Re: That Sonia Poulton documentary update 8 June: The detailed reponses of 'Tigger', Vikki Scott and Tony Bennett

by Mark Willis 18.06.15 8:12

lj wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:(Betamax was a far superior medium than VHS but c'est la vie)

Meanwhile, BREAKING NEWS
WHO IS THE MYSTERY PERSON WE WILL ALL BE SHOCKED BY? - REVEALED!

Yes, on the QT I found out it is none other than Lord Lucan!
Stumbling through the almost impenetrable undergrowth at Craiglockhart, ace film maker, Poulton, discovers Lucan, happily chatting with Elvis as Shergar gambolled merrily around the triffids, to the adumbrating eldritch echoes of a time long since gone....or ever likely to sodding well happen...

Agree about Beta max. I still have a machine and tapes. Also things like a commodor 64. I secretly have fun imagining how, after my death, my kids will be completely bewildered trying to find out what things are and how to work it. The other day my daughter and I were watching an old movie, not really old, just from 64. In it was somebody doing a presentation with a slide projector. She almost fell of her chair laughing. When I told her we had to make those slides with a typewriter and a lot of drawing: all the graphs etc. she got a concerned look, like I was from outer space!

I know that feeling! Brought up with Radio as the main "box in the room", no fridge or telephone...
Around 1979-80 we had the arcade machines then the home micro computer boom and our own machines to record TV, yes the Betamax versus VHS battle was on. The best format lost sad

I had a VIC20, Spectrum, BBC, Commodore64 was THE machine, wasn't it?
Then the consoles came...Atari, Amiga and I still have my slide projector and slides.
No, one cannot explain this to our kids, can we? Yes, we really really really did look at our photos like this.
Now look. We can "develop" our own pictures in an instant.
Yet it takes Scotland Yard three years and £10m to resolve, umm, nothing. Impressive.

by **tigger** 18.06.15 13:18

Mark Willis wrote:
lj wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:(Betamax was a far superior medium than VHS but c'est la vie)

Meanwhile, BREAKING NEWS
WHO IS THE MYSTERY PERSON WE WILL ALL BE SHOCKED BY? - REVEALED!

Yes, on the QT I found out it is none other than Lord Lucan!
Stumbling through the almost impenetrable undergrowth at Craiglockhart, ace film maker, Poulton, discovers Lucan, happily chatting with Elvis as Shergar gambolled merrily around the triffids, to the adumbrating eldritch echoes of a time long since gone....or ever likely to sodding well happen...

Agree about Beta max. I still have a machine and tapes. Also things like a commodor 64. I secretly have fun imagining how, after my death, my kids will be completely bewildered trying to find out what things are and how to work it. The other day my daughter and I were watching an old movie, not really old, just from 64. In it was somebody doing a presentation with a slide projector. She almost fell of her chair laughing. When I told her we had to make those slides with a typewriter and a lot of drawing: all the graphs etc. she got a concerned look, like I was from outer space!
I know that feeling! Brought up with Radio as the main "box in the room", no fridge or telephone...
Around 1979-80 we had the arcade machines then the home micro computer boom and our own machines to record TV, yes the Betamax versus VHS battle was on. The best format lost
I had a VIC20, Spectrum, BBC, Commodore64 was THE machine, wasn't it?
Then the consoles came...Atari, Amiga and I still have my slide projector and slides.
No, one cannot explain this to our kids, can we? Yes, we really really really did look at our photos like this.
Now look. We can "develop" our own pictures in an instant.
Yet it takes Scotland Yard three years and £10m to resolve, umm, nothing. Impressive.

Ah! Terry Pratchett in 'Good Omens' where a 17th C book of predictions includes: DO NOTTE BUYE BEETAMAX....

by Mark Willis 19.06.15 7:29

LOL!!

by snook 27.07.15 3:08

First, most of the comments following Vikki Scott's piece were on the Justice for Madeleine Facebook group where it was originally posted. It was was not pretty. Most were supporting Poulton and only a few agreed with the contents. She has mentioned Poulton again in another piece on Enigma.

Secondly, we're still waiting to be shocked by this ardent online supporter close to TM's. Last week she tweeted that she was going to announce a 'treat' for doubters and supporters. Again this never materialised.

As far as doorstepping at the McCann residence, Poulton specifically said she had spoken to Kate who had been most amenable until she asked awkward questions . So if Kate was initially happy to speak to Poulton it begs the question, who arranged it? I cannot see Kate opening the door with a smile on her face ready to engage with some random woman within cameraman in tow.

by Liz Eagles 31.07.15 15:29

Once again no revelation from Sonia Poulton despite her tantalising tweet with a promise of something last week. There were a few horrid words exchanged over the road when Cristobell told everyone off and the thread was closed.

Any sniff of a documentary or at least the hint of one? nope, absolute zilch.

This week, Poulton and Hutton are mostly involved with supporting Jeremy Corbyn. The former is tweeting the latter is blogging. This would be the revolutionary who is going to take UK forward? Jeez, I want to weep.

by snook 31.07.15 15:43

But they are ' right on ' innit Aquila? Social justice, free speech, equal society. All top of the dastardly duo's agenda.. Unless you happen to disagree with them.

by Liz Eagles 31.07.15 15:56

snook wrote:But they are ' right on ' innit Aquila? Social justice, free speech, equal society. All top of the dastardly duo's agenda.. Unless you happen to disagree with them.

Hutton will have to get a move on and write another hate blog about Tony Bennett pretty sharpish otherwise she'll have no-one commenting on her latest Corbyn purple prose. The crap written about Richard D. Hall didn't elicit much so it'll be back to Bennett bashing soon to keep up the interest in the blog.

by snook 31.07.15 16:53

There is always the fascinating subject of her revolutionary diet. You know, the one she wishes was on shelves of ALL GPs in the UK. I have to say I'm surprised the BMA haven't published a paper on it yet.

by Guest 31.07.15 23:36

aquila wrote:Once again no revelation from Sonia Poulton despite her tantalising tweet with a promise of something last week. There were a few horrid words exchanged over the road when Cristobell told everyone off and the thread was closed.

Any sniff of a documentary or at least the hint of one? nope, absolute zilch.

This week, Poulton and Hutton are mostly involved with supporting Jeremy Corbyn. The former is tweeting the latter is blogging. This would be the revolutionary who is going to take UK forward? Jeez, I want to weep.

It's girl power!

I don't know why she insists that anyone critical of Poulton wants to stop this threatened documentary. I for one can't wait to see it - that's the problem, I can't wait..

by Guest 31.07.15 23:43

snook wrote:
There is always the fascinating subject of her revolutionary diet. You know, the one she wishes was on shelves of ALL GPs in the UK. I have to say I'm surprised the BMA haven't published a paper on it yet.

:puke: - that's the way to do it - gottle o'geer gottle o'geer

Revolutionary diet my bum, it's nothing but a hash of information that's been out there for decades. I had to laugh at the price reduction and free introduction, the same day Amazon was offering a summer sale of hundreds of kindle books AND the free introduction is readily available on Amazons look inside !!!

ETA:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 12.08.15 12:17

Just seen this chez Hutton

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Still munching that popcorn and laughing BB1? You have all been had and you are too stupid to know it.

She's not referring to the legendary 'documentary' is she?

Nah surely not, it's nigh on 10 months since the original announcement.. tic toc tic toc

by **tigger** 12.08.15 14:38

I can only field some old ones, but they're quite good.....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] tigger ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] did not profile you, however object to accusation of sending you hate mail. It is a criminal offence. Please produce proof.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Cristobell Author ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] yeh, cause I'm gonna go running around finding stuff for you. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] You are a gnat. Squish,

by Guest 12.08.15 15:12

tigger wrote:I can only field some old ones, but they're quite good.....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] tigger ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] did not profile you, however object to accusation of sending you hate mail. It is a criminal offence. Please produce proof.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Cristobell Author ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] yeh, cause I'm gonna go running around finding stuff for you. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] You are a gnat. Squish,

Femme Fatale or Fatale Femme? She has such a way with words doesn't she - so elequent for an auferess! I can smell a Nobel prize for literature in the wind.. dance

by snook 12.08.15 17:11

She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

by Joss 12.08.15 17:44

snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

ROFL

What planet is she on?

by Joss 12.08.15 17:47

Verdi wrote:
tigger wrote:I can only field some old ones, but they're quite good.....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] tigger ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] did not profile you, however object to accusation of sending you hate mail. It is a criminal offence. Please produce proof.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Cristobell Author ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] yeh, cause I'm gonna go running around finding stuff for you. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] You are a gnat. Squish,

Femme Fatale or Fatale Femme? She hasu sch a way with words doesn't she - so elequent for an auferess! I can smell a Nobel prize for literature in the wind..

Very, unique big grin

Stay on topic, please. Mod.

by aiyoyo 12.08.15 20:08

snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?

by **Jill Havern** 12.08.15 20:41

aiyoyo wrote:
snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?

Nope

Didn't you read her blog correctly aiyoyo? It's CMOMM that's self combusting.

by aiyoyo 12.08.15 20:41

Verdi wrote:Just seen this chez Hutton

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Still munching that popcorn and laughing BB1? You have all been had and you are too stupid to know it.

She's not referring to the legendary 'documentary' is she?

Nah surely not, it's nigh on 10 months since the original announcement.. tic toc tic toc

She's probably referring to the legendary 'pocumentary' that has been teasingly serialised on the social media.

What exactly did she mean to convey when she said "you have all been had......"?
Has she let the cat out of the bag - that SP has been leading her adoring sheeple down the garden path? Likely this is another one of her infamous foot in mouth moments.....?

I can smell a Novice Prize for her patched artworks in the wind........

by aiyoyo 12.08.15 22:44

Get'emGonçalo wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?
Nope Didn't you read her blog correctly aiyoyo? It's CMOMM that's self combusting.

Blog? Do you mean a certain public DIARY wherein a certain somebody airs her dirty linens (about her mental condition and what have you), and records her obsession with a certain male member here?

I have kept well clear from that open sewage-tank because of the odious stench there. The last time (ages ago) that I looked in there, I heard the ferocious barking of the distinctive bitch residing there.

If a certain novice pulp fiction novelist who's burning excessive fuel with her bitterness and maliciousness as if there is no tomorrow, speculates on this place self combusting, let's just say it's patently obvious she is projecting.

Of course she's thick as two bricks not to realize some people over yonder have been leading her by the nose from the outset to suit their purpose. She's the protagonist whose notoriety and notorious artworks they exploit on, to manage/operate a purported free voice sanctuary for Madeleine case, when in fact the forum that condones her notoriety is nothing but an internet cafe (sanctuary) for bitter members to gossip about this place.

by Guest 12.08.15 23:06

by Liz Eagles 13.08.15 9:15

Ladyinred wrote:

Yep, here's the Vikki Scott (whoosed) post.

THE LUNATICS HAVE TAKEN OVER THE ASYLUM
By Vikki Scott

Originally published on the Justice for Madeleine page, but since censored and removed. If you try to access this article, a note from their Admin says: “This post has been removed”.

The Justice for Madeleine FB page currently has 33,985 members, also on the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] hashtag.

Vikki’s post has however been posted on another Madeleine McCann FB group: the Madeleine McCann Debate group, which has 1,753 members.

Vikki Scott published this article about Sonia Poulton on 8 June:

THE LUNATICS HAVE TAKEN OVER THE ASYLUM.

A precognitive statement by Terry Hall if ever there was one. Were The Fun Boy Three to release that single now it would serve as the perfect anthem for what now laughingly passes for debate of the McCann conundrum on Twitter and many other dark recesses of the internet, Facebook included in some cases.

That it is impossible for personalities not to be attacked when 'discussing' a case with such polarised views is something those engaging have to put up with. Casualties of war and all that, but what we are witnessing lately has gone beyond name-calling and slight ridicule. No, what we witness now is an all-out assault to destroy reputations, research and possibly ruin certain people’s lives.

What we are seeing now is verging on apostasy. The investigation into what happened to Madeleine McCann has been abandoned by some in favour of venomous attacks on those who were previously allies to the cause, 'fighting' for the same truth to emerge, namely what was the fate of the little child and at whoses hands did she suffer.

There are many theories into what happened to Madeleine but the only certainty is, we don't know, other than she is no longer with us, whether you believe she is dead or being held by a loving family/paedophile (delete as applicable) and is lost forever or findable.

There are theories as to what date she met her fate, how she met her fate, the reasons why there seems to be a cover-up and why so much assistance is being given to the parents.
The theories are endless.

Was Tanner lying?

Does Smithman exist ?

How long was David Payne in the apartment, if at all on that fateful evening on 3 May 2007?

What did Kate shout when she gave the alarm and why?

You get the picture.

30,000 documents to pore over, yet the pressing priority at the moment seems to be to attack each other in the vilest way possible.

Most people who are sure the parents are responsible for Madeleine's demise are, quite rightly, fighting Goncalo Amaral's corner. Yet many of these same people do not agree with his theory and timeline.
Textusa has a faithful following and an enviable number of views of the blog site.

Do these two come in for attacks for the crime of not going along 100% with other theories and from the very people who purport to be batting for the same side? Not very often.

Neither are subject to personal attacks by those who ostensibly fight for the same truth, even if their theories are questioned, so when I see the disgusting very personal attacks being launched now I have to ask: why and what is the true agenda?

The only people trying to ridicule Amaral and Textusa are those who see it as a life mission to protect Kate and Gerry at any cost and ridicule anyone who cannot see the light of innocence shining from their stricken eyes.

So why are we seeing so-called sceptics turning on other sceptics with the gusto that would see them earning rapid promotion within the ranks of Stop The Myths?

It is no revelation that I have no faith in the much vaunted 'revelatory' documentary everyone is waiting for with bated breath. Nor do I think it is a coincidence that these attacks have gained momentum since the ‘alternative’ journalist, Sonia Poulton rode into town on the coat tails of the tragic death of Brenda Leyland.

Ms Poulton has found a willing ally in one Rosalinda Hutton, a.k.a. Cristobell, who already had a reputation for stretching the truth and throwing her toys out of the pram when forum/Facebook group members refused to kneel at the altar of her words of wisdom.

Although I am reluctant to give either a name check, it needs to addressed as to why Tony Bennett has now become the target of Ms Poulton's smears.

For months now we have contradictory statement after contradictory statement with regard to her documentary which, thanks to her self- promotion, some people think is going to blow the lid off the murky world of McCann.

She told us it was going to be aired by mainstream media. Hang on, make that a debut in the USA now. It was going to be screened after Brenda's inquest, no wait, after the conclusion of the trial in Portugal. The only recurring theme throughout has been the teasers telling her panting audience that she has door-stepped Kate McCann and others and is going to imminently reveal a personality ‘close to the McCanns that will shock us'.

Still waiting.

We have also been made privy to the fact that she has been ‘troll’ hunting those who have ‘defamed’ her (get the theme?) and that there are many many people who are trying to stop her from producing this masterpiece.

Get over yourself Poulton. Richard Hall's videos have had over a million views with, I have no doubt, far superior research than your troll-fest - and without the self-promotion that is another recurring theme of this production.

I don't doubt this will earn me the accusation that I am working for ‘the other side’, because anyone who casts doubt on this forthcoming extravaganza is obviously in the pay of the McCanns - as how could anyone possibly not slavishly hang on her every word?

The above notwithstanding, say I give Ms Poulton the benefit of the doubt. Each to their own, and if the job gets done, all power to her. So I have to ask why, with the aid of Hutton and her attack dog with a big gun (what is they say about men who love guns?) has she launched an unprovoked attack on Mr Bennett?

It is no secret that Hutton has made it her life mission to sully his reputation and research ever since she received a seven-day suspension from the forum, The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann, to cool off after one of her ever-increasing outbursts.

Suspension mind you, not ban as she purported. Buoyed by her ‘success’, revelling in announcing herself as a bitch who loves to ‘squish’ in the train wreck of an article in The Sun (arranged by guess who – yes, Sonia Poulton), she regaled her adoring public with tales of death threats from Mr Bennett - although as with all of her assertions no-one has yet see proof of these ridiculous claims. But, hey, it makes for great copy for the blog.

We get it, Cristobell, you don't like Tony. You are playing in the major league now. Out on location, making THE documentary. So why is your new bezzie mate Poulton now attacking Mr Bennett? Why are you two accusing him of being a ‘McCann stooge’? What on earth has this got to do with any search for ‘truth’? And why, having forced him to go to the effort of putting his personal details online for your delectation do you respond with ‘kiss my a**e’ ? Have you any idea how ridiculous you look?

And not content with that, the pair of you continue the attacks on Twitter, including, Ms Hutton, our Very own Ben Thomson in your attacks.

We get it. No-one can compete with you as an ‘attractive, articulate woman’. That your words are awaited by the online community with bated breath is a given, so it begs the question, what do you hope to achieve and what is YOUR game?
You demand answers, yet refuse to answer the most innocuous ones asked of you. You have been proven a liar. Even Poulton won’t back you in your assertions against Ben, yet still you refuse to apologise. Is it so difficult to admit the world of Cristobell may be wrong sometimes? Still, I understand - after all, as you keep reminding us, you are a ‘better writer’, which is no more than we expect from a ‘Lecturer in English'. Is there no end to your talents ?

See - from where I am sitting, Tony is not the one whoring himself out to Murdoch's Sky whilst purporting to be outraged by the way Brenda was hounded to death by that very organisation.

Nor does he or Ben feel the need to ridicule and rubbish other people's work and research.

I don't recall Mr Bennett or any other ‘anti’ McCann group giving house room to the lunatic Birch like Ms Poulton did for a full half-hour.

Love or loathe Mr Bennett I would put money on the fact that most of us have arrived at our conclusions based on much of the early research done by him. Research most of us have neither the time or inclination to undertake ourselves. I doubt the numbers now awake to the lies of McCann would be any the wiser were it not for Mr Bennett.
Serious researchers are not interested in the identities of those who support the McCanns and are not seeking out ‘fat hairy pros’ to ‘out’ in public.

Neither of you have any self-awareness. You speak of dignity yet engineered a farce at Brenda's inquest. You scream ‘foul’ at Martin Brunt yet revel in the prospect of doing the very same thing. Indeed, Ms Hutton is now blaming ‘anti-McCanns'’for Brenda's suicide.

Indeed, your latest tome tells us how you can see why the MSM are disgusted with anti campaigns and that you have nothing for contempt for us. Remind us again which side of the fence you sit - or do you need to consult your new found pals over in the ‘pro’ Debate camp ?

Your adoring fans are salivating at the prospect of this forthcoming documentary. I hope they are not disappointed. I'm sure they won’t be.

Madeleine had become lost in the cesspit of sensationalism and I'm sure most of your adoring fans will be happy when they see you trying to humiliate ordinary men and women who support Kate and Gerry.

Yes, some go too far, but that statement can be applied to both sides of the argument - and all you two are doing are stoking the fire. Credible journalists don’t need to provide a running commentary on their projects. They are judged on results - and they certainly don't make personal attacks on anyone who may not agree with their way of working.

So what results has Poulton shown to give us faith in this forthcoming expose? I'm still waiting for the ‘Unmasking of a Messiah’, the promised ‘'outing’ of David Icke following Ms Poulton 's sudden departure from his TV station.
If I recall correctly, that was put on hold due to ‘legal reasons’. Yet this very same lady tells us she cannot afford a legal team to take on one man who was building a website for her? How odd. Money seems no object for the McCann project?

I wonder who is funding it? - as it is being run past legals now prior to its outing? Is it surprising that her former colleagues in the alternative media community refer to her as 'controlled opposition'?

So I have to wonder, what exactly is your game ? How did Sonia manage to breach the state-of-the-art security system purported to be installed at chez McCann? How come Clarence hasn’t been on the front pages decrying the attack on the vulnerable mother of a missing child? Why do Sky tolerate and pay a woman who purports to denounce them for their support of the McCann family?

Team McCann must be rubbing their hands with glee. To those who can’t wait to get pull up the sofa for a evening’s exciting viewing, ask yourself, just who is behind it?

On second thoughts, take no notice of me. After all, I'm just another shill, throwing a spanner in the works, trying to destroy all attempts to explain to the world ‘The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann’.

Update. It seems Ms Poulton is now to be in talks with broadcasters but has no idea when (or presumably where) it will be aired? I have to wonder who produces a film, then has the legalities ironed out, not knowing if it will ever be marketable to a wide audience. Must be a money-no-object production? Seems rather at odds with previous announcements.

Stop it Vikki. I bet you are one of those dark mysterious individuals who have been plotting to undermine this gem.

by **tigger** 13.08.15 11:39

aiyoyo wrote:
snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?

Alex Woolfall might do? He did quite a good job for some couple or other.

It will be close to a year soon and I'm going to lose a tenner if it appears on TV in the UK before september. That's euros mind you...

by sonic72 13.08.15 16:20

"It seems Ms Poulton is now to be in talks with broadcasters but has no idea when (or presumably where) it will be aired?"

She's been saying she's in talks for a while now, I personally dont think we will see the finished article.

by aiyoyo 13.08.15 19:50

tigger wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
snook wrote:She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?

Alex Woolfall might do? He did quite a good job for some couple or other.

It will be close to a year soon and I'm going to lose a tenner if it appears on TV in the UK before september. That's euros mind you...

Alex Woolfall? Won't be cheap. Depends if he would accept her 'diet' book for payment in lieu of fee. big grin

It's never going to appear......
Her claim of talks with mainstream broadcasters has been going on forever.
Probably not wrong to deduce the finished product fails to meet 'documentary' standards for consideration.

All very dodgy...after all this tantalizing and promises....then zilch...

by snook 13.08.15 21:23

I don't care what she says, no one commences such a lon running project before having it run by legal first and with an idea of which market will purchase it. Who would embark on a costly project with no idea of saleability? In any case, she was supposedly 'in talks' with broadcasters when is started this and she also seems to have forgotten that she, via her lapdog said she'd been commissioned. If this were true then the oulet would have been known then.

by Guest 13.08.15 22:39

snook wrote:I don't care what she says, no one commences such a lon running project before having it run by legal first and with an idea of which market will purchase it. Who would embark on a costly project with no idea of saleability? In any case, she was supposedly 'in talks' with broadcasters when is started this and she also seems to have forgotten that she, via her lapdog said she'd been commissioned. If this were true then the oulet would have been known then.

Meanwhile the good lady seems to be on a sabbatical. Perhaps in the land of Oz negotiating terms direct with the fat controller? Lapdawg must be in denial unless of course she went along for the ride as excess baggage.

by snook 13.08.15 23:51

Verdi wrote:
snook wrote:I don't care what she says, no one commences such a lon running project before having it run by legal first and with an idea of which market will purchase it. Who would embark on a costly project with no idea of saleability? In any case, she was supposedly 'in talks' with broadcasters when is started this and she also seems to have forgotten that she, via her lapdog said she'd been commissioned. If this were true then the oulet would have been known then.
Meanwhile the good lady seems to be on a sabbatical. Perhaps in the land of Oz negotiating terms direct with the fat controller? Lapdawg must be in denial unless of course she went along for the ride as excess baggage.

No Verdi, you are wrong. 'Troof Seekers' never rest. She is now busy ( with her lapdawg ) throwing the full might of her not inconsiderable influence behind Jeremy Corbyn's bid to become the next Labour leader. What I find amusing about this is that as a self appointed spokesperson for victims of child sexual abuse both her and Hutton are wilfully ignoring the fact that their messiah blanked repeated attempts to get him to address the scandal on his doorstep when he was working tirelessly for the Islington luvvies.

by Guest 14.08.15 22:39

snook wrote:
Verdi wrote:
snook wrote:I don't care what she says, no one commences such a lon running project before having it run by legal first and with an idea of which market will purchase it. Who would embark on a costly project with no idea of saleability? In any case, she was supposedly 'in talks' with broadcasters when is started this and she also seems to have forgotten that she, via her lapdog said she'd been commissioned. If this were true then the oulet would have been known then.
Meanwhile the good lady seems to be on a sabbatical. Perhaps in the land of Oz negotiating terms direct with the fat controller? Lapdawg must be in denial unless of course she went along for the ride as excess baggage.

No Verdi, you are wrong. 'Troof Seekers' never rest. She is now busy ( with her lapdawg ) throwing the full might of her not inconsiderable influence behind Jeremy Corbyn's bid to become the next Labour leader. What I find amusing about this is that as a self appointed spokesperson for victims of child sexual abuse both her and Hutton are wilfully ignoring the fact that their messiah blanked repeated attempts to get him to address the scandal on his doorstep when he was working tirelessly for the Islington luvvies.

Ha! Ha! Ha!

Ah yes Corbyn, stuck in the 1980s when the loony left rocked the very foundations of Westminster, the political hard left with Ken 'the red' Livingstone flying the red flag from the rooftops of the GLC. Another one who is said to have known about VIP child abuse for decades. Wide spread child abuse connected to child care establishments across the nation, many of which were administered by the loony left regime.

Corbyn representing Islington along side Lady Margaret Hodge, another one who is said to have know about VIP child abuse. Lady Margaret Hodge whose nephew, one Philip Edmonds, who by some strange coincidence just happened to be staying at the Ocean Club with his children during the same week as the McCann group.

In the words of Kate McCann - "One coincidence, two coincidences - maybe they're still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence."

Amen to that!

by willowthewisp 15.08.15 10:53

Hi Verdi,
Do not forget who the owners of the Ocean Club complex,Symington's, family reportedly related to one of three named arquidos from the original case notes, friends of John Major?
PR company involved in the companies image damage reputation, who were paid £500,000 to keep a certain couple in the MSM headlines,Leveson, "we were not suspects eh Gerry,Kate,Robert"?
I have seen a speech made in the House of Commons from Ann Clwyd about child abuse from Bryn Estyn/ Alyn,Jillings Inquiry, where in the speech Ann recites the pressure being exerted by the "Insurance Companies being liable for compensation to the abused children",if proven, which led to the inquiry's being suppressed by the State!!?
So the State is complicit in with holding evidence of abuse of children in their care and eventually certain person's have now been found Guilty of the abuse's they had covered up!!?
Would the same need to suppress a "Death of a child" in a business sense lead to the name of the Company being exposed involved in a cover up?
Not wishing to name the names of the company and it may be unfortunate in this sense, who are the recent new owners of the Ocean Club complex from where Madeleine McCann disappeared /Abducted 3 May 2007.
The very same company having huge difficulties over two child deaths in an Apartment complex in Greece?
The website Aangirfan had posted pictures of Angus Symington who appears to be very similar to a former named arquido, Doppel ganger?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]	tigger ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] did not profile you, however object to accusation of sending you hate mail. It is a criminal offence. Please produce proof.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]	Cristobell Author ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.])
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] yeh, cause I'm gonna go running around finding stuff for you. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] You are a gnat. Squish,

Latest topics