The bad smell surrounding Sonia Poulton

by **Tony Bennett** 02.02.15 18:29

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com

Putting this here separately for reference so that we have Lazzeri's analysis of Sonia Poulton's current activities - but not wanting to interrupt the useful discussion about her activities, so Mods please move elsewhere if considered necessary.

Can I first clear up that I do not even have a clue who 'L-azzeri' is, let alone be one and the same, as some numpties claim elsewhere. S/he may or may not be a member of this forum, again I have absolutely no idea. His/her writing style is different from anypone I know here on the forum or elsewhere.

From reading his/her posts, I think s/he has a good bullshit-detector. S/he has exposed pretence, cant, humbug, ego, hypocrisy, inconsistency on many occasions - whether it be the McCanns and their friends, other members of the McCann Team, or personalities around the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

If we put all her/his pieces - subject to precis - into one volume, it would make a pretty complellng read I think.

Here goes with 'The Poulton Pong'

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Poulton Pong

An adult and a professional she declared on Twitter last evening, who does not need the permission of others to do as she pleases, or doorstep at the home of young children presumably?

But isn't that the oddest of things.

For weeks Poulton has been promoting a documentary which she will bring to the world. She cannot speak too much about it (of course she can't ) she'll wait until after the inquest into the death of Brenda Leyland before she does.

But why the wait?

It cannot be out of respect for Ms Leyland, else she would have kept silent completely until after the inquest?

So what else could explain the wait? What else could explain her promoting a documentary which she has no date of airing?

Poulton has been drip feeding her frenzied followers, feeding them a diet of Kate McCann for weeks now. All salivating at the thought of Kate McCann being doorstepped, pertinent questions put to her.

As if! In the real world like that is going to happen. Kate McCann standing politely answering questions. Questions she refused to answer when put to her by police. Questions which for almost 8 years she has avoided like the plague. Paid top lawyers, Clarence Mitchell £hundreds thousands to make sure she was never made answerable for ANYTHING in connection with the suspicious disappearance/death of her daughter Madeleine.

So what are the chances that this documentary will feature Kate McCann co-operating with Poulton, she never fully co-operated with police, so why would she entertain Poulton on her own doorstep?

Short answer - she would not!

So is Poulton's hype, exactly that, just hype, and the only thing the viewer will be getting their teeth into, is not Kate McCann, but a damp squib?

Only time will tell.

But it is the curious pong that surrounds Poulton that is concerning. Haven't quite put my finger on exactly what is the stench, but I think safe to say, I think I smell a rat!

All the hooha from Gerry McCann, demanding that people be silenced, that those persons online who dare question him, his wife, their outrageous story of abduction, be sent to prison no less! Yet here we have Poulton who has now posted pictures, pictures taken of her, standing right outside the front door of the McCann home, a cameraman filming her. So at least three persons present. Poulton, cameraman, and the person who took the still.

Now if I turned up and hung around the McCann front door this morning, just stood there on their front path, their lawn, whatever, taking pictures, filming, you can bet your boots that a few burly British Bobbies would have me removed pretty darn quickly, and I would have been made an example of - the horrid individual who had stalked the McCann family.

You can be sure that Gerry McCann would have contacted Clarence Mitchell (before the police) who would in turn have had this splattered across Sky News, the press, the story of how Kate and Gerry McCann had been been threatened by an intruder on their property. How the McCann family feared for their lives, the lives of their children. Stories of how the little ones had been so affected by this. You can be sure Clarence would have had a team down there pronto to capture on film the evil do'er being arrested.

Brunt, in his little piece, accused people of threatening McCann family simply because they lived in the same area, frequented the same stores, leisure centres, in fact they were a threat simply for having breathed the same air as the McCanns!

But what do we have herein case of Poulton - Perfect silence!

Poulton has been on about her documentary for many weeks. She has been bickering on twitter (so utterly unprofessional) with the nasty individual that is Jim Gamble. So has made no secret of this documentary.

The McCanns have there man 'Wright' trawling the internet on a daily basis we are told, so it would be reasonable to say that the McCanns knew to expect a 'visit' from Poulton. And knowing this, it seems extraordinary that Kate McCann would then be 'caught out' by Poulton (if as Poulton is saying, this is the case) Also the McCanns it has been reported in the press in the past have some state of the art security system in place at their home.

Yet Poulton from what we can establish, waltzed onto the McCann property and 'tackled' shall we say Kate McCann, and not a murmur from Clarence Mitchell, Sky, Murdoch, not even a word from that nice man at the Sun, who brought us Cristobell's Trollgate.

More importantly, not a word from Gerry McCann, the police!

I haven't as yet figured out as I said what the pong around Poulton is, but it pervades the internet.

Poulton last evening declared that she will NOT be answering any more questions put to her on Twitter regarding this documentary, but wait for it, she will ~~throw you a bone~~ bring you good folks a bit more to chew - very SOON... Mmm yummy.

Two main questions here:

Why is Poulton behaving as she is, on twitter arguing with others, drip feeding the twit people, what she wants them to hear? Not professional.

And why have the McCanns not said a word about all of this? Not like them to pass up an opportunity to play the victims.

Not like them, not by a long shot.

Do the McCanns not want to say anything about it, as it might draw unwelcome attention to them the part they played in the circumstances which led to the tragic death of Brenda Leyland?

I don't think that would stop McCann. They are not that sensitive.

They appeared at a function just after Ms Leyland's death, and McCann smirked when a question about same was put to him. So he really doesn't give a rats ass about that. We're talking the two people who have stood on the steps of a Lisbon Court in front of TV cameras from around the world, and lied through their teeth about many things. They are the people who have stood in Court and before the Court been untruthful. They are the people whose police witness statements could have been written by Pinnochio!

So NO, if McCann their teams of lawyers, Mitchell et al have said not a thing about Poulton parking her fanny on their property, I'd hazard a guess that fanny was welcome!

Poulton's build up to her documentary is panning out just like DCI Redwood's build up to Crimewatch 2013...trailers and all!

The Poulton Pong certainly pervades the online air, she knows what it is, possibly the McCanns and their team know too, together concocted this new scent? And of course that nice man, rat face from the Sun he for sure is used to splashing Eau de Rodent all over!

I find the idea of Poulton having doorstepped the home of the McCann children abhorrent - absolutely nothing can justify her actions in this regard.

If it is a case that the McCann couple are somehow involved in the Poulton Pong, then all hang their heads in shame!

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
2nd February 2015

by aiyoyo 02.02.15 19:37

The McCanns have there man 'Wright' trawling the internet on a daily basis we are told, so it would be reasonable to say that the McCanns knew to expect a 'visit' from Poulton. And knowing this, it seems extraordinary that Kate McCann would then be 'caught out' by Poulton (if as Poulton is saying, this is the case) Also the McCanns it has been reported in the press in the past have some state of the art security system in place at their home.

IMO this observation of Lazz-in-the sun may be wrong.
Why I say that ? Because in SP's teaser video she said that she had doorstepped four main characters. So I take it the doorstepping of Kate and three others were already done and dusted by the time she puts out the teaser ad. Unless Kate is in addition to the FOUR already mentioned, then yes it could be a recent happening.
Just saying.

by littlepixie 03.02.15 11:04

I will quietly observe. After eight years watching players come and go I take nothing at face value. Sonia Poultons profile has certainly been raised recently.

by woodforthetrees 03.02.15 11:19

People are presuming that the McCans were at home but simply did nothing.

They might've been out!

by Joss 03.02.15 12:45

woodforthetrees wrote:People are presuming that the McCans were at home but simply did nothing.

They might've been out!

Then why would she even mention it? It would be a moot point, IMO. Wouldn't she have gone back another day if they weren't home, or made sure they were home before she went doorstepping them?

by Jamming 03.02.15 12:49

Joss wrote:Then why would she even mention it? It would be a moot point, IMO. Wouldn't she have gone back another day if they weren't home, or made sure they were home before she went doorstepping them?

Agreed, but more likely to determine GM was out and just KM there I reckon

by **Nina** 03.02.15 12:52

Jamming wrote:
Joss wrote:Then why would she even mention it? It would be a moot point, IMO. Wouldn't she have gone back another day if they weren't home, or made sure they were home before she went doorstepping them?

Agreed, but more likely to determine GM was out and just KM there I reckon

It was Kate she wanted to doorstep.

by Joss 03.02.15 13:00

Nina wrote:
Jamming wrote:
Joss wrote:Then why would she even mention it? It would be a moot point, IMO. Wouldn't she have gone back another day if they weren't home, or made sure they were home before she went doorstepping them?

Agreed, but more likely to determine GM was out and just KM there I reckon
It was Kate she wanted to doorstep.

Yes i think so.

by MRNOODLES 03.02.15 13:31

I bet it'll be a riveting watch. SP knocking on four doors and nobody answering.

And the rest of the docu about twitter being a cess pit of trolls, full of attention seekers with nothing better other than trying to get their 5 minutes of fame to boost their egos.

by LombardySkeptik 03.02.15 14:00

Doorstepping Kate at home seems a bit too much IMO -- The twins do live there after all, and i actually believe that she grieves tremendously now that the excitement has faded

A more reasonable approach would be GerryMac at Glenfield or wherever he is currently allowed to hang his stethoscope by his increasingly uneasy colleagues

Gerry is much better fun anyway

by Joss 03.02.15 14:02

MRNOODLES wrote:I bet it'll be a riveting watch. SP knocking on four doors and nobody answering.

And the rest of the docu about twitter being a cess pit of trolls, full of attention seekers with nothing better other than trying to get their 5 minutes of fame to boost their egos.

by Joss 03.02.15 14:05

Has Poulton ever done anything of significance as an investigative journalist apart from the Grieg case, which from what i read here & elsewhere was a big fail on her part? I really can't seem to find much info. on her on my search engine about her career.

by Mark Willis 03.02.15 14:07

How much better would it be to see Richard Halls 4 vids on telly. smilie

by LombardySkeptik 03.02.15 14:10

Or just a dramatised reconstruction of the evening based on the statements

by Joss 03.02.15 14:14

Mark Willis wrote:How much better would it be to see Richard Halls 4 vids on telly.

Yes it would be a good one to broadcast on T.V. His series of videos was an excellent effort IMO to tell the other side of the story to what MSM have presented so far.

by Guest 03.02.15 14:59

Mark Willis wrote:How much better would it be to see Richard Halls 4 vids on telly.

As much as I love Richard D Hall, for all those having a go at Sonia Poulton's credentials at least she has never (to the best of my knowledge) appeared in a video reconstructing the alleged killing of an alien in a back lane in wartime Gateshead by whacking it on the head with a coal shovel.

by Rogue-a-Tory 03.02.15 16:09

This Sonia Poulton escapade, has all the alluring aroma of rotting sea bass.

by Mark Willis 03.02.15 16:58

Clay Regazzoni wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:How much better would it be to see Richard Halls 4 vids on telly.

As much as I love Richard D Hall, for all those having a go at Sonia Poulton's credentials at least she has never (to the best of my knowledge) appeared in a video reconstructing the alleged killing of an alien in a back lane in wartime Gateshead by whacking it on the head with a coal shovel.

LOL, there is that.
However, those vids are spot on.
Sometimes some people do get it right, even David Icke. Well, maybe not.
Anyway, irrespective of who he is or what he's done before, those vids are excellent - compare those to any TV McCann worshipping MSM rubbish.
Which is why you will never see them on TV.

by Maggs Shaw 03.02.15 23:44

Wonder if the Sun wrapped their article up in a bow before they passed it to the McCanns.. IMO of course

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **Tony Bennett** 04.02.15 1:19

Maggs Shaw wrote:Wonder if the Sun wrapped their article up in a bow before they passed it to the McCanns.. IMO of course

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

THE FULL ARTICLE BY LAZZERI

Mr Sunshine

Well who'd have thought it - Martin D, Hutton's new best friend is nice, one of the good guys, Mr Sunshine himself!

I can now say that I have read his Trollgate article. Took several attempts. Could only read little bits at one sitting. Each time I had to draw back from this cringe-worthy piece.

Before completing the read, I noted however that many were angry and rightly so at the nonsense contained therein. Slowly some tried to console themselves:

'It's really not that bad'

'It's really not about the McCanns'

'If we close our eyes real tight and try real hard, it looks a real rosy piece a fairy tale with a happy ending'.

And of course Hutton cried it was a generic piece about trolls - whatever in hell they are when at home.

And if I may go a little off track at this point. Hutton's Trollgate is interesting if only from the point that back in 2007 the time her story is set - the time she claimed she was a warring troll - did 'trolls' as the term is used now, exist? Far as I can see the ridiculous and childish term 'troll' seems to have been developed pretty darn recently, about ten minutes ago, and to the advantage of a certain party. More interesting perhaps is that adults out there are using the term, accepting the term to describe themselves. What the heck is that about?

As I said I have now read every last word of this awful piece (written by the very nice man of course) and maybe it is something only 'trolls' can see, but I fail, as claimed by Hutton, to see, that this piece was not about the McCanns, that it was generic - a generic piece about nasty people, behaving appallingly - would that be about right?

Either way, it is an appalling piece!

Considering it is being peddled by the obvious persons as being not a jot to do with McCann. Not such a bad old bit of writing. It didn't harm anyone. Did a lot of good we are to believe - Well yes there is some truth in that. It did a lot of good for McCann - I counted, the name McCann mentioned no less than SIX times in this short piece!

Hell can you imagine if it HAD been about the McCanns?

Hutton is a fool if she believes what she peddles, that the piece was not about the McCanns, as are those who are trying to convince themselves of same.

That is EXACTLY who it was about.

Mr nice guy, Murdoch's Mr Sunshine, Hutton's new best buddy Martin D together with Hutton very successfully managed to include in the article:

B. Leyland as a nasty person who hounded the McCanns

R. Hutton herself as an absolute nut case who admitted to attacking the McCanns

The McCann sceptics, as being much the same as Hutton!

And Mr Nice guy, well probably more than anything else in the piece he managed to exonerate the McCanns, the part they played in the lead up to Ms Leyland's death. His true agenda? And how convenient the timing of his role as Mr Nice guy!

He said of B. Leyland:

'It is believed she received death threats from Twitter users who aggressively defended the McCanns'!

See what the nice man did there?

The McCanns were NOT responsible in any way for the death of B. Leyland or that dossier - the blame lay SOLELY in the hands of the Twitter users who aggressively defended the McCanns!

Someone like to tell me how this piece is NOT about the McCanns? Be much obliged if you could! Thanks in advance to any takers!

As for what followed, the SIX 'McCann' mentions - Hutton's story of her life, which is, at best if not laughable, doubtful in the extreme!

And no I have not forgotten Poulton, her name so conspicuous by its absence in the piece. Poulton the 'arranger' somehow slipped into the background.

As an incidental - the fact that Pouton may or may not have doorstepped several people apart from the McCanns - it is not proof in itself of which side she is working for! Could be either or! Depends on the 'arrangement' just like Hutton's piece was 'arranged'

Or perhaps Poulton is simply a nice lady, just like the nice man, and together they make a very nice couple who only want to bring us a little ray of ~~Sunshit~~ Sunshine? Or did I get it right first time around?

Of the trio though, Poulton, Mr Sunshine aka Mr Nice Guy, and Hutton, difficult to figure out who is the biggest bullshitter.

Hutton who cries:

'He quoted me wrongly, but I knew he would, but he's a nice guy, so none of you say bad things about him, not when he's posted some really really nice Twit messages about me.

No, none of his really nice messages came in the form of an apology for printing things I never said, but I don't hold that against him, and well, I never asked for an apology...he's such a really nice guy, a father, two boys, he's a good guy how could I ask for an apology for him printing a shed load of lies about me. I prefer to let it go and just fight with my fellow forum members. I'm such a bitch, I'm addicted to fighting with people, but not really nice people like Martin!'

Oh lordy, lordy, Mr Nice Guy and Poulton fixed Hutton good and proper!

Does anyone think they wanted anyone else, wanted someone sane and sensible who would have been more able to put across more rational and relevant points?

Course they didn't. They wanted motormouth Hutton who they knew would play both the victim and the aggressor in equal measure!

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
3rd February 2015

===========================

From McCannfiles - thank you!

Saturday, January 31, 2015

- Extract -

'I can be quite a bitch. I gave as good as I got. I enjoyed the wars and the spats'

WARZONE ... Rosalinda Hutton

ONE of the most bitter areas of conflict on social media is between the "pros" and "antis" who obsessively follow the case of missing Madeleine McCann.

The dispute resulted in tragedy in October last year when Brenda Leyland, 63, was found dead after being publicly exposed for trolling Maddy's parents, Kate and Gerry McCann.

It is believed she received death threats from Twitter users who aggressively defended the McCanns.

Rosalinda Hutton, 57, was a supporter of Leyland and proudly declares: "I'd like to pick up where Brenda left off.

"I've been totally gripped by the McCann case for the last seven years. It was an addiction.

"When the story broke in May 2007, I was suffering from the most terrible depression. I'd lost my mother, my best friend and my Dad.

"I was very isolated and became engrossed in a forum on the McCann case. It was a way to switch off the pain of the real world. I'd gone from the lonely, isolated existence to suddenly having this huge arena of friends from all around the world.

"We had this hardcore group, all women much like myself - similar age, backgrounds. We formed a friendship.

"I wasn't one of the evil ones - and there were a few of those around. I was attacking the McCanns and suddenly I became this object of attack by absolutely crazy people."

Author Hutton, from Dartford, Kent, says she was bombarded with abuse and offensive pictures.

She adds: "They said, 'Your mother was a tramp'. Really nasty stuff. On the first anniversary of my Mum's death, I got a 'phone call in the wee small hours saying, 'Mummy's here...' It was really menacing.

"One night, they all descended on me and I said, 'Leave me alone, I'm going to kill myself', and one of them said, 'Good idea. Put yourself out of your misery'.

"Eventually I went off to bed about 3am. One of my friends who'd seen it phoned me to make sure I hadn't killed myself, she was that concerned."

Her friend wanted to involve the police. Hutton says: "It became like a pack of wolves attacking somebody in the middle. One of them said to me, 'You've made up your mother's death to get attention'.

"It was so distressing. It was as if they had a system and they'd suddenly all dive in."

But Hutton says the anger she felt towards the mob egged her on to fight back.

She says: "I felt absolutely outraged that they were ripping into my parents.

"I was involved in these vile wars yet I couldn't wait to get back. They were dreadful to me but I couldn't stay away. I couldn't resist it."

In revenge, Hutton dished out some serious abuse.

She says: "I am a bit of a show-off and I had an audience. It was a warzone. To the trolls, I gave as good as I got. I can be quite a bitch. I enjoyed the wars and the spats. It saved kicking the dog, really.

"A lot of people kept records of all the comments and would wave them at lawyers and police. People were issuing writs. It got really down and dirty.

"You do get a buzz when you squish somebody. I felt high. The more outrageous you are, the bigger the reaction.

"It is a form of attention-seeking really. It's a real buzz that keeps drawing you back. Perhaps I should be ashamed of that but it is so easy to become hooked."

by Joss 04.02.15 2:06

Well i gather most of the words were uttered by RH, otherwise the article could not have printed them? Perhaps the 'nice man' got them misconstrued, but nevertheless it comes across as an awful article.
And i agree, the word Troll is stupid to describe anyone.
Why are these people stooping so low to get their point, whatever that is, across in such a classless way?

by Maggs Shaw 04.02.15 6:44

Joss wrote:Well i gather most of the words were uttered by RH, otherwise the article could not have printed them? Perhaps the 'nice man' got them misconstrued, but nevertheless it comes across as an awful article.
And i agree, the word Troll is stupid to describe anyone.
Why are these people stooping so low to get their point, whatever that is, across in such a classless way?

It would not have been useful at all if The Sun had been handed over someone that was focused on ramming home some salient points, or inundated him with questions that needed to be 'put to the McCanns' and come to the table with no issues or gripes of their own. The 'nice man' quite possibly did a better job translating the rantings than we have been led to believe.

Sonia's choice was just perfect and the victim was led like a lamb to the slaughter.

by jozi 04.02.15 8:14

Maggs Shaw wrote:
Joss wrote:Well i gather most of the words were uttered by RH, otherwise the article could not have printed them? Perhaps the 'nice man' got them misconstrued, but nevertheless it comes across as an awful article.
And i agree, the word Troll is stupid to describe anyone.
Why are these people stooping so low to get their point, whatever that is, across in such a classless way?
It would not have been useful at all if The Sun had been handed over someone that was focused on ramming home some salient points, or inundated him with questions that needed to be 'put to the McCanns' and come to the table with no issues or gripes of their own. The 'nice man' quite possibly did a better job translating the rantings than we have been led to believe.

Sonia's choice was just perfect and the victim was led like a lamb to the slaughter.

How do we know RH was a victim though !!!

She tells us she put herself up for this and could not wait to tell them the other side of being a troll,she fell for this little stunt and blames it all on her being miss-quoted !!!

Now refuses to ask for an apology from this guy(as he is such a nice man)??? Mmmmmm.

by Smokeandmirrors 04.02.15 8:57

The crux of this whole sorry episode is that someone who freely admits to enjoying spats and Twitter wars, and who has written whole blog posts attacking people with the most scurrilous lies, and seeks as much attention as they can possibly get, throws an absolute wobbler when the get a dose of their own medicine.

The "troll" tag is just thrown around as a cheap get-out clause when the bully gets busted. It's as simple as that.

by Joss 04.02.15 9:05

Maggs Shaw wrote:
Joss wrote:Well i gather most of the words were uttered by RH, otherwise the article could not have printed them? Perhaps the 'nice man' got them misconstrued, but nevertheless it comes across as an awful article.
And i agree, the word Troll is stupid to describe anyone.
Why are these people stooping so low to get their point, whatever that is, across in such a classless way?
It would not have been useful at all if The Sun had been handed over someone that was focused on ramming home some salient points, or inundated him with questions that needed to be 'put to the McCanns' and come to the table with no issues or gripes of their own. The 'nice man' quite possibly did a better job translating the rantings than we have been led to believe.

Sonia's choice was just perfect and the victim was led like a lamb to the slaughter.

True.

by wombat42 04.02.15 10:10

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by mad world 15.02.15 0:37

How i wish i could claim to be l-azzerri..cuts through the bullshit with a chainsaw

by Smokeandmirrors 16.02.15 10:43

Over the last couple of weeks Sonia Poulton has claimed that individuals are trying to stop her documentary coming out. If you are reading this Sonia, please can you clarify this. Without naming names, are you able to state wether your detractors are industry colleagues or members of the general public commentariat. Also, please can you clarify how you define trying to stop your documentary being aired? If free speech/opinion, which happens not to be in your favour is considered "trying to stop" - by what means can this stop any documentary being released, and as there is no known broadcaster for this as yet, how can anyone be accused in this way? Even your detractors will watch your documentary with great interest, as no doubt they are interested to see how you have processed 8 yrs of information.

by hentie 16.02.15 13:29

Richard D Hall was able to produce over 4 hours of forensic analysis. Why should it be any different for SP to produce a documentary?

by Ayniia 16.02.15 22:36

hentie wrote:Richard D Hall was able to produce over 4 hours of forensic analysis. Why should it be any different for SP to produce a documentary?

IMHO she's making such a fuss about it...uhm I'm expecting to be disappointed with what she delivers.Plus her picture at Mc's doorstep...makes me think that wouldn't happen if she talked to kate and asked though questions...but i'll wait to see...