SUE their butts off TONY!

by jeanmonroe on 07.02.13 1:11

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/297353
ARRESTS IN ‘VIP’ SEX RING INQUIRY

That picture is NOT Cyril Smith but looks remarkably like Tony Bennett!
In story of paedos!

If i were TB i would sue for 10 ZILLION QUID!

I got SCREENSHOTS (loads)

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_rn=2&gs_ri=hp&cp=13&gs_id=1g&xhr=t&q=cyril+smith+mp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42080656,d.d2k&biw=1024&bih=685&wrapid=tljp1360197429920024&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=P_cSUbD8Msr80QWbvIBg

THAT'S CYRIL SMITH! PAEDO OF ROCHDALE!

And a lot lardier than TB!

LOOKS LIKE EXPRESS GROUP gonna have to dig DEEP to get out of this one!

Richard Desmond ain't gonna be happy!

Can somebody get this post to JH Forum?

by jd on 07.02.13 1:12

With credit to jeanmonroe from MM for finding this

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/297353

ARRESTS IN ‘VIP’ SEX RING INQUIRY

That picture is NOT Cyril Smith but looks remarkably like Tony Bennett!
In story of paedos!

If i were TB i would sue for 10 ZILLION QUID!

I got SCREENSHOTS (loads)

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_rn=2&gs_ri=hp&cp=13&gs_id=1g&xhr=t&q=cyril+smith+mp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42080656,d.d2k&biw=1024&bih=685&wrapid=tljp1360197429920024&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=P_cSUbD8Msr80QWbvIBg

THAT'S CYRIL SMITH! PAEDO OF ROCHDALE!

And a lot lardier than TB!

LOOKS LIKE EXPRESS GROUP gonna have to dig DEEP to get out of this one!

Richard Desmond ain't gonna be happy!

Can somebody get this post to JH Forum?

Please delete as appropriate CF but they are ABSOLUTE BASTARDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE...

by jd on 07.02.13 1:16

Oh...suddenly it has been whooshed!!!! That was quick! Anyone associated with the mccanns are going to suffer greatly..mark my words

by jd on 07.02.13 2:32

Tony has now been sent the article with the photo concerned (still cannot believe the Star did this personally)

Thank you to a certain person with all your help roses

by Guest on 07.02.13 4:34

Since the article is wooshed I hope you took a copy of it !

Sick, but I feel a change of tide in this case, like the truth is coming more and more to the surface :) 2013 will be a good year I feel for Madeleine And all her supporters :)

by WindsorBlue on 07.02.13 7:09

I saw that and thought what the hell ,but unfortunately as they have removed the page, and the story they will say that the stories and pictures got mixed up. Then they will print a clarification and that will be it, they will not have to pay anything as it was removed. I know and it is wrong, before some start saying it is unjust, but just look at how many little columns are in the papers after they make mistakes.

by Juulcy on 07.02.13 7:11

Sorry, to me it doesn't look like mr. Bennett, was his name mentioned in the article? Otherwise I think you are reading too much in it, IMO.

by Guest on 07.02.13 7:17

@Juulcy wrote:Sorry, to me it doesn't look like mr. Bennett, was his name mentioned in the article? Otherwise I think you are reading too much in it, IMO.

The link with the picture is Cyril smith the article with tb picture is wooshed, maybe u should read it correctly instead :)

by Juulcy on 07.02.13 7:27

Moa wrote:
@Juulcy wrote:Sorry, to me it doesn't look like mr. Bennett, was his name mentioned in the article? Otherwise I think you are reading too much in it, IMO.

The link with the picture is Cyril smith the article with tb picture is wooshed, maybe u should read it correctly instead :)

Sorry! that is not clear, I interpreted that you are quoting a story about a sex ring (that cannot be about TB) with pictures of Smith (who to me doesn't look like TB). I'll read you post again..

by Guest on 07.02.13 7:31

@Juulcy wrote:
Moa wrote:
@Juulcy wrote:Sorry, to me it doesn't look like mr. Bennett, was his name mentioned in the article? Otherwise I think you are reading too much in it, IMO.

The link with the picture is Cyril smith the article with tb picture is wooshed, maybe u should read it correctly instead :)

Sorry! that is not clear, I interpreted that you are quoting a story about a sex ring (that cannot be about TB) with pictures of Smith (who to me doesn't look like TB). I'll read you post again..

I did not write the post, and it clearly says the link photos is Cyril ..forgot your glasses somewhere?:) and the point is they don't look like each other at all ! That's why the link to Cyril is there I guess.

by Karen Pinto on 07.02.13 7:53

Here is the pic
http://www.mccannfiles.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/ds070213b.JPG&target=tlx_pic4dj1

by bobbin on 07.02.13 8:17

@WindsorBlue wrote:I saw that and thought what the hell ,but unfortunately as they have removed the page, and the story they will say that the stories and pictures got mixed up. Then they will print a clarification and that will be it, they will not have to pay anything as it was removed. I know and it is wrong, before some start saying it is unjust, but just look at how many little columns are in the papers after they make mistakes.

I don't think you are the person to dismiss this. It might be your wishful thinking. Tony will give it his full consideration and decide what to do, I am sure.

by plebgate on 07.02.13 8:37

errrr how could any newspaper mistake TB for that Fat Git Smith. Error or no error the pic was up long enough for people to get screen shots. On record forever. SUE TONY SUE.
I was also thinking that it would be great if some director hears of Tony and his fight for justice and decided to make a film, Hollywood love an underdog story. I pray that it comes about.

by mydadsanastronaut on 07.02.13 8:40

Any other cynics out there who aren't surprised by this supposedly wholly innocent mistake?

IMO, it's like a final sting from a fatally wounded jellyfish.
Usual tactics, if you can't vanquish the man, try to tarnish the man.
Disgraceful.

by plebgate on 07.02.13 8:43

Let's hope the newspaper have come up with a novel way of saving TB from bankruptcy. ha ha. Yay.

by Mustardseed on 07.02.13 8:50

I don't know whether this is a coincidence, but here's a Tweet I remembered seeing the other day:

Joseph O'Driscoll ‏@Josephodriscoll
“@GaeMar01:...Police have arrested a 65 year old in south London as part of #Savile..investigations...#mccann ...” One way to avoid Court..
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More

This was on Tuesday.

by tigger on 07.02.13 9:06

The best thing would be for Tony to demand a rerun (on the front page) of the trial report. Plus an apology .

Perfectly sensible and effective method of dealing with such things imo.

The screenshots are available and an estimate of the number of people who will have seen it would be easy to calculate by the counters used on the site.
I would insist on front page apology and reprint or summary (to be OK'd by TB) why TB was in the news.

by tasprin on 07.02.13 9:06

I have no doubt whatsoever that had the Star 'mistakenly' published a photo of Gerry McCann with this paedo story, it would be forking out half a million quid right now.

by olipet on 07.02.13 9:08

Can someone please educate me with regard to slanderous tweets on twitter.
Tony Bennett is being tortured by twitters.
Including posting photographs of Raymond Hewlett stating that it is Tony.
Is this allowed?

by Lance De Boils on 07.02.13 9:18

oilpet, no,it's not allowed. I strongly recommend you take some screenshots.
There's nothing wrong with people voicing opinions, but if they are intentionally and maliciously making people think that TB is a convicted paedophile, then it is very wrong.
Just capture screenshots and let Tony decide what he wants to do about it, if anything, when he returns from his break.

by olipet on 07.02.13 9:21

thank you for that reply.
unfortunately i am not a whizkid with computers and have no idea how to take screenshots.
i wonder if someone can do this for Tony.
it is muratfan who posted the picture of Raymond Hewlett and stated it was Tony.
alongside this are numerous slanderous comments - i would say every 5 minutes or so.

Walter Scott · by david_uk on 07.02.13 9:21

Sorry but you cant mistake the two people and i think that looks deliberate. Which in itself is very worrying

Walter Scott · by david_uk on 07.02.13 9:23

@olipet wrote:thank you for that reply.
unfortunately i am not a whizkid with computers and have no idea how to take screenshots.
i wonder if someone can do this for Tony.
it is muratfan who posted the picture of Raymond Hewlett and stated it was Tony.
alongside this are numerous slanderous comments - i would say every 5 minutes or so.

press your 'print screen' button, that automatically saves a screenshot, you just have to the right click and paste it into a word document or something similiar.

by olipet on 07.02.13 9:25

it was absolutely deliberate - as are all the tweets.
i simply cannot understand why no one has reported it.
i read very strict rules for twitter and it includes not being allowed to pretend you are someone else.
muratfan does this as well - pretends to be Tony Bennett.

by Guest on 07.02.13 9:27

@olipet wrote:it was absolutely deliberate - as are all the tweets.
i simply cannot understand why no one has reported it.
i read very strict rules for twitter and it includes not being allowed to pretend you are someone else.
muratfan does this as well - pretends to be Tony Bennett.

If everybody report @muratfan as spam hes account will be shut down ! I've done it with all my tweeter accounts ! That will speed the prosess ! Go to his account and push the report button !

SUE their butts off TONY!

SUE their butts off TONY!

Somebody had better explain this!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!