Twitter (News and important information only please)

by **PeterMac** 30.03.13 8:04

https://twitter.com/Justice_forum

Twitter today full of tweets that the forum has been threatened over copyright and has withdrawn its support . . .

by plebgate 30.03.13 9:31

It will be very interesting to see how this pans out. One of the tweets - damage limitation?

by **sharonl** 30.03.13 10:39

UK Justice Forum ‏@Justice_forum 2m
We have removed the link to the #MADELEINE book as requested by the #McCann's agent. We will make a decision on #MADDIE support later today.

by ShuBob 30.03.13 12:23

I've never heard of the Justice Forum before I saw this thread but it would appear they're quite popular with now over 15k followers on Twitter. That's quite impressive! Why would the McCanns threaten an outfit like that with copyright infringement? Looks like an own-goal to me especially since the forum don't appear to be taking the threat lying down Twitter (News and important information only please) 172348

Twitter (News and important information only please) 172348

by aiyoyo 30.03.13 12:44

You would think she would want the book "madeleine' to be circulated and read by as many as possible even FOC as her said aim for the book is to engage the public in their search.

by ShuBob 30.03.13 12:50

Now that their so-called "search" has been suspended and Kate has taken to running a marathon to raise money for ANOTHER organisation, what do they need money for? I don't know how the alleged threat to the Justice Forum was worded but I would have thought they could have asked for the link to be taken down in a manner that didn't appear threatening so much so the forum appear quite upset by it.

It has been said many times before that their downfall will be because of their love for money.

by tiny 30.03.13 13:19

Why are this group supporting the mccann parents and not Madeleine,have they not read the files.mind boggling

by ShuBob 30.03.13 13:31

They campaign for cases where they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice. It would appear they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice in the McCann case. Though I didn't know until today they had a twitter account, I remember that they supported Adrain Prout but deleted all reference to him leaving a note that their support had now ended following his confession.

by tiny 30.03.13 14:14

ShuBob wrote:They campaign for cases where they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice. It would appear they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice in the McCann case. Though I didn't know until today they had a twitter account, I remember that they supported Adrain Prout but deleted all reference to him leaving a note that their support had now ended following his confession.

but surely if you campaign about any thing you need to read up all you can on the subject,but in this case this group havent bothered by the looks of it and just took the mccanns word there was an abduction.

by ShuBob 30.03.13 14:24

tiny wrote:
ShuBob wrote:They campaign for cases where they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice. It would appear they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice in the McCann case. Though I didn't know until today they had a twitter account, I remember that they supported Adrain Prout but deleted all reference to him leaving a note that their support had now ended following his confession.

but surely if you campaign about any thing you need to read up all you can on the subject,but in this case this group havent bothered by the looks of it and just took the mccanns word there was an abduction.

That's what one would expect but judging by some of their support campaigns, they obviously don't. The Adrian Prout case is one example. I don't know what criteria they use in choosing who to support.

by tiny 30.03.13 14:34

ShuBob wrote:
tiny wrote:
ShuBob wrote:They campaign for cases where they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice. It would appear they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice in the McCann case. Though I didn't know until today they had a twitter account, I remember that they supported Adrain Prout but deleted all reference to him leaving a note that their support had now ended following his confession.

but surely if you campaign about any thing you need to read up all you can on the subject,but in this case this group havent bothered by the looks of it and just took the mccanns word there was an abduction.

That's what one would expect but judging by some of their support campaigns, they obviously don't. The Adrian Prout case is one example. I don't know what criteria they use in choosing who to support.

Not very good at what they say they do then.
i see they are still promoting this abduction on twitter

by ShuBob 30.03.13 14:43

Tiny, it's because they promote the abduction theory that it's strange they've apparently been threatened by McCann operatives.

by ShuBob 30.03.13 15:23

Hmmm.....

There appears to be some serious backtracking by the Justice Forum. Have the McCanns apologised perhaps?

by tiny 30.03.13 20:04

there appeared to be misunderstanding on both sides according to the jf.so its back to the abduction and support to the mccanns by the looks of it.poor Madeleine

by **Nina** 30.03.13 21:09

tiny wrote:there appeared to be misunderstanding on both sides according to the jf.so its back to the abduction and support to the mccanns by the looks of it.poor Madeleine

Yes indeed Tiny, poor Madeleine, mustn't upset the parents, yet poor Madeleine just doesn't count. The abduction farce must be supported at all costs, and the final cost is justice for Madeleine where the truth, the full truth is made public, and this must be prevented. We only have part of it now, sadly some ignore it as it is more important to 'support' the parents. All in my opinion of course based on the released police files.

by ShuBob 30.03.13 21:23

Justice Forum now saying they never supported Adrian Prout. That's not how I remember it but concede I may have got it wrong.

by plebgate 30.03.13 21:44

Link uk justice forum

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?PHPSESSID=b2d1eec783c3906d725fc593ad9bdf75&topic=58.0

by **PeterMac** 05.04.13 22:25

It is now a "disappearance" not an abduction.
Softly softly catchee monkee.
The message is getting through.
For some people it may take years, but slowly there is a dawning of a glimmer of a beginning of a realisation that . . .

by The End Is Nigh 06.04.13 8:06

That's good to hear.

I sometimes worry that too much can be made of the use of particular single words on occasion and that it is better to look instead for persistent changes of emphasis - mainly because everyone, good, bad, or anywhere in between suffers from the human failing of slips of the tongue.

Nevertheless, the mainstream Press have more or less consistently moved on from Abduction to Disappearance and now we are seeing evidence (Well, if not Evidence, then solid indications) of similar change in other arenas.

Now, if only the snowball effect were to take hold ......................... Twitter (News and important information only please) 1710420815

Twitter (News and important information only please) 1710420815

by Guest 16.04.13 18:34

It's not just CR c.s., who are following every word written in this and other fora. The "cesspit" also invests a good amount of time to follow facebook & twitter:
***
SCUMBAGS.

--- .. ..--. ‏@w_nicht 1h
Will k8 #mccann use Boston marathon for her own PR?

Emma van den Hoek ‏@parapono 6m
@w_nicht
That thought crossed my mind as well. It's certainly not beyond
her.#mccann used the agony of others before to keep a high profile!

Follow

--- .. ..--.
‏@w_nicht
@parapono I wouldn't be surprised if she do use it.

Is it possible to get any lower than these...things? I won't insult Nature by calling them animals.

Are they even human beings, as is normally understood?
***
Beware. Big Brother is following your every single step/word/thought ...

by Guest 16.04.13 19:04

A miscarriage of Justice may also be: no Justice meeted out to perps of a heinous crime

by Guest 16.04.13 19:16

I don't know to which comment you're reacting, Portia.
But, whatever, I do agree: miscarriage of justice = [equals] injustice, whatever the cause, reason, explanation or cover-up for it to be.

by aiyoyo 17.04.13 2:02

Then Big Brother should put their hands in their pockets and find their balls instead of playing with Mccanns' balls.
Peeping on people just to earn mccanns' silver is not doing their profession any favour.
Hey that's something for lowlife scumbag - any means to legally steal people's money.

by russiandoll 30.07.13 9:48

Deactivated my twitter account last night, after being there for approx. 6 months; am interested to read what is posted re the Maddie case [ as far as can be posted in 140 characters!] , but as it is one of only a few topics I post on and by far the one I am most interested in, I will continue to read posts by certain people.
Not only has it been impossible to engage in debate with any " pros" there, it has now descended into childish abuse even between people who are on the same " side" in some cases!
Last week there were personal details posted there about one of the so called rabid pros , photos, address, and it was claimed that the details belonged to another person, someone not posting on the Maddie case at all. A tit for tat developed where someone gave personal details about an "anti" and there were threats of the police giving certain people a knock on the door. Also boasts that media are being sent anything detrimental to the parents. Threats and abuse galore, not interesting reading.
Last night I saw so many vile posts on the #McCann tag and also on my timeline, that I blocked people I normally converse with and then had to go to the help page as all sorts of non #McCann related stuff was on my timeline, some full of obscenities. It is easy enough to go to that person's page and block them, but you still get to read the porn stuff.
I am saddened to see people debating #McCann turning on one another, like playground taunting and name-calling. I understand the strong emotions generated by the case, and given the 140 characters and repeated tweets needed to get more than a brief point across, I have decided after experimenting with twitter not to contribute any longer, does not seem very productive, but will read what I find interesting there.

by Guest 30.07.13 10:24

re twitter I block the pros cos impossible to debate with them, I have been perfectly polite when debating with them, not abusive, not name calling, not making personal remarks but all I get back is abuse etc.

Appears some antis turning on each other, also on facebook, no idea what all this is about, have tried to find out but got no answers, apparently some antis paying others to get info on antis!! What on earth is going on, seems to be more like a kids playground, also antis being accused of being trolls by antis!! Seems like if you are an established anti poster and one who is listened to by others you get attacked but worrying now that people getting attacked by those who are all supposed to be working towards a common purpose of finding out what happened to Madeleine. Sadly with all the game playing and tit for tat sometimes the real cause seems to have been forgotten.

The best way is not to resort to the level of the pros, I can understand why people fight back after years and years of abuse, stalking, harassment etc., but it is just stooping to their level, better to ignore, block the lot of the pros and post facts from the files and factual info from the case.

by tiny 30.07.13 10:28

russiandoll wrote:Deactivated my twitter account last night, after being there for approx. 6 months; am interested to read what is posted re the Maddie case [ as far as can be posted in 140 characters!] , but as it is one of only a few topics I post on and by far the one I am most interested in, I will continue to read posts by certain people.
Not only has it been impossible to engage in debate with any " pros" there, it has now descended into childish abuse even between people who are on the same " side" in some cases!
Last week there were personal details posted there about one of the so called rabid pros , photos, address, and it was claimed that the details belonged to another person, someone not posting on the Maddie case at all. A tit for tat developed where someone gave personal details about an "anti" and there were threats of the police giving certain people a knock on the door. Also boasts that media are being sent anything detrimental to the parents. Threats and abuse galore, not interesting reading.
Last night I saw so many vile posts on the #McCann tag and also on my timeline, that I blocked people I normally converse with and then had to go to the help page as all sorts of non #McCann related stuff was on my timeline, some full of obscenities. It is easy enough to go to that person's page and block them, but you still get to read the porn stuff.
I am saddened to see people debating #McCann turning on one another, like playground taunting and name-calling. I understand the strong emotions generated by the case, and given the 140 characters and repeated tweets needed to get more than a brief point across, I have decided after experimenting with twitter not to contribute any longer, does not seem very productive, but will read what I find interesting there.

that's a shame you have given up twitter,but I agree you cant debate with any pro on there, all they do is abuse and they only do that because they cant come up with any evidence of an abduction but I guess that's what the pro's want,all who do not believe the mccanns abduction must be targeted.(no I am not on twitter but I follow most of madeleine supporters on there)

by Guest 30.07.13 11:08

I like to keep an eye on twitter.

I don't look at what is being posted, I look at which side is posting. Usually it just ticks along but there have been times that the pros have all vanished and other times when they have swamped it. Either extreme usually means something is happening.

I don't bother with facebook. I did used to look at that other forum (you know which one I mean) but I got embarrassed for them. They are just a handful of social inadequates with nothing to say and who seem to think that hundreds of laughing emoticons is the height of sophisticated satire.

by Lostfridge 30.07.13 11:23

Twitter is where the dregs of debate reside. A place where unfortunately both sides are as bad as each other

by jay2001 30.07.13 17:07

There are some decent posters on mcann # but there are also some dreadful ones. There are more people seeming to be aware of the facts of the case so I do think it's important to keep tweeting, but not get involved with the disruptors.

Jim Gamble was very arrogant today and blocking people who question the Mcs left, right and centre. People should be allowed to question the abduction as there are so many inconsistencies in what we've been told.

Direct people to this site, mccannfiles, Pamalam's site and then folks can make up their own minds, instead of PRopaganda fed by MSM

by Guest 30.07.13 20:38

Lostfridge wrote:Twitter is where the dregs of debate reside. A place where unfortunately both sides are as bad as each other

I have to disagree with you there, there are some antis who are retaliating against the pros and being abusive back but the vast majority of antis are perfectly polite, never abusive, never threatening, never intimidating, never harass the pros, never out any of the pros, never make disparaging remarks, never accuse pros of being people they aren't but are not afforded the same courtesy back but abused, intimidated, lied about, harassed, attacked, etc. etc., constantly just for not believing the abduction story and politely pointing out facts and discrepancies.