranger phoning the police, asking questions and getting answers? How is this possible I ask myself?

Maybe it's a technique that I've missed somewhere along the line - diplomacy perhaps big grin

?

by sandancer on 23.11.18 12:30

@NickE wrote:
@sharonl wrote:
@Verdi wrote:

Why is there only one entry on that report?

Why is the rest of the page concealed?

How can we be sure that the call was made be her and that it isn't a screenshot from someone else?

Can we be sure that pic has not been manipulated?
f
How do we know that she wasn't on hold for 31 minutes?

Didn't she claim that she had talked to a Detective "Mark" in Operation Grange?
This is a tweet a few days ago from the Brazil guy who has for many years claimed Madeleine is alive in Holland and has posted several photos of girls and even dropped the name and photo of the "kidnapper".
He also reported a hoax sighting and sent a photo to the British media some years ago and they published the fake story.
There is only 4? detectives in the O.G so I wonder if this is the same Mark as Isabelle said she talked to?

Moreno is busy posting all over YouTube that Madeleine is studying at Wageningen University in the Netherlands !

I don't know what is needed to get into University in the Netherlands , but a 15 year old ?

Moreno is nothing but a fool .

by Doug D on 12.12.18 9:26

12:59 PM - 8 Dec 2018
@BreesAnna
FollowFollow @BreesAnna
More
I’m going to make this article haunt you ⁦@DavidRoseUK⁩ as will many other great journalists How police chief Lenny Harper lost the plot over the Jersey children's home 'murders' | Daily Mail Online

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086018/How-police-chief-Lenny-Harper-lost-plot-Jersey-childrens-home-murders.html

More
Replying to @BreesAnna @wedger_jon @DavidRoseUK
Looks like someone informed another Forensic Scientist to fudge results in #McCann case. Same award winning dogs were used in both cases. This is convo I had on FB

Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Dt7O2zmWoAArCI8

Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Dt7O2zmWoAArCI8

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dt7O2zmWoAArCI8.jpg

Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Dt7O2zcXgAEg29U

Dt7O2zcXgAEg29U.jpg

by **Jill Havern** on 17.12.18 8:46

Twitter (News and important information only please) - Page 23 Ceop10

https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1073717285989212160

by **Verdi** on 08.01.19 21:05

by **Verdi** on 09.01.19 12:20

by **Jill Havern** on 09.01.19 12:31

I think I saw it said on twitter yesterday that Isabelle claims to have said Kate called Madeleine a brat.

Is there any proof of this?

by **Verdi** on 09.01.19 15:24

First I've heard of it - I think it very unlikely.

It would be extremely helpful if people who put themselves up-front, speaking out about the case of Madeleine McCann, would at least try to get their facts right.

It's detrimental to the case and to Madeleine's memory, for any old tom dick 'n harry to spout off on a public forum on a subject they know little or nothing about. Filling in the gaps with any old nonsense only destroys any chance of moving forward and finding more about the key to the mystery and the public learning the truth.

Second thoughts - maybe that's the reason they do it think

!