Re: One coherent theory apart from abduction

by DCB1 03.01.10 19:18

aiyoyo wrote:
DCB1 wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:DCB1

Accusing people of team something something just proved your inability to hold your own arguments coherently! If your argument fells flat on its face retorting to that antics is disgusting to say the least.

With due respect, you started the accusation and showing you in return exactly what you did is the only way I could demonstrate your antics is not even to your liking when applied to you is it?

And, BTW creating thread after meaningless thread with a stick in hand says it all.

It is not obligatory to post on my threads - it is not obligatory to even read my threads.

It's true, but I happened to click on it and did see it and that was how it came across!

No offense but are people supposed to avoid any particular poster's thread - how is that going to help healthy debate ? Or am I mistaken and that you meant your thread to be one-sided, and any dissent is going to beget that sort of answer?

This thread is looking for a coherent theory that does not include abduction.

by aiyoyo 03.01.10 19:25

DCB1 wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
DCB1 wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:DCB1

Accusing people of team something something just proved your inability to hold your own arguments coherently! If your argument fells flat on its face retorting to that antics is disgusting to say the least.

With due respect, you started the accusation and showing you in return exactly what you did is the only way I could demonstrate your antics is not even to your liking when applied to you is it?

And, BTW creating thread after meaningless thread with a stick in hand says it all.

It is not obligatory to post on my threads - it is not obligatory to even read my threads.

It's true, but I happened to click on it and did see it and that was how it came across!

No offense but are people supposed to avoid any particular poster's thread - how is that going to help healthy debate ? Or am I mistaken and that you meant your thread to be one-sided, and any dissent is going to beget that sort of answer?

This thread is looking for a coherent theory that does not include abduction.

Again you are deliberately trying to side-track the issue.
You knew v. well I wasnt refering to this thread!

by DCB1 03.01.10 19:31

aiyoyo wrote:
DCB1 wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
DCB1 wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:DCB1

Accusing people of team something something just proved your inability to hold your own arguments coherently! If your argument fells flat on its face retorting to that antics is disgusting to say the least.

With due respect, you started the accusation and showing you in return exactly what you did is the only way I could demonstrate your antics is not even to your liking when applied to you is it?

And, BTW creating thread after meaningless thread with a stick in hand says it all.

It is not obligatory to post on my threads - it is not obligatory to even read my threads.

It's true, but I happened to click on it and did see it and that was how it came across!

No offense but are people supposed to avoid any particular poster's thread - how is that going to help healthy debate ? Or am I mistaken and that you meant your thread to be one-sided, and any dissent is going to beget that sort of answer?

This thread is looking for a coherent theory that does not include abduction.

Again you are deliberately trying to side-track the issue.
You knew v. well I wasnt refering to this thread!

Then a post on the appropriate would be better - don't confuse yourself.

by Guest 03.01.10 20:39

PearlB wrote:As is usual, no one has come up with a plausible theory as to how the McCanns accidentally killed their daughter and what they did afterwards.

BUMP...................ANYONE ?

by Old Nick 03.01.10 23:18

I felt so sure that one would be forth-coming by now. 7 pages of bickering and not a coherent theory to be found amongst it. Most disappointing.

by Guest 03.01.10 23:39

Old Nick wrote:There's one in Dr Amaral's book apparently.

The one he is getting sued for?

by twinkle 03.01.10 23:51

marigold wrote:Twinkle, proof please that it was a 'planned abduction'. I am sure that you are not daft and therefore do know that the chances of a stranger abduction are miniscule. Surely you are not just taking the parents word for it?

Hi marigold, just saw this.
I have no need to provide proof as it is just a suggestion as to what may have happened. I am firmly on the fence, I would rather look at all opinions.
The chances of stranger abduction are miniscule..............so that means they can actually happen.

Going back to the OP, the only other alternative I can offer is she woke and wandered. What happened after that, I just don't know.

by aliberte2 04.01.10 1:50

MaryB wrote:I was watching a Miss Marple on TV earlier. People were puzzled as to the circumstances. Miss Marple said that's because people believe what other people say, I never do. (Sensible woman.)

I was Watching CSI and the First Thing they Did Was Secure The Crime Scene and Then Start Collecting DNA Evidence. And Bring in Dogs. Immediately.

by aliberte2 04.01.10 1:52

Madeleine Fell off the Couch.
She Died.
Gerry McCann Carried her Body to the Beach.
Kate McCann Brought a Refrigerator.
They Put the Body in the Fridge and Brought It to Their Portuguese Friends' House.
They Went Back Weeks Later.
Took the Fridge.
Dumped It in Spain.

ETA: All of the Speculation about Sexual Abuse and Unable to Handle the Stress of Children, the Involvement of the Church, Use of Tunnels in PDL, is Just Folly for People Who Have an Irrational Personal Dislike of the McCann Parents and Anti-Catholic People.

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 1:57

Old Nick wrote:I felt so sure that one would be forth-coming by now. 7 pages of bickering and not a coherent theory to be found amongst it. Most disappointing.

Let's hear your coherent theory then!

by Guest 04.01.10 2:00

Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

by aliberte2 04.01.10 2:01

Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

by marigold 04.01.10 2:03

aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:I felt so sure that one would be forth-coming by now. 7 pages of bickering and not a coherent theory to be found amongst it. Most disappointing.

Let's hear your coherent theory then!

They don't have one!!

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 2:15

aliberte2 wrote:
Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

The storing method is one thing, but how did Maddie died? Self caused accident or parents caused accident? If the former, why went the length to hide it?

by aliberte2 04.01.10 2:16

aiyoyo wrote:
aliberte2 wrote:
Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

The storing method is one thing, but how did Maddie died? Self caused accident or parents caused accident? If the former, why went the length to hide it?

No Idea. If the Former, Sheer Panic and Hysteria, Fear of Foreign Jails, Foreign Justice.

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 2:36

DCB1 wrote:br />
Then a post on the appropriate would be better - don't confuse yourself.

I did, you didnt reply but chose to bring it here instead.

Perhaps your answer is the same old yeah - incoherent labelling without conviction no matter which thread when you no longer can hold an argument. Keep it! People are fed up with it.

by Old Nick 04.01.10 9:34

aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:I felt so sure that one would be forth-coming by now. 7 pages of bickering and not a coherent theory to be found amongst it. Most disappointing.

Let's hear your coherent theory then!

You first.

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 10:13

OLD nick,You did say you'd covered the pages.

Just to refresh your memory, I believe in the investigators official thesis ie she is dead from an accident (probably not self caused) while in the care of her parents and disposed of.

by Old Nick 04.01.10 10:15

Dear Aiyoyo - truth be told I don't have a coherent theory which is why I am so interested to read yours.

by Slartibartfast 04.01.10 10:32

aiyoyo wrote:OLD nick,You did say you'd covered the pages.

Just to refresh your memory, I believe in the investigators official thesis ie she is dead from an accident (probably not self caused) while in the care of her parents and disposed of.

It was a hypothesis that never became a thesis because there was no evidence to support it.
Hence the archiving of the case.

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 11:00

Old Nick wrote:Dear Aiyoyo - truth be told I don't have a coherent theory which is why I am so interested to read yours.

Dear OLD Nick,

Why is it that was what I expected of you - evasive and tease!

by sans_souci 04.01.10 11:33

The problem with most of the "non abduction" theories is that they all need to be flexed a bit to fit in with the evidence, or involve a large number of people being involved in a conspiracy.

by Old Nick 04.01.10 11:52

aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:Dear Aiyoyo - truth be told I don't have a coherent theory which is why I am so interested to read yours.

Dear OLD Nick,

Why is it that was what I expected of you - evasive and tease!

Nevertheless don't let me put you off expounding your theory, it would never do to deprive the rest of the forum from your thoughts.

by aiyoyo 04.01.10 12:11

Old Nick wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:Dear Aiyoyo - truth be told I don't have a coherent theory which is why I am so interested to read yours.

Dear OLD Nick,

Why is it that was what I expected of you - evasive and tease!

Nevertheless don't let me put you off expounding your theory, it would never do to deprive the rest of the forum from your thoughts.

Perhaps you are in the wrong thread Non! This is called the 'coherent theory' thread and not 'sarcasm' thread!
Or is patronising the best you can offer!

by Guest 04.01.10 12:19

Slartibartfast wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:OLD nick,You did say you'd covered the pages.

Just to refresh your memory, I believe in the investigators official thesis ie she is dead from an accident (probably not self caused) while in the care of her parents and disposed of.

It was a hypothesis that never became a thesis because there was no evidence to support it.
Hence the archiving of the case.

Some people miss the bloody obvious. It would have been far easier for the McCanns to admit an accident had occured and worked round that. Than to spend over 2 years putting themselves through immense heartache and crap whilst holding onto the belief that Madeleine could be alive somewhere.

by Old Nick 04.01.10 12:26

aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Old Nick wrote:Dear Aiyoyo - truth be told I don't have a coherent theory which is why I am so interested to read yours.

Dear OLD Nick,

Why is it that was what I expected of you - evasive and tease!

Nevertheless don't let me put you off expounding your theory, it would never do to deprive the rest of the forum from your thoughts.

Perhaps you are in the wrong thread Non! This is called the 'coherent theory' thread and not 'sarcasm' thread!
Or is patronising the best you can offer!

I am not being sarcastic, I am being deadly serious. I want to know your coherent theory. We all want to know your coherent theory. Do you have one, yes or no?

by Guest 04.01.10 14:17

aliberte2 wrote:
Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

Sure. I think it's in every Doctor's Holiday Travel Kit.
Silly PJ must have missed it when they searched the apartment and the villa.

by Old Nick 04.01.10 14:24

Molly wrote:
aliberte2 wrote:
Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

Sure. I think it's in every Doctor's Holiday Travel Kit.
Silly PJ must have missed it when they searched the apartment and the villa.

Any doctor of repute always takes his own refrigeration unit away with him / her for just this sort of eventuality - you never know when it might come in handy.

by Guest 04.01.10 14:32

Old Nick wrote:
Molly wrote:
aliberte2 wrote:
Raffle wrote:Don't forget the bit about the fridge being buried under the sand and having a mile long flex for it to plug into the electricity socket.

Personally I think It was More of a Cooler Than a Fridge. As Doctors and Scientists the McCanns would have Had Access to Liquid Nitrogen.

Sure. I think it's in every Doctor's Holiday Travel Kit.
Silly PJ must have missed it when they searched the apartment and the villa.

Any doctor of repute always takes his own refrigeration unit away with him / her for just this sort of eventuality - you never know when it might come in handy.

Don't give Tony ideas to latch onto, or we'll be onto inflatable battery powered travel fridges!

by sans_souci 04.01.10 15:11

God you lot are so thick. It is obvious to the most amateur of armchair defectives that the fridge was solar powered. It would just need a few square yards of solar panel. Ideal for the beach or car.

Latest topics