The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story Mm11

Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story Regist10

Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story

Go down

20191217

Post 

Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story Empty Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story




17th January 2018

by Peter Cullen

Introduction

This is the first in a planned series of articles that will deconstruct the Madeleine McCann story.  The study of this story has traditionally been undertaken by those trying to solve the mystery of what happened to Madeleine?  I am offering something different, a textual study that will investigate the story of Madeleine McCann as a work of allusion and intertext.

“Intertext – a text that is related to one or more other texts through the use of allusions to these texts.”

Too often individual allusions within the Madeleine McCann story have been considered in isolation and regularly dismissed as coincidence, but to understand the work correctly we must consider the bigger picture.  Once exposed to the extravagance of these allusions, the reader is drawn away from the original story and towards the creativity of the writer.

Due to the sheer volume of these literary inventions one can only conclude that invention itself is central to the project.  The discovery of these inventions, I believe, is the primary purpose for which the work was created; that is, to be admired by a small ‘in-the-know’ audience, yet to remain unseen by everyone else.

I will offer many examples of creative play that will serve as background to the arguments put forward.  The writer of the Madeleine McCann story was not the victim of circumstance challenged with the manipulation of reality, he is the willing and extremely able creator of pure fiction.

To understand the story of ‘Madeleine’ we must not ignore these allusions as unwelcome intrusions into a factual story, but foreground them as central to the project of author and audience.

I will now reveal the original texts / source materials that the author draws upon to construct the Madeleine McCann story and demonstrate the ingenious allusions he has devised.

Thank you and please read on…

http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/false-history/deconstructing-the-madeleine-mccann-story/?fbclid=IwAR2BaCnvQYEflDejPBUpBjPdgI1LZgRSSdNljHYbNRLt-8rnRHukPhRIgeA

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
George Orwell, '1984': "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever."
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Chief Faffer
Chief Faffer

Posts : 17029
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Share this post on: diggdeliciousredditstumbleuponslashdotyahoogooglelive

Deconstructing the Madeleine McCann Story :: Comments

Cammerigal

Post on 18.12.19 0:00 by Cammerigal (Online)

The article makes great sense in the context of a script that was used to perpetuate the great McCann abduction myth. The dogs indicated she died in the apartment, via cadaver and blood.
Is the 'abduction myth author' Clarence Mitchell, or one of his HM government minions of spin? 
Should we consider this abduction author as guilty of perverting the course of justice as the tapas 7; or in the context of the fund fraud and of false news in the MSM, is this now an equally despicable crime in its own right that needs prosecuting (by the Portuguese)?

Back to top Go down

Verdi

Post on 18.12.19 0:31 by Verdi

The knock-on effect is indeed a crime in itself.

Indeed many of these main and bit part players are guilty of perverting the course of justice. I personally feel Clarence Mitchell is the star performer - only problem is, he represented the British government .... there it began and there it ended.

A pub brawl is fair play but try punching above your weight. There lies the problem.

Back to top Go down

pauloalexandre

Post on 18.12.19 22:04 by pauloalexandre

This guy Peter Cullen... he thinks that Madeleine is a fictional character starring in a big Hollywood production and that Fátima Espada (the cleaner who saw Madeleine on 29th April) is part of the script.

He also called Gonçalo Amaral a fraud and insulted the great research conducted by MMRG.

Reading his material is just a waste of time.

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum