Articles in MSM etc. supporting Investigation/ Exposure of Cover Ups.

by bobbin 04.10.14 13:22

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2779973/Report-reveals-extent-allegations-against-ex-MP-Greville-Janner.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2780174/How-detectives-let-child-porn-suspects-hook-They-sat-list-2-300-paedophiles-14-months-did-nothing.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2779459/Police-struggling-soaring-number-child-abuse-images-online-warns-NSPCC.html

Three articles from the Mailonline 03.10.14.
Particular reference to Leicestershire (Lord Greville Janner/Elm House etc.) for historic paedophile cover ups.

I do see an increasing effort to expose the former cover ups and feel the tide is turning on those who thought they had an iron clasp on their former secrets.

Does seem to be more voices daring to come out into the open and this is from the 'newspapers' albeit also on the internet.
Who else are the 'allies' trying to get the truth out there.

by Doug D 04.10.14 14:25

Thank you Bobbin.

Interestingly no comments are allowed on the Janner/Elm Guest House article, but they are on the other two.

Second article:

‘Senior investigators at the National Crime Agency (NCA) sat on the names of 2,345 suspects for at least 14 months, it emerged last night.’

Is this factually correct?

I understood that the file was passed to CEOP (not then part of NCA) by the Canadians in 2012 and it was CEOP that largely ignored it.

CEOP was rolled under the NCA in October 2013 and they then highlighted these cases in November 2013.

……………………………………………

A further article today relating to Islington Care Homes and ‘proof’ of holidays for the boys to Jersey with a suggestion of a tie up with Haut de la Garenne home. There have already been connections made with Saville & the Islington homes.

http://www.islingtontribune.com/news/2014/oct/postcards-link-islington-care-home-children-scene-notorious-jersey-sex-abuse

by bobbin 04.10.14 16:37

Doug D wrote:Thank you Bobbin.

Interestingly no comments are allowed on the Janner/Elm Guest House article, but they are on the other two.

Second article:

‘Senior investigators at the National Crime Agency (NCA) sat on the names of 2,345 suspects for at least 14 months, it emerged last night.’

Is this factually correct?

I understood that the file was passed to CEOP (not then part of NCA) by the Canadians in 2012 and it was CEOP that largely ignored it.

CEOP was rolled under the NCA in October 2013 and they then highlighted these cases in November 2013.

……………………………………………

A further article today relating to Islington Care Homes and ‘proof’ of holidays for the boys to Jersey with a suggestion of a tie up with Haut de la Garenne home. There have already been connections made with Saville & the Islington homes.

http://www.islingtontribune.com/news/2014/oct/postcards-link-islington-care-home-children-scene-notorious-jersey-sex-abuse

I agree that the CEOP and NCA amalgamation is very confusing.

Snipped
“Doubts were also raised about the NCA. Critics said the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, the unit of the NCA that received the Canadian intelligence in 2012 and which was absorbed into the NCA when it took over in 2013, is also struggling to keep up with the flood of child abuse cases.”
……………..

A spokesman said one line of investigation is why the NCA did not refer the case to the watchdog in November 2013 when it first realised the CEOP unit had failed to pass on the list of names to police forces.
The NCA declined to comment on the latest revelations and instead referred to a statement that it had posted on its website three weeks ago.
Deputy Director Phil Gormley has ordered a review of how the material was handled by CEOP before the NCA took full control in October 2013.”

Snipped.

CEOP clearly 'failed' to pass the shocking information over. I think that's why Theresa May made such a stand against Gamble and his CEOP group continuing to be in control and Gamble is appearing to be a very irked person as a result of this.
Why the NCA sat on info is up for question. Did they only act when Theresa went off on one at the Police Federation Conference (whatever it was) and are needing to show themselves as acting the part correctly.
Maybe they didn't have the resources. Maybe they too were 'cleansing' some of the 'inappropriate political references' or maybe they were looking into the Canadian reports, taking a closer look at the CEOP activity, and moved forwards when the time was appropriate.
Who knows.
The good news though, in the article that you posted.

Re the Postcards ... Jersey to Islington.
That is wonderful, solid proof at last, that children were moved from Islington homes to Jersey Haut de la Garenne.
This is what 'researchers' go hunting for and this is what the perpetrators of foul crime must always be hauntingly watching over their shoulders for.
The truth will out.
Just one little slip, somewhere, anywhere, and the whole thing becomes exposed for the cover up, lies and horror that it is.
That's why we and all other socially responsible researchers keep on gnawing away at the records. high5

by **PeterMac** 04.10.14 16:40

OK. Let's ask the questions

Was Gamble part of the problem, or just an innocent fool

Was he covering up for others ?

Is he himself . . . ?

Any comment, Gamble ?

by **Tony Bennett** 04.10.14 17:24

PeterMac wrote:OK. Let's ask the questions

Was Gamble part of the problem, or just an innocent fool

Was he covering up for others ?

Is he himself . . . ?

Any comment, Gamble ?

I do hope that Jim Gamble doesn't sue me for reproducing this extract from an article in the Sun (yes, I know, I apologise) dated 13 March 2014, about the trial of Max Clifford.

The article, bylined Chris Pllard, has a photo of Jodie Foster, a still from some film or other called 'Taxi Driver', and is headlined:

"I'll make you the next Jodie Foster...now take yor bra off".

It was Max Cliffford, in Spain, chatting up a wannabe actress aged 15, and persuading her parents to give permission "to take her out in my yellow Jaguar to see if I can further her career". She was then sexually abused by Clifford for several months.

But below the artice is a poignant letter from the very person to whom those words: 'I'll make you the next Jodie Foster', was said.

It was written to her abuser, Max Clifford.

It began:

"It has taken me 35 years to write this letter..." (she was aged 52 in 2014).

It continued: "I wondered if you remembered as I do the child sex abuse you engaged in. The abuse started in your office...the abuse continued. You raped me. You were very clever. A+ in grooming..."

The letter concluded:

"You may have gotten away with it for years, but inside you can't escape from the monster that you are. That terriible festering secret of yours that burdens you, the hypocrisy of your life".

And finished off with...

"A paedophile who publicly condemns paedophiles in order to divert attention. A double bluff! How many others like that are there?"

[END OF LETTER]