McCanns want Amaral's house

McCann wants house Amaral - Corrie de Manha


"Do not separate myself from . It would be a mockery . Our family has lived in full communion . " Sofia Leal , married for eight years with the former coordinator of the Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral , reacted indignantly to be notified , by application of the McCanns , to proceed to a separation of property so that it can be accomplished the seizure of a house field in the municipality of Olhão, within the protective action of a claim of 1.2 million.

0h30
No. of votes (2) Comments (0) By:Paulo Marcelino


The application for compensation made by the McCanns is based on the contents of the book ' Maddie - The Truth Lies ' (written by Amaral, in July 2008 ) on the investigation into the disappearance of Maddie , the daughter of McCann, in Praia da Luz ( Algarve), in May 2007 . The couple claims that the former head of research in the book accuses them of being responsible for the death of his daughter and insist on the thesis of abduction.

The interim measure was filed in the 1st Civil Court of Lisbon in June 2009 and was accepted. The McCanns had the seizure of all duties owed to the author of the book , half of reform and " moiety in their villa " field in Olhão. In July this year , the recording of sharecropping in conservatory was refused by a focus on common good. The McCanns , by their lawyer, Sofia Leal requested to make a separation of property , as provided by law. The defendant refused and the court ultimately consummate in August, the arrest complete. " My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allow pedophiles in our circle. I am shocked that a couple who they say want to destroy our religious family, " says Sofia Leal.

ENGLISH DISPOSAL ABDUCTION

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom ( Office Foreign & Commonwealth ) does not have the disappearance of Madeleine McCann cataloged as kidnapping , accepting that there is no evidence to suggest that crime, as concluded by the Portuguese Judiciary Police research initially led by Gonçalo Amaral, and that is mirrored in the book ' Maddie - The Truth Lies '. In response to an investigator , who requested information on missing British children abroad, the Consular Directorate of the Foreign Office - in reply dated December 14, 2009 and to which the CM had access - claims: "We also know the Madeleine McCann case . This is the case of Needham ( missing in Greece in 1991 and the case filed since 2008) are categorized as missing persons , rather than child abduction, because there is no evidence to support that the child was or was not kidnapped. "
Correct





Also on Joana's site

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/09/mccanns-want-amarals-family-home.html

" My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allow pedophiles in our circle"

Strong words...

kangdang wrote:" My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allow pedophiles in our circle"

Strong words...

Just the quote I was going to highlight kangdang. Yes strong words indeed

What's happened to the trial then? Why are they persuing this now?

Christmas is coming?

from Joana's site

The interim measure [injunction] was filed at the 1st Civil Court of Lisbon in June 2009 and was allowed. The McCanns gained all the still due book authorship rights, half of Amaral's retirement pension as well as his “share [moiety, half] of their rural property” in Olhão. In July this year, the house division in two parts at the registry office was refused on the grounds that it affected a common asset.

The McCann couple via their lawyer [Isabel Duarte] applied for Sofia Leal execute a separation of assets, as foreseen by law. She refused and in August the court carried into completion the full arrest. “My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allowed paedophiles in our circle of friends. I am shocked that a couple who affirm to be religious is seeking out to destroy our family”, said Sofia Leal

:.

So they filed for half his share and the registry refused because it was in both their names, so the Mccann lawyer has told Sofia to seperate her assests, she has refused and in August this year the court has agreed to take the whole ammount. The bloody cheek Grrrrrrrrrrr Have I read that right?? How can they have applied in August, last month, when we have had no trial. The injunction was only an interim thing till the trial wasn't it?

kangdang wrote:" My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allow pedophiles in our circle"

Strong words...

People in Rothely should all be given a chance to read the Gaspar statements - I expect many have had the chance via the internet and a few more via the MF book.

From Joana's (link in first post)

snipped

The interim measure [injunction] was filed at the 1st Civil Court of Lisbon in June 2009 and was allowed. The McCanns gained all the still due book authorship rights, half of Amaral's retirement pension as well as his “share [moiety, half] of their rural property” in Olhão. In July this year, the house division in two parts at the registry office was refused on the grounds that it affected a common asset.

The McCann couple via their lawyer [Isabel Duarte] applied for Sofia Leal to execute a separation of assets, as foreseen by law. She refused and in August the court carried into completion the full arrest. “My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allowed paedophiles in our circle of friends. I am shocked that a couple who affirm to be religious is seeking out to destroy




How can they claim half of his pension fgs!! He has worked for that all his life. What sort of person would do that. The proceeds of the book, well that is to do with the case, but his pension and his house,......I am totally disgusted.

candyfloss wrote:

kangdang wrote:" My husband and I have never abandoned our daughters, or allow pedophiles in our circle"

Strong words...

Just the quote I was going to highlight kangdang. Yes strong words indeed

What's happened to the trial then? Why are they persuing this now?

Someone on another site has just asked if they are going to sue Sofia for the quote above. They are strong words and she wasn't afraid to say them. Do they know a lot more than they let on?

I hope they bloody do.

Sofia will have the strength to say these words because she will genuinely know a lot more than we do. She will certainly know more than Kate McCann does. The intriguing thing is, that unlike Kate McCann who has told us she knows more than we do, Sofia truly does know more than we do, and will one day be able to reveal exactly what it is that she knows more about than we do.

Therefore we appear to have some known unknowns ready to emerge in the fullness of time. Many flights across to Portugal and pleadings by lawyers has still not revealed the evidence that the McCanns wish to see. Whereas Sofia will probably know every word that is missing from the police files, as an insurance policy in case anything happens to her husband.

Silly woman,even IF she knows more about the case she should have kept quiet considering her husband is being sued for libel d'oh.

Sofia didn't say anything libellous. She said she didn't abandon her children or allow paedophiles into her circle.

I don't see how the McCanns can sue her for that, especially as they haven't sued the Gaspars.

Rainbow wrote:Silly woman,even IF she knows more about the case she should have kept quiet considering her husband is being sued for libel d'oh.

@ Rainbow

Having previously been made thoroughly aware of your utter and total objectivity with regard to Madeleine's uncanny disappearance from the face of God's earth, it is with the greatest humility that one is currently observing that the fence you have chosen to sit on seems to be consistently giving you the same strange perspective as those who have been fooled into supporting the parents abduction theory.

May one suggest that you try facing in the opposite direction for just a few weeks, allowing your nostrils to avoid most of the ill breezes? One is becoming rather concerned that there is a distinct possibility that you could have been infected by an hallucinogenic substance that may be wafting on the wind. One would not wish to see your judgement being clouded to the extent that you see libel in every written word albeit Tony Blair is an utter lying bastard and so is Gordon Brown.

ufercoffy wrote:Sofia didn't say anything libellous. She said she didn't abandon her children or allow paedophiles into her circle.

I don't see how the McCanns can sue her for that, especially as they haven't sued the Gaspars.

One is quite sure that the French will have a word for it, but it is the most extraordinarily odd thing that the McCanns and Payne have not instructed their lawyers to hammer the Gaspars into the ground for suggesting that Payne and McCann were merrily having a sordid conversation about a quite heinous subject right in front of them. On more than one occasion, one hastens to add.

@ Rainbow

Would your fence permit you to make any sort of comment on the fact that the McCanns and Payne have chosen to ignore this episode, yet are quite happy to pursue a man into the ground and make him and his family homeless for merely telling his side of the story about the investigations he had been working on?

One is taking into account that the fence may be some hindrance here, and is of course not expecting a particularly profound answer in response. Perhaps if you were to shuffle your bottom along the fence a few yards, you would find a gateway to stand in for just a few moments? One would be quite happy to keep the fence warm for when you want to jump back on it again.

One sees idiots on both sides of the fence.

Rainbow wrote:One sees idiots on both sides of the fence.

Care to name a few Rainbow?

No

Wise decision

[img][/img]

Why is that then?

Some folk take none to kindly to being labelled idiots, particularly when it is evident that they are not.

So you know to whom I am referring? We are all entitled to our opinions on things AND people,what may seem evident to one does not mean it is evident to another nor does it mean EITHER opinion is correct..... just different.

I have an idea as to whom you are referring, and if I am correct then I am in a position to categorically state that you are a very poor judge of character.

Rainbow wrote:Silly woman,even IF she knows more about the case she should have kept quiet considering her husband is being sued for libel d'oh.

Not silly. To the contrary very brave.
Afterall the mccanns have evolved to pond low lives demanding everything, even pension...what has Mrs Amaral got to lose? There is nothing at stake anymore.

Besides she'd said nothing libellous.
If the mccanns construe it to mean them, are they then admitting guilt conscious to both points in the statement?

When this goes to trial it'll reflect very negatively for the mccanns.
Their greed and vindictiveness know no bound - is that going to go down well with the public?
It stops being about Maddie to them long ago.
It's all about their vendetta and hatred against a retired Police Inspector who'd named them 'official suspects' The pair of fascists are baying for blood; doubtless even a blind can see that.

No matter what, they cannot whitewash their blackened name. Its too late for that. Taking Amaral to court and cleaning him out only serves to rehash their blackened name in the press all over again when this goes to trial.

I have never in my life seen such greed in a defamation case even before the case is over and won.
Demanding all these even before trial begins is being very presumptious and shows their intent to destroy Amaral totally. They have taken it beyond defending their name.

If the Portuguese law has allowed for that...then it sucks. How can a presumptious demand be legal when the case is still pending trial and there's no verdict yet. If mccanns lost, can Amaral equally demand all the assets of mccanns including their future earnings and pensions?

Excellent post Aiyoyo

@ aiyoyo

Splendid post

kangdang wrote:Wise decision

[img][/img]

One could not think about exterminating Rainbow, as one is currently using her in an experiment to see just how far the Lizard people are prepared to go in their brainwashing programmes. Therefore one's business today was looking for Lizard infiltrators who may be looking around here for people to convert. They could very easily whoosh Rainbow away from us if a wind were to blow along her fence.

One has to say that Rainbow is relatively polite in comparison with some of the posts copied over here lately, and it is quite obvious that she is much safer facing us on this side of the fence. It rather looks like a jungle on the other side, and one fears that she could very easily be snaffled up by those perverse people who keep brainwashing people with their abduction theory. Therefore, it is my belief that one should be thankful for Rainbow, because her replacement could be somebody really rather obnoxious and rude.

Excellent post aiyoyo hope you don't mind but I've put it on my blog. I was so bluddy angry to read this latest saga that I couldn't bring myself to write a comment.

kangdang wrote:I have an idea as to whom you are referring, and if I am correct then I am in a position to categorically state that you are a very poor judge of character.

Again,your opinion.We all see things and people differently and I dont think you have the first idea to whom I am referring-there are so many

Rainbow wrote:

kangdang wrote:I have an idea as to whom you are referring, and if I am correct then I am in a position to categorically state that you are a very poor judge of character.

Again,your opinion.We all see things and people differently and I dont think you have the first idea to whom I am referring-there are so many

Then we should all count ourselves very lucky to have you here.

Brilliant post aiyoyo
Soon the world will see that it has only ever been about money as far as the McCanns are concerned. They are the lowest of the low