With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Thank you, PeterMac.
Also, I read your message on gofundme.com/Legal-DefencePJGA - brilliant.
Guest- Guest
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
I posted it on the CMOMM facebook page this morning - here it is in case anyone missed it:Ladyinred wrote:
Thank you, PeterMac.
Also, I read your message on gofundme.com/Legal-DefencePJGA - brilliant.
Great comment written by retired Police Superintendent, Peter Macleod on Leanne Baulch's Defence Fund for Dr Amaral: http://www.gofundme.com/Legal-DefencePJGA
Won 11 Euros on the lottery, bought another ticket and here is the rest. But just to add . . .
Told the world that the shutters had been broken and smashed. They were not.
Told the world the curtains were wide open, then changed it to tight closed.
Told the world in Leveson they hated the Press Intrusion, but Bell then revealed they had paid him £ half a million to keep the story on the front pages for a year.
Told the world they despised the press innuendo, then sold the story of their sex lives to the Sun.
Told the world they would continue the “search for Madeleine” but failed even to search the first night, preferring to “keep vigil’ [Kate] or go to sleep on a camp bed. [Gerry] Then admitted they had not searched on the following days, because they had been “BUSY”.
Told the world that Madeleine had been abducted. But even their own highly experienced solicitor from the most feared and expensive firm in the WORLD, who had been prepareing the case for the previous 3 YEARS had to admit in court that they had NO EVIDENCE of this.
Told the Pope, who very quickly afterwards “whooshed” it from the Vatican website.
Is there a pattern emerging ?
It is all well documented on www.mccannfiles.com
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
A wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
The McCcanns never said the shutters were broken and smashed...wouldn't we be more likely to find the truth if we were more accuratePeterMac wrote:" />
angel7777- Posts : 4
Activity : 4
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-08
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
No they didn't, they have always taken great care to pass their messages via third parties to allow for "confusion".angel7777 wrote:The McCcanns never said the shutters were broken and smashed...wouldn't we be more likely to find the truth if we were more accuratePeterMac wrote:" />
But the fact remains that identical stories that the shutters were broken and "jimmied" (whatever that is) were relayed to the media next day by the people who said this was what the McCanns had told them, eg Patricia Cameron, Philomena McCann, Jon Corner. Shurely shome mishtake, as Private Eye would say, if they had all misheard in exactly the same way.
So, nice try, but no cigar.
Ashwarya- Posts : 141
Activity : 162
Likes received : 19
Join date : 2011-04-23
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
No they didn't, they have always taken great care to pass their messages via third parties to allow for "confusion".The McCcanns never said the shutters were broken and smashed...wouldn't we be more likely to find the truth if we were more accurate
But the fact remains that identical stories that the shutters were broken and "jimmied" (whatever that is) were relayed to the media next day by the people who said this was what the McCanns had told them, eg Patricia Cameron, Philomena McCann, Jon Corner. Shurely shome mishtake, as Private Eye would say, if they had all misheard in exactly the same way.
So, nice try, but no cigar.
------
Indeed. The Mucks always get other people to do their dirty work.
j.rob- Posts : 2243
Activity : 2511
Likes received : 266
Join date : 2014-02-02
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
PeterMac wrote:They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
neither kate nor Gerry used those words so they did not tell the world the shutters had been smashed or broken...that is totally untrue. The word they used was forced. This is typical of the myths and untruths that are used to discredit them
angel7777- Posts : 4
Activity : 4
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-08
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Jimmied = Jemmiedj.rob wrote:No they didn't, they have always taken great care to pass their messages via third parties to allow for "confusion".The McCcanns never said the shutters were broken and smashed...wouldn't we be more likely to find the truth if we were more accurate
But the fact remains that identical stories that the shutters were broken and "jimmied" (whatever that is) were relayed to the media next day by the people who said this was what the McCanns had told them, eg Patricia Cameron, Philomena McCann, Jon Corner. Shurely shome mishtake, as Private Eye would say, if they had all misheard in exactly the same way.
So, nice try, but no cigar.
------
Indeed. The Mucks always get other people to do their dirty work.
noun
(plural) -mies[list="sense_list level_1"]
[*]a short steel crowbar used, esp by burglars, for forcing doors and windows
[/list]
verb
-mies, -mying, -mied[list="sense_list level_1"]
[*](transitive) to prise (something) open with a jemmy
[/list]
Word Origin
C19: from the pet name for JamesExample Sentences Including 'jemmied'
Forbes, Bryan A Song at TwilightI noticed you've got a decent lock on the door, and the chain, but of course any door can be jemmied.
roy rovers- Posts : 473
Activity : 538
Likes received : 51
Join date : 2012-03-04
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
You now claim the mccanns gave clear instructions to tell the story...how could you possibly know this to be true...Chinese whispers is exactly what it wasPeterMac wrote:They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
angel7777- Posts : 4
Activity : 4
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-08
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
no doubt the family and friends had discussed the converstaion with each other before speaking to the mediaPeterMac wrote:They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
angel7777- Posts : 4
Activity : 4
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-06-08
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Lighten up baby!angel7777 wrote:The McCcanns never said the shutters were broken and smashed...wouldn't we be more likely to find the truth if we were more accuratePeterMac wrote:" />
Guest- Guest
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
[color:6601=000000]"the apartment... was locked" Philomena McCann, Gerry McCann's sister | |
Philomena McCann, said on 04 May: "Some people may ask why they left the children alone in the apartment but it was locked and they had a full view of the front door and they were checking every half hour." [color:6601=000000]Link to Daily Mail article containing this quote [color:6601=000000]Just one problem, the link says gone. from McCann files [color:6601=000000]sorry, i know this is a botch but c/p is not my strong point. Angel 777 would be interested to hear your explanation for this comment. They told Philomena on the 4th may that the door was locked. Its also in the PJ files. later they changed that ludicrous story to unlocked. How else could an "abduction " occur?? Peter Mac i always enjoy your posts & humour. |
morse- Posts : 24
Activity : 24
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-10-23
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
I believe you are mistaken - these are hardly chinese whispers.angel7777 wrote:You now claim the mccanns gave clear instructions to tell the story...how could you possibly know this to be true...Chinese whispers is exactly what it wasPeterMac wrote:They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
"
[color:ef54=0DD8E6]The First Reactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[color:ef54=000000]Here we read the first reactions from Kate and Gerry's closest family and friends, immediately after they have been contacted individually with the news that Madeleine has been 'abducted'. Note how consistent the stories are that an 'abductor' gained access to a locked apartment by breaking open the shutter on the bedroom window and escaping by the front door. The story changed later when it became clear the shutters on the window had not been forced, were not damaged in any way and could only be opened from inside the apartment. From that point, the McCanns became convinced that an 'abductor' had entered through 'open' patio doors and escaped through the open shuttered window. Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns' spokesman, is eventually forced to admit that "There was no evidence of a break-in".
|
Richard IV- Posts : 552
Activity : 825
Likes received : 265
Join date : 2015-03-06
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
C&P'd from the above post.
Trish said: "When Kate checked, she came out screaming. Maddy had gone. The door was open and the window in the bedroom and shutters were jemmied open.Nothing had been touched and no valuables taken."
I have enlarged above what gets me everytime. No valuables taken. The abiding sadness in this case, the priorities of that family, were evident from the very beginning.
Trish said: "When Kate checked, she came out screaming. Maddy had gone. The door was open and the window in the bedroom and shutters were jemmied open.Nothing had been touched and no valuables taken."
I have enlarged above what gets me everytime. No valuables taken. The abiding sadness in this case, the priorities of that family, were evident from the very beginning.
Rabbitte- Posts : 20
Activity : 28
Likes received : 8
Join date : 2015-06-05
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
This was Trish Cameron talking about the jemmied shutters on Newsnight on Friday 4th - notice the video of MBM is already being circulated (24hrs later). And notice the presenter says "they say she was abducted".
Richard IV- Posts : 552
Activity : 825
Likes received : 265
Join date : 2015-03-06
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
So let's get this straight. An old video of Madeleine showing her looking cute, sweet and eminently marketable, is both made available and being used by the MSM within 24hrs?... and yet it takes 3 weeks for the *ahem* 'Last Photo' to surface, complete with its Exif data as the only photographic evidence that three siblings still existed on Madeleine's alleged 'last afternoon'?Richard IV wrote:This was Trish Cameron talking about the jemmied shutters on Newsnight on Friday 4th - notice the video of MBM is already being circulated (24hrs later). And notice the presenter says "they say she was abducted".
Maybe it's just a case of bureaucracy and 3 weeks is simply how much things are slowed down when one of the government's spin doctors gets involved... or maybe this simply highlights how much the whole case stinks? Call me old fashioned and anti-Establishment but I reckon a 'last photo' would have been equally, if not far more, 'marketable' and if it existed would have been saturating the news asap. Maybe people felt they had to wait 3 weeks so as people there wouldn't recall what the rather poor weather was like that day and not, as appeared in the *ahem* 'Last Photo', hot and sunny!?!
____________________
Justice... Fought for by the masses. Purchased by the wealthy. Traded by the powerful.
Knitted- Posts : 240
Activity : 259
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2015-01-02
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Hi Rabbitte and welcome.Rabbitte wrote:C&P'd from the above post.
Trish said: "When Kate checked, she came out screaming. Maddy had gone. The door was open and the window in the bedroom and shutters were jemmied open.Nothing had been touched and no valuables taken."
I have enlarged above what gets me everytime. No valuables taken. The abiding sadness in this case, the priorities of that family, were evident from the very beginning.
I agree, it's still gets to me too. I cannot imagine that they could say that.
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry
http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0
http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/
lj- Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Interesting that 8 years on, somone is trying to re-write history.
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
I would not trust so many people to say the right thing unless I'd made sure they could read it of either an email or a cribsheet.I'm PeterMac wrote:They told the identical story to at least four family members and friends, who were also clearly given instructions to tell the story to the Press,
and in every case the story was the same. Smashed, broken open, forced, "jammed . . . or whatever the word is" . . . door hanging off its hinges.
People don't make that sort of stuff up, at 1,500 miles distance. They have to be told.
Not Chinese whispers. Different people, in different parts of the country, speaking to different newspapers and radio and TV stations.
The astonishing thing is that they gave out this story AFTER the arrival of the police, and AFTER Gerry had been outside to move the shutters up and down . . .
So AFTER they knew that the story would be shown conclusively to be "untrue".
Good try.
Perhaps, what with so many things going wrong that night and possibly not wishing to have the changes to the script overheard/traced, the changes were not passed on until it was far to late?
After all, they deleted calls from their mobiles on the night, being forensically aware.
Mrs. H using 'chalet' is interesting. Mislaid the instructions?
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
It is always interesting to see what topics really wind people up.
Shutters
Curtains
Dogs
Last Photo
First Photo
seem to be the main ones.
The first three are discussed in Dr GA's book, and in 60 Reasons.
Is that a clue ?
Shutters
Curtains
Dogs
Last Photo
First Photo
seem to be the main ones.
The first three are discussed in Dr GA's book, and in 60 Reasons.
Is that a clue ?
Private Eye never sleeps ! !
1398, p. 27
" />
We are surely due for another Mitchell "Sighting".
How about
Maddie may have been spotted in New Zealand, walking Ben Needham's dingo
Sufficiently tasteless to match anything Mitchell and the McCanns and their shills have come up with so far.
" />
We are surely due for another Mitchell "Sighting".
How about
Maddie may have been spotted in New Zealand, walking Ben Needham's dingo
Sufficiently tasteless to match anything Mitchell and the McCanns and their shills have come up with so far.
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
Just re-reading some of the drivel and lies that were uttered from the very beginning, makes it quite clear why the McCanns will always actively seek to keep well away from any court room and the risk of ever being cross questioned under oath.
Their stories would unravel, they would probably unravel, and all those friends and relatives who initially stood by them and supported them, would be made to look naïve and gullible.
Their stories would unravel, they would probably unravel, and all those friends and relatives who initially stood by them and supported them, would be made to look naïve and gullible.
Dr What- Posts : 249
Activity : 286
Likes received : 35
Join date : 2012-10-26
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
They sent a hapless Solicitor to the High Court to lie on their behalf. TB managed to destroy her with one simple questionDr What wrote:Just re-reading some of the drivel and lies that were uttered from the very beginning, makes it quite clear why the McCanns will always actively seek to keep well away from any court room and the risk of ever being cross questioned under oath.
Their stories would unravel, they would probably unravel, and all those friends and relatives who initially stood by them and supported them, would be made to look naïve and gullible.
When GM gave evidence in Portugal he too was cut down by the judge
Sadly on both those occasions they were discussing a side-issue, so could not really get in deep.
The Mccanns have skilfully - and not so skilfully - used other people to lie on their behalf.
Some of the people they have used KNOW they were lying, and should be dealt with accordingly
Other may not realise, and can be written off as stupid.
Re: With acknowledgements and sincere apologies to Private Eye
I recently came across a snippet from Clarence Mitchell where he states that he often gave information to the press as 'friend of the family' so as not to make things look too official or something. TM has been positively brilliant at getting their own message across via various mouth-pieces. Problem is that the source - as ever - is not of the intelligence needed to convince those with an IQ higher than room-temperature.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Similar topics
» FRAUDULENT FUND
» A long year of promises Acknowledgements to Anorak for the collection
» A PUBLIC APOLOGY TO MR BRIAN KENNEDY
» Re: Email and Missingabroad
» Why have the McCanns lied about Maddie's coloboma for 4 years?
» A long year of promises Acknowledgements to Anorak for the collection
» A PUBLIC APOLOGY TO MR BRIAN KENNEDY
» Re: Email and Missingabroad
» Why have the McCanns lied about Maddie's coloboma for 4 years?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum