Re: Summers and Swan reply to criticisms of their book - and explain the David Payne/Kate McCann 6.30pm visit contradictions

by **Verdi** 17.02.17 15:25

That BlueBag, is an example of an impartial account of 'their kind of investigative work'. Rather like Operation Grange's impartiality - to review/investigate with remit abduction as the only option.

I'm not convinced by that 'cock and bull' story about Swann's daughter sowing the first seed that led to publication of this epic novel. Question is - who commissioned them to write it in the first place? Reading between the lines of that interview, it appears they've been doing a bit of snooping around trying to get their grubby little trotters on information relating to an active investigation that could be passed on to ~~their clients~~ team McCann.

All roads lead to the BBC - if not Rome.

by MayMuse 19.02.17 4:07

BlueBag wrote:

There is a “cogent skein of evidence” pointing to the notion that she was a carefully selected target, very possibly of a paedophile.”
Complete bollocks.

As they say.

Does anyone else find it strange that "paedophillia" is the most shouted about yet the McCanns say no proof Madeleine has come to any harm?

Considering there is zero evidence of an abduction taking place, why would anyone shout paedophillia? Perhaps to encourage and embed the abduction theory, or something else.

by Lands_end 20.02.17 20:13

Verdi wrote:That BlueBag, is an example of an impartial account of 'their kind of investigative work'. Rather like Operation Grange's impartiality - to review/investigate with remit abduction as the only option.

I'm not convinced by that 'cock and bull' story about Swann's daughter sowing the first seed that led to publication of this epic novel. Question is - who commissioned them to write it in the first place? Reading between the lines of that interview, it appears they've been doing a bit of snooping around trying to get their grubby little trotters on information relating to an active investigation that could be passed on to ~~their clients~~ team McCann.

All roads lead to the BBC - if not Rome.

Not read the Summers and Swan book, might give it a look see when I have an afternoon to kill in Waterstones. As for the Kate McCann book well anybody who remotely believes that is completely brain dead especially the Jane Tanner intervention 24 hours after the disappearance took place. For mods, please post this to critics of this site, I will happily talk to any of them in person.

by JohnyT 17.11.17 12:13

I don't like being called a hater just because I disagree with their version of events............after all.......I don't call them lovers...........

Summers and Swan reply to criticisms of their book - and explain the David Payne/Kate McCann 6.30pm visit contradictions