The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Mm11

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Mm11

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Regist10

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why?

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap6%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 6% 
[ 12 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap5%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 5% 
[ 10 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap4%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 4% 
[ 9 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap7%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 7% 
[ 14 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap2%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 2% 
[ 4 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap60%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 60% 
[ 123 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap2%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 2% 
[ 5 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap0%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 0% 
[ 1 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap1%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 1% 
[ 3 ]
*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_lcap12%*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Vote_rcap 12% 
[ 24 ]
 
Total Votes : 205
 
 

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by 23 Librae 26.02.17 14:26

NOTE: The Moderators have now added a poll to this thread - Mods

----------

Hello, I'm new here. Never believed the abduction story from the start but only recently started to look into the high strangeness of the whole affair after watching some Richard D Hall films.

My quick question is what is the prevailing thought about why they are being protected? There is so much material to read through so any hints of what to search for would be welcome.

I can see they are being protected by people in high places but I was wondering if anyone knows why? Is it about something Kate and Gerry know about the government or the medical establishment? 

Thanks

-----
A Mod writes:

There isn't a single prevailing thought or consensus on CMOMM on the reason for the cover-up. There is however broad consensus here that there is a major cover-up which extends to the government, the security services and the mainstream media.

The theories that have been offered here include:

* The McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends were trying out a new sedative product for the pharmaceutical industry

* They were discussing some secret new project, possibly involving the microchipping agenda

* A connection to bio-engineering research e.g. IVF treatment, cloning, stem cell research, genetics/DNA/human genome research

* The connections of Gerry McCann (COMARE)and the McCanns' main solicitor Edward Smethurst (British Nuclear Fuels) to the nuclear power industry

* It was just a giant money-making scam

* Madeleine died as the result of a Beltane occult ritual 

* They were all on a 'swinging holiday' and none of the swingers wants to be identified, and

* The McCanns' connections to some high-level, elite paedophile ring, e.g. they have at least knowledge of establishment figures involved in child sexual absue.

It's a good question on which there is no answer, so it won't harm if we have another debate on the issue.

Richard D Hall has announced the title of his next, and maybe last, Madeleine McCann documentary as: 'Maddie: Why The Cover-Up?'  Maybe that will provide answers. I think it's due out early April 

- Mod
23 Librae
23 Librae

Posts : 26
Activity : 62
Likes received : 28
Join date : 2017-02-24

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by suzyjohnson 26.02.17 15:04

I have never thought they were being protected. 

They were offered help at the beginning by a concerned British Labour government and other wellwishers. But they also have enough money and influence themselves to obtain assistance (friends and relatives with professional careers etc)

Then they were given money from the public which they have used to fund expensive lawyers. 

Clarence jumped in because he wanted to be there for an exclusive news story (he was at Soham also) The Sun newspaper supported them, but that's because they wanted their exclusive news also.  

The Conservative government authorised Operation Grange but it's possible they did so without actually knowing the full details of the case, why would Theresa May has Home Secretary have time to look at it all?

And then you have the Emperors New Clothes effect. And that's it really.

I know I'm in the minority on here, I think people are looking for a bigger story than there really is in this case.

____________________

avatar
suzyjohnson

Posts : 1209
Activity : 1542
Likes received : 271
Join date : 2013-03-03

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 26.02.17 15:17

I agree Suzy - Blair and Brown were quite adept at abusing power without the need for a major conspiracy theory. I'm open to the idea that Mark Warner were complicit to some degree and that the McCanns received help which goes beyond their immediate circle but that's as far as I can go, for my own sanity. I do believe it's unravelling ing at a rapid rate now and once the abduction theory is proven to be false, there's only one way to go and all roads lead back to the parents. Just an opinion and definitely not as refined as that of many posters on this forum.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Janerj 26.02.17 15:44

My first reaction having only recently watched Richard Hall's videos was that it must have been a case of 'funny handshakes' ie Masons as I don't see how any ordinary couple could have got that amount
of attention from high level government.
Janerj
Janerj

Posts : 12
Activity : 26
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2017-02-21

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by 23 Librae 26.02.17 16:51

Janerj wrote:My first reaction having only recently watched Richard Hall's videos was that it must have been a case of 'funny handshakes' ie Masons as I don't see how any ordinary couple could have got that amount
of attention from high level government.
I'm starting to think it could be this too.
23 Librae
23 Librae

Posts : 26
Activity : 62
Likes received : 28
Join date : 2017-02-24

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 17:16

They were protected and still are. How did the news of an abduction spread within an hour or so of Maddie going missing? Why were top diplomats told to get to pdLat once? They were told to shadow the mcCanns in all police and media dealings. Why did th couple delete almost all their phone calls (before Payne procured new phones )? Early reports suggested the teenage son of a VIP had been flown out that night. That report got submerged liike so much.
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by MayMuse 26.02.17 17:30

Reggiregg wrote:They were protected and still are. How did the news of an abduction spread within an hour or so of Maddie going missing? Why were top diplomats told to get to pdLat once? They were told to shadow the mcCanns in all police and media dealings. Why did th couple delete almost all their phone calls (before Payne procured new phones )? Early reports suggested the teenage son of a VIP had been flown out that night. That report got submerged liike so much.
Do you have a link to these reports?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
avatar
MayMuse

Posts : 2033
Activity : 3472
Likes received : 1413
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Casey5 26.02.17 19:44

Apparently the standard statement by the FOC is that they cannot interfere in the laws of a foreign country.
So how could they insist that the police didn't take the clothes they had all been wearing in case the press got wind of the fact and brought the parents under suspicion? And then they were all sent to the MW laundry, even Madeleine's. I suppose the prop, sorry cuddle cat, was washed by hand.
avatar
Casey5

Posts : 348
Activity : 402
Likes received : 52
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 19:50

How can the police ignore the scent of death found on KM's trousers, the car, Cuddle Cat  (despite her attempts to wash it) the car key fob etc etc. How can that be swept aside?
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Hobs 26.02.17 19:52

23 Librae wrote:
A Mod writes:

There isn't a single prevailing thought or consensus on CMOMM on the reason for the cover-up. There is however broad consensus here that there is a major cover-up which extends to the government, the security services and the mainstream media.

The theories that have been offered here include:

* The McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends were trying out a new sedative product for the pharmaceutical industry

* They were discussing some secret new project, possibly involving the microchipping agenda

* A connection to bio-engineering research e.g. IVF treatment, cloning, stem cell research, genetics/DNA/human genome research

* The connections of Gerry McCann (COMARE)and the McCanns' main solicitor Edward Smethurst (British Nuclear Fuels) to the nuclear power industry

* It was just a giant money-making scam

* Madeleine died as the result of a Beltane occult ritual 

* They were all on a 'swinging holiday' and none of the swingers wants to be identified, and

* The McCanns' connections to some high-level, elite paedophile ring, e.g. they have at least knowledge of establishment figures involved in child sexual absue.

It's a good question on which there is no answer, so it won't harm if we have another debate on the issue.

Richard D Hall has announced the title of his next, and maybe last, Madeleine McCann documentary as: 'Maddie: Why The Cover-Up?'  Maybe that will provide answers. I think it's due out early April 

- Mod


* The McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends were trying out a new sedative product for the pharmaceutical industry
No.  Clinical trials are performed under strict conditions and protocols firstly in hospitals and then depending on results restricted to a specific group of people before years down the line being passed for general release.
Had they been testing some new sedative and Maddie died as a result of it, the mccanns would have sued the pants off the company.
There would have been police investigations , all all sorts of other investigations .
Did you see the programme last week about the clinical trial that went wrong?
That was the first trial in humans, in clinical trials there are multiple trials of a new medicine before it is ever released for general use.
This theory is a no brainer.

* They were discussing some secret new project, possibly involving the microchipping agenda.
This would result in Maddie's death how?
Microchipping would not need sedation if they were trialling it.
Again if Maddie died as a result of it then they would have come up with a much better scenario than they did and it would have been covered up properly with no blame on the mccanns.
At best she would have been autopsied by a 'friendly' and natural causes would have been the verdict.
Mccanns walk free.
 A conspiracy theory at best.

* A connection to bio-engineering research e.g. IVF treatment, cloning, stem cell research, genetics/DNA/human genome research.
There is ongoing research into the human genome and has been for years.
IVF again has been going since the 1970's, at best they would be looking at improving  number of births and also of removing hereditary diseases which is why we now have a tiny number of 3 parent babies.
Cloning of humans is illegal the world over, it is also darn near impossible.
it took years of work to get Dolly the sheep and more years to get where we are today which is cloning (poorly) of dogs.
Said dogs are genetically the same as the donor, the markings however are different nor do they have the same character as the donor.
It is mindblowingly expensive to get a dog cloned, it would be billions to clone a human.
Then there is issue of finding anyone willing to risk life in jail for trying it.
Then how do you explain a clone away when it would be much younger than Maddie, not look anything like her or act like her.
Although genetically the same, the clone would be different. Look at identical twins as an example.
They share the same genes as they are one egg and sperm, one embryo that at only a couple of cells old divided completely and developed into two identical babies.
Identical yet different.
Again all the research is done in labs using a chit load of computers and expensive equipment and a lot of highly trained staff.
Again a no brainer

* The connections of Gerry McCann (COMARE)and the McCanns' main solicitor Edward Smethurst (British Nuclear Fuels) to the nuclear power industry.

This would cause Maddie to die in the apartment how?
If this was why Maddie died, again they would have covered it up a darn sight better than was done.
It would have been explained away as natural causes case closed.
No brainer.

* Madeleine died as the result of a Beltane occult ritual
Maddie was more likely to have died at the hands of a Christian than any Satanist, In fact  more likely to have died at the hands ofa muslim than a Satanist.
Satanism is the go to religion for claims of sacrifice.
Why not blame Voodoo since they sacrifice chickens  etc, that at least is marginally more believable than a bunch of Satanists.
If a human sacrifice was indeed done (it wasn't) why risk abducting a child from an apartment when there are scores of homeless folk lying around or all those orphanages in Eastern Europe.
Why would they hold a ritual in a holiday apartment?
People would have been seen coming and going from the apartment, sounds would have been heard plus all the group were at the table Thurs night
If a ritual, it would hav and they would have been taking part in the ritual otherwise they would have b noticed it going on in the apartment and taken action.
Any ritual been covered up better than it was and the mccanns and chums would have been better protected, there would have been a better crime scene set up with enough traces to indicate an abductor rather than none at all.
No brainer.

* They were all on a 'swinging holiday' and none of the swingers wants to be identified, and
Swinging is not illegal, and not even that scandalous anymore.
At best the mccanns would have felt embarrassed, maybe lost a couple of friends and had a telling off drom their respective parents.
They would have made more than a few new friends.
Maybe a few paragraphs in the press and then it is yesterdays story.
I doubt even the GMC would be interested since it would have no bearing on their work in hospital and surgery.
No brainer


* The McCanns' connections to some high-level, elite paedophile ring, e.g. they have at least knowledge of establishment figures involved in child sexual absue.
They may have some connections to high level paedophile rings, again though if a VIP was involved it would have been better covered up than it was.
A friendly autopsy done and natural causes declared.
A hefty pay off to the mccanns perhaps and them being told to shut up or else.
If no friendly autopsy then again they could have claimed abduction, Maddie's body found and murder and sexual abuse declared.
The world looks for the non existent abductor, the mccanns  get pilloried for child neglect and face charges, possibly a couple years in jail, more likely a hefty fine and probabtion since Maddie died and they have suffered enough.
The mccanns get a hefty pay off to take their punishment and keep quiet.
They get to grieve and Maddie gets a funeral.
Since we know Maddie was not found, a piss poor abduction secene was claimed despite no forensic evidence of abduction, their own words and behavior reveal the truth.
Pretty much everyone has some idea of which establishment figures are suspected of involvement in paedophilia proven and otherwise.
This is plausible but unlikely given the mccanns own words and behavior.

* It was just a giant money-making scam.
Bingo!

Maddie died at the hands of kate and gerry.
Whether by accidental or deliberate sedation.
As a result of some other crime being committed upon her.
As a result of kate(most likely given her poor relationship with Maddie) losing her temper and lashing out.
As a result of coming between kate and gerry during one of their fights and being accidentally hit or pushed causing fatal injuries.
A combination of any of the above.

It happened earlier in the week to allow for disposal of the body and most importantly cleaning up of the apartment.
The apartment being almost forensically cleaned of DNA evidence and other evidence found when you have three toddlers running around.

The tapas 7 are involved because they took part in something criminal that would force them to stay silent, knbowing if they spoke out they wiould be doing serious jail time.
Possible them men are involved and the women stay silent for fear of charges and fear of losing their children and their jobs.

Donations came in to help find Maddie and the parents saw a gold mine waiting to be reaped.
They created a fund for the funds to be sent to, knowing that money would come pouring in (especially with good marketing) and for some time to come since they knew Maddie wouldn't be found any time soon.

They spin spiel about how it would be run like a charity, transparently and then it wasn't.
They sued , using the fund as they changed the clauses so they lose none of their own money.
It was win win for them.

Now though they have been publicly and legally declared not cleared and stuill suspects in the disposal of their daughter.

it looks like money may be their downfall.
Not enough prrof yet to declare legally what they did but we can nail them for fraud for a start.

money was the downfall of Al Capone remember.

____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Hobs
Hobs
Researcher/Analyst

Posts : 1084
Activity : 1825
Likes received : 713
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 60
Location : uk

http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 20:07

I think the money angle is too simple and doesn't explain the huge rush to protect them and all the suspicious early stuff like the news being ready to print at the Telegraph by midnight that night, the deleted phone calls, the ambassador being called in, the weirdness about the printing of the photos.....so many things. One thing for sure is they did not want the body found.
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 26.02.17 21:07

Hobs wrote:
23 Librae wrote:
A Mod writes:

There isn't a single prevailing thought or consensus on CMOMM on the reason for the cover-up. There is however broad consensus here that there is a major cover-up which extends to the government, the security services and the mainstream media.

The theories that have been offered here include:

* The McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends were trying out a new sedative product for the pharmaceutical industry

* They were discussing some secret new project, possibly involving the microchipping agenda

* A connection to bio-engineering research e.g. IVF treatment, cloning, stem cell research, genetics/DNA/human genome research

* The connections of Gerry McCann (COMARE)and the McCanns' main solicitor Edward Smethurst (British Nuclear Fuels) to the nuclear power industry

* It was just a giant money-making scam

* Madeleine died as the result of a Beltane occult ritual 

* They were all on a 'swinging holiday' and none of the swingers wants to be identified, and

* The McCanns' connections to some high-level, elite paedophile ring, e.g. they have at least knowledge of establishment figures involved in child sexual absue.

It's a good question on which there is no answer, so it won't harm if we have another debate on the issue.

Richard D Hall has announced the title of his next, and maybe last, Madeleine McCann documentary as: 'Maddie: Why The Cover-Up?'  Maybe that will provide answers. I think it's due out early April 

- Mod


* The McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends were trying out a new sedative product for the pharmaceutical industry
No.  Clinical trials are performed under strict conditions and protocols firstly in hospitals and then depending on results restricted to a specific group of people before years down the line being passed for general release.
Had they been testing some new sedative and Maddie died as a result of it, the mccanns would have sued the pants off the company.
There would have been police investigations , all all sorts of other investigations .
Did you see the programme last week about the clinical trial that went wrong?
That was the first trial in humans, in clinical trials there are multiple trials of a new medicine before it is ever released for general use.
This theory is a no brainer.

* They were discussing some secret new project, possibly involving the microchipping agenda.
This would result in Maddie's death how?
Microchipping would not need sedation if they were trialling it.
Again if Maddie died as a result of it then they would have come up with a much better scenario than they did and it would have been covered up properly with no blame on the mccanns.
At best she would have been autopsied by a 'friendly' and natural causes would have been the verdict.
Mccanns walk free.
 A conspiracy theory at best.

* A connection to bio-engineering research e.g. IVF treatment, cloning, stem cell research, genetics/DNA/human genome research.
There is ongoing research into the human genome and has been for years.
IVF again has been going since the 1970's, at best they would be looking at improving  number of births and also of removing hereditary diseases which is why we now have a tiny number of 3 parent babies.
Cloning of humans is illegal the world over, it is also darn near impossible.
it took years of work to get Dolly the sheep and more years to get where we are today which is cloning (poorly) of dogs.
Said dogs are genetically the same as the donor, the markings however are different nor do they have the same character as the donor.
It is mindblowingly expensive to get a dog cloned, it would be billions to clone a human.
Then there is issue of finding anyone willing to risk life in jail for trying it.
Then how do you explain a clone away when it would be much younger than Maddie, not look anything like her or act like her.
Although genetically the same, the clone would be different. Look at identical twins as an example.
They share the same genes as they are one egg and sperm, one embryo that at only a couple of cells old divided completely and developed into two identical babies.
Identical yet different.
Again all the research is done in labs using a chit load of computers and expensive equipment and a lot of highly trained staff.
Again a no brainer

* The connections of Gerry McCann (COMARE)and the McCanns' main solicitor Edward Smethurst (British Nuclear Fuels) to the nuclear power industry.

This would cause Maddie to die in the apartment how?
If this was why Maddie died, again they would have covered it up a darn sight better than was done.
It would have been explained away as natural causes case closed.
No brainer.

* Madeleine died as the result of a Beltane occult ritual
Maddie was more likely to have died at the hands of a Christian than any Satanist, In fact  more likely to have died at the hands ofa muslim than a Satanist.
Satanism is the go to religion for claims of sacrifice.
Why not blame Voodoo since they sacrifice chickens  etc, that at least is marginally more believable than a bunch of Satanists.
If a human sacrifice was indeed done (it wasn't) why risk abducting a child from an apartment when there are scores of homeless folk lying around or all those orphanages in Eastern Europe.
Why would they hold a ritual in a holiday apartment?
People would have been seen coming and going from the apartment, sounds would have been heard plus all the group were at the table Thurs night
If a ritual, it would hav and they would have been taking part in the ritual otherwise they would have b noticed it going on in the apartment and taken action.
Any ritual been covered up better than it was and the mccanns and chums would have been better protected, there would have been a better crime scene set up with enough traces to indicate an abductor rather than none at all.
No brainer.

* They were all on a 'swinging holiday' and none of the swingers wants to be identified, and
Swinging is not illegal, and not even that scandalous anymore.
At best the mccanns would have felt embarrassed, maybe lost a couple of friends and had a telling off drom their respective parents.
They would have made more than a few new friends.
Maybe a few paragraphs in the press and then it is yesterdays story.
I doubt even the GMC would be interested since it would have no bearing on their work in hospital and surgery.
No brainer


* The McCanns' connections to some high-level, elite paedophile ring, e.g. they have at least knowledge of establishment figures involved in child sexual absue.
They may have some connections to high level paedophile rings, again though if a VIP was involved it would have been better covered up than it was.
A friendly autopsy done and natural causes declared.
A hefty pay off to the mccanns perhaps and them being told to shut up or else.
If no friendly autopsy then again they could have claimed abduction, Maddie's body found and murder and sexual abuse declared.
The world looks for the non existent abductor, the mccanns  get pilloried for child neglect and face charges, possibly a couple years in jail, more likely a hefty fine and probabtion since Maddie died and they have suffered enough.
The mccanns get a hefty pay off to take their punishment and keep quiet.
They get to grieve and Maddie gets a funeral.
Since we know Maddie was not found, a piss poor abduction secene was claimed despite no forensic evidence of abduction, their own words and behavior reveal the truth.
Pretty much everyone has some idea of which establishment figures are suspected of involvement in paedophilia proven and otherwise.
This is plausible but unlikely given the mccanns own words and behavior.

* It was just a giant money-making scam.
Bingo!

Maddie died at the hands of kate and gerry.
Whether by accidental or deliberate sedation.
As a result of some other crime being committed upon her.
As a result of kate(most likely given her poor relationship with Maddie) losing her temper and lashing out.
As a result of coming between kate and gerry during one of their fights and being accidentally hit or pushed causing fatal injuries.
A combination of any of the above.

It happened earlier in the week to allow for disposal of the body and most importantly cleaning up of the apartment.
The apartment being almost forensically cleaned of DNA evidence and other evidence found when you have three toddlers running around.

The tapas 7 are involved because they took part in something criminal that would force them to stay silent, knbowing if they spoke out they wiould be doing serious jail time.
Possible them men are involved and the women stay silent for fear of charges and fear of losing their children and their jobs.

Donations came in to help find Maddie and the parents saw a gold mine waiting to be reaped.
They created a fund for the funds to be sent to, knowing that money would come pouring in (especially with good marketing) and for some time to come since they knew Maddie wouldn't be found any time soon.

They spin spiel about how it would be run like a charity, transparently and then it wasn't.
They sued , using the fund as they changed the clauses so they lose none of their own money.
It was win win for them.

Now though they have been publicly and legally declared not cleared and stuill suspects in the disposal of their daughter.

it looks like money may be their downfall.
Not enough prrof yet to declare legally what they did but we can nail them for fraud for a start.

money was the downfall of Al Capone remember.
Thank you Hobs you are the voice of reason! It really doesn't need to be any grubbier than it already is. All the necessary ingredients for a tragedy are there: greed, secrecy and hubris. The denouement awaits - that's all that's left now, apart from a very lonely exit from the stage.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Yvie Han 26.02.17 21:38

I have a different perspective for the first -  

Pharmaceutical companies have governments eating out their hands, with huge control and power over them, they have been referred to as the New Mafia. There are many online sources about the corruption with government and pharmaceutical industry.

I don't think it was necessarily a new medicine testing, it could have been one on market already. 

I think therefore it needed to be kept from the public for fear of 1000's of other potential lawsuits. 

This would explain WHY the Tapas lot also keep their mouths shut as they well know, being in the industry, you don't go up against the giant pharma companies.   

They would have received a huge payout, some of which could well have been covered by some being donated to THE FUND, the rest in an offshore account. 

I also believe the paedophilia somewhere. 

I don't think the cloning or research was involved from what I have read they were not flush financially, if they were involved and testing they would be on some hefty wages for it.
Yvie Han
Yvie Han

Posts : 37
Activity : 49
Likes received : 12
Join date : 2017-02-16

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 21:49

I agree with Yves. There is much more involved than the Mccanns seeing a way to make money.
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Yvie Han 26.02.17 21:53

Sorry I also forgot to add, they wouldn't be able to have some big court case against Pharmaceutical company as that would require a PM and I do believe there could have been signs of abuse.

Also, a pharmaceutical company would do a deal offside, the publicity of a Dr's child dying would be crucifying and really HIT media in a big way, and as I said above its the knock on effect of 1,000's to 100,000's of other potential lawsuits as a result of it being made public.
Yvie Han
Yvie Han

Posts : 37
Activity : 49
Likes received : 12
Join date : 2017-02-16

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 21:58

One reason thebody had to be hidden is if there were signs of long term abuse. We know Payne made gestures to Gerry which suggest both are very dodgy..and the other tapas lot said nothing.  That is telling.
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 22:08

Suppose it was a big pharma thing - planned long before. And the Tapas lot had to take part bcause they were being blackmailed over previous activities involving children. What is Payne's history? He was around 50 when the rest were a decade younger. Previous wife and family? Previous dodgy behaviour?
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Yvie Han 26.02.17 22:08

Has anyone thought the body could have been flown back to the UK on a private jet?

They have an astonishing amount of help from the government, MI5 etc

Just a thought I know the hire car had some unexplained mileage on it, would that be reason G is so very confident about a body never being found?

Cost would be approx £30,000 the fund certainly could of covered that!
Yvie Han
Yvie Han

Posts : 37
Activity : 49
Likes received : 12
Join date : 2017-02-16

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 26.02.17 22:18

Yvie Han wrote:I have a different perspective for the first -  

Pharmaceutical companies have governments eating out their hands, with huge control and power over them, they have been referred to as the New Mafia. There are many online sources about the corruption with government and pharmaceutical industry.

I don't think it was necessarily a new medicine testing, it could have been one on market already. 

I think therefore it needed to be kept from the public for fear of 1000's of other potential lawsuits. 

This would explain WHY the Tapas lot also keep their mouths shut as they well know, being in the industry, you don't go up against the giant pharma companies.   

They would have received a huge payout, some of which could well have been covered by some being donated to THE FUND, the rest in an offshore account. 

I also believe the paedophilia somewhere. 

I don't think the cloning or research was involved from what I have read they were not flush financially, if they were involved and testing they would be on some hefty wages for it.
I do think it's a murky business but at the moment I'm working my way through the case files and seeing where that leads me. Interestingly, two people in the case files - not just Gasper but also the child protection witness whose name escape me - cast David Payne in a very poor light, the child protection witness saying she felt she had had some previous contact with him and felt so concerned by this that she contacted the British police. There has to be a reason why these people were so willing to close ranks but I can't find  anything other than self preservation that accounts for that yet but I think links with pharmaceuticals is definitely rich pickings but I haven't really explored it.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Reggiregg 26.02.17 22:51

As Hobs says, "a pisspoor abduction scene was staged". Yet even though it was rubbish, the British police, successive governments and the media has colluded to support the ludicrous version of events. This has not bbeen simply to help the Mccanns get rich.
Reggiregg
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Activity : 78
Likes received : 48
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty POLL ADDED

Post by Tony Bennett 27.02.17 10:32

In view of the interest shown already on this thread, the Mods are adding a poll.

Eight options are given for why there is a cover-up, and there's an 'Other' category for those who think there is some other reason for the cover up..

The first option in the poll however is for those who think there is no cover-up, a viewpoint explained in clear terms by 'suzyjohnson' upthread (and supported by 'What's_up_doc?') as follows:

QUOTE suzyjohnson: "I have never thought they were being protected. They were offered help at the beginning by a concerned British Labour government and other wellwishers. But they also have enough money and influence themselves to obtain assistance (friends and relatives with professional careers etc). Then they were given money from the public which they have used to fund expensive lawyers. Clarence jumped in because he wanted to be there for an exclusive news story (he was at Soham also). The Sun newspaper supported them, but that's because they wanted their exclusive news also..."

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Investigator

Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Carrry On Doctor 27.02.17 13:01

Voted 4, but I differ from TextUSAs' accident/death on the 3rd theory. There would appear to be a far stronger argument that something happening to MBM much earlier in the holiday.

I don't believe that Paedophiles would go en masse to a foreign holiday resort (with bookings, passports, and credit cards leaving a very clear trail) for the purpose of abusing children. Neither do I believe that OG, with 40 officers, and being parents themselves, would knowingly allow any remaining children to be put at risk for this long.

There seems little doubt an 'event' was being held at OC that week. A budget resort packed to capacity out of season with professional and well off people. People with careers, connections, and images to protect.

In their own words, the group were 'into' each other.
Carrry On Doctor
Carrry On Doctor

Posts : 391
Activity : 586
Likes received : 199
Join date : 2014-01-31

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by nomendelta 27.02.17 13:04

Gone for the paedo option as I can't think of anything else that would bind people from such varying walks of life and we know from Savile how protective the elite can be.

And there is, for me, protection given to the McCanns. Nothing else explains Clarence's appointment and susequent control of the press coupled with the years of SY investigation into seemingly everything barring the obvious.
avatar
nomendelta

Posts : 347
Activity : 399
Likes received : 52
Join date : 2011-05-20

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 27.02.17 13:07

I voted 8 "other".

I have been following this case very closely for 10 years and I have no clue as to the reason.

It's obvious they have had unheard of extraordinary assistance from Government, Police, rich people and UK Media.

Lord knows what is behind it all but it looks like an establishment thing.

I think it's big whatever it is.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 27.02.17 13:11

Tony Bennett wrote:In view of the interest shown already on this thread, the Mods are adding a poll.
I've read it carefully this time before voting  thumbsup .  It'll be interesting to see how it takes shape over the next few days.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by JRP 27.02.17 13:52

If there is one thing the "establishment" covers up very well, it is pedophilia.
I confess that I don't know the reason for Madeleine's death, but certain aspects which have been discussed, such as the Gaspar statement, the make-up photo Lolita image, the dining with Clement Freud led me to vote 6.

I noticed a fair percentage of votes going for the no cover up choice, which surprised me a little. Why then, if that's the case, haven't they been arrested and formally questioned? because there's a heck of a lot of circumstantial evidence which points at their involvement. The same sort of behaviour which has led to the arrest of others in similar cases.
avatar
JRP

Posts : 601
Activity : 1176
Likes received : 573
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 67
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Guest 27.02.17 14:12

JRP wrote:If there is one thing the "establishment" covers up very well, it is pedophilia.
I confess that I don't know the reason for Madeleine's death, but certain aspects which have been discussed, such as the Gaspar statement, the make-up photo Lolita image, the dining with Clement Freud led me to vote 6.

I noticed a fair percentage of votes going for the no cover up choice, which surprised me a little. Why then, if that's the case, haven't they been arrested and formally questioned? because there's a heck of a lot of circumstantial evidence which points at their involvement. The same sort of behaviour which has led to the arrest of others in similar cases.
I voted for the no cover up option - I agree with your assertion why haven't they been  arrested yet - I tend towards cronyism. I known the British Ambassador to Portugal warned the government not to be taken in by the McCanns but they ignored him and shortly after he resigned. I tend towards the McCanns lobbying Blair and Brown and convincing them that they were victims of Portuguese incompetence - so there's probably a bit of 'Johnny foreigner can't be trusted' in it. Also, by commanding the media and controlling the narrative, Blair, whose wife was a Liverpudlian Catholic, was probably taken in, just like he was by Bush and well - the list is just too long. When the baton was passed to Cameron, Ester McVeigh a close friend of Kate Mccann, was well positioned to influence and keep the gravy train rolling on. I hope now the truth will out but if we don't get an announcement that suggests, let's just say a change of direction, then I will gladly back pedal and have a rethink.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by Carrry On Doctor 27.02.17 14:29

Regarding a cover up, I thought the John Buck (FCO diplomat) article last year was quite revealing.

Simply, it would appear that Gordon Brown, and for political gain, seized on an opportunity to help put a very British family, seemingly in crisis. The cavalry (agencies, diplomats etc) were all dispatched as part of the show, with spin being provided by media expert Clarence Mitchell.

I can only assume that by the time the red flags started to be waived, any U-turn would have been hugely embarrassing. Since then, having passed through successive administrations, the issue has snowballed into a looming international and diplomatic crisis.

A cover up by the Government ? Absolutely, but to save face.

Mrs May can't be looking forward to this one coming out. It continued through her watch as Home Secretary.

A close second to Brexit ? Maybe !
Carrry On Doctor
Carrry On Doctor

Posts : 391
Activity : 586
Likes received : 199
Join date : 2014-01-31

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by suzyjohnson 27.02.17 14:52

JRP wrote:
I noticed a fair percentage of votes going for the no cover up choice, which surprised me a little. Why then, if that's the case, haven't they been arrested and formally questioned? because there's a heck of a lot of circumstantial evidence which points at their involvement.

The McCanns have been arrested and formally questioned ...... by the Portuguese.

Regarding Operation Grange ....

1) A lot of the evidence is circumstantial. I would think SY would look to establish what other evidence there was before making any arrests

2) An arrest in the Uk might well place the McCann family into a similar situation to that of Karen Matthews. The police would then need to provide protection particularly for the McCann children.

____________________

avatar
suzyjohnson

Posts : 1209
Activity : 1542
Likes received : 271
Join date : 2013-03-03

Back to top Go down

*NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED  (was: Why are they being protected?) Empty Re: *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)

Post by JRP 27.02.17 15:36

suzyjohnson wrote:
JRP wrote:
I noticed a fair percentage of votes going for the no cover up choice, which surprised me a little. Why then, if that's the case, haven't they been arrested and formally questioned? because there's a heck of a lot of circumstantial evidence which points at their involvement.
Thanks for the reply.

The McCanns have been arrested and formally questioned ...... by the Portuguese.

But they were allowed to fly home. They may have been charged if they'd have stayed, and knowing that, the UK police haven't even questioned them.

Regarding Operation Grange ....

1) A lot of the evidence is circumstantial. I would think SY would look to establish what other evidence there was before making any arrests.

People get arrested all the time on circumstantial evidence, courts are full of people who plead not guilty.

2) An arrest in the Uk might well place the McCann family into a similar situation to that of Karen Matthews. The police would then need to provide protection particularly for the McCann children.

Is that a reason for not arresting them? I would imagine anyone arrested for a serious crime, would have an effect on the wider family.


avatar
JRP

Posts : 601
Activity : 1176
Likes received : 573
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 67
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum