Latest interview with Dr Amaral - copied from Joana Morais - with thanks

IKNOWWHATHAPPENED wrote:I suspect Katie and the wee man will be cantankerous when they read Joanas article.

IKNOWWHATHAPPENED wrote:I suspect Katie and the wee man will be cantankerous when they read Joanas article.

Woofer wrote:@ PeterMac -
"Eugene Zapata
D’Andre Lane
Adrian Prout,
David Gilroy,
Marquis Bulloch,
Zinah Jennings
Albert Fine,
Pedro Hernandez,
Shakara Dickens,
Mike Gifford-Hull

In their cases the dogs' alerts alone WERE  admissible conclusive evidence "

Setting aside the US cases, were the UK ones really convicted on the dogs` alerts ALONE ?

Watching The Detectives wrote:
I do not believe it to be the case that 'dog alerts alone were admissible conclusive evidence' in this case, although it was a dog that took the investigation a great leap forward.

15 In the UK, the case of Kirsi Gifford-Hull, in Winchester in 2005, is of interest since although the body was discovered by a man walking a dog, and the offender Mike Gifford-Hull had made a public appeal at a press conference for his wife to return, cadaver dogs had already alerted some weeks earlier in the house and in his car during the initial search for a “missing person”.  
After the trial he told officers that when he saw the dogs alerting in the car he had contemplated making a full admission.
He was convicted.    After the trial  Judge Guy Boney QC ”. . .added that the police inquiry was so superior it could be matched with that of any other police force in the world.”

Woofer wrote:

From Martin Grimes statement...   

"I never met nor spoken to Gerald McCann. However I do know that he addressed my head supervisor at the time, the South Yorkshire Head of Police, or Mr. Meredith Hughes."

South Yorkshire Police Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes suggested in an interview that the coroner’s office who dealt with the inquests into the 96 fans who lost their lives would be unable to release papers because they were constrained by a “30 year rule”.

Snifferdog wrote:

Garrincha wrote:Having looked back over this thread, IMO, given the extraordinary efforts to derail it, there must be something extremely sensitive in the first few pages. Any ideas?

I suspect it was Mr Amarals interview and the opinions of those randomly interviewed in Praia da Luz.  All of them including Mr Amaral said in so many words that S Yard are conducting a Cover up/Show.  

Watching The Detectives wrote:Hi PeterMac
Out of interest, do you have a link to the source of the comment about the dogs and the car, please? I've not read that before. 
I believe that police searched his house high and low (without dogs, I believe) and didn't find Kirsi.......and then stood talking to Mike in the garage.....with Kirsi's body hidden right beside them.

canada12 wrote:Narcissistic...?
Trying to disrupt and possibly destroy any forum and/or blog that debates the case...?
Maybe a someone named Gerry or Kate...?
Just my opinion.

aiyoyo wrote:

dantezebu wrote:Latest from Joana Morais: BASTA!

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2014/06/basta.html

Enough!

6 years with all of his assets frozen so he can pay, just in case he looses, the 1,2 million euros demanded by the McCann couple for the "rights, freedoms and guarantees of the family" that were violated, as they allege by a book and a documentary, based on the same title, which they were able to ban in a connected lawsuit.

A book, they claim, which has interfered in the searches for the child. Searches which would have had another outcome if only Kate McCann had answered the 48 questions asked by the PJ, or if, they had done the reconstruction requested by the PJ in 2007, or if the couple had not omitted to the PJ investigation the e-fits that were suppressed since 2008, which were only released last year, in October, by the Metropolitan Police. Not to mention the multiple interferences of spin doctors and illegal private detectives who boycotted the PJ investigation with red herrings, with impunity.

Meantime to save his family from further property losses, Gonçalo Amaral got divorced. He lost his father, became ill, poor to the point of only getting by with the help of friends. His lawyer is being paid with a defence fund that we, PJGA (http://pjga.blogspot.com/), created in 2009, whose donations come mostly from English people.

The trial which continues this Monday, has also held sessions during 2013, sessions that were not properly addressed and divulged by the Portuguese media.

From the witnesses inquired in favour of the McCann couple follows that:

1) The Mccann couple has people monitoring the social networking sites who besiege those, like me, who impart opinions or make translations about the case;

2) That most witnesses have never read the process and only echo the couple's mantra;

3) That the McCann couple is vindictive and wishes above all to see Gonçalo Amaral suffer, seemingly even more than they wish to know what happened to Madeleine (as if they don't know it already)

Kate and Gerry who didn't even came to accompany the Metropolitan Police search for their daughter's remains, are however already in Portugal to attend the trial on Monday, according to a resident journalist in Luz.

And I quote: "He deserves to be miserable and feel fear." Kate McCann's own words in the book titled 'madeleine', written exactly like that without a capital letter.

The Portuguese mainstream media also failed to report the fact that the McCanns, following the poor performance of their witnesses, asked the four defendant parts - Gonçalo Amaral, TVI, Guerra e Paz and Valentim de Carvalho Produções for an out-of-court settlement, reason why the trial was postponed.

They have also failed to report that the Judge considered that Kate and Gerry McCann did not possess authorization to initiate proceedings against Gonçalo Amaral on behalf of their daughter, because the child was placed under the tutelage of a British court, ie a 'Ward of Court'.


I wish to clearly state here, that I consider guilty for the destruction of this man's life the McCann couple, Clarence Mitchell, Salvador da Cunha's Lift Consulting (McCanns PR's in Portugal), Dr. Isabel Duarte and Dr. Rogério Alves, and also the Portuguese state, politicians from both right and left wings who turned a blind eye and the PJ Directorates for allowing Gonçalo Amaral (as well as other PJ inspectors) to have been vilified, ridiculed, reduced to poverty, in what is clearly a revolting case of injustice.

My solidarity is with Gonçalo Amaral and his family, and all those who were victims of this couple, a couple who should have been, at least, taken to court for exposure and abandonment, ie for their negligence.

This is my opinion as a Portuguese citizen, "so sue me McCann"!

Tony Bennett wrote:

Woofer wrote:

From Martin Grimes statement...   

"I never met nor spoken to Gerald McCann. However I do know that he addressed my head supervisor at the time, the South Yorkshire Head of Police, or Mr. Meredith Hughes."

1. On what date did Dr Gerald McCan 'address' Martin Grime's boss, Mr Meredith Hughes, of South Yorkshire Police?

2. By 'phone, by e-mail, by letter, or in person?

3. At the time of this conversation, had Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann been named as suspects by the investigating Portuguese Police?

4. Did Dr Gerald McCann speak to Mr Hughes with the knowledge, consent and approval of his legal team, led by senior Freemason Edward Smethurst?

5. Was Mr Meredith Hughes also a senior Freemason? 

6. Could this intervention by Dr Gerald McCann be construed as interference with a witness and interference in a police investigation?

7. During his 'address' to Mr Hughes, did Dr Gerald McCann advance any of the following facts or hypotheses...

- A. The dogs' evidence against Eugene Zapata was flawed

- B. Cadaver dogs are 'incredibly unreliable'

- C. It was rotting meat

- D. It was dirty nappies

- E. The dogs were merely 'alerting to the conscious or unconscious signals of the handler' ('madeleine', by Dr Kate McCann, pp. 249-250)

- F. Ricardo Paiva, who put Martin Grime's evidence to the McCanns, was a 'f___ing tosser'?