Only in America blog, worth reading
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Books on the Madeleine McCann case :: Kate McCann's book, Prosecution Exhibit 1: 'madeleine'
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Only in America blog, worth reading
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-does-this-remind-you-of.html?spref=fb
This is well worth a read. I was considering to cut and paste the bit about Snr. Amaral as it is very good. Can we have an Amaral support ongoing topic? One could hope that he could dip into it from time to time.
It further amused me to see the M's called 'a couple of chav doctors'. Can't improve on that! I think I got pretty close by saying he was Delboy.
This is well worth a read. I was considering to cut and paste the bit about Snr. Amaral as it is very good. Can we have an Amaral support ongoing topic? One could hope that he could dip into it from time to time.
It further amused me to see the M's called 'a couple of chav doctors'. Can't improve on that! I think I got pretty close by saying he was Delboy.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
That's a really good blog, thank you for bringing it to my attention:
" justice, unlike Madeleine Mccann had gone straight out of the window"
" justice, unlike Madeleine Mccann had gone straight out of the window"
Guest- Guest
a great idea!
tigger wrote:http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-does-this-remind-you-of.html?spref=fb
This is well worth a read. I was considering to cut and paste the bit about Snr. Amaral as it is very good. Can we have an Amaral support ongoing topic? One could hope that he could dip into it from time to time.
It further amused me to see the M's called 'a couple of chav doctors'. Can't improve on that! I think I got pretty close by saying he was Delboy.
Thanks for that tigger, I haven't read the blog yet, but I will do. Love the idea of a support topic for Snr Amaral, I would certainly support him. I get truly sick and tired of McCann apologists smearing his name, making him out to be the Devil incarnate! Even if ANY of what they say is true, HE didn't do to Maddie whatever befell her, he's just the poor sod who was pushed (not fell) onto his sword through political pressure. He doesn't deserve the McCann's hatred or contempt. None of the PJ do.
Re 'chav doctors', well Kate's 'f**king t***er' comment doesn't really become a lady, does it? Though I do think that possibly it could be construed as an insult to chavs everywhere, most of them have more class than K+G!!!
____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras
Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.
NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
rainbow-fairy- Posts : 1971
Activity : 2140
Likes received : 16
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 50
Location : going round in circles
Reply.
You're right, more East Enders than anything else really. That why they managed to appeal to such a huge part of the population.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
spoons
Well, I've now read the blog - I love it! Especially 'I don't believe you - I can use a spoon!'
Fantastic! :-)
Fantastic! :-)
____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras
Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.
NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
rainbow-fairy- Posts : 1971
Activity : 2140
Likes received : 16
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 50
Location : going round in circles
thanks tigger
a very interesting read from someone who is clearly angry at this state of affairs.
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Is this OK Candyfloss?
From the same blog:
The other great difference between the truth and a lie is that the truth is usually simple and a lie is invariably complicated.
"We went out to dinner leaving the kids most nights and we came back and they were still there" is really simple.
As is, unfortunately, "We went out one night leaving the kids but one of them got out of the apartment and fell off the balcony". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had had a serious accident". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had got out and been run over by a car."
The alternative is somewhat more complicated: "We went out one night leaving the kids, not realising that we'd been watched by a predatory paedophile for several days, who we hadn't noticed, despite the resort being quiet and despite the fact that we felt it was safe to leave the kids, who targeted Madeleine rather than the other kids because she was special, who got into the apartment between our checks, despite the fact we'd doubled the frequency from the night before following the crying incident, which we can't recall happening, avoiding being noticed by Gerry, who was talking to Jez, on the other side of the road to that claimed by Jez and Jane, who wasn't seen by Jez or Gerry anyway, just before she saw the abductor, who must have gone out through the window, despite no-one noticing it open and without leaving any marks, because the door slammed when Kate went in, and it's odd about those dogs, but Kate had handled dead bodies when she went to work in her holiday pants and took the cuddle cat, and anyway the twins' sandals were in the boot of the car with the nappies and the rotting meat, but we're totally confident in each other's innocence and our legal and PR team are too."
The other great difference between the truth and a lie is that the truth is usually simple and a lie is invariably complicated.
"We went out to dinner leaving the kids most nights and we came back and they were still there" is really simple.
As is, unfortunately, "We went out one night leaving the kids but one of them got out of the apartment and fell off the balcony". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had had a serious accident". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had got out and been run over by a car."
The alternative is somewhat more complicated: "We went out one night leaving the kids, not realising that we'd been watched by a predatory paedophile for several days, who we hadn't noticed, despite the resort being quiet and despite the fact that we felt it was safe to leave the kids, who targeted Madeleine rather than the other kids because she was special, who got into the apartment between our checks, despite the fact we'd doubled the frequency from the night before following the crying incident, which we can't recall happening, avoiding being noticed by Gerry, who was talking to Jez, on the other side of the road to that claimed by Jez and Jane, who wasn't seen by Jez or Gerry anyway, just before she saw the abductor, who must have gone out through the window, despite no-one noticing it open and without leaving any marks, because the door slammed when Kate went in, and it's odd about those dogs, but Kate had handled dead bodies when she went to work in her holiday pants and took the cuddle cat, and anyway the twins' sandals were in the boot of the car with the nappies and the rotting meat, but we're totally confident in each other's innocence and our legal and PR team are too."
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
tigger wrote:From the same blog:
The other great difference between the truth and a lie is that the truth is usually simple and a lie is invariably complicated.
"We went out to dinner leaving the kids most nights and we came back and they were still there" is really simple.
As is, unfortunately, "We went out one night leaving the kids but one of them got out of the apartment and fell off the balcony". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had had a serious accident". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had got out and been run over by a car."
The alternative is somewhat more complicated: "We went out one night leaving the kids, not realising that we'd been watched by a predatory paedophile for several days, who we hadn't noticed, despite the resort being quiet and despite the fact that we felt it was safe to leave the kids, who targeted Madeleine rather than the other kids because she was special, who got into the apartment between our checks, despite the fact we'd doubled the frequency from the night before following the crying incident, which we can't recall happening, avoiding being noticed by Gerry, who was talking to Jez, on the other side of the road to that claimed by Jez and Jane, who wasn't seen by Jez or Gerry anyway, just before she saw the abductor, who must have gone out through the window, despite no-one noticing it open and without leaving any marks, because the door slammed when Kate went in, and it's odd about those dogs, but Kate had handled dead bodies when she went to work in her holiday pants and took the cuddle cat, and anyway the twins' sandals were in the boot of the car with the nappies and the rotting meat, but we're totally confident in each other's innocence and our legal and PR team are too."
Great summary written by 'bestbefore' - thank you for finding it and posting it here tigger.
I'm going to put it in the calculated hoax section
As for your suggestion about an ongoing support thread for Goncalo, please feel free to start one.
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
Only in America strikes again
I think this is worth quoting in full.
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2014/10/madeleine-mccann-was-not-abducted.html
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2014/10/madeleine-mccann-was-not-abducted.html
Only In America
What claim has your piety on my deference?
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Madeleine McCann Was Not Abducted
Introduction: Dr Martin Roberts.
Insight is a truly wonderful thing. It nourishes and advances those who are able to appreciate it. For the rest, knowledge is merely borrowed for the purposes of reference, not genuinely shared. Things are either what they are because we appreciate and understand what has been established, or they are simply taken on trust, on an ‘it is said by others’ basis.
For seven years past a watching international community has been witness to a growing clamour of borrowed knowledge regarding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, hearsay tearing repeatedly through the fabric of reason like a succession of tornados in America’s mid-west, and bringing us more recently to the most ludicrous of situations; one in which a UK police force is given a seemingly limitless budget, so as to review and pursue a case over which it has no legal jurisdiction, and in deliberate disavowal of the evidence collated by the original investigators. In an admitted collaboration with the UK government, they are acting ‘as if the abduction happened in the UK’ without first, or indeed ever, establishing whether ‘abduction’ happened at all.
It is at this point that I refer you wholeheartedly to the post that follows.
Besides being wonderful, insight is also scarce – so scarce in fact that, in all these seven years no one has truly been able to cut the Gordian knot that is the ‘abduction’ of Madeleine McCann, never mind cut it completely in two. Or three for that matter. For that we must defer to Himself. What he presents here is not ‘opinion’, coloured so as to conform to a context of allegiance, nor interpretation influenced by surmise. Here we have evidence, pure and simple - evidence conveniently shunted into a siding by all those who cannot bear to confront the truth, and largely undervalued by others unduly concerned with the incessant regurgitation of garnish so often first coughed up by ‘a source close to something or other’.
Law enforcement agencies, crime writers and Hollywood film producers are all perfectly aware that the crux of any crime resides at the point of commencement, when the perpetrator, however practised they may be, is most likely to have made a mistake. The disappearance of Madeleine McCann involved circumstantial criminals who did exactly that. To appreciate what these data are telling us therefore, it is necessary to discard the shroud that has been thrown over them in the intervening years and look afresh at what has been staring at us all from the outset.
How likely is it that two people can be independently mistaken about an open or shut situation? How likely is it that these same two people should independently, yet simultaneously, decide to ‘prune’ their respective cell ‘phone memories? How likely is it also that two different dogs, on two separate occasions, could show interest in different, yet mutually corroborating, scents, and at the very same loci?
These are the fundamental issues addressed here, and for which various bizarre, unrealistic, even childish explanations have been proffered over time – as knowledge for the undiscerning. If instead we open our eyes to another’s insight, it soon becomes apparent that the origins of, and explanations for, many of the reputedly paradoxical phenomena associated with the case of Madeleine McCann do indeed reside at the very beginning. - Martin Roberts
Madeleine McCann Was Not Abducted
Should I so desire, I could lay before you, anomalies related to this case, by the score. As equally by the score, I could inundate you with unanswered questions. But that is not my intention here today. Rather, I present just three, but extremely important questions for your consideration.
But these three chosen questions are not exclusively for your perusal, they are in fact directed at what I shall call the McCann Establishment, or for ease here on in, the Establishment.
That the Establishment now includes the Prime Minister David Cameron, who as a result of pressure by Rebecca Brooks, pressure being a polite word for coercion, as coercion is for blackmail one must say, is for the intents of this post, quite academic.
As for the involvement of the Home Secretary, Theresa May, that involvement becomes a good deal less academic, given the Home Secretary's overall responsibility for the policing of the Nation. Granted that some of that responsibility is now diminished since the introduction of police and crime commissioners, a system laid bare to justifiable charges of nepotism, I easily add. But that is by the by and concerns us little, for there was no such office at the time of initiating a "review" of the Madeleine McCann case by DCI Andy Redwood and Scotland Yard's finest. Something, I think I can maintain, that is unique in the history of English policing.
But that uniqueness is far from alone, as we shall see.
Is it not unique, that in the case of a missing child, presumed dead by the investigating police force and for good reason, that when the very cornerstone of the McCann's claim for a case of stranger abduction, turns out to be a tissue of lies, but is then seemingly ignored by those charged with this nonsensical review?
Before we had even heard the name Madeleine McCann, the script had been written, distributed, and was being learned by rote, albeit to an embarrassing degree, by seemingly every member of the McCann's extended family. The source of which, and undeniable, Kate and Gerry McCann.
"The shutters had been jemmied and poor wee Madeleine was taken." echoed every family member, with unwavering similarity.
Only the shutters weren't jemmied, and wee Madeleine was not taken.
Cause and Effect
So let us look at such.
"The shutters had been jemmied" cause.
"and poor wee Madeleine was taken" effect.
I hardly need to say it do I? No cause, no effect. It is that simple and so fundamental to the McCann's claim of abduction. No jemmied shutters, no abduction.
As simple as that may sound, it is in fact, of such profundity that it cannot, and should not, be ignored. The cornerstone for abduction, and all that surrounds it, is a house of cards. A house that took a shift years ago. The only thing propping it up now, is the litigious nature of the McCanns.
Now call me old fashioned if you will, but this bothers me. But it bothers me more, that this fundamental and crucial component of this case, not only remains unaddressed, but seemingly, is totally ignored.
To finish up this part of the post, there being two other fundamental issues I wish to address, let me try and apply some perspective to this staggering and blatantly obvious miscarriage of justice.
If our featured two were suspected of robbing a Post Office, and it's not by accident that I use a PO as an example, because, you may be surprised to know, there is no greater crime in the UK than making an unauthorised withdrawal from said establishment.
So if our two suspects, under questioning, uttered the kind of testament or set in motion testament such as we have witnessed, what might you suppose, the outcome would be?
Parts two and three will be delivered when and whenever, creativity and the will to write are pretty rare commodities for me these days.
But do bare in mind, should you come under attack, from whatever quarter: No jemmied shutters, no abduction.
Part Two, The Deleted Phone Logs
Are they such an important issue you may ask? Well they were important enough for the McCanns to lie about them, so they must be.
That we have already ascertained in part one, the setting up with family members the case for abduction, the deleted phone logs, selectively deleted I must add, and at a time, the day before in fact, of Gerry McCann's announcement to the world that his daughter had been abducted. Via of course, the jemmied shutters that weren't
What follows, is the only section of this article where some parts are not provable, but given the circumstances, let us take a look at the situation circumstantially.
The speed, or should I call it indecent haste? (and being all the more suspicious for it) The indecent haste with which the McCann Machine (Government machine) rolled into action was, putting it mildly, quite staggering.
I think at this moment, I shall let the Portuguese coordinator of the case, Goncalo Amaral, take over the narrative. This on the 4th of May
GA: At ten in the morning, twelve hours after the disappearance, the British Consul to Portimão goes to the Department of Criminal Investigation.
We inform him of the actions taken up to then and the next stages being considered. He doesn't seem satisfied.
Someone hears him on the telephone saying that the police judiciaire are doing nothing. Now, that's strange! Why that untruth? What objective does he have in mind? Giving another dimension to the case? Perhaps, I don't know a thing about it, but this is not the time for conjecture; we have to concentrate on our work, of finding the little girl.
Why indeed?
A little later still on the 4th May John Buck, British Ambassador to Portugal, descends on the scene.
GA- The McCanns are put up with David Payne.
We want to search the accommodation of the family friends to try to pick up Madeleine's clothes, especially those she was wearing on May 3rd at 5.35pm when she returned from the day centre with her mother and the twins.
Evidently, this initiative is not widely supported. The British ambassador meets with the team directing the investigation. The political and the diplomatic seem to want to prevent us from freely doing our work.
GA- I'm sure this check is necessary.
JB- The clothes? Are you mad? if I understand you properly, you want to go into the apartment to take clothes to have them analysed?
GA- Yes. What's the problem? It's a perfectly normal procedure in cases like this.
JB- Of course, but with this media hype...I don't think I have ever in my life seen so many journalists....And I didn't come down in the last shower.
I leave you to arrive at your own conclusions regarding that little nest of vipers.
To the phone logs then.
To fully understand the importance of this clip, one has take into account, that having just fled Portugal, the McCanns feel free to tell all the lies they wish and to do so with impunity. Never realising of course, to just what degree the files of the investigation would be made available to the public once the investigation was shelved.
Gerry and Kate McCann's fury after 14 texts slur
Gerry McCann reacted angrily yesterday to claims he received a string of mystery texts the day before his daughter vanished.
Police applied to Portugal's supreme court to seize his phone records after learning of the alleged messages.
They claim Gerry was sent 10 texts from an unknown number 24 hours before Madeleine disappeared.
And detectives say four messages arrived from the same mystery number the day after she went missing, according to court documents.
But Gerry and wife Kate have dismissed the claims as "utter rubbish".
A source close to them said: "They have had their phone records available for inspection for months. But the police never asked for them. And now they have formally asked, they have been refused.
"Any suggestion of Gerry receiving 10 texts the day before Madeleine disappeared are utter rubbish.
"He hardly used his phone during the holiday and most of the friends with them didn't even have mobiles.
"The only time his phone rang was when work called and he explained he was on holiday. There are no mystery texts. Gerry has nothing to hide. It's yet more nonsense coming from Portugal."
Whoops!
I haven't bothered with the second sheet that shows the final two calls. More on the deleted phone records from Paulo Reis, a worthy read.
So from whom, and what was the content of the fourteen texts messages that Gerry McCann selectively deleted and subsequently found the need to lie about?
Just one last question and then we shall move on. A question you might ask yourself for that matter.
Would Gerry McCann have the wherewithal to implement and carry out such hair-brained scheme as the one we have witnessed without the gears being set in motion by third parties of no little importance and influence?
Part Three, Cadaver Odour.
Disregarding the thousands of column inches that have been written on the subject. Disregarding the thousands of arguments for the accuracy of the dogs' alerts and to a lesser degree, the arguments against the importance of said findings, and quite shamelessly by some that, not should know better, but do know better, we have but a few things to consider.
Firstly, two irrefutable facts. No one had previously died in the McCann's holiday apartment, likewise nobody had previously met their end in the car hired by the McCanns.
Keeping in mind, that all that has been written about the dogs, for the purpose of this article, and for the sake of my argument, we shall ignore.
What we can't ignore however, are two simple facts, but by virtue of their simplicity, they do in fact become the most damning.
You may wish to remember, that the dogs alerted uniquely to things McCann without exception. On the other hand, you may choose to ignore these facts. It doesn't matter. And why doesn't it matter you may well ask?
It doesn't matter, because Kate McCann acknowledges the existence of both blood residue and cadaver odour, both in the hire car and on her own clothes.
The reasons for such we are asked to believe, range from rotting meat in the car (odour) to the transporting, however unlikely, dirty nappies of the twins. (DNA)
Regarding the cadaver odour on Kate McCann's clothes, what we are asked to believe is even more unlikely than the dirty nappies explanation. So unlikely in fact, it staggers the imagination.
The reason for Kate McCann's clothes smelling of cadaver, we are incredulously asked to believe, is that prior to the ill fated holiday in Praia da Luz, Kate McCann, as a part time locum in a general practice, came in contact with cadavers. Any number of them, depending on which source you read.
But that's not all we are asked to believe, she came into contact with said cadavers wearing her holiday clothes. And if you like that cake, I have some topping for you, she took Madeleine's soft toy, Cuddle Cat, along with her for the ride.
How hard to confirm or deny this, DCI Andy Redwood?
And of course, not only does Kate McCann acknowledge the existence of cadaver odour, but her husband too, Gerry McCann. Why else would he go to such lengths (America) to discredit the accuracy of the dogs?
And it was to such lengths he went, contacting lawyers in the US and quoting the Eugene Zapata case where the judge wouldn't except as evidence, the alerts of the dogs.
How did that one work out for you Gerry McCann? Not too good when the Zapata eventually admitted to killing his wife and the subsequent revelations that the dogs were right all along.
How damning do the actions of the parents have to be? Madeleine McCann disappeared in the most controversial circumstances imaginable, and the last two people to see here alive, and statistically the most likely people to be involved in that disappearance, the parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, are doing their utmost to explain or discredit the stench of death that surrounds them.
I'm sorry, not in my world. Madeleine McCann was not abducted.
For Brenda Leyland RIP
All issues mentioned here are searchable and confirmable.
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
excellent,PeterMac, So what are sy playing at.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
What are they playing at ?
Complete Exoneration.
Complete Exoneration.
The....truth- Posts : 88
Activity : 92
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2014-02-18
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
Thetruth wrote:What are they playing at ?
Complete Exoneration.
I don't know what they are playing at.
What I do know is that unless and until they manage to shut down the entire World Wide Web this is not going to go away.
The Curse of the McCanns will follow some of the main players for the rest of their lives, for whatever reason.
" />
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
I've just read on the missingmadeleine forum that the Onlyinamerica blog closed down on 17th July 2016. The site is still up with lots of info. A big thank you to Himself , who is moving on.
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2016/07/blog-news.html
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2016/07/blog-news.html
whatsupdoc- Posts : 601
Activity : 953
Likes received : 320
Join date : 2011-08-04
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
Yes, it's a real shame that he closed his blog, he made some amazing posts.whatsupdoc wrote:I've just read on the missingmadeleine forum that the Onlyinamerica blog closed down on 17th July 2016. The site is still up with lots of info. A big thank you to Himself , who is moving on.
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2016/07/blog-news.html
But I think he'll be back. He's 'moved on' before when he shut down the McCann Gallery.
I personally think that when you've invested so much time on this case from the start that it gets under your skin and you keep coming back to it.
Many times I've felt like 'moving on' but I find it impossible.
I keep thinking about my own grandchildren and how I would feel if this had happened to one of them.
Madeleine needs as many people as possible to get to the truth about what really happened to her.
Because her own despicable parents are doing whatever they can to ensure the truth doesn't come out, however many millions of pounds it takes and how many lives they destroy in the process.
Keep the faith that Dr Amaral is still beavering away in the background with the support of thousands of people who raised thousands of pounds for him to keep the complete mystery of Madeleine McCann's case ongoing. His hands are still tied until the outcome of the 'Damages Trial' after which I believe it will be all systems go! We haven't heard the last from him yet.
Courtesy of Himself:
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
only in America, latest blog
"Come on Philomena,it's your Niece we'er trying to find the Truth for,you know,Wee Madeleine,care to offer a Tune, Philomena" thought not, not been standing near any lakes lately have you?Get'emGonçalo wrote:Yes, it's a real shame that he closed his blog, he made some amazing posts.whatsupdoc wrote:I've just read on the missingmadeleine forum that the Onlyinamerica blog closed down on 17th July 2016. The site is still up with lots of info. A big thank you to Himself , who is moving on.
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2016/07/blog-news.html
But I think he'll be back. He's 'moved on' before when he shut down the McCann Gallery.
I personally think that when you've invested so much time on this case from the start that it gets under your skin and you keep coming back to it.
Many times I've felt like 'moving on' but I find it impossible.
I keep thinking about my own grandchildren and how I would feel if this had happened to one of them.
Madeleine needs as many people as possible to get to the truth about what really happened to her.
Because her own despicable parents are doing whatever they can to ensure the truth doesn't come out, however many millions of pounds it takes and how many lives they destroy in the process.
Keep the faith that Dr Amaral is still beavering away in the background with the support of thousands of people who raised thousands of pounds for him to keep the complete mystery of Madeleine McCann's case ongoing. His hands are still tied until the outcome of the 'Damages Trial' after which I believe it will be all systems go! We haven't heard the last from him yet.
Courtesy of Himself:
willowthewisp- Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
When Madeleine went missing and her parents were supported by just about every senior/high profile agency, had procured lawyers and all manner of professionals, had set up a limited company with serious London addresses, why was the hub/nerve centre/distribution centre of the Madeleine shop in Ullapool?
£47k to set up a website and a distribution centre allegedly run out of a garage by a 19 year old former pupil, son of a policeman.
£47k to set up a website and a distribution centre allegedly run out of a garage by a 19 year old former pupil, son of a policeman.
Liz Eagles- Posts : 11164
Activity : 13573
Likes received : 2218
Join date : 2011-09-03
Re: Only in America blog, worth reading
Loved the article Dr Martin Roberts wrote, he has a magical way of explaining things, I could read his work all the time. Thanks Peter Mac.
DENNISSALLY- Posts : 93
Activity : 230
Likes received : 131
Join date : 2016-04-14
Location : Ireland Co Donegal
Similar topics
» only in America, latest blog + Hobs blog: Thanks for nothing
» From Only in America blog: "The 'pyjamas' have always bothered me"
» A very, very interesting reading, from a blog of Ben Salmon
» Gerry's Blog - Blog 1, Day 17
» Gerry's Blog - Blog 2, Day 20
» From Only in America blog: "The 'pyjamas' have always bothered me"
» A very, very interesting reading, from a blog of Ben Salmon
» Gerry's Blog - Blog 1, Day 17
» Gerry's Blog - Blog 2, Day 20
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Books on the Madeleine McCann case :: Kate McCann's book, Prosecution Exhibit 1: 'madeleine'
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum