"We must NEVER give up on Maddie" - James Murray, Sunday Express, 10 May 2015

Joss wrote:

aquila wrote:When all the speculation and myth and controversy is stripped away what you're left with is a pile of inconsistent statements and cadaver/blood dogs.

Obviously trying to hide the fact Madeleine died, if we go with the dog evidence, and that is what is being covered up for whatever reasons that we have already discussed about.
Innocent parents don't lie, and neither do highly trained dogs, they have no reason to. All IMO.

History

jeanmonroe wrote:"TES has gained a reputation as a well-equipped organization which can deploy on short notice resources such as........SAR dogs"
------------------------------------------

Well, THAT would be a complete 'waste of time' then!

'according' to police EVRD dog 'expert'........GM!

'totally unreliable'

Yet, what 'amazes' me, is that, NO UK police 'force' has had their EVRD 'sniffer' dogs 'put down'!

WHY NOT?



After all, they AIN'T no good, are they?

(even though 'they' get 'paid'/cost more than the Chief Constable, of most UK Police forces!)

Doug D wrote:Joss:
 
‘Are there any such ongoing searches by the police’
 
We never did hear what the four dogs that went to PdL last year got up to. We were led to believe there were only two dogs over there and the subsequent FoI request about who went was refused.
 
It was only the Welsh Dog Unit that let the cat out of the bag around Christmas time.

jeanmonroe wrote:Joss:

‘Are there any such ongoing searches by the police’?

We never did hear what the four dogs that went to PdL last year got up to. We were led to believe there were only two dogs over there and the subsequent FoI request about who went was refused.

It was only the Welsh Dog Unit that let the cat out of the bag around Christmas time.
--------------------------
I didn't know that.  What are they so secretive about it i wonder? It's the search for a missing child after all. They need as many volunteers as they can get if they want to be able to locate her. That should of been done right from the get go, ongoingly searching for her, IMO. At least for a while.
-----------------------------------------------------
Quick 'reminder':

'This investigation is ANYTHING but 'normal' and it has NEVER been 'normal' from the day Madeleine McCann 'disappeared'

BBC reporter in PDL. (June, 2014)

jeanmonroe wrote:Joss wrote:

"From all i have seen of the McC's in videos and MSM articles they really don't act like the parents of a missing child or even parents grieving a child if they know she is deceased."
-------------------------------------
Another 'reminder'

September 23rd 2009.

"whether the investigation, (into our 'missing' daughter) is re-opened, or not, it dosen't matter..."

and

2011

"it may sound odd, but we were glad the investigation (into our 'missing' daughter) was closed"

BOTH 'utterances' straight from the 'missing' child's OWN mother!

Very ODD, indeed!

What mother, anywhere in the world, would be 'glad' the investigation into her 'missing' child was 'closed'

What mother, anywhere in the world, would say that 'it didn't matter' if the investigation, into her 'missing' child was ever re-opened?

Even 'odder' that these pronouncements were made by an 'ambassador' for 'missing people/children'

I wonder how many other mothers of 'missing' children are 'glad' there is no investigation to 'find' them?

My 'guess' is..................NONE!

But an 'ambassador' for 'missing people/children' IS 'glad' there was no more 'investigation', and it didn't matter, anyway, to her, if there was, or wasn't, an investigation, into her 'missing' child!

Yes it is very bizarre, it's as if she is not the mother of a missing child at all, as if she has to act out the part, but stumbles here and there with some truth leaking through the lies. I wonder what other parents of missing children would think about all that, and if they even know what she has stated? There is something very wrong in this picture, IMO. Did she have no real bond with her child perhaps? Just because a woman has a child doesn't necessarily make her a mother.

And the other very telling signs that there was no co operation with the police to try and go over every detail of what could possibly have happened to Maddie. The questions that sat unanswered for one. Not even the tapas crew wanted to help with a reconstruction of events of that night. Couldn't be bothered to trouble themselves with any of it. What kind of people are these people? But they will go on some stupid bike ride to drum up some more money. It's all about the money, however much they want to deny that fact, its obvious, IMO.

espeland wrote:

Yes it is very bizarre, it's as if she is not the mother of a missing child at all, as if she has to act out the part, but stumbles here and there with some truth leaking through the lies. I wonder what other parents of missing children would think about all that, and if they even know what she has stated? There is something very wrong in this picture, IMO. Did she have no real bond with her child perhaps? Just because a woman has a child doesn't necessarily make her a mother.

And the other very telling signs that there was no co operation with the police to try and go over every detail of what could possibly have happened to Maddie. The questions that sat unanswered for one. Not even the tapas crew wanted to help with a reconstruction of events of that night. Couldn't be bothered to trouble themselves with any of it. What kind of people are these people? But they will go on some stupid bike ride to drum up some more money. It's all about the money, however much they want to deny that fact, its obvious, IMO.

IMO something happened to Madeleine that three PMs want to keep from the public. The McCanns, knowing this, decided to make money from the situation - they knew that they'd never get Madeleine back. Unfortunately for them they stayed in Portugal, the PJ naturally got involved and the McCanns found themselves in an awkward position which Kate responded to by not answering questions. Gordon Brown applied pressure on the Portuguese and the McCanns fled back to England.

The other Tapas members knew the truth and, therefore, that their voluntary return to Portugal was meaningless and indeed could make matters much worse for everyone. The McCanns, however, were intent on pursuing money and continued making noises - within a few days of their return, Gordon Brown publicly told them in effect to shut up.

Their scheming of course has brought them an immense amount of money, which they have largely spent on litigation, legal advice and pointless investigations. In addition, they quickly realised that their seemingly hopeless situation could be used to promote their involvement in charitable causes  etc - thus keeping themselves in the public eye.

As to OG, I still fervently hope that it is legitimate and that they apparently haven't approached any of the Tapas 9 because they haven't yet got evidence. On the other hand the £10 million is an immense amount to us as individuals, but chicken feed (equivalent to around 16p per head) to the population as a whole.

This is of course simply conjecture on my part which others may see as nothing more than a rather poor conspiracy theory.