Re: Bernt Stellander interview

by Justice for Maddie 06.10.24 14:24

Come on Bernt! It's a great forum.

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 14:28

Yes, come on down!

by **CaKeLoveR** 06.10.24 14:31

Ladyinred said that he has more control on FB and Instagram, perhaps. If that's the case it's rather telling, imo.

by Jojo1 06.10.24 14:31

Jill Havern wrote:He's happy to post on facebook and instagram, but won't join here where most people are supportive of him

We are absolutely supportive of him. Would still be great if he would join here.

by **Jill Havern** 06.10.24 14:31

Honesty wrote:
Jill Havern wrote:He's happy to post on facebook and instagram, but won't join here where most people are supportive of him
I'm very sorry, but I don't understand why he would not post here, especially if most people are supportive of him.

Me neither, to be fair.

by pinkgladioli 06.10.24 14:34

I think it’s about getting his theory across to the public at large, the public who don’t frequent forums and others who believe that anything written in a newspaper, news programme etc etc are spouting the truth when infact they may not be

by Honesty 06.10.24 14:39

Couldn't he do both/all?

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 14:39

Bernt has posted on only eight occasions on Instagram, it is nothing like posting on a forum such as this one.

What he has posted is not new information, it's about the book and the case generally, which he has discussed in the two interviews.

by **crusader** 06.10.24 14:40

He has already put himself up for criticism by writing the book.
I wonder what it is he want's to control.

by Honesty 06.10.24 14:43

crusader wrote:He has already put himself up for criticism by writing the book.
I wonder what it is he want's to control.

Isn't everyone's theory open to debate?

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 14:45

#519 Crusader

I would think he doesn't want to get bogged down with arguments which have been ongoing for aeons such as Smithman.

by Jojo1 06.10.24 14:49

pinkgladioli wrote:I think it’s about getting his theory across to the public at large, the public who don’t frequent forums and others who believe that anything written in a newspaper, news programme etc etc are spouting the truth when infact they may not be

I think you have hit the nail on the head there.

Bernt... Please do join here. We are totally supportive of you and what you are doing.

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 14:49

Honesty wrote:
crusader wrote:He has already put himself up for criticism by writing the book.
I wonder what it is he want's to control.
Isn't everyone's theory open to debate?

He's written and published his book, he's moved beyond debate.

The next stage is where it's all at, and it's potentially explosive.

by **CaKeLoveR** 06.10.24 14:55

Ladyinred wrote:#519 Crusader

I would think he doesn't want to get bogged down with arguments which have been ongoing for aeons such as Smithman.

True, but if he wants to attract new people, he has to be prepared for renewed interest in everything connected to the case.

by **crusader** 06.10.24 14:56

He probably would encounter arguments about Smithman.
His book is mainly about the McCann's hiding Madeleine and rooting about around Rocha Negra.
He's said the Smith sighting is not important.
After his next explosive reveal, we will be doing a lot of debating.

by **Nina** 06.10.24 14:57

Facebook became a battle of egos from people who hadn't even read his book. People were banned.
I left as couldn't support what was happening so would probably have been banned too. Now come on who wants that label, haha.

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 15:03

CaKeLoveR wrote:
Ladyinred wrote:#519 Crusader

I would think he doesn't want to get bogged down with arguments which have been ongoing for aeons such as Smithman.
True, but if he wants to attract new people, he has to be prepared for renewed interest in everything connected to the case.

I think what he wants is for the case to be resolved, and those responsible for Madeleine 's demise to be brought to justice

by Honesty 06.10.24 15:05

Ladyinred wrote:Bernt has posted on only eight occasions on Instagram, it is nothing like posting on a forum such as this one.

What he has posted is not new information, it's about the book and the case generally, which he has discussed in the two interviews.

I hope that is the reason and its not because there are people on this forum who are particularly knowledgeable about this case ( e.g., in alphabetical order: Anne, Jill and Peter).

by Honesty 06.10.24 15:10

Ladyinred wrote:
CaKeLoveR wrote:
Ladyinred wrote:#519 Crusader

I would think he doesn't want to get bogged down with arguments which have been ongoing for aeons such as Smithman.
True, but if he wants to attract new people, he has to be prepared for renewed interest in everything connected to the case.
I think what he wants is for the case to be resolved, and those responsible for Madeleine 's demise to be brought to justice

Surely, this is what all the genuine members on this forum hope for.

by Jojo1 06.10.24 15:33

Honesty wrote:
Ladyinred wrote:
CaKeLoveR wrote:
Ladyinred wrote:#519 Crusader

I would think he doesn't want to get bogged down with arguments which have been ongoing for aeons such as Smithman.
True, but if he wants to attract new people, he has to be prepared for renewed interest in everything connected to the case.
I think what he wants is for the case to be resolved, and those responsible for Madeleine 's demise to be brought to justice
Surely, this is what all the genuine members on this forum hope for.

It's all that we hope for.
Will we ever see this case resolved and justice served? I don't know.
I think we are a long way off that being achieved.
However if Bernt manages to crack this case wide open then it's a darn good start. It's about time that we had some movement from the Portuguese and British side, as it's just stagnating and fading away into the background if nothing gets done. Bernt has done a lot of proactive work and I admire him for that.

by **crusader** 06.10.24 15:42

We will have to wait and see, up to now, we only have what is in the book and the only proof that the McCann's were involved are the photo's and video's that are yet to be shown.

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 16:25

To quote Bernt, "Timing is everything."

by Farcical 06.10.24 16:37

crusader wrote:We will have to wait and see, up to now, we only have what is in the book and the only proof that the McCann's were involved are the photo's and video's that are yet to be shown.

I always apply the same phrase to a lot of things in life, be it this, relationships etc.

''Its all bullshit until it happens.''

Saves a lot of disappointment!

by Honesty 06.10.24 16:45

Ladyinred wrote:To quote Bernt, "Timing is everything."

With the greatest respect, and obviously I cannot speak for him but I think the Deception Detective might describe this, as he has described some of Bernt's other statements, as 'vague'.

by **crusader** 06.10.24 16:52

I am intrigued by the "timing is everything" remark.
Timed to what? only Bern't knows.
One thing I do know, if the next reveal isn't explosive, I will have serious concerns about him.
Up to now, fish on the line comes to mind.

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 16:56

The remark was in relation to the release of the videos.

It's been over four months since his interview with JE and I'm hoping the next one is imminent.

I'm becoming concerned that this could be one big sham, funded and supported by intelligence services, or some other group. I had a strange moment a few weeks ago when a few issues crossed my mind.

by **crusader** 06.10.24 17:04

The mind boggles, would you be willing to elaborate?

by Honesty 06.10.24 17:05

If Bernt doesn't wish to post here, where most people are supportive of him, how does he feel about giving a second interview to JE who might ask him some searching questions?

by **Ladyinred** 06.10.24 17:08

You'll need to direct your question to Bernt as we don't know how he feels.

by Justice for Maddie 06.10.24 17:11

When is the next interview? Any date?

Latest topics