Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

by **PeterMac** 23.12.14 15:04

Just as a strange aside, look at the percentage of black, brown, chinese and far eastern faces and names on the long list.

by Guest 23.12.14 18:18

Snifferdog wrote:
aquila wrote:I sincerely hope among many, many questions, the Coroner will ask Sky News why exactly they chose Brenda Leyland from a 'secret dossier' and why in God's name they thought it newsworthy (i.e. in the public interest) to show her face and Martin Brunt's door-stepping of her every fifteen minutes for an entire day.

....which tells me All is Not as it Seems.

Snifferdog, I am intrigued by your comment, and hadn't considered what you're suggesting.

by Joss 24.12.14 4:16

FH wrote:
Joss wrote:
PeterMac wrote:Strange definition of CHILDREN, I think.
Perhaps almost as od as using "Abducted"

" />
Well i guess they are someone's children, even though they are young adults and then older adults as well. I don't know why they are listed under missing children though? Maybe people in the U.K. or Portugal might know why?
Because they went missing when they were technically children, under 18?

Yes that could well be.

by Joss 24.12.14 4:26

I really think most of us want to know Why Brenda was singled out in the crazy dossier? She was not a troll, just an opinionated lady in the sinister McCann case, as most of us are that aren't buying the McCann BS and their spin doctors nonsense. She didn't personally and directly harass the McC's or threaten them, unlike the pro McC trolls did to her. I really hope someone asks the hardball questions, because laws as we have seen were definitely violated against Brenda, and it should never of happened, and the people responsible for breaking those laws need to be held to account and properly investigated and charged accordingly, IMO.