INTERNET TROLLS - Maximum term to be raised from 6 months to TWO YEARS IN JAIL (and prosecutions to be able to take place up to 3 years after an internet posting)
Page 1 of 1 • Share
INTERNET TROLLS - Maximum term to be raised from 6 months to TWO YEARS IN JAIL (and prosecutions to be able to take place up to 3 years after an internet posting)
David Hencke
Internet trolls beware, your prison cell awaits
Posted on June 5, 2015 by davidhencke
With growing interest on the abuse of people on the internet, some amazing figures have emerged from the Ministry of Justice showing the huge rise in the number of prosecutions in the last decade.
I am indebted to the pay wall site of Media Lawyer for permission to reproduce much of their findings and to Inforrm blog who have also published the report.
Ten years ago just 143 people were convicted of the crime to send “by means of a public electronic communications network” a message or other material that is “grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character”.
Last year – the latest figure for convictions had soared to 1209 – an extraordinary eight fold increase.
As Media Lawyer reports:
“The previously little-used section [ Section 127 of the malicious communications act 2003] has come to prominence in recent years following a string of high-profile cases of so-called trolling on social media sites.
It can also cover phone calls and e-mails, and cases of “persistent misuse” which cause the victim annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
Ministry of Justice statistics show that 1,501 defendants – including 70 juveniles – were prosecuted under the Act last year, while another 685 were cautioned.
Of those convicted, 155 were jailed – compared with just seven a decade before. The average custodial sentence was 2.2 months.
Compared with the previous year there was an 18% increase in convictions under Section 127 but the number has dipped since a peak in 2012 when there were 1,423.”
The article adds:
” The issue of online abuse came under scrutiny after cases such as the targeting of Labour MP Stella Creasy, who spoke of the “misery” she suffered caused after a Twitter troll re-tweeted menacing posts threatening to rape her and branding her a “witch”.
Other victims of trolling have included campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez and Chloe Madeley, daughter of Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan.
The MoJ figures also revealed a similar rise in the number of convictions under the Malicious Communications Act, which makes it an offence to send a threatening, offensive or indecent letter, electronic communication or article with the intent to cause distress or anxiety.
Last year, 694 people were convicted of offences under this Act – the highest number for at least a decade and more than 10 times more than the 64 convictions recorded in 2004.”
I have noticed an increase – since this blog has highlighted child sexual abuse – in the number of survivors who speak out and then find themselves the target of trolls – sometimes saying they don’t believe their story.
The government will increase penalties. Media lawyer reports it will increase: “the maximum sentence for trolls convicted under the Malicious Communications Act from six months to two years and extend the time limit for prosecutions under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 to three years from the commission of offence.”
Obviously there has to be a balance between pursuing people and free speech – with the previous head of the Crown Prosecution Service now a Labour MP, Keith Starmer, saying there must be a ” high threshold” and people practising internet jokes should not be prosecuted.
But what is disturbing - and I intend to return to this - is that the abuse and misuse of the internet is growing and there may be a case for even harsher penalties for the most persistent offenders.
Westminster, Whitehall and Berkhamsted news and views
Internet trolls beware, your prison cell awaits
Posted on June 5, 2015 by davidhencke
With growing interest on the abuse of people on the internet, some amazing figures have emerged from the Ministry of Justice showing the huge rise in the number of prosecutions in the last decade.
I am indebted to the pay wall site of Media Lawyer for permission to reproduce much of their findings and to Inforrm blog who have also published the report.
Ten years ago just 143 people were convicted of the crime to send “by means of a public electronic communications network” a message or other material that is “grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character”.
Last year – the latest figure for convictions had soared to 1209 – an extraordinary eight fold increase.
As Media Lawyer reports:
“The previously little-used section [ Section 127 of the malicious communications act 2003] has come to prominence in recent years following a string of high-profile cases of so-called trolling on social media sites.
It can also cover phone calls and e-mails, and cases of “persistent misuse” which cause the victim annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
Ministry of Justice statistics show that 1,501 defendants – including 70 juveniles – were prosecuted under the Act last year, while another 685 were cautioned.
Of those convicted, 155 were jailed – compared with just seven a decade before. The average custodial sentence was 2.2 months.
Compared with the previous year there was an 18% increase in convictions under Section 127 but the number has dipped since a peak in 2012 when there were 1,423.”
The article adds:
” The issue of online abuse came under scrutiny after cases such as the targeting of Labour MP Stella Creasy, who spoke of the “misery” she suffered caused after a Twitter troll re-tweeted menacing posts threatening to rape her and branding her a “witch”.
Other victims of trolling have included campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez and Chloe Madeley, daughter of Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan.
The MoJ figures also revealed a similar rise in the number of convictions under the Malicious Communications Act, which makes it an offence to send a threatening, offensive or indecent letter, electronic communication or article with the intent to cause distress or anxiety.
Last year, 694 people were convicted of offences under this Act – the highest number for at least a decade and more than 10 times more than the 64 convictions recorded in 2004.”
I have noticed an increase – since this blog has highlighted child sexual abuse – in the number of survivors who speak out and then find themselves the target of trolls – sometimes saying they don’t believe their story.
The government will increase penalties. Media lawyer reports it will increase: “the maximum sentence for trolls convicted under the Malicious Communications Act from six months to two years and extend the time limit for prosecutions under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 to three years from the commission of offence.”
Obviously there has to be a balance between pursuing people and free speech – with the previous head of the Crown Prosecution Service now a Labour MP, Keith Starmer, saying there must be a ” high threshold” and people practising internet jokes should not be prosecuted.
But what is disturbing - and I intend to return to this - is that the abuse and misuse of the internet is growing and there may be a case for even harsher penalties for the most persistent offenders.
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: INTERNET TROLLS - Maximum term to be raised from 6 months to TWO YEARS IN JAIL (and prosecutions to be able to take place up to 3 years after an internet posting)
Harsher penalties than jail?
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
MAGA MBGA
A wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Re: INTERNET TROLLS - Maximum term to be raised from 6 months to TWO YEARS IN JAIL (and prosecutions to be able to take place up to 3 years after an internet posting)
Well, if true, about jailing 'trolls' is true, then the McCann's won't have many 'supporters' left!
YOU CAN'T 'TROLL' FROM THE 'NICK', CAN YOU 'PAM G'! (or can you?)
YOU CAN'T 'TROLL' FROM THE 'NICK', CAN YOU 'PAM G'! (or can you?)
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Interent trolls
I wonder if the abusers who sent the nasty pernicious messages to the late Mrs Brenda Leyland(sweepyface) are to be dealt with under these new laws, it was really disgusting abuse but no replies from Sir Bernard Hogan Howe or the Metropolitan Police on the electronic messages posted to Mrs Brenda Leyland,Rest in Peace, Brenda, you did not deserve to be vilified by Sky news, MB,JG and cronies.
PS Jean are Kate and Fiona on a tandem?
PS Jean are Kate and Fiona on a tandem?
willowthewisp- Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07
Similar topics
» "Jail threat for internet trolls?" Kate Smurthwaite,Jim Gamble & Katie Hopkins discuss,
» "Anti-McCann Internet Trolls" - Six Definitions
» INTERNET TROLLS
» McCanns and the 'Internet Trolls'
» I Was a Paid Internet Shill: How Shadowy Groups Manipulate Internet Opinion and Debate
» "Anti-McCann Internet Trolls" - Six Definitions
» INTERNET TROLLS
» McCanns and the 'Internet Trolls'
» I Was a Paid Internet Shill: How Shadowy Groups Manipulate Internet Opinion and Debate
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum