Correio da Manha 28/10-2014

by NickE 28.10.14 19:36

Maddie: ADN de 444 pelos foi alvo de análise
Em 2007, foram feitos testes parciais a 25 amostras de sangue e saliva.
Por Rui Pando Gomes

Os peritos do Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal (INML) analisaram 444 pelos que foram recolhidos pela Polícia Judiciária nos meses seguintes ao desaparecimento de Madeleine McCann, em 2007, na Praia da Luz, Lagos. Ao que o CM apurou, foram ainda sujeitos a testes periciais 25 amostras de sangue e de saliva e três outros vestígios encontrados no quarto de onde a criança desapareceu e na bagageira de um carro. São alguns destes vestígios que a Scotland Yard quer agora levar para Inglaterra, para os analisar de novo, num laboratório privado britânico.

Os ingleses, tal como o CM noticiou ontem, querem ainda voltar a fazer exames a um cortinado do quarto onde Maddie dormia, que foi alvo de perícias por parte do INML, em 2007, e onde nada de relevante foi encontrado. A recolha dos vestígios foi feita em casas, carros e sofás por peritos do Laboratório de Polícia Científica da PJ. Entre os vestígios estão ainda amostras de cabelo e de saliva de várias pessoas que foram consideradas importantes para a investigação. Na lista de 444 pelos sujeitos a testes, 432 são humanos e 12 não-humanos, 98 não tiveram correspondência com qualquer perfil de ADN e de 19 foram obtidos resultados parciais. O pedido para a reavaliação dos vestígios irá fazer parte de uma 6ª carta rogatória. Isto apesar de ainda não existir decisão da nova procuradora do Ministério Público de Portimão, Inês Sequeira, para a 5ª carta, enviada pelos britânicos para Portugal.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"Trunk of a car"??
Retesting???
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Praiaaa 28.10.14 19:55

NickE wrote:"Trunk of a car"??
Retesting???

Interesting!

by notlongnow 28.10.14 21:00

If true this is very interesting.

by noddy100 28.10.14 22:15

It will be very interesting if true but only if samples stay in Portugal Bringing them here fills me with fear as UK police lose so much evidence

by Angelique 29.10.14 0:06

noddy100

Yes I agree. The thing is it's still looking very much like a white-wash.

SY are still trying to find an "abductor".

They have managed to convince the majority in UK that Madeleine was abducted. They have dissed the dogs - notoriously unreliable - the only remaining problem for the Brothers is the DNA Evidence held by the Portuguese which they are doing their best to get their mitts on!

by jeanmonroe 29.10.14 0:42

Angelique wrote:

noddy100

Yes I agree. The thing is it's still looking very much like a white-wash.

SY are still trying to find an "abductor".

They have managed to convince the majority in UK that Madeleine was abducted. They have dissed the dogs - notoriously unreliable - the only remaining problem for the Brothers is the DNA Evidence held by the Portuguese which they are doing their best to get their mitts on!

---------------------------------------------------

Is that SY or the dog 'expert' DCI Mahogany that is 'dissing' the dogs? dontgetit

Suppose that means the 38 Maddie Cops and staff, will be doing the rounds, of the Met Police's specialist 'dogs units' putting all the dogs 'down' sad1

Well, they ain't exactly busting a gut 'looking for/ searching for' M McCann, are they?

Strangely, just like Madeleine's parents/familiy/family friends are not exactly 'busting a gut' to 'find' their 'missing' daughter/family member.

Lots of 'waiting' for Madeleine, by her 'parents'

BUT.

NOT lots of actual 'searching' for Madeleine, by her 'parents'

Weird that, innit?

by plebgate 29.10.14 6:25

I did read on twitter yesterday that Mr. & Mrs. are on tv next week discussing missing people. Has he now joined her as a spokesperson for Missing Persons? Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue? Maybe Maddie will get a mention hence the need for him to be there as well?

by Praiaaa 29.10.14 8:52

plebgate wrote: Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue?

IMO GM missing the limelight... Wannabe sleb.

by Angelique 29.10.14 9:33

jeanmonroe

Ah, yes perhaps I should have said TM have dissed the dogs as they seem to be controlling Redwood in this "search" for Madeleine's abductor Sad

by Praiaaa 29.10.14 9:36

Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue?

Actually, thinking about it, I know KM has done radio interviews on her own - has she ever done a TV interview?
Just wondering if maybe GM not happy for her to be unaccompanied on view where body language might betray her, and she might need some hand-squeezing to prompt?

by Liz Eagles 29.10.14 9:40

Praiaaa wrote:

Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue?

Actually, thinking about it, I know KM has done radio interviews on her own - has she ever done a TV interview?
Just wondering if maybe GM not happy for her to be unaccompanied on view where body language might betray her, and she might need some hand-squeezing to prompt?

I've seen KM sitting on the sofa talking to Kelly on the telly about her bad feet, the twins and doing a marathon run for Missing People - all by herself.

by tiny 29.10.14 10:28

plebgate wrote:I did read on twitter yesterday that Mr. & Mrs. are on tv next week discussing missing people. Has he now joined her as a spokesperson for Missing Persons? Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue? Maybe Maddie will get a mention hence the need for him to be there as well?

They would do better explaining the reason they handed the dossier to the police,also how sky news got hold of it.

by tiny 29.10.14 10:30

noddy100 wrote:It will be very interesting if true but only if samples stay in Portugal Bringing them here fills me with fear as UK police lose so much evidence

T his what I fear will happen as well,or sy might destroy these samples all together

by Silverspeed 29.10.14 13:56

plebgate wrote:I did read on twitter yesterday that Mr. & Mrs. are on tv next week discussing missing people. Has he now joined her as a spokesperson for Missing Persons? Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue? Maybe Maddie will get a mention hence the need for him to be there as well?

I caught the end of a brief preview of this during yesterday's Good Morning Britain show on itv.
Both of them were shown on it.
They just can't keep out of the limelight can they?
They ought to get Kerry Needham on there instead. After all Ben will be 25 today if he is still alive somewhere.

by **Nina** 29.10.14 20:23

tiny wrote:
noddy100 wrote:It will be very interesting if true but only if samples stay in Portugal Bringing them here fills me with fear as UK police lose so much evidence

T his what I fear will happen as well,or sy might destroy these samples all together

Isn't it dreadful that we feel we cannot believe the integrity of SY?

by plebgate 29.10.14 20:34

Silverspeed wrote:
plebgate wrote:I did read on twitter yesterday that Mr. & Mrs. are on tv next week discussing missing people. Has he now joined her as a spokesperson for Missing Persons? Why would they both need to be on tv discussing the issue? Maybe Maddie will get a mention hence the need for him to be there as well?
I caught the end of a brief preview of this during yesterday's Good Morning Britain show on itv.
Both of them were shown on it.
They just can't keep out of the limelight can they?
They ought to get Kerry Needham on there instead. After all Ben will be 25 today if he is still alive somewhere.

Yes, it's about time all missing children had the same amount spent on them.