Re: CEOPS

by **tigger** 08.07.15 9:40

This is the first part of the Home Office report on Ceop: rest can be found via Companies House [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Foreword by the Home Secretary

When we created the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre over three

years ago, we recognised the need to develop a national law enforcement capability

that would act as a focus for fighting the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Since its inception, CEOP has been a remarkable success. It has rescued over 500

children, and has led to the arrest of over 800 people seeking to harm children. It has

developed the leading UK child internet safety website “ThinkUKnow”, backed up by

a comprehensive schools programme with award winning materials, and has achieved

significant success through its ‘Most Wanted’ website, which targets missing sexual

offenders who offend against children.

CEOP has achieved this by looking at the problem holistically and through an integrated

partnership approach, working with a wide range of stakeholders, including local and

international law enforcement, industry and charities.

CEOP has been affiliated with the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), but we

now believe that the time is right to give CEOP a legal identity of its own. We believe

that there is a long-term need to provide protection for children, and that we should

create CEOP as a Non-Departmental Public Body (NDPB). This will allow CEOP to

respond quickly and effectively to emerging threats, and to take on additional related

work, including missing and / or abducted children, enhancing the protection of children

at a national level.

I would like to thank CEOP and their partners for the work that they have done over the

past three years to protect children, and to SOCA for their support for the Centre, and I

look forward to CEOP continuing to ensure the safety of children both in the online and

offline environments.

Alan Johnson

by lj 09.07.15 1:08

Verdi wrote:
willowthewisp wrote:Hi Tony, thank you for the reply to my post.
At least it was shown in the PJ files that a certain Doctor for what ever reason chose not to provide evidence that might have given the "Leicestershire Police" a chance to find Madeleine Mc Cann seven years ago!
Doe's it remind you of Kate's only answer out of 48, "by not answering the questions you do realise you, that you are jeopardizing the investigation" Yes, "if that's what you think"?
Did at this stage of the investigation, Kate already knew of her daughter's demise and it was save your own *rse time?
How many times have you heard the McCann sycophants excuse that she was acting under the instructions of her lawyer? Well I don't give a monkey's who was or wasn't advising her, as far as I'm concerned any well balanced loving parent would care more about finding their missing child than self preservation. IF she knows nothing about her child's fate she has nothing to worry about has she? Maybe a little personal inconvenience/discomfort experienced by awkward questions and suspicion but that pales into insignificance compared to what you child might be going through.

If totally innocent what the hell was the woman thinking?

I have no idea what this woman is thinking. I only know she is not thinking of her daughter, Madeleine.

by **tigger** 13.08.15 15:07

Just came across this in the LostMarketingPloy.blogspot.com - from 2011 : hope I'm not duplicating.

[size=32]Security breach found on Ceop website[/size]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

11 Apr 11 - 12:03PM |

A web page set up and designed to protect children while they are online has been found to be insecure, it has been reported.

According to reports, a form found on the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) website to report alleged offenders was not encrypted.

Security experts claim that the breach of data could have put children at risk.

Ceop spokesman Peter Davies told the BBC: "The security was not as good as it should have been but it's been fixed now. But to have accessed it you would have had to have really gone hunting for it and would have had to have had very high levels of expertise."

As a result of the breach, there will now be a full investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office. The unencrypted pages meant personal details entered on the site could have been visible to anyone with a sinister motive.

Ceop was set up in 2006 to help find and convict individuals that pose a risk to children, as well as working to keep young people safe while online.

Enhanced and [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] services available at Capita RVS.[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Registered office: 71 Victoria Street, Westminister, London SW1H 0XA. Registered in England No. 01396443.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Capita Recruitment Vetting Service is registered as an umbrella organisation with the Criminal Records Bureau (England and Wales) and Disclosure Scotland.

@ 2008 The Capita Group Plc. All rights reserved

Onderkant formulier

There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!

unquote

by willowthewisp 14.08.15 11:24

Hi Tigger,
thanks for your article about the information about CEOP and the "Protection of children on line", I wonder if Big Jim would care to pass comment on the unencrypted details being made available to persons accessing this information, as wasn't his first duty was to "protect vulnerable children" against these people?

by jeanmonroe 14.08.15 11:45

There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!
----------------------------------------------

There's no way, the new 'wheeze', CRA 'system' don't know they are putting 'missing' children at grave risk with their text 'alerts', deliberately exposing their details to every paedo in the 'missing' child's 'area' who has 'registered' with CRA.

'I was just taking her/him, in my car, to the police station, honest, guv'

by **tigger** 14.08.15 16:44

willowthewisp wrote:Hi Tigger,
thanks for your article about the information about CEOP and the "Protection of children on line", I wonder if Big Jim would care to pass comment on the unencrypted details being made available to persons accessing this information, as wasn't his first duty was to "protect vulnerable children" against these people?

You'd think wouldn't you?

Now that children's charities are are finally in the news - Miss Bagwash and Co. - let's hope the press/charity commision will have a look at what they actually DO!

CEOPS

Re: CEOPS

Re: CEOPS

Re: CEOPS

CEOPS

Re: CEOPS

Re: CEOPS

Latest topics