On no account have anything to do with Tony Bennett

littlepixie wrote:The VERY LAST persons I would contact would be the McCanns investigation team and anyone who does needs their head testing.

Rainbow wrote:IMO ANY information SHOULD be passed on to the authorities.

"If you have any information which may help with the search for Madeleine, please come forward and tell the McCanns and their investigation team. All information will be handled with the strictest confidence. If you would prefer to stay anonymous, please see the 'Anonymous' section on this link http://www.findmadeleine.com/contact-us.html. Thank you for your help. "

aiyoyo wrote:

Rainbow wrote:IMO ANY information SHOULD be passed on to the authorities.

Why? Do you think Madeleine is still alive?

Whit bits of info - the bits about knutsford covert operations? You think the mccanns will be plsd with that ya?

vaguely1 wrote: Can't argue with Rainbow. Any information should go to the authorities.

Not anyone else who's decided that they're best placed to have it and has a vested interest in it.

Authorities.

vaguely1 wrote:Well I guess that would depend on which country you lived in Aiyoyo.

Here, I presume you are referring to sightings. I stand corrected, but I understood TB's info was not sightings related. If it was, then country would mean UK - although LP had allegedly withheld info from prime investigative authority, that is besides the point, TB'd indicated that info received relates to the mccanns, and not Maddie.



Personally I'd go through Crimestoppers.

All very well - but that of course would depend whether you'd received anything enough to pass on. I would imagine you can't possibly go to them and say you'd received calls from anonymous callers claiming the mccanns are this and that but refused to commit themselves.......what do you think crimestoppers (or for that matter police) can do with the half info, that had nothing to do with Maddie in the first place?

I would have thought any sensible person with info they thought worthy to the investigation would have gone to the police directly. If informants were strangers or public off the street, then they wouldnt fear and wouldnt need to stay anonymous. I stand corrected but TB'd hinted info received relates to mccanns, and not Maddie. Callers claimed they know the mccanns but either wouldnt reveal themselves or refused to repeat it to police for fear of repercussion or whatever. In that case do you regard them seriously, or which derogatory bits about mccanns are suitable to pass on, and to which authority? I would have thought it isnt crimestoppers remit to study info relating to witness of characters against the mccanns and from anonymous source at that!



What I wouldn't do is phone up either the foundation or the family.
Precisely! That's the whole point of the OP ie that hysterical rosiepops is stark barking mad making an Everest of a non-issue and wanting info to be passed onto the mccanns (of all people)!

Judge Mental wrote:Whilst we are all busying ourselves here on these web-sites, finding inconsistencies in statements and looking into telephone and creche records, it would appear that the police are at a standstill. Undoubtedly this is because of Government orders.

However, Tony Bennett is the only person who is openly spending a lot of his own time writing practical letters and books in his own name and sending them out to the people and establishments who should be looking into Madeleine's disappearance.

Those same establishments that deliberately withhold resources and information from each other and the public. He is stating most clearly that he is not going away. He also has a lot of support for what he is doing, as we can see from the people who copy and forward his letters to reinforce his message.

The delusional Rosiepops and other such crones may think they are somehow protecting the McCanns with their ridiculous rantings against Tony Bennett, but the sad fact is that all they are doing is hindering all free-thinking and intelligent people from trying to find out what really happened to Madeleine.

Anybody who makes criticism of Tony Bennett is not behind Madeleine's memory. Who else is openly and actively doing anything? Chris Freind is the only other person who has been as openly vocal.

Pascal wrote:Actually Tony the message in the Op should apply to everyone as far as I'm concerned. Might I ask why you are helping Majic in his attempts to ruin the MM forum? Why are you posting emails/private correspondence between you and Susan Menez on his site? Do you not realise that he and Muratfan are in cahoots and as soon as they've done with MM they will turn their attention here? Do you care?

Pascal wrote:Actually Tony the message in the Op should apply to everyone as far as I'm concerned.

aiyoyo wrote:

Rainbow wrote:IMO ANY information SHOULD be passed on to the authorities.

Why? Do you think Madeleine is still alive?

Whit bits of info - the bits about knutsford covert operations? You think the mccanns will be plsd with that ya?

Rainbow wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Rainbow wrote:IMO ANY information SHOULD be passed on to the authorities.

Why? Do you think Madeleine is still alive?

Whit bits of info - the bits about knutsford covert operations? You think the mccanns will be plsd with that ya?

Eh?

What I think doesnt matter.She may very well be alive,she may very well be dead.The point is it isnt for you,me et al to decide what info is relevant or not is it? It is up to the proper authorities.

Judge Mental wrote:vaguely1 writes .............. 'Do you actually believe that?'

********************************************

Of course I do. I would not have had cause to write it if I did not.

Tony Bennett is striving to find out what really happened to Madeleine McCann. He is not playing detective, judge and jury as some posters appear to do. He genuinely wants the Government and police to enable the police in Portugal to proceed with their enquiries and seek justice for Madeleine.

Bloggers and posters such as Rosiepops and Nessling are opposed to any further enquiries being undertaken, and believe that the McCanns and others who were with them have nothing else to answer for.

Therefore anybody who supports these bloggers is trying to deny Madeleine her rights as a British Subject.

Making criticism of a person such as Tony Bennett who is merely trying to do something about this situation, is an enormous hinderance to the cohesion of all the groups of people who gather on forums. I have seen some despicable things written about this man by people who have never even spoken to him.

His letters and books are available to read on the internet. Nobody has ever come up with one good reason to stop the printing of this information. Information that the press are banned from printing. Not everybody has the internet at their fingertips and there is a need for hard copies in order to disseminate this information to a wider audience.

All of the information contained in any of his books or letters is factual, and he is a trained lawyer. The man knows what he is doing. He is familiar with areas of the law that laymen have little knowledge of. He also knows about systems, procedures and process. He knows whom to contact and when.

I would ask him to stop wasting his time and defending himself against any people who continue to wage their vendettas against him. They have an equal opportunity to put their own views about Madeleine's case onto the internet and discuss and debate why they believe there may have been an abduction.

Countless police and ex-detectives have not discovered any evidence to support an abduction theory. The Rosiepops and Nessling types of posters only exist to perpetuate that myth. If we acknowledge their existence, they will continue to thrive.

Therefore, anybody who makes criticism of Tony Bennett is not behind Madeleine's memory. He is the only person who is publicly trying to help the Portuguese police. He has caused people to gather behind him.

Where would we be today if he had not chosen to put his head above the parapet? Who else is putting direct pressure on the Government by writing letters week after week and asking for others to do the same?

We can sit here chatting away on the internet about the rights and wrongs of losing a child on what purported to be a holiday, but who is taking direct action?

justagrannynow 1 wrote:

Pascal wrote:Actually Tony the message in the Op should apply to everyone as far as I'm concerned.

There is just one suggestion to look on wikipedia and make a note of the emergency police number of the country you are visiting so you can contact the police of that country if you think you see Madeleine.
The bulk of the OP asks people to contact the McCanns and their investigation team with any information they may have. All the links provided are to the Find Madeleine website.

Do you really agree with that ?

Pascal wrote:Actually Tony the message in the OP should apply to everyone as far as I'm concerned.

Noted. I'm bound to say that the McCanns should consider themselves jolly fortunate, if not greatly blessed, that Leicestershire Police helps them to raise money, er, to pay for people of the quality (ahem) of Dave Edgar and not forgetting Arthur Cowley who I fear is very much in Dave's shadow. Do you think everyone who sees a seven-or-so-year old girl who might look a bit like Madeleine (after all she might look quite a bit differnt now, differnt colour hair and all that) should get on the blower to Dave 'n Arthur?

Might I ask why you are helping Majic in his attempts to ruin the MM forum?

You must be joking! The ferrets over at 'MM' are fighting in an ever shrinking sack. If you wanted to look at the malign forces who might be actively wrecking 'MM' at the moment, I wouldn't put 'Majic' near the top of the list, indeed he might not even be on that list at all. Apart from providing a forum where the squabbling re 'MM' can be carried on (for those who want to), what possible evidence do you have that Majic is 'attempting to ruin the MM forum'? It has become a seriously discredited forum all by itself, especially since the Kent women joined it.

Why are you posting emails/private correspondence between you and Susan Menez on his site?

The hatefest on 'MM' began with the decision of Ms Butler to post publically a perfectly polite private e-mail I sent her back on 26 October, with Susan Menez' approval and active encouragement. Things went from bad to worse after that, with all manner of my private e-mails published on 'MM'. Now what I have done is post a message which I think you and everyone else would agree casts Susan in a postive light; not only that, I took the trouble to add (and I meant it) that Susan's heart was in the right place. That is said only to give credit where credit is due; she has of course managed and promoted an unrestrained hatefest about me on her forum for the past 5 months.

Now I have one question for you, Pascal, seeing as you've asked me quite a number since this forum started. What makes you round on me for publishing one e-mail which shows Susan in a favourable light, when, so far as I am aware, and unless you can convince me otherwise, you have not said a word about others publishing emails I've sent out? Thanks in advance for your answer.

Do you not realise that he and Muratfan are in cahoots and as soon as they've done with MM they will turn their attention here? Do you care?

As I've said, I think Majic is not the arch-plotter that you think. That doesn't mean to say I defend all his actions, and I don't know his forum history. Anyway, Jill runs the forum here, she has put her own stamp on it, I think she has banned both, hasn't she?