The only evidence of Madeleine having been abducted came from an alleged sighting of a man with a child, by their friend Jane Tanner.
Page 1 of 1 • Share
The only evidence of Madeleine having been abducted came from an alleged sighting of a man with a child, by their friend Jane Tanner.
by sharonl 04.03.21 21:25
With thanks to Spudgun
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Ostensibly, the ONLY evidence that Madeleine McCann was abducted comes from JANE TANNER.
She insists that she saw a man carrying a small child whom she believes was MADELEINE, around 40 minutes before Kate McCann actually declared the girl was missing.
Those more conversant with this case will know that Tanner’s description of this ‘abductor’ changed dramatically over the subsequent Month’s and indeed years, since Madeleine’s disappearance.
His height, size, shape, hairstyle, clothes, manner, and on at least ONE occasion, even SEX, have all been changed or modified, often coinciding with, (and dependent ON), the description being given out by ‘Team McCann’ of the person that they and their ‘investigators’ were eager to locate in any given Month.
Additionally, not only the ‘abductor’ but his PREY was also subjected to a number of changes, starting out as a mere ‘bundle’, as in a BLANKET, before metamorphosing into a little GIRL with pink pyjamas just like Madeleine!
More saliently, particularly for the POLICE investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance, the Policia Judiciaria afforded NO significance to Tanner’s sighting for THREE reasons.
ONE, because it would have been way too dark to afford any credibility to the description Tanner provided;
TWO, despite insisting that she DID see an abductor, 40 minutes later when Kate McCann appeared at the Tapas bar, screaming that Madeleine was, indeed MISSING, Jane sprung into action and erm......not only DID nothing but SAID NOTHING!!
And THIRDLY, the Portuguese Police were equally sceptical when it transpired that at precisely the same time Tanner is alleged to have SEEN this abductor, two other witnesses who were effectively in exactly the same location saw neither this man NOR Tanner herself! One of these witnesses being Gerry McCann!
It doesn’t need a forensic mind to deduce the obvious great flaws in Tanner’s testimony.
None-the-less, after a private audience with Gordon Brown where the McCann’s had sought his assistance in early JUNE, the BRITISH and Portuguese press widely reported that Brown had INTERVENED in the case and that he had persuaded the Portuguese Authorities to permit the McCann’s to APPEAL for information relating to this ‘abductor’.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Ostensibly, the ONLY evidence that Madeleine McCann was abducted comes from JANE TANNER.
She insists that she saw a man carrying a small child whom she believes was MADELEINE, around 40 minutes before Kate McCann actually declared the girl was missing.
Those more conversant with this case will know that Tanner’s description of this ‘abductor’ changed dramatically over the subsequent Month’s and indeed years, since Madeleine’s disappearance.
His height, size, shape, hairstyle, clothes, manner, and on at least ONE occasion, even SEX, have all been changed or modified, often coinciding with, (and dependent ON), the description being given out by ‘Team McCann’ of the person that they and their ‘investigators’ were eager to locate in any given Month.
Additionally, not only the ‘abductor’ but his PREY was also subjected to a number of changes, starting out as a mere ‘bundle’, as in a BLANKET, before metamorphosing into a little GIRL with pink pyjamas just like Madeleine!
More saliently, particularly for the POLICE investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance, the Policia Judiciaria afforded NO significance to Tanner’s sighting for THREE reasons.
ONE, because it would have been way too dark to afford any credibility to the description Tanner provided;
TWO, despite insisting that she DID see an abductor, 40 minutes later when Kate McCann appeared at the Tapas bar, screaming that Madeleine was, indeed MISSING, Jane sprung into action and erm......not only DID nothing but SAID NOTHING!!
And THIRDLY, the Portuguese Police were equally sceptical when it transpired that at precisely the same time Tanner is alleged to have SEEN this abductor, two other witnesses who were effectively in exactly the same location saw neither this man NOR Tanner herself! One of these witnesses being Gerry McCann!
It doesn’t need a forensic mind to deduce the obvious great flaws in Tanner’s testimony.
None-the-less, after a private audience with Gordon Brown where the McCann’s had sought his assistance in early JUNE, the BRITISH and Portuguese press widely reported that Brown had INTERVENED in the case and that he had persuaded the Portuguese Authorities to permit the McCann’s to APPEAL for information relating to this ‘abductor’.
sharonl- Forum Owner
- Posts : 8643
Activity : 11282
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Cammerigal likes this post
Similar topics» The Tanner "Sighting" - AGAIN
» New Series of Videos - MCANN 'LIES' #1 Front Door or Patio Doors
» Freedom of Information Act question: IS Dr JUILIAN TOTMAN, 'TANNERMAN', the man allegedly seen by Jane Tanner, friend of the McCanns?
» Freedom of Information Act question: IS Dr JUILIAN TOTMAN, 'TANNERMAN', the man allegedly seen by Jane Tanner, friend of the McCanns?
» Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: The Smith Sighting vs Jane Tanner's by Pat Brown
» New Series of Videos - MCANN 'LIES' #1 Front Door or Patio Doors
» Freedom of Information Act question: IS Dr JUILIAN TOTMAN, 'TANNERMAN', the man allegedly seen by Jane Tanner, friend of the McCanns?
» Freedom of Information Act question: IS Dr JUILIAN TOTMAN, 'TANNERMAN', the man allegedly seen by Jane Tanner, friend of the McCanns?
» Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: The Smith Sighting vs Jane Tanner's by Pat Brown
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
