Textusa: Doing a Kate McCann

by **Jill Havern** 22.01.16 17:23

Far too long to copy here: http://textusa.blogspot.ie/2016/01/doing-kate-mccann.html?m=1

by Guest 22.01.16 20:30

Get'emGonçalo wrote:Far too long to copy here: http://textusa.blogspot.ie/2016/01/doing-kate-mccann.html?m=1

What the heck is she talking about - any chance someone who understands Textusa's cryptic writings can précis the text to make it a bit more coherent?

Textusa's powers of deduction are really quite extraordinary, she has the ability to pick on a simple straightforward aspect of the case and turn it into a full blown story of epic proportions. I've no doubt she means well but surely her task could be made easier if only she would reduce the verbiage by about 90%. Whilst I don't believe the child care staff witness statements to be taken as a truthful depiction of events on the night of 3rd/4th May 2007, Textusa appears to overlook the fact that the creche workers statements contained in the PJ files are not taken verbatim - can you really imagine a 20 something year old using expressions like 'when it comes to her name she cannot indicate'? It's not even correct English.

Nor can I cope with her constant cross referencing to past blogs, you'd need the mind of a computer to recall every detail of everything she's ever produced - and that's if you can understand it in the first place. As an example of her vivid imagination that invariably leads on to yet another epic monologue - why should she assume that one particular creche worker needed to circumvent apartment 5a on her way from one place to another? Maybe the answer is hidden in the detail but I for one haven't the time nor patience for a treasure hunt if there's nothing to be gained in the end. It is only her opinion after all..

Had the PJ investigation been able to proceed without foreign interference perhaps the creche staff would have been re-interviewed at some stage. Without clarification of their garbled seemingly contradictory statements, rather like the need for the Tapas group to participate in a reconstruction, how can anyone in all honesty be sure who was lying/telling the truth/fantasizing or just maximizing on their own 15 minutes of fame. IMO there are far more obvious anomolies surrounding the child care staff to excite curiosity.

by MRNOODLES 25.01.16 12:08

Verdi wrote:
Get'emGonçalo wrote:Far too long to copy here: http://textusa.blogspot.ie/2016/01/doing-kate-mccann.html?m=1
What the heck is she talking about - any chance someone who understands Textusa's cryptic writings can précis the text to make it a bit more coherent?

Textusa's powers of deduction are really quite extraordinary, she has the ability to pick on a simple straightforward aspect of the case and turn it into a full blown story of epic proportions. I've no doubt she means well but surely her task could be made easier if only she would reduce the verbiage by about 90%. Whilst I don't believe the child care staff witness statements to be taken as a truthful depiction of events on the night of 3rd/4th May 2007, Textusa appears to overlook the fact that the creche workers statements contained in the PJ files are not taken verbatim - can you really imagine a 20 something year old using expressions like 'when it comes to her name she cannot indicate'? It's not even correct English.

Nor can I cope with her constant cross referencing to past blogs, you'd need the mind of a computer to recall every detail of everything she's ever produced - and that's if you can understand it in the first place. As an example of her vivid imagination that invariably leads on to yet another epic monologue - why should she assume that one particular creche worker needed to circumvent apartment 5a on her way from one place to another? Maybe the answer is hidden in the detail but I for one haven't the time nor patience for a treasure hunt if there's nothing to be gained in the end. It is only her opinion after all..

Had the PJ investigation been able to proceed without foreign interference perhaps the creche staff would have been re-interviewed at some stage. Without clarification of their garbled seemingly contradictory statements, rather like the need for the Tapas group to participate in a reconstruction, how can anyone in all honesty be sure who was lying/telling the truth/fantasizing or just maximizing on their own 15 minutes of fame. IMO there are far more obvious anomolies surrounding the child care staff to excite curiosity.

I take it all to mean (unless I'm way off). Texusa has stuck to one theory. That is the majority of people on holiday at that time were there to play hide the sausage with each other. And the cover-up is to make out it was an ordinary fully functioning holiday club. But as it wasn't, they the Ocean Club had to literally make the whole thing up. Which is why Textusa picks holes into every statement and hotel records. People worked there, but not as it seemed.

Textusa: Doing a Kate McCann

Textusa: Doing a Kate McCann

Re: Textusa: Doing a Kate McCann

Re: Textusa: Doing a Kate McCann

Latest topics