Re: Oooh..errr Has AR actually been very clever.

by Truthandjustice 16.10.13 16:56

ultimaThule wrote:That too, but the defilement of their little girl's book does it for me - and it'll do it for the jury.

My 10 year old was horrified by that.

by rustyjames 16.10.13 17:13

gbwales wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I commented on this in another thread but I find this strange with the spelling of Jerry (sic), the "did he check?" comment and what looks to me, (although it's probably the handwriting or the copy), as "tv room".

by Guest 16.10.13 17:24

I think that's "in to room" as in "Jerry" actually went in and checked and all was well.

As for the spelling of Gerry's name - can't remember off hand who wrote the list - they weren't all well acquainted with each other.

by statsman 16.10.13 17:52

rustyjames,

The whole page is very odd.

Both past and present tenses are used. The present tense rings warning bells for me as it seems like construction rather than recall.

Shutters are mentioned at 9.00 - 9.05 but not later. Seems like they were keeping their options open on this one.

Could tv be the start of 'twins' but cut short because that would be a giveaway that Madeleine wasn't there?

It could be 'in to' but it doesn't look like the other 'o's on the page.

9.30 says that Matt checked all 3 but he actually only checked the twins.

Can't make out 9.35 line. It seems to say Matt check door sec twins. Any ideas anyone?

9.55 and 10pm are circled. Could these be the only pure factual lines on this page.

by Guest 16.10.13 17:54

"See twins" I think - which agrees with his statement that he saw them but not Madeleine.

by margaret 16.10.13 18:15

What's written at 9.12

RM Returns

Rachael Manphilly?

by Guest 16.10.13 18:36

margaret wrote:What's written at 9.12

RM Returns

Rachael Manphilly?

Think it might be Russ or Rus as in ROB - Don't think it's supposed to be 9.12

by margaret 16.10.13 18:39

candyfloss wrote:
margaret wrote:What's written at 9.12

RM Returns

Rachael Manphilly?
Think it might be Russ or Rus as in ROB - Don't think it's supposed to be 9.12

Thanks, l think you're right on both counts.

by Guest 16.10.13 18:40

Yes, 9.12 would be out of order time-wise. I think it's 9.50 and Russ - remember his super dad exploits of cleaning up his sick daughter all within the space of about 10 minutes.

by ultimaThule 16.10.13 20:45

We know they didn't search and we also know they had no intention of searching, but we also know 2 men were seen in the vicinity of the apartments talking in loud voices which became muted as the witness drew close to them and proficient liars such as the McCanns will have little difficulty in finding reason to counteract an allegation that they did not get off their bums to go look for Madeleine.

In any event their inaction on that night, together with the act of defiling their daughter's book, will aid the prosecution and I will continue to maintain that, of the two, the destruction of the book will have far greater visual and emotive impact on a jury who will be supplied with copies of the list as presented on the mccannfiles website which also shows the front of the cover/reverse of the list on which it is written and which bought tears to my eyes. As I'm not easily moved to tears please regard this as a < O hardboiled egg~~man~~ emoticon >

by ultimaThule 16.10.13 21:26

Truthandjustice wrote:
ultimaThule wrote:That too, but the defilement of their little girl's book does it for me - and it'll do it for the jury.
My 10 year old was horrified by that.

As was I, Truthandjustice, and as is every one of those I've talked to about it. It's not common knowledge and, as it's unlikely to become widely known prior to any trial, the impact will be far reaching when published during the course of the proceedings.

Deleted

What really happened that night? Did it happen earlier than the evening of 3 May 2007? Will we ever elicit the truth from imo a morally bankrupt couple and their equally immoral friends?

by Guest 18.09.14 11:58

Hicks wrote:You are correct bobbin, it was the 1st of May. This article had confused me! See what you make of it.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].

18 months down the line... what do we make of this Express article?

Who were the two witnesses if Pamela Fenn died in 2011?

Who stood on the balcony at 9.15 with a whiskey?

What the hell is this?:

"SCOTLAND YARD detectives are trying to find a middle-aged couple said to have entered Madeleine McCann’s holiday apartment to comfort her because she was crying, we can reveal today".

The article is infuriating because it's written in a very vague way.

by Guest 18.09.14 12:05

Same story in the Daily Mail.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Two witnesses said they saw a middle-aged couple enter the apartment to comfort Madeleine, who was crying, The Sunday Express has reported.
The newspaper quoted a source as saying: 'Apparently they were concerned about the crying and went to see if they could comfort the girl.'
Detectives are now believed to be trying to identify the couple as part of an ongoing review into the case - codenamed Operation Grange.

They know the reason for them entering but not their identity?

So we have two witnesses who saw two people enter the flat on the 2nd May. We know why they went in but not who they are?

What is this?

Latest topics