VIDEO - Good Morning Britain - 'Enough is enough' - but the search for Madeleine McCann continues 13 MAR 2017

And, AND, 'inbetween' TM's £95,000 (Apr 2016-Sept/Oct 2016) and Home secretary AR's 'new' £85,000 (Apr 2017-?) was Home secretary AR's £100,000 'extra' UK taxpayer 'funding'! (September 2016-April 2017)

"But a fresh request, believed to be for a sum of around £100,000, was submitted to the Home Office as the deadline approached and has now been signed off."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

PUBLISHED:  00:01, Sun, Sep 18, 2016.

It's 'weird', to me anyway, that almost ALL of the 'extra/ more funding' stories in the last few days, have OMITTED, to 'mention', this 'slipped in' £100,000 'more funding', for OG, in their 'stories'!

Must have 'slipped' their minds!

So, AR, Home Secretary, and 'acquaintance' of H Grant, (BOTH 'worked on' 'four weddings and...together) and H Grant being an 'acquaintance' of the McS and Missing People 'charity', has ACTUALLY 'signed off', personally, £185,000, of UK taxpayers money, in less than 9 months, for OG, a 'single' missing person 'investigation'

NOT 'just' the £85,000 'highlighted' in the news, recently.

'Small world' innit?

"Botched investigation " Has Graham​ Hill actually READ​ the​ PJ Files ?

Well done Sue for​ not slapping​ the arrogant​ Piers Morgan    

Personally if she'd​ called him a " f.....g tosser​ " I wouldn't have blamed​ her !

I just watched this tv fragment and I am truly astonished that both Hill and Morgan are so adamant that she has been kidnapped and that the original investigation was botched. It is as if the clock has been turned back to May 2007. Not even an ounce of doubt. So unreal with all the information now available

Piers interupting as usual...very ignorant. He thinks Madeleine could be still alive.

Dr. Graham Hill ignorant of the facts. PJ soon ruled out an abduction. He would leave 2 year old children as well...disgraceful!

Nobody heard about the dogs .

I suspect Sue Hill knows quite a lot but was cut short.
I think they said the link from Manchester with the sound problem was via Sky TV.  Don't blame posty,Sky.  

Shame the lady didn't put her points over quick enough before the left her.

Piers was accusing Stinson Hunter of libel the other day re.hacking "dead girls phone" as Stinson put it.
I requoted "takes down Piers' autobiography from shelf and reads where he explains exactly how to listen to others voicemails"
Needless to say I've not heard back from Piers.
He's Establishment through and through, he even removed  the "Pugh" part from his surname, i.m assuming to sound more like some kind of "man of the people" haha as if!
Ive often wondered if subsequent editions of his book have had these parts edited out. I only know whats inside the early copy that i own
Throughout the book he bangs on about being the youngest editor the "scum" had ever had, but i bet he now regrets ever boasting about "hacking"


THANKYOU HiDeHo for posting the WHOLE video btw! X

Roxyroo wrote:Piers was accusing Stinson Hunter of libel the other day re.hacking "dead girls phone" as Stinson put it.
I requoted "takes down Piers' autobiography from shelf and reads where he explains exactly how to listen to others voicemails"
Needless to say I've not heard back from Piers.
He's Establishment through and through, he even removed  the "Pugh" part from his surname, i.m assuming to sound more like some kind of "man of the people" haha as if!
Ive often wondered if subsequent editions of his book have had these parts edited out. I only know whats inside the early copy that i own
Throughout the book he bangs on about being the youngest editor the "scum" had ever had, but i bet he now regrets ever boasting about "hacking"


THANKYOU HiDeHo for posting the WHOLE video btw! X

Don't forget that he used to be in partnership with Matthew Freud, son of Clement Freud. Probably still great friends.

Morgan has an agenda.

This is a real case where there should be public capability to phone in or email live. Cadaver dogs, KMs lies to the Police, JT witholding information from the Police AND the child's mother are a few questions that they should ALL have instant answers for. Who is driving this bunch of pricks to regurgitate this rubbish.

I am so infuriated after watching that clip. 

It's really as if these people are living on another planet, they have absolutely no idea of what's going on, or they just choose to ignore the facts.

I would like to have heard more from Sue, she seems to know more than she said, and she kept using the word 'murder' even Morgan picked her up on that, but I believe she knows, and is sick of them as the majority are.

Piers asked Sue a question and didn't let her finish.
Piers asked Hill a question but did let him finish.

I couldn't watch it til the end though so maybe Sue did manage to finish a sentence.

princess_leia wrote:I am so infuriated after watching that clip. 

It's really as if these people are living on another planet, they have absolutely no idea of what's going on, or they just choose to ignore the facts.

I would like to have heard more from Sue, she seems to know more than she said, and she kept using the word 'murder' even Morgan picked her up on that, but I believe she knows, and is sick of them as the majority are.

Hiya princess_leia, nice to see you posting here.  It's a shame Sue Hill didn't get a fair chance to speak. If you don't support the abduction view, then you get talked over by the interviewer or the sound goes faulty.

Yes , Sue did mention murder many times. We can only guess at some aspects of this case until the truth comes out. If the truth doesn't come out, we will still be here discovering what our government is really like.

Waiting for permission from a US channel interview with Graham Hill to either use clips or full video to 'explain' his comments in a new video... NONE of them reflect the truth.

I don't understand why anyone wants Operation Grange to close. I want Operation Grange to stay open and explain what it has achieved.

Getting the general public scrapping over incremental, down-scaled funding is giving Scotland Yard and more importantly the government a get-out option to close.

Morgan 'angling' for 10th 'anniversary' exclusive 'interview'?

"It is complicated, so many people take a moral view on the McCanns."

"I wouldn’t have done what they did but having interviewed them your heart breaks for these people," Piers said.

Possible new 'topic'?

"Questions you would like Piers Stefan Pughe-Morgan (born Piers Stefan O'Meara) to ask the McCan'ts"

How do they sleep at night.  They MUST ALL know by now.

Richard D. Hall wrote:How do they sleep at night.  They MUST ALL know by now.

THEY all know, that we all know, that they KNOW!

That's WHY 'we' don't get 'invited' on to the 'sofa's' and in to the TV 'studios' of this world!

It's a P A C T.

It is no accident that the only person who is not "on the McCann's side" is speaking via a Skype connection that is not working properly.  This is why I travelled to the U.S. to get Peter Hyatt on film and did not film via Skype.  They must have paid expenses for the other two guests to be on the sofa, but they chose to have the potentially hostile guest on the other end of a flaky internet connection that could have been dropped at any time.  They took this precaution EVEN THOUGH this person is putting forward the incorrect "they left the kids" argument as opposed to the real argument which is whether, how and when Madeleine died.  This is classic "phony bone of contention" TV.  They are masters at creating fake contention so the viewer is lead away from the sensitive real issue.  It is pure propaganda and one day hopefully they will be discussing on sofas just how it went on for so long and why all those people lied through their teeth to protect criminals.

Richard D. Hall wrote:It is no accident that the only person who is not "on the McCann's side" is speaking via a Skype connection that is not working properly.  This is why I travelled to the U.S. to get Peter Hyatt on film and did not film via Skype.  They must have paid expenses for the other two guests to be on the sofa, but they chose to have the potentially hostile guest on the other end of a flaky internet connection that could have been dropped at any time.  They took this precaution EVEN THOUGH this person is putting forward the incorrect "they left the kids" argument as opposed to the real argument which is whether, how and when Madeleine died.  This is classic "phony bone of contention" TV.  They are masters at creating fake contention so the viewer is lead away from the sensitive real issue.  It is pure propaganda and one day hopefully they will be discussing on sofas just how it went on for so long and why all those people lied through their teeth to protect criminals.

I don't watch daytime tv, it's generally full of nonsense, but if the time comes and they start discussing the lies in their comfy studios, on their comfy sofas, I will be glued. A day many people are waiting for!

If and when this case unravels, and we do find the truth of what happened during those few days in Spring 2007, it will be interesting to see what spin the media put on their own involvement. 
I guess they could state they were "duped" as they have claimed in the past about at least one case, but this case is different in many ways.

The media have helped to shape public opinion in the McCann case. They still push the abduction theory, move timescales, introduce suspects, introduce theories which have no substance, and they polish the parents as doers of good. 

So when does media spin become complicity? And when does media spin become perverting the course of justice?

Despite having celebrity people who don't go along with the official story, not many stray too far away. They'll point out the lack of care, the dangers of leaving children alone. But I can't remember anyone sitting on a sofa saying... You know what, there's an awful lot of evidence to say Maddie is dead, and all those storyline changes from the parents, their friends, they all need investigating.

When somebody in the media limelight says something like that, I'll turn on day time TV.

Richard D. Hall wrote:They are masters at creating fake contention so the viewer is lead away from the sensitive real issue.  It is pure propaganda and one day hopefully they will be discussing on sofas just how it went on for so long and why all those people lied through their teeth to protect criminals.

This is one very good reason why I can't go along with the prevalent ideal that UK mainstream media are now daring to step out of the controlled zone and venturing into a resemblance of truth.  How could they ever justify the past ten years of lies and deception - I was carrying out instructions - s/he made me do it?

The propaganda machine that protects the criminals in this case, doesn't begin and end with the media - they are nothing but the messengers.  For the truth to be exposed in entirety, a good starting point would be the corridors of Westminster and work down through the police, the NHS, Social Services, the leisure industry etc. - or start at the bottom and work upwards if deemed more productive.  Problem is, as with any major scandal, as fast as a hole is found it's plugged before any water escapes.  A formidable task by anyone's standards.

Apart from anything else, the establishment needs to be constantly reminded, the pesky interfering public are not going anywhere.

These presenters and news people just repeat the mainstream media consensus, that's there job. Intelligence would be a hindrance because you would start to question the accepted narrative. Their desire to fit in with the mainstream and keep their jobs is also a major factor. They don't have the guts to be that one person sticking their neck out.

 If the truth does ever come out, they will cry crocodile tears and proclaim everyone was fooled, just like the Savile case.

ChippyM wrote:These presenters and news people just repeat the mainstream media consensus, that's there job. Intelligence would be a hindrance because you would start to question the accepted narrative. Their desire to fit in with the mainstream and keep their jobs is also a major factor. They don't have the guts to be that one person sticking their neck out.

 If the truth does ever come out, they will cry crocodile tears and proclaim everyone was fooled, just like the Savile case.

NOT 'everyone' i humbly 'suggest'!

There is a complication in this case, it's not simply news readers reading a story because they fear their jobs are at stake. In this case there is fabrication on an individual level.
Some of the "journalists" who make comment or write stories about abductors are personally known by the McCanns. Some are very protective, like Lorriane Kelly for instance.

She, and many others, will in my opinion, be aware of other more likely possibilities, they will know about this forum, they will know about the dogs Eddie and Keela, they will know about Richard Hall's videos on youtube. 
If any journalist writing about the McCann case doesn't know about the evidence on this forum, then they shouldn't be a journalist, they haven't done any basic research.

There's a difference between a news reader and a journalist, despite the former thinking they are the latter.
A newsreader could be forgiven for reading out any old cr*p on a prompter. A journalist should be informed of all sides of a debate and be willing to discuss them without fear or favour.

A 'Scum' rehash ('update') but..........'pointing' out erm, 'things' including 'leaving' GA's 'theory' in 'print' in 'comments'!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

By Neal Baker, Jon Lockett and Gemma Mullin  

14th March 2017, 9:09 am

Updated: 14th March 2017, 9:53 am

That's a 'quick' update of an update!

44 minutes!

Perhaps they got a 'call' from Farter Cluck!

Who else thinks this extra funding is just to pay the wages until they can figure out some cover story that the public cannot doubt?
I had great hopes last month when Miss Marsh started tweeting, but its plainly obvious now they were paid PR to counter Snr. Amaral's win.
Sigh

YEP! (It 'seems' almost official!)

Sorry Lorraine.

MORGAN 'gets' the 'exclusiff' 10 year 'anniversary' SCOOOP!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

'gist'

'HE'S SPEAKING SENSE'

Madeleine McCann’s parents praise Piers Morgan for defending multi-million pound hunt for missing tot

The family's spokesman said the host's comments were 'very sensible' as extra funding to aid search announced

By Tracey Kandohla and Ellie Flynn
14th March 2017, 8:43 am
Updated: 14th March 2017, 12:21 pm

PIERS Morgan has been praised by Madeleine McCann’s parents for “speaking sense” in a fresh debate over the multi-million pound police hunt, their spokesman revealed last night.

The outspoken Good Morning Britain host hit back on Monday’s show at criticism of the extra £85,000 cops are getting to continue the search for Maddie nearly 10 years after her disappearance.
Piers Morgan led the debate on Good Morning Britain on Monday
Kate and Gerry McCann have been searching for their daughter for almost 10 years

McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “What Piers said in defence of Kate and Gerry and the police search for their daughter is entirely right and his comments speak for themselves, and are very sensible.”

Piers and his co-host Susanna Reid debated the issue with retired Met police officer Sue Hill, Dr Graham Hill, who worked on the investigation, and Karen Danczuk.
Some viewers were left furious as it emerged the investigation has cost more than £11 million since Maddie vanished aged three from Praia da Luz, Portugal, in 2007.
Piers sparked outrage with some after defending the £85,000 fund to extend the case for another six months.
He said: “It is complicated, so many people take a moral view on the McCanns.
“I wouldn’t have done what they did but having interviewed them your heart breaks for these people.
“I don’t think there is any bigger priority, I really don’t. Other than keeping the country safe from terrorism, missing kids has got to be top of the list.”
Former cop Sue Hill slammed the huge bill as a waste of taxpayers’ money and urged the force to finally shelve their inquiry and “put sentiment aside”.
Maddie was three when she disappeared in Portugal in 2007
She said: “Knowing how many undetected murders there are here in London… sometimes you have to put sentiment to one side and say enough is enough.”
A source close to ex-GP Kate, 49, and heart doctor Gerry, 48, of Rothley, Leics, said: “Why a retired police officer is challenging how Scotland Yard spend their resources on the biggest ever missing child cases is simply baffling.
“To say they should be closing the case while important inquiries are still ongoing is ridiculous.”
Ex-top cop Sue Hill says Madeleine McCann hunt is over-resourced
Fans took to Twitter to insist police resources had been stretched far enough by the case - and many suggested other missing child cases have been underfunded in comparison to the Maddie probe.
One outraged viewer wrote: "Glad that @gmb are covering the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] funding. This case is being over-resourced, yet again. Taxpayers aren't happy."
Another added: "11.1m on the search for [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is ridiculous..."
A third tweeted: "[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] When Do We [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Really? Im [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] For The Families Of This Girl But What About Other [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Who Have [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]?"
Another added: "Oi I'm not being funny but if I was abducted in Benidorm when I was 8, my mum would not have got 11m quid to look for me [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]."
Retired police officer Sue Hill is convinced the force needs to put 'sentiment aside'
Dr Graham Hill claimed the original investigation was 'botched'
TV detective claims Maddie McCann knew where parents were and went looking for them
Piers stood by his viewpoint and later defended the McCanns on Twitter.
He said: "Astonishing how much vitriol & abuse the sanctimonious British public pours on the heads of Madeleine McCann's parents. And shameful."
The TV host later added: "The McCanns spend every day imagining their little girl being raped, tortured or murdered by a paedophile. There can't be anything worse.
"Sue made a valid point but British cops are chasing a new lead that could solve the McCann case. Surely they must pursue it?"
The funding bump comes after it emerged cops are chasing a new lead as they hunt for a former employee at the resort where Maddie disappeared.
British police want to speak to a Portuguese man who worked at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz.
The unnamed man had previously been interviewed by cops desperate to track down Maddie, but now they have reason to believe he may hold more key information.
------------------------------------

Morgan said: "I WOULDN'T have done what THEY DID..."

Some 'defence' that eh, Pinky?

Clarence Mitchell trying to explain why the McCanns left three young children under four on their own, several nights in a row, whilst on holiday, and then went out for the evening wining and dining. He told his TV audience: “There is a cultural difference between Britain and Portugal. It is a British approach to get your children washed, bathed and in bed early in the evening, if you can, so you can have something of the evening to yourself. That’s the British way of doing things."



NOT Piers Stefan Pughe-Morgan's... 'way of doing things' eh, Pinky?

And 'guess what' Pinky?

Piers Stefan Pughe-Morgan hasn't had a child of his.....'disappear or have been abducted'!

Comments

Max DeFrost
3 minutes ago
Piers is an opportunistic, sleezy, shallow idiot. See's a little niche for self promotion and jumps all over it. If any journalist had a molecule of integrity and investigative skill, they would have read the PJ files and matched up the enormous amount of discrepancies and disinformation in the McCann's story.
Funny to see that slime Clarence Mitchell back in the frame. I thought he'd been binned ?
Pail smith
1 hour ago
Ask the McCanns how maddies DNA was in the boot of the rental car they hired after she apparently went missing ?
Robert Mansfield
1 hour ago
Morgan will soon be eating his words.
hayley neill
1 hour ago
Guess the McCann's want a new house or holiday for them to need extra money because god knows they aren't using it to search for her as they​ know exactly what they did with her .
Ben Sebastien
2 hours ago
Yeah - he's as f u c k e d up as the nasty Mcanns - rot in hell you nasty evil pair so called parents. Get this into your thick stupid heads - if you two p r I c k s had not left that defenceless little girl on her own then none of this would have happened.
carmen macintyre
2 hours ago
He makes his living from being a contrarian, that is all.
Ninoovcov
2 hours ago
It does not matter if you think the mc canns are guilty or not! Maddie is one of our own and is a innocent child that is missing and we need to find out exactly what happened.
Donny Dee
41 minutes ago
@Ninoovcov Write to her parents then, they know exactly what happened.
Ultimate JediMaster
2 hours ago
Piers Morgan is a hideous, evil lowlife that slithers in the gutters where it has built its nest. If that loathsome creature is defending something, its almost certain that that something is dodgy and evil.
McKenzie32
3 hours ago
Had the parents been sleeping in the villa only to wake and find the child missing I'd have a very different opinion on the money being spent.
They should be in jail. The twins should be in care and the police should stop this insane hunt immediately. Too many unsolved crimes in this country which we should be focusing on. Crimes that took place due to no ones neglect.
The McCanns are a vile example of parents. I cannot feel sorry for them one bit when they clearly didn't feel sorry for their own children. children they knew had been upset on previous nights as they woke up to find themselves alone in that villa but yet they left them night after night.
Why should any money be spent when they refuse to answer questions, refused a reconstruction and refuse to look into any other lead of enquiry which doesn't fall in line with their suggestion of what happened. I thought they were doctors not detectives.
Donny Dee
3 hours ago
Piers Morgan and the McCann's have a lot in common, they both as of yet haven't been prosecuted for their crimes.
Dave Barlow
4 hours ago
Who gives a toss what Piers Morgan thinks, He is a Traitor. People like him would be finished in Russia.
colin culk
4 hours ago
Piers Morgan, the new Katie Hopkins desperately looking for attention
John Copsey
5 hours ago
He only done as he was told like anyone else in the British Media regarding this. If you want the truth look abroad.
Jay D
5 hours ago
Don't see what the problem is, the police are only under resourced because of the rotten to the core tories
oldbill
4 hours ago
@Jay D Nobody mentioned under resourced other than you. People are saying this case has been ridiculously OVER funded. Time to call a halt. There is no new evidence. The parents understandably will never say never but someone has to at some time.
andrew walker
4 hours ago
@Jay D crime was far higher under useless labour !!
McKenzie32
3 hours ago
Labour ruined this country. Tony Blair well overstayed his term. Any government in charge now would struggle to put right Blairs wrongs.
Ben Sebastien
2 hours ago
Mate you are a total t o s s e r - just like the Mcanns - human garbage at best

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]



Yeah Piers very sensible guy - he let a cricketer bowl at him so hard that his ribs ended up broken.   Very sensible indeed.    heeeheeeheeeee.

"WE'RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER 'BANDWAGON'!"

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

'THEY'VE DONE NOTHING WRONG'

Kirstie Allsopp defends Madeleine McCann’s parents and says it ‘was OK to leave kids sleeping nearby’ as debate rages over £85k cash injection into search

The TV presenter shared her feelings with followers

By Nola Ojomu, Showbiz Reporter
14th March 2017, 8:49 am
Updated: 14th March 2017, 11:38 am

TV presenter Kirtie Allsopp has spoken out in defence of Madeleine McCann’s parents on Twitter.
The Location, Location, Location star debated with her followers about the famous hunt which it was revealed to have cost taxpayers over £11.1 million since the three-year-old went missing in 2007.
Location, Location, Location star Kirstie Allsopp has spoken out in defence of Madeleine McCann’s parents
Kirstie shared her feelings about the criticism Madeleine’s parents received for leaving their children alone in their holiday room in Portugal.
Kirstie had been responding to Piers Morgan‘s tweet saying the McCann’s were being vilified for the “mistake” of leaving their children alone as she tweeted: “I disagree, I think it was OK to leave the kids sleeping while the parents were in a restaurant close by & checking frequently.”
Kirstie shared her feelings about the criticism Madeleine’s parents received for leaving their children alone in Portugal
She continued: “Have always though the McCanns did nothing wrong leaving the kids asleep nearby, it’s something people have done worldwide since time began.”
When comedian Dara O’Briain warned: “Beware! This is a topic that is uniquely beloved of ghoulish, judgemental arseholes, sneering at the bereaved.”
Kirstie replied: “Bless you, I know, but I’ve always thought that they did nothing wrong and it’s important to say it.”
She stressed to followers: “We cannot live every moment in fear of the tiny, tiny number of evil freaks that sadly exist, parenting has become too fearful.
“For years Mums & Dads have popped next door to have a cuppa with a neighbour when the kids were in bed or even gone to the pub on the corner.”
She continued: “What I find staggering is the number of people who think that they could never make the wrong choice, because I know I have, often.
"Good to know that if you fail there are so many to judge & condemn you, on the upside great to learn that perfect parents are so numerous."
She then concluded: "No desire to debate this, I've said my bit and won't be revisiting the topic, shocked by the amount of bile people hold, it isn't healthy."
The topic had been a hot point again after Piers Morgan debated the case on Good Morning Britain after it was revealed police are getting another £85,000 to prop up the probe.

Comments

Susan Yew
1 hour ago

oh Kirsty you've left yourself wide open to be pilloried on this one. Me, I can't judge one way or another because I wasn't there and don't know the circumstances. I will say this tho not every parent is a paragon of virtue, even the ones living on council estates that people so love to parade when they say nasty things (what's wrong with living on a council estate) . Well done you and Dara O'Brien for daring to voice another opinion. When I was a kid it was quite common for parents to leave their kids outside the pub with a bag of crisps and a lemondate while they were inside drinking and if you went on holiday to a holiday camp kids were always left in bed while mum and dad were whooping it up in the Ballroom. The camp babysitter listened at the door for any babies crying and if there were an announcement was made over a tanoy, "baby crying in chalet....". And I know you are all going to scream times were different but then that is an indicment on Society and the internet allowing pervs and paedos to roam free and do what they like without question.
Sadly a mistake was made in a country where supposedly we are led to believe children are treasured; not the case here. I can't believe these two people woke up that day with the intention of believing or hoping their daughter would be kidnapped, but then what do I know... I do know this vile language and vitriole is uncalled for.
Ben Sebastien
2 hours ago
No it wasn't okay ( obviously ) Kirsty you drop kick because look what has happened as a result of the f u c k I n g Mcanns neglect. A dead child and millions of Pounds wasted because of these total w a n k e r s . Lost all respect for you Kirsty........stick to your property programs because you're obviously a hopeless parent like those two Mcann morons.
TDXI LIVERPOOL
3 hours ago
Yes people have left kids asleep nearby, but there's nearby and there's over a 100 yards away in a foreign country where you can't actually keep a real eye on them because you're getting PlSSED with your mates.
Donny Dee
3 hours ago
Kirstie Allsopp should try looking into the case a bit further, you'd soon see her attitude change, her comments seem to come from someone who doesn't know very much about the case.
Debbie Taylor
5 hours ago
Well said Sue Hill - you hit the nail on the head. There are tons of children go missing in Britain and most are never heard of.
I cannot get my head around the fact that the McCanns are getting the support of our government, the support of lots of stars, the media etc, etc. Why does this never happen if it is a normal family off a council estate? Okay, we saw the Shannon Matthews so called abduction aired and to this day, someone is making money off the back of that. She was found alive and well and her mother went to prison for it (rightly so too) but Maddie has not been found, all we know definatley, is that she was left alone in a foreign country while her parents were enjoying themselves. Why have they not done a 'stint' in prison?
It is like they know something they shouldn't about someone in power. Why else would they get the support they are getting when no-one else in this country does. Something is not quite right and anyone who gets too close is slapped with a law-suit.
Debbie Taylor
5 hours ago
Another idiot who thinks it is okay to leave your kids alone to go out having fun and boozing. What is the matter with people??
Our kids are precious and if you want to have fun with your friends and be irresponsible by not getting a babysitter, then maybe you shouldn't have children.
These are two medical professionals, on a family holiday (supposedly, though it seems it was all about them) who should know better. It is not just about someone taking your child, there could have been a fire, they could have choked and I DON'T care if you are only a stone's throw away, you would never get to them in time because you would not know about it until it's too late.
These two, Doctors or not, should have been charged with neglect at the very least. We are never going to know what really happened to Maddie but please, stopppppppp supporting her parents who let her down so very badly.
They are obssessed with money and you rarely see them with the twins. They should be focusing on them because they will always live in the shadow of their 'missing' sister.
jbird65
5 hours ago
I dearly hope this stupid cow doesn't have children of her own, as she clearly isn't fit to raise them.
-----------------------------------------------

When comedian Dara O’Briain warned: “Beware! This is a topic that is uniquely beloved of ghoulish, judgemental arseholes, sneering at the bereaved."

......sneering at "the bereaved" Dara?

Do 'tell'!

Piers talking about Hacking....how ironic

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And as for that first comment above, about there being no journalists with any intergrity left, i personally think Richard d. Hall is the only one left in the uk!

Did Kirsty Allsops last bit of telly not do so well or something, which c list sleb will it be getting trotted out next week, any bets?