PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: PeterMac's FREE e-book: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?
Page 1 of 1 • Share
PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
CHAPTER 51
SOME RANDOM UNRELATED THOUGHTS
In a week when even the BBC has apologised and paid out a lot of your, the licence payers’ money for the disgraceful conduct and a series of blatant lies and libels by one of their top ‘journalists’ to get a sensational and “exclusive” story, and then covering it up at the highest levels in management for over a quarter of a century, I browsed through other organs of disinformation and junk ‘exclusive’ stories. In some cases “Exclusive” apparently means ‘appearing in no more than five other papers’, (rather like the definition of “top secret” meaning “tell no more than twelve”)
I focussed on some of the nonsense, including lies and libels published over the past 14 years, which continue to be covered up, denied, or simply ignored.
More here:
https://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.com/2016/08/chapter-51-some-random-unrelated.html
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
Liz Eagles, Cammerigal and CaKeLoveR like this post
Re: PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
It appears Clarke is not altogether happy with this Chapter.
Which is capable of several interpretations !
Which is capable of several interpretations !
Re: PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
May his unhappiness increase tenfold.
CaKeLoveR- Forum support
- Posts : 5509
Activity : 5577
Likes received : 76
Join date : 2022-02-19
Re: PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
Re: PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
Perhaps if he stopped publishing lies and libels about people, they might think better of him and his newspaper.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
Re: PeterMac's FREE e-book: Chapter 51 Some random unrelated thoughts
The day after this Chapter was published and ‘churned’ to various Facebook sites, Clarke responded in characteristic belligerent fashion, denouncing it as lies, and finishing with
“His hatred for the media must have a basis in something…”
which is as we might expect completely untrue.
I do not hate the ‘media’
I am second to none in my admiration for good, and particularly for diligent investigative journalism.
We remember
* Bernstein and Woodward, who brought down a President “the single greatest reporting effort of all time”,
What do they have in common ?
They all refused to accept the “Official Story”.
Each one was determined to challenge what they had been told, what the ‘experts” and the politicians and the Police and the Spokesmen were telling them.
That it was just a routine burglary; that all receipts were properly inspected; that this was recognised medial practice and did not cause harm to children . . .
They refused to accept this and to drift away.
And the others ? The hacks who turn up at incidents, ask damn-fool questions to which the answers are obvious anyway, and even more stupid ones which they must know cannot be answered for various reasons of legality, security or common decency ? I do not hate them. I pity and deplore them and the Tabloids which then publish the tripe they write, but I do not hate them.
The gutter press has a place to keep the illiterate masses happy. Page 3 of the Sun was there for a reason.
The News of the World had its infamous place in the order of things, as does the Star and the Record
I reserve my contempt for those who passively accept the official line on anything whilst falsely claiming to be independent and to be investigating. For those who pretend that pursuing a suspect who has already been exonerated is in some way helping an enquiry. For those who by refusing to look at evidence, even as basic as a registration plate on a motor vehicle, and by concealing facts make a saleable stories out of falsehood. For those who fail to do even basic research, invent ‘facts’ to fit a story, or mistake personal prejudice for evidence.
But that is not “hatred’. It may be contempt, pity, despite, scorn or many other things, but not Hatred.
That may be reserved for those who use their publishing power to lie, libel and abuse those who lack adequate means of reply.
“His hatred for the media must have a basis in something…”
which is as we might expect completely untrue.
I do not hate the ‘media’
I am second to none in my admiration for good, and particularly for diligent investigative journalism.
We remember
* Bernstein and Woodward, who brought down a President “the single greatest reporting effort of all time”,
- Heather Brooke who spend over five years delving into MPs’ expenses, to reveal when it was finally published (by the Telegraph) that it was a scandal which led to several being imprisoned, others losing their seats, and to a wholesale review of internal systems within the heart of Parliament
- Sue Reid whose focus on the Tavistock Clinic has led to its being closed this very week
- Nick Davies on the phone hacking scandal
- Andrew Norfolk on grooming and trafficking in Northern towns
- Claire Newall on the corruption at the heart of FIFA
- and many more
What do they have in common ?
They all refused to accept the “Official Story”.
Each one was determined to challenge what they had been told, what the ‘experts” and the politicians and the Police and the Spokesmen were telling them.
That it was just a routine burglary; that all receipts were properly inspected; that this was recognised medial practice and did not cause harm to children . . .
They refused to accept this and to drift away.
And the others ? The hacks who turn up at incidents, ask damn-fool questions to which the answers are obvious anyway, and even more stupid ones which they must know cannot be answered for various reasons of legality, security or common decency ? I do not hate them. I pity and deplore them and the Tabloids which then publish the tripe they write, but I do not hate them.
The gutter press has a place to keep the illiterate masses happy. Page 3 of the Sun was there for a reason.
The News of the World had its infamous place in the order of things, as does the Star and the Record
I reserve my contempt for those who passively accept the official line on anything whilst falsely claiming to be independent and to be investigating. For those who pretend that pursuing a suspect who has already been exonerated is in some way helping an enquiry. For those who by refusing to look at evidence, even as basic as a registration plate on a motor vehicle, and by concealing facts make a saleable stories out of falsehood. For those who fail to do even basic research, invent ‘facts’ to fit a story, or mistake personal prejudice for evidence.
But that is not “hatred’. It may be contempt, pity, despite, scorn or many other things, but not Hatred.
That may be reserved for those who use their publishing power to lie, libel and abuse those who lack adequate means of reply.
Silentscope and CaKeLoveR like this post
Similar topics
» PeterMac's FREE e-book: CHAPTER 63 Addendum A response to critiques of Chapter 63 – SmithGerryMan
» Latest from PeterMac's FREE e-book: CHAPTER 63 SMITH-GERRY-MAN SCRUTINISED
» New from PeterMac's FREE e-book: CHAPTER 58 The Trials and Tribulations of Christian Brückner
» PeterMac's FREE e-book - Chapter 61. Brückner’s “Arrest Warrant “ cancelled.
» PeterMac's FREE e-book. Chapter 62: Pool Photo Proves Madeleine Was Dead
» Latest from PeterMac's FREE e-book: CHAPTER 63 SMITH-GERRY-MAN SCRUTINISED
» New from PeterMac's FREE e-book: CHAPTER 58 The Trials and Tribulations of Christian Brückner
» PeterMac's FREE e-book - Chapter 61. Brückner’s “Arrest Warrant “ cancelled.
» PeterMac's FREE e-book. Chapter 62: Pool Photo Proves Madeleine Was Dead
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: PeterMac's FREE e-book: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum