Timeline questiom
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 3 of 3 • Share
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Timeline questiom
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
The Jane Tanner walk by never happened as Bernt pointed out.
The reasons why JT had to walk past GM and JW.
She according to her Script had to check the rear window to Madeleine's room.
She had to be far enough up the Road to be able to see the Abductor carrying a Child towards Murats house.
She had to be close enough to make her pre-arranged Description believeable.
Which is why neither JW or Gerry saw her - because she never passed them. If she was ever even there, she went left up the Pathway behind the Gardens.
The Jane Tanner walk by never happened as Bernt pointed out.
The reasons why JT had to walk past GM and JW.
She according to her Script had to check the rear window to Madeleine's room.
She had to be far enough up the Road to be able to see the Abductor carrying a Child towards Murats house.
She had to be close enough to make her pre-arranged Description believeable.
Which is why neither JW or Gerry saw her - because she never passed them. If she was ever even there, she went left up the Pathway behind the Gardens.
Silentscope- Posts : 2849
Activity : 2957
Likes received : 114
Join date : 2020-06-30
Re: Timeline questiom
That is true but in her statements she said what she said.
She was not under caution so she was free to tell as many lies as she wanted wasn't she?
She was not under caution so she was free to tell as many lies as she wanted wasn't she?
crusader- Posts : 6312
Activity : 6656
Likes received : 338
Join date : 2019-03-12
Silentscope likes this post
Re: Timeline questiom
Do only Suspects get Cautioned under Portugeuse Law?
Or potential Witnesses as well?
Making a False Statement to any Police force would be at least wasting Police time, or at worst Perjury / attempting to Pervert Justice if it was ever produced in Court.
Or potential Witnesses as well?
Making a False Statement to any Police force would be at least wasting Police time, or at worst Perjury / attempting to Pervert Justice if it was ever produced in Court.
Silentscope- Posts : 2849
Activity : 2957
Likes received : 114
Join date : 2020-06-30
crusader likes this post
Re: Timeline questiom
Perhaps that's one of the reasons they are keeping quiet.
crusader- Posts : 6312
Activity : 6656
Likes received : 338
Join date : 2019-03-12
Re: Timeline questiom
21:50 according to the waiter Ricardo (Russell had only eaten 3 bites of steak when all except for Diane, left the table). The BBC, informed by Rachel's friend, said 21:45.Paddingtom wrote:Goncalo says it was drawn up days after the alleged disappearance.Honesty wrote:Shouldn't it be in chronological order? Perhaps it's not because it's a draft as at this stage she had not decided where to try and fit everything in.
we know this is true because it has an alarm time of 10p.m. there ia a lot of evidence, agreed by Goncalo, that the alarm was actually raised at 9.30.
AnneCGuedes- Posts : 204
Activity : 210
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2024-05-23
Re: Timeline questiom
Silentscope wrote:
The reasons why JT had to walk past GM and JW.
She according to her Script had to check the rear window to Madeleine's room.
Where have you found this, Silentscope ?
AnneCGuedes- Posts : 204
Activity : 210
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2024-05-23
Re: Timeline questiom
I believe Tanner was Verbally instructed or directed. not that she was given a written Script which she had to follow.
No actual paperwork Scripts exists as far as I am aware.
No actual paperwork Scripts exists as far as I am aware.
Silentscope- Posts : 2849
Activity : 2957
Likes received : 114
Join date : 2020-06-30
Re: Timeline questiom
Bluebagthepirate wrote:
The Jane Tanner walk by never happened as Bernt pointed out.
The most remarkable point about these two timelines is that there is no reference to Jane walking past G and J chatting outside the gate of 5A, rua Francisco Gentil Martins, and then seeing a man with a child crossing the same street. In both timelines, the checking of 5D is associated with the presence of a stranger with a child. When she checks 5D, J sees a stranger with a child. Moreover, in Jane's account to the GNR (not the PJ) on the night of 2/3 May (reported by Silvia Baptista), she was in the corridor along the front of building 5 when she saw a man with a child in Agostinho da Silva street.
According to Russell's statement, Jane is then not going, but returning from 5D. Finally, it is worth recalling G and K's statements on this subject.
(KMC), in her statement of May 4 afternoon, "highlights that a member of the group, Russell's partner Jane, when she went to her apartment to see her children at around 9.15pm, saw about 50 metres away, in the street bordering the complex (it has to be Agostinho da Silva str), the back of a long-haired person, in what she thinks were jeans, with a child in his arms and walking very quickly."
K says ‘in her arms’ and not ‘lying on her arms’, a detail that struck Jane. This statement is very similar to the one given by GMC on May 4 morning.
Curiously, these two statements differ markedly, not from Jane's accounts during the night, but from Jane's statement on 4 May, particularly as there is no mention of Jane seeing Tannerman as she passes Gerald and Jeremy W in Francisco Gentil Martins Street.
AnneCGuedes- Posts : 204
Activity : 210
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2024-05-23
Re: Timeline questiom
Silentscope wrote:I believe Tanner was Verbally instructed or directed. not that she was given a written Script which she had to follow.
No actual paperwork Scripts exists as far as I am aware.
OK, thanks for replying.
AnneCGuedes- Posts : 204
Activity : 210
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2024-05-23
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Theory
» The timeline
» SY Review Team - Includes STATEMENT 6 Oct by Inspector Steve Bentley
» POSSIBLE TIMELINE?
» Anyone for scraps?
» The timeline
» SY Review Team - Includes STATEMENT 6 Oct by Inspector Steve Bentley
» POSSIBLE TIMELINE?
» Anyone for scraps?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum