***NEW - Reply received from Mike Penning M.P., Home Office, 6 Jun 2016*** (was: Reasons why the public need a report on Operation Grange: The letter handed in to Prime Minister, David Cameron, on 29 April 2016 in support of the petition

MayMuse wrote:I agree with you @Verdi & your post makes such great sense... 
However, 
"The UK authorities have seriously compromised their position in this case"



Why would they do this, if it wasn't for some form of "cover-up"? 
What could they potentially gain or not gain ? 


This is what goes around in my head trying to make sense.
I cannot come up with a "reasonable" answer! 


No wonder people are so "baffled" with it all. 

MayMuse wrote:

Joss wrote:

MayMuse wrote:I agree with you @Verdi & your post makes such great sense... 
However, 
"The UK authorities have seriously compromised their position in this case"



Why would they do this, if it wasn't for some form of "cover-up"? 
What could they potentially gain or not gain ? 


This is what goes around in my head trying to make sense.
I cannot come up with a "reasonable" answer! 


No wonder people are so "baffled" with it all. 

BBM, I think the whole cover up is more to do with G.M. and who he is and who is connected with, that is the only reasonable explanation i can think of. They had a "disaster" alright in Portugal, and it was probably an "OMG what are we going to do now, our lives will be ruined" moment that the McC's had in regard to Madeleine on their trip to Portugal and what actually happened to their daughter. They had to get into damage control mode immediately, so lots of frantic calls back to the U.K. and the authorities in the U.K. bailed them out of their dilemma fairly promptly, IMO.

That would mean that GM would have some form of a "hold" on the UK government? Like I have said I cannot come up with a "reasonable" answer; what sort of "power" could GM have to bring all of that "support" in at a moments notice?

Google.Gaspar.Statements wrote:It was John McCann who said they were "calling in favours".

Favours in return for what?

Joss wrote:

MayMuse wrote:

Joss wrote:

MayMuse wrote:I agree with you @Verdi & your post makes such great sense... 
However, 
"The UK authorities have seriously compromised their position in this case"



Why would they do this, if it wasn't for some form of "cover-up"? 
What could they potentially gain or not gain ? 


This is what goes around in my head trying to make sense.
I cannot come up with a "reasonable" answer! 


No wonder people are so "baffled" with it all. 

BBM, I think the whole cover up is more to do with G.M. and who he is and who is connected with, that is the only reasonable explanation i can think of. They had a "disaster" alright in Portugal, and it was probably an "OMG what are we going to do now, our lives will be ruined" moment that the McC's had in regard to Madeleine on their trip to Portugal and what actually happened to their daughter. They had to get into damage control mode immediately, so lots of frantic calls back to the U.K. and the authorities in the U.K. bailed them out of their dilemma fairly promptly, IMO.

That would mean that GM would have some form of a "hold" on the UK government? Like I have said I cannot come up with a "reasonable" answer; what sort of "power" could GM have to bring all of that "support" in at a moments notice?

COMARE perhaps? Or is GM a Freemason, because there are Masons in Govt. from what i have read, and don't they all cover for each other? The "Brotherhood" and all that.

pennylane wrote:I too believe COMARE / EDF energy are high on the list as to a potential reason for the protection.  It's also interesting to note that Gerry McCann quietly disappeared off the COMARE subcommittee soon after the disappearance!

Tony Bennett wrote:

pennylane wrote:I too believe COMARE / EDF energy are high on the list as to a potential reason for the protection.  It's also interesting to note that Gerry McCann quietly disappeared off the COMARE subcommittee soon after the disappearance!

@ pennylane & @ Estelle

For those thinking that the COMARE connection might be the answer to the riddle, there is of course a very interesting connection to the nuclear energy industry via leading Lancashire Freemason, Edward Smethurst, the McCanns' co-ordinating lawyer from the beginning (and Director of Madeleine's Fund).

Smethurst's first real job, back in the 1990s, was as a junior lawyer in the Legal Department of British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL). He was appointed to that job by Alvin Shuttleworth, an even more senior fellow Freemason in the East Lancashire Provincial Lodge.

Shuttleworth was the Head of BNFL's Legal Department at the time. The two men became engaged in a very successful campaign to deny compensation to many families, especially those with young children, who claimed to have developed leukaemia due to living so long close to the Sellafield nuclear reactor in Cumbria.

But if anything, that points not so much to COMARE and nuclear energy but to the possible role of senior Freemasons working on the Madeleine McCann case. The McCanns' bizarre action, lying prostrate before the GNR police when they arrived at the Ocean Club, was a copybook repetition of an ancient Masonic symbol of severe distress - a direct appeal to any Masonic police in the Portuguese police.

Then again the McCanns' friendship with the pervert Ray Wyre might suggest other influences.

But then we have strayed   more than a bit            

 

r

MayMuse wrote:Thank you that sounds promising