Re: JonBenet Ramsey's brother to break near 20 year silence and speak publicly for the first time about his sisters murder

by Volver 25.09.16 9:27

Eiddam wrote:Apparently there was no definitive evidence of sexual assault. Little JonBenet had vaginitis and had visited the doctor with that. This is a common issue in little girls. There was no intruder that is a fact. Zero proof of. Why would JR suddenly decide to abuse this one child out of all of his children. Someone in that house struck that little girl once on the head and a cover up ensued. The lad did it.

Hi all, new member here.

@Eiddam, vaginitis is a common in little girls? Do you have figues to back up your assertion?

Admin - it's confusing having two running topics on Burke. Can they be merged?

by Eiddam 25.09.16 9:44

Google it for one. Most people with a vagina themselves can associate with it. Maybe I have a doctor in my family and or maybe I have lots of girls myself. Unabused ones of course. Bacteria grows easy in pre pubescent girls. It doesn't mean dark stuff is going on.
Now as much as you WANT to believe in a paedophile theory there isn't one here IMO.

by Volver 25.09.16 9:51

I googled before I posted.

I am in possession of a vagina but do not associate with vaginitis.

I don't believe in anthing regarding this case, I know the basics, that's all.

My opinion is that child sexual abuse is rife, sadly.

by Eiddam 25.09.16 10:02

little girls are self cleaning and you are advised off using anything that may irritate that area, because of the high risk of bacterial infection. Even when you do that it's not always enough.

While I do agree with you that child abuse is rife not all child murders are sexually motivated when they have happened within the family. Imfact though I may be wrong, predominantly they are not.

by MayMuse 27.09.16 19:08

whodunit wrote:Where do the chronic and acute sexual assaults fit in with that theory?

Dead child, sexually assaulted, asphyxiated, head bashed in but it was the NINE YEAR OLD CHILD whodunit because he was jealous? I don't think so.

I'm glad he's suing, both for his own sake and for the possibility of some truth leaking out.

Hopefully some truth will, the parents were exonerated for good reason. Male DNA as we know did not match the parents or JonBenets brother. CBS do need to be held accountable over the documentary as it was most damaging,did not cover all aspects in my opinion, plus extremely accusatory!
Further pertinent info on this video which I encourage people who have followed this sad and abhorrent case to watch.
https://youtu.be/d59-dUBn3LY

by Roxyroo 28.09.16 1:57

MayMuse wrote:
whodunit wrote:Where do the chronic and acute sexual assaults fit in with that theory?

Dead child, sexually assaulted, asphyxiated, head bashed in but it was the NINE YEAR OLD CHILD whodunit because he was jealous? I don't think so.

I'm glad he's suing, both for his own sake and for the possibility of some truth leaking out.
Hopefully some truth will, the parents were exonerated for good reason. Male DNA as we know did not match the parents or JonBenets brother. CBS do need to be held accountable over the documentary as it was most damaging,did not cover all aspects in my opinion, plus extremely accusatory!
Further pertinent info on this video which I encourage people who have followed this sad and abhorrent case to watch.
https://youtu.be/d59-dUBn3LY

@MayMuse
Can u tell me the name of the vid pls? The link won't work on my tablet, x

by MayMuse 28.09.16 3:47

Roxyroo wrote:
MayMuse wrote:
whodunit wrote:Where do the chronic and acute sexual assaults fit in with that theory?

Dead child, sexually assaulted, asphyxiated, head bashed in but it was the NINE YEAR OLD CHILD whodunit because he was jealous? I don't think so.

I'm glad he's suing, both for his own sake and for the possibility of some truth leaking out.
Hopefully some truth will, the parents were exonerated for good reason. Male DNA as we know did not match the parents or JonBenets brother. CBS do need to be held accountable over the documentary as it was most damaging,did not cover all aspects in my opinion, plus extremely accusatory!
Further pertinent info on this video which I encourage people who have followed this sad and abhorrent case to watch.
https://youtu.be/d59-dUBn3LY

@MayMuse
Can u tell me the name of the vid pls? The link won't work on my tablet, x

What DNA found in Jonbenet Ramsey's underwear revealed - But the public didn't know eek

by Guest 28.09.16 7:59

MayMuse wrote:
whodunit wrote:Where do the chronic and acute sexual assaults fit in with that theory?

Dead child, sexually assaulted, asphyxiated, head bashed in but it was the NINE YEAR OLD CHILD whodunit because he was jealous? I don't think so.

I'm glad he's suing, both for his own sake and for the possibility of some truth leaking out.
Hopefully some truth will, the parents were exonerated for good reason. Male DNA as we know did not match the parents or JonBenets brother. CBS do need to be held accountable over the documentary as it was most damaging,did not cover all aspects in my opinion, plus extremely accusatory!
Further pertinent info on this video which I encourage people who have followed this sad and abhorrent case to watch.
https://youtu.be/d59-dUBn3LY

Seriously... these are Ramsey people trying to rubbish the Police.

The Ramsey lawyer: "DNA from the manufacturing process... are you kidding me?"

And yet the CBS team proved that new panties straight from the package are covered in DNA from manufacturing.

The linked video is something anyone would be proud of.

The Boulder authorities were absolutely WRONG to exonerate because of the DNA in the panties - they could not rule out the manufacturing process.

This is all about wealth and politics.

by Et-AL 28.11.19 0:22

Photographer who sold JonBenét Ramsey images remains in Oregon jail on child porn charges

https://kval.com/news/local/photographer-who-sold-jonbent-ramsey-images-remains-in-oregon-jail

Latest topics